Skip to main content
Log in

The stimulatory effects of surfactants on composting of waste rich in cellulose

  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chemical surfactant Tween 80 and biosurfactant rhamnolipid were respectively added to the composting substrate, a mixture of rice straw and bran, and their effects on the composting process were investigated. Samples were analysed for microbial communities of bacteria, actinomycetes and fungi, carboxymethylcellulose hydrolysis (CMCase) and xylanase activities, cellulose and hemicellulose fractions, water-soluble carbon (WSC) contents in the substrates, organic matter contents and pH values during the composting process. The results showed that both Tween 80 and rhamnolipid had slight stimulatory effects on the microbial populations of bacteria, actinomycetes and fungi. In addition, rhamnolipid increased the peak xylanase activity 15% higher than that of the control, while Tween 80 increased the maximum CMCase activity 35% higher than that of the control. As a result of the increased enzyme activities, treatments with Tween 80 and rhamnolipid were of higher WSC contents than the control during the whole composting process. Accordingly, the composting process was accelerated by the surfactants, since the organic matter was decomposed more quickly and the breakdown of cellulose and hemicellulose was better in the treatments with Tween 80 and rhamnolipid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson CF, Jones DD, Gauthier JJ (1996) Biodegradabilities and microbial activities during composting of municipal solid waste in bench-scale reactors. Compost Sci Util 4:14–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson CF, Jones DD, Gauthier JJ (1997) Microbial activities during composting of pulp and paper-mill primary solids. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 13:519–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolta SV, Mihelic R, Lobnic F, Lestan D (2003) Microbial community structure during composting with and without mass inocula. Compost Sci Util 11:6–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Chantigny MH, Prévost D, Angers DA, Vézina LP, Chalifour F (1996) Microbial biomass and N transformations in two soils cropped with annual perennial species. Biol Fertil Soils 21:239–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Charest MH, Antoun H, Beauchamp CJ (2004) Dynamics of water-soluble carbon substances and microbial populations during the composting of de-inking paper sludge. Bioresource Technol 91:53–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cotrufo MF, Ineson P, Roberts JD (1995) Decomposition of birch leaf litters with varying C-to-N ratios. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1219–1221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eiland F, Klamer M, Lind A-M, Leth M, Bååth E (2001) Influence of initial C/N ratio on chemical and microbial composition during long term composting of straw. Microb Ecol 41:272–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eklind Y, Kirchmann H (2000) Composting and storage of organic household waste with different litter amendments. I: carbon turnover. Bioresource Technol 74:115–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson T, Börjesson J, Tjerneld F (2002) Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 31:353–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghose TK (1987) Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analyses. In: USDA Agricultural Handbook 379, USDA, Washington, DC, pp 1–20

  • Goes AP, Sheppard JD (1999) Effect of surfactants on α-amylase production in a solid substrate fermentation process. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74:709–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helle SS, Duff SJB, Cooper DG (1993) Effect of surfactants on cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 42:611–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen AR, Karlson U (2004) Evaluation of bacterial strategies to promote the bioavailability of polycyclicaromatic hydrocarbons. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:452–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laouar L, Bernard JM, Lowe KC (1992) Yeast permeabilization with surfactants. Biotechnol Lett 14:719–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandviwala TN, Khire JM (2000) Production of high activity thermostable phytase from thermotolerant Aspergillus niger in solid state fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 24:237–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN (2005) Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environ Pollut 133:183–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF, James S, Bennett HPJ (1999) Metal removal from contaminated soil and sediments by the biosurfactant surfactin. Environ Sci Technol 33:3812–3820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo AG (1996) Effect of surfactants on cellulose production by Nectria catalinensis. Current Microbiol 33:275–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez J, Muňoz-Dorado J, Rubia T, Martínez J (2002) Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. Int Microbiol 5:53–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman KSM, Rahman TJ, Kourkoutas Y, Petsas I, Marchant R, Banat IM (2003) Enhanced bioremediation of n-alkane in petroleum sludge using bacterial consortium amended with rhamnolipid and micronutrients. Bioresource Technol 90:159–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reese ET, Manguire A (1969) Surfactants as stimulants of enzyme production by microorganisms. Appl Microbiol 17:242–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava RAK, Baruah JN (1986) Culture conditions for production of thermostable amylase by Bacillus stearothermophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:179–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tengerdy RP, Szakacs G (2003) Bioconversion of lignocellulose in solid substrate fermentation. Biochem Eng J 13:169–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. Rhamnolipid biosurfactant (110029) Fact Sheet. 2005 http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/ingredients/factsheets/factsheet_110029.htm

  • Vuorinen AH (2000) Effect of bulking agent on acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase and β-d-glucosidase activities during manure composting. Bioresource Technol 75:113–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XF, Wang HT, Zhou HY, Zhang YA, Nie YF (2003) Co-composting of flower waste and cattle manure in pilot scale. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae 23:360–365 (In Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National 863 High Technology Research Program of China (2004AA649370) and the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) (No. 2005CB724203).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guang-Ming Zeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, JG., Zeng, GM., Yuan, XZ. et al. The stimulatory effects of surfactants on composting of waste rich in cellulose. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22, 1121–1127 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-006-9152-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-006-9152-2

Keywords

Navigation