Skip to main content
Log in

Biocontrol of Meloidogyne javanica by Rhizobium and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on lentil

  • Original paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biocontrol of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica was studied on lentil using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) namely Pseudomonas putida, P. alcaligenes, Paenibacillus polymyxa and Bacillus pumilus and root nodule bacterium Rhizobium sp. Pseudomonas putida caused greater inhibitory effect on the hatching and penetration of M. javanica followed by P. alcaligenes, P. polymyxa and B. pumilus. Inoculation of any PGPR species alone or together with Rhizobium increased plant growth both in M. javanica-inoculated and -uninoculated plants. Inoculation of Rhizobum caused greater increase in plant growth than caused by any species of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in nematode-inoculated plants. Among PGPR, P. putida caused greater increase in plant growth and higher reduction in galling and nematode multiplication followed by P. alcaligenes, P. polymyxa and B. pumilus. Combined use of Rhizobium with any species of PGPR caused higher reduction in galling and nematode multiplication than their individual inoculation. Use of Rhizobium plus P. putida caused maximum reduction in galling and nematode multiplication followed by Rhizobium plus P. alcaligens. Pseudomonas putida caused greater root colonization and siderophore production followed by P. alcaligenes, P. polymyxa and B. pumilus. Analysis of the protein bands of these four species by SDS-PAGE revealed that P. putida had a different protein band profile compared to the protein profiles of P. alcaligenes, P. polymyxa and B. pumilus. However, the protein profiles of P. acaligenes, P. polymyxa and B. pumilus were similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalten PM, Vitour D, Blanvillain D, Gowen SR, Sutra L (1998) Effect of rhizosphere fluorescent Pseudomonas strains on plant parasitic nematodes Radopholus similis and Meloidogyne spp. Lett Appl Microbiol 27:357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali SS (1997) Status of nematode problems and research in India. In: Diagnosis of key nematode pests of chickpea and pigeon pea in their management. Proceedings of Regional Training Course 25–30 Nov. 1996, ICRISAT, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India, pp 74–82

  • Barker KR, Huisingh D (1970) Histopathological investigations of the antagonistic interaction between Heterodera glycines and Rhizobium japonicum on soybean. Phytopathology 60:1282–1283

    Google Scholar 

  • Bora T, Ozaktan H, Gore E, Aslan E (2004) Biological control of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis by wettable powder formulations of two strains of Pseudomonas putida. J Phytopathol 152:471–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty U, Chakraborty BN (1989) Interaction of Rhizobium leguminosarum and Fusarium solani f.sp. pisi in pea affecting disease development and phytoalexin production. Can J Botany 67:1698–1701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty U, Purkayastha RP (1984) Role of Rhizobitoxine in protecting soybean roots from Macrophomina phaseolina infection. Can J Microbiol 30:285–289

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dospekhov BA (1984) Field experimentation: statistical procedures. Mir publishers, Moscow, 352 pp (ISBN 6000133960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Enebak SA, Carey WA (2000) Evidence for induced systemic protection to Fusarium rust in Loblolly pine by plant growth-promoting rhizosphere. Plant Disease 84:306–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamliel A, Katan J (1993) Suppression of major and minor pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads in solarized and nonsolarized soils. Phytopathology 83:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokte N, Swarup G (1988) On the potential of some bacterial biocides against root-knot and cyst nematodes. Indian J Nematol 18:152–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque SE, Gaffar A (1993) Use of rhizobia in the control of root-rot disease of sunflower, okra, soybean and mungbean. J Phytopathol 138:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Leong J, Teintze M, Schroth MN (1980) Enhanced plant growth by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Nature 286:885–886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural protein during the assembly of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson LM (2004) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): prospects for new inoculants. Crop Management doi:101094/Cm-2004-0301-05-RV. See http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/review/2004/rhizobacteria/

  • Raupach GS, Kloepper JW (1998) Mixture of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple cucumber pathogens. Phytopathology 88:1158–1164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roslycky EB (1967) Bacteriocin production in the rhizobia bacteria. Can J Microbiol 13:431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui ZA (2006) PGPR: prospective biocontrol agents of plant pathogens. In: Siddiqui ZA (ed) PGPR: biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 111–142, 318 pp. ISBN 1402040024

  • Siddiqui ZA, Husain SI (1992) Interaction between Meloidogyne incognita race 3,Macrophomina phaseolina and Bradyrhizobium sp. in the root rot disease complex of chickpea, Cicer arietinum. Fund Appl Nematol 15:491–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui ZA, Mahmood I (1995) Role of plant symbionts in nematode management, a review. Bioresour Technol 54:217–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui ZA, Mahmood I (1999) Role of bacteria in the management of plant parasitic nematodes, a review. Bioresour Technol 69:167–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Southey, JF (1986) Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes, 6th edn. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food. Reference book No. 402, HMSO, 202 pp. London, UK. ISBN 0112427545

  • Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1996) Induced systemic resistance to cucumber diseases and increased plant growth by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under field conditions. Phytopathology 86:221–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller DM (1988) Biological control of soil borne plant-pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 26:379–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Z, Reddy MS, Ryu CM, McInroy JA, Wilson MA, Kloepper JW (2002) Induced systemic protection against tomato late blight elicited by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 92:1329–1333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The first author is grateful to D.S.T. New Delhi for the financial assistance through Project No. SP/SO/A22/2001 to carry out this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zaki A. Siddiqui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siddiqui, Z.A., Baghel, G. & Akhtar, M.S. Biocontrol of Meloidogyne javanica by Rhizobium and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on lentil. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23, 435–441 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-006-9244-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-006-9244-z

Keywords

Navigation