Abstract
Rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patient samples is vital for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The emergence of M. tuberculosis strains with either no copies or only a single copy of IS6110 in Asian countries makes the standard PCR based diagnosis of M. tuberculosis using IS6110 not reliable. We studied the diagnostic efficacy of the in-house PCR amplification of the candidate gene mtp40 as an alternative to IS6110 element based diagnosis. Clinical samples included pulmonary and extra-pulmonary specimens from TB suspected patients residing in Puducherry, South India and were analyzed using in-house PCR procedures targeting IS6110 element and mtp40 genes. Out of 317 clinical specimens analyzed, 132 (41.6 %) and 114 (36 %) were found positive for mtp40 PCR and IS6110 PCR, respectively. However, 18 specimens that were found to negative for IS6110 PCR were found positive for mtp40 PCR, which was further confirmed by DNA sequencing method. PCR amplification of mtp40 gene for the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis in clinical samples is fast, sensitive, and further identified clinical strains that lack IS6110 element in this region. It is clearly demonstrated that there is a significant difference between the two PCR procedures and the sensitivity and specificity levels of mtp40 PCR were found to be higher when compared with DNA sequencing method. Thus, mtp40 based PCR technique will be beneficial in diagnosis of TB where M. tuberculosis strains lack of IS6110 element is predominant.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexis W, Pilkaytis BB, Butler WR et al (1996) The mtp40 Gene is not present in all strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 34:2309–2311
Almeda J, Garcia A, Gonzalez J et al (2000) Clinical evaluation of an in-house IS6110 polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of tuberculosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 19:859–867
Balabanova Y, Drobniewski F, Nikolayevskyy V et al (2009) An integrated approach to rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance using liquid culture and molecular methods in Russia. PLoS ONE 4:e7129. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007129
Caws M, Wilson SM, Clough C, Drobniewski F (2000) Role of IS6110-targeted PCR, culture, biochemical, clinical and immunological criteria for diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 38:3150–3155
Chauhan A, Chauhan DS, Parashar D et al (2004) DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Agra region by IS6110 probe. Ind J Med Microbiol 22:238–240
Cheong HC, Sang HH, Bum SC et al (2009) Diagnosis and species identification of mycobacterial infections by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of sterile body fluids. Korean J Intern Med 24:135–138
Das S, Paramasivan CN, Lowrie DB et al (1995) IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Madras, South India. Tuber Lung Dis 76:550–554
Demellawy MA, Wahab AA, Emad EM et al (2006) Sensitivity of IS6110, mtp40 and 85B-RNA based amplification assays in the diagnosis and treatment follow up of pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Sci 6:121–126
Forbes BA, Hicks KES (1993) Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens in a clinical laboratory by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 31:1688–1694
Herrera EA, Segovia M (1996) Evaluation of mtp40 genomic fragment amplification for specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 34:1108–1113
Kolk AH, Kox LF, van Leeuwen J et al (1998) Clinical utility of the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of extra pulmonary tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 11:1222–1226
Kulkarni S, Singh P, Aafreen M et al (2012) An in-house multiplex PCR test for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, its validation and comparison with a single target TB-PCR kit. Indian J Med Res 135:788–794
Mani C, Selvakumar N, Kumar V et al (2003) Comparison of DNA sequencing, PCR-SSCP and PhaB assays with indirect sensitivity testing for detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Tuber Lung Dis 7:625–659
Manjunath N, Shankar P, Rajan L et al (1991) Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Tubercle 72:21–27
Muthuraj M, Jagadeesan S, Ayalusamy N et al (2010) Molecular epidemiological study of pyrazinamide resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from South India. Int J Mol Sci 11:2670–2680
Radhakrishnan I, Manju YK, Ajay KR, Mundayoor S (2001) Implications of low frequency of IS6110 in fingerprinting field isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Kerala. India J Clin Microbiol 39:1683
Sahadevan R, Narayanan S, Paramasivan CN et al (1995) Restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Madras, India by use of direct-repeat probe. J Clin Microbiol 33:3037–3039
Viana NC, de Haas PE, van Soolingen D, Leao SC (2004) Analysis of genetic polymorphisms affecting the four phospholipase C (plc) genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex clinical isolates. Microbiology 150:967–978
Wilson SM, McNerney R, Nye PM et al (1993) Progress toward a simplified polymerase chain reaction and its amplification to diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 31:776–782
World Health Organization (WHO) (2012) Global tuberculosis report. WHO report 2012. WHO, Geneva
Acknowledgments
We thank Mr. Leovalan and Mr. Stalin Chellappa for providing the technical support and to help prepare this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kathirvel, M., Kommoju, V., Brammacharry, U. et al. Clinical evaluation of mtp40 polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of extra pulmonary tuberculosis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30, 1485–1490 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1566-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1566-z