Skip to main content
Log in

Performance analysis of an advanced heterogeneous mobile network architecture with multiple small cell layers

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The integration of small cell technologies into the current mobile network operators is a necessity for providing capacity and coverage improvement in the future mobile networks (5G). This integration paves the way for heterogeneous networking. In this paper, a novel heterogeneous architecture for the efficient integration of small cell technology into the current mobile networks is developed, namely advanced heterogeneous mobile network (AHMN). AHMN architecture consists of a stack of multiple cell layers wherein the upper layer is the macrocell layer while under this layer, a number of lower small cell layers are formed. Focusing on femtocells and metrocells, as the most typical paradigms of small cells, a femtocell layer which serves the indoor traffic activity of femtocell users is considered, while the metrocell serves the outdoor traffic activities as well as the overflow traffic from femtocells. The overall heterogeneous network (HetNet) is completed with the macrocell overlay layer, which serves only the macrocell users and the overflowed traffic from the underlay metrocell layer. In the proposed AHMN architecture, the metrocell layer is deployed as a complementary layer between the macrocell and femtocell layers and facilitates the handover traffic interaction between the edge layers. Meanwhile, the mobility management in this architecture is critical and hence, the interaction between successive network layers, due to the handover (HO) traffic, is analyzed. Furthermore, for each network layer, a guard channel scheme is proposed in order to minimize the HO dropping rate of the mobile users. We show both analytically and by simulation the capability of AHMN in offloading traffic and reducing the blocking/dropping probability compared with the traditional macrocellular network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ericsson white paper. Heterogeneous networks. Eircsson, 284 23-3165 Uen February 2012, pp. 1–13.

  2. Damnjanovic, A., Montojo, J., Yongbin, W., & Tingfang, J. (2011). A survey on 3GPP heterogeneous networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 18(3), 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ernst, Jason B., Kremer, Stefan C., & Rodrigues, Joel J. (2014). A survey of QoS/QoE mechanisms in heterogeneous wireless networks. Physical Communication, 13, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shakir, M. Z., Tabassum, H., & Alouini, M. S. (2011). Analytical bounds on the area spectral efficiency of uplink heterogeneous networks over generalized fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Communications, 63(5), 2306–2318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalbkhani, H., Jafarpour-Alamdari, S., Solouk, V., & Mahrokh, G. (2014). Interference management and six-sector macrocells for performance improvement in femto-macro cellular networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 75, 2037–2051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, S., et al. (2014). Algorithms for enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) in LTE HetNets. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 22(1), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heath, R. W, Jr, Kountouris, M., & Bai, T. (2013). Modeling heterogeneous network interference using poisson point processes. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 61(16), 4114–4126.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Suryaprakash, V., Moller, J., & Fettweis, G. (2015). On the modeling and analysis of heterogeneous radio access networks using a poisson cluster process. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(2), 1035–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bai, Y., Zhou, J., & Chen, L. (2009). Hybrid spectrum usage for overlaying LTE macrocell and femtocell. In Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM (pp. 1–6).

  10. Chu, X., Wu, Y., Benmesbah, L., & Ling, W.-K. (2010). Resource allocation in hybrid macro/femto networks. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC workshop (WCNCW) (pp. 1–5).

  11. Erturk, M. C., Aki, H., Güvenc, I., & Arslan, H. (2010). Fair and QoS-oriented spectrum splitting in macrocell-femtocell networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010) (pp. 1–6).

  12. Zhang, Y. (2010). Resource sharing of completely closed acces in femtocell networks. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC (pp. 1–5).

  13. Lin, J.-S., & Feng, K.-T. (2014). Femtocell access strategies in heterogeneous networks using a game theoretical framework. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(3), 1208–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lusheng, W., & Binet, D. (2009). Mobility-based network selection scheme in heterogeneous wireless networks. In IEEE 69th VTC (pp. 1–5).

  15. Ioannis, M., Alexandros, K., & Lazaros, M. (2014). UDS: A distributed RAT selection mechanism for heterogeneous wireless networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 74(1), 101–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim, Jaechan, & Hong, Daehyoung. (2013). Mobility and handover management for heterogeneous networks in LTE-advanced. Wireless Personal Communications, 72(4), 2901–2912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghadah Aldabbagh et al. (2013). QoS-aware tethering in a heterogeneous wireless network using LTE and TV white spaces. Computer Networks, 81(4), 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aldabbagh, Ghadah, et al. (2015). Distributed dynamic load balancing in a heterogeneous network using LTE and TV white spaces. Wireless Networks,. doi:10.1007/s11276-015-0921-4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lopez-Perez, D., Guvenc, I., & Chu, Xiaoli. (2012). The mobility management challenges in 3GPP heterogeneous networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(12), 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jaechan, L., & Daehyoung, H. (2013). Mobility and handover management for heterogeneous networks in LTE-advanced. Wireless Personal Communications, 72(4), 2901–2912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mariem, Z., Badii, J., & Djamal, Z. (2012). A review on mobility management and vertical handover solutions over heterogeneous wireless networks. Computer Communications, 35(17), 2055–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dmitry, S., Veselin, R., & Joachim, H. (2015). Integrated mobility and resource management for cross-network resource sharing in heterogeneous wireless networks using traffic offload policies. Wireless Networks, 21(3), 981–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alcatel-Lucent. (2012). Metrocells: A cost-effective option for meeting growing capacity demands (pp. 1–9). Boulogne-Billancourt, France: Alcatel-Lucent.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ghosh, A., Mangalvedhe, N., Ratasuk, R., Mondal, B., Cudak, M., Visotsky, E., et al. (2012). Heterogeneous cellular networks: From theory to practice. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(6), 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Claudio, C., Hu, L., Huan, N., Kovács, I. Z., Vejlgaard, B., Irmer, R., & Scully, N. (2012). Heterogeneous deployment to meet traffic demand in a realistic LTE urban scenario. In Proceedings of IEEE 76th vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall) (pp. 1–5).

  26. Andrews, Jeffrey G., Claussen, Holger, Dohler, Mischa, Rangan, Sundeep, & Reed, Mark C. (2012). Femtocell: past, present, and future. IEEE Journal Selected Areas in Communications, 30(3), 497–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yun, Se-Young, Yi, Yung, Cho, Dong-Ho, & Mo, Jeonghoon. (2012). The economic effects of sharing femtocells based networks. IEEE Journal Selected Areas in Communications, 30(3), 595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Erturk, M. C., Aki, H., Güvenc, I., & Arslan, H. (2010). Fair and QoS-oriented spectrum splitting in macrocell-femtocell networks. In Proceedings of IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM 2010) (pp. 1–6).

  29. Jo, H.-S., Xia, P., & Andrews, J. G. (2012). Open, closed, and shared access femtocells in the downlink. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.

  30. Chowdury, M. Z., & Jang, Y. M. (2012). Call admission control and traffic modeling for integrated macrocell/femtocell networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE 4th international conference on ubiquitous and future networks (ICUFN) (pp. 272–275).

  31. Yeung, Kwan L., & Nanda, Sanjiv. (1996). Channel management in microcell/macrocell cellular radio systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 45(4), 601–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Abd El-atty, S. M., & Gharsseldien, Z. M. (2013). On performance of HetNet with coexisting small cell technology. In Proceedings of 6th IFIP/IEEE WMNC (pp. 1–5).

  33. Fu, H.-L., Lin, P., & Lin, Y.-B. (2013). Reducing signaling overhead for femtocell/macrocell networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 12(8), 1587–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hasib, A., & Fapojuwo, A. O. (2008). Mobility model for heterogeneous wireless networks and its application in common radio resource management. IET Communications, 2(9), 1186–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cooper, R. B., & Kleinrock, L. (1981). Introduction to queuing theory, 2nd edition North Holland. New York, NY: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ni, W., & Collings, I. B. (2012). A new base station control switch for metrocells. In Proceedings of IEEE 23rd international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC) (pp. 1174–1178).

  37. Ardian, U., Robert, B., & Melvi, U. (2010). Handover scenario and procedure in LTE-based femtocell networks. In Proceedings of IEEE mobile ubiquitous computing, systems, services and technologies (UBICOMM 2010) (pp. 213–218).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their cooperative comments and constructive suggestions that helped us largely to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saied M. Abd El-atty.

Appendices

Appendix 1

In this appendix, we derive the probability P nc , let X and Y denote the time duration from an intermediate instant to the border of the metrocell and the time duration from the instant the session starts to the instant the FUE comes to the border of its femto cell. Due to the memoryless property, the random variable X follows the same exponential distribution with mean 1/η m . Meanwhile, due to the femtocell users (FUEs) and femtocell are randomly distributed within the metrocell, the time duration Y is uniformly distributed in X. Then for t > 0, the probability density function (pdf) of Y is given by

$$f_{Y} (t) = \int_{x = t}^{\infty} {\frac{1}{x}(\eta_{m} e^{{- \eta_{m} x}})} dx = \eta_{m} \int_{{\eta_{m} t}}^{\infty} {\frac{{e^{- x}}}{x}} dx$$
(43)

By using Mathematica package, the pdf of Y can also be expressed as

$$f_{Y} (t) = \eta_{m} \varGamma (0,\eta_{m} t),$$
(44)

where \(\varGamma (a,x)\) is an upper incomplete Gamma function which given by.

$$\varGamma (a,x) = \int\limits_{x}^{\infty} {\gamma^{a - 1} e^{- \gamma}} d\gamma$$
(45)

Taking Laplace transform of (44), we have

$$f_{Y}^{*} (s) = \left\{{\frac{{\ln (1 + s/\eta_{m})}}{{s/\eta_{m}}}} \right\}$$
(46)

Then the probability P nc can be expressed as

$$P_{nc} = \Pr \{Y < T_{C} \} = f_{Y}^{*} (\mu_{C})$$
(47)

Then

$$P_{nc} = \left\{{\frac{{\ln (1 + \mu_{C}/\eta_{m})}}{{\mu_{C}/\eta_{m}}}} \right\}$$
(48)

Appendix 2

In this appendix, we derive the mean value of Z, E{Z}. The cumulative distribution function of the random variable Z is given by

$$\begin{aligned} F_{Z} (t) & = 1 - [1 - F_{Y} (t)][1 - F_{{T_{C}}} (t)] \\ & = 1 - e^{{- \mu_{C} t}} + F_{Y} (t)e^{{- \mu_{C} t}} \\ \end{aligned}$$
(49)

The Laplace transform of the CDF \(F_{Z} (t)\) is given by

$$F_{Z}^{*} (s) = \frac{{\mu_{C}}}{{s \cdot (\mu_{C} + s)}} + F_{Y}^{*} (s + \mu_{C})$$
(50)

The Laplace transform of the pdf of the random variable Z is given by

$$f_{Z}^{*} (s) = s \cdot F_{Z}^{*} (s) = \frac{{\mu_{C}}}{{(\mu_{C} + s)}} + s \cdot F_{Y}^{*} (s + \mu_{C})$$
(51)

Then the mean value of Z is given by

$$\begin{aligned} E\{Z\} & = - \frac{{df_{Z}^{*} (s)}}{ds}|_{s = 0} \\ & = \frac{1}{{\mu_{C}}} - F_{Y}^{*} (\mu_{C}) = \frac{1}{{\mu_{C}}} - \frac{1}{{\mu_{C}}}f_{Y}^{*} (\mu_{C}) \\ & = \frac{1}{{\mu_{C}}} - \frac{1}{{\mu_{C}}}\left[{\frac{{\ln (1 + \mu_{C}/\eta_{m})}}{{\mu_{C}/\eta_{m}}}} \right] \\ \end{aligned}$$
(52)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abd El-atty, S.M., Gharsseldien, Z.M. Performance analysis of an advanced heterogeneous mobile network architecture with multiple small cell layers. Wireless Netw 23, 1169–1190 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1218-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1218-y

Keywords

Navigation