Abstract
In tropical regions, mangroves, clean (unpolluted) water-bodies and fish are important aspects of wetland areas, which are considered as the basic requirement for livelihood improvement in local communities. Particularly, their conservation is very important to both inland as well as inshore fisheries. However, conservation of such areas is dependent on the perceptions of key stakeholders in the area. A novel approach of a one and one-half bound based contingent valuation method (CVM) was implemented to measure the stakeholder willingness to pay (WTP) towards the conservation of fish, mangroves and water in a Sri Lankan wetland area. Estimated median WTP is Rs. 264.26, which is thought reliable when considering average income in the community. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to separate use and non-use values from the total value. Results show that non-use values are a significant component in the elicited WTP value, of between 45-55%. In the past such commodities have been assigned zero or low values due to difficulties involved in assigning economic values.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow KJ, Solow R, Portnet PR, Leamer EE, Rodner R, Schuman H (1993) Report on the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Regist 58:4601–4614
Barbier EB (1989) The economic value of tropical ecosystems: 1—Tropical wetlands, Gatekeeper series No. LEEC 89-02. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK
Bateman IJ, Willis KG, Garrod GD, Doctor P, Langford I, Turner RK (1992) Recreation and environmental preservation value of the norfolk broads: a contingent valuation study. Technical report, Environmental Appraisal Group, University of East Anglia, UK
Bauer DM, Cyr NE, Swallow SK (2004) Public preferences for compensatory mitigation of salt marsh losses: a contingent choice of alternatives. Conserv Biol 18(2):401–411
Bowker JM, Stall JR (1988) Using the dichotomous choice non-market methods to value the Whooping Crane resource. Am J Agric Econ 70:372–381
Boyle KJ, Bishop RC (1987) Valuing wildlife in benefit-cost analyses: A case study involving endangered species. Water Resour Res 23:943–950
Brookshire DS, Eubanks LS, Randall A (1983) Estimating option prices and existence values for wildlife resources. Land Econ 59:1–15
Carson RT, Flores NE, Mitchell RC (1999) Theory and measurement of passive-use value. In: Bateman I, Willis KG (eds) Valuing environmental preferences. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF (2001) Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ 19:173–210
CEA (Central Environmental Authority) (1994) Conservation management plan: Muthurajawela Marsh and Negombo Lagoon, Wetland Conservation Project, CEA. Colombo/EUROCONSULT, The Netherlands
Cooper JC (2002) Flexible functional form estimation of willingness to pay using dichotomous choice data. J Environ Econ Manage 43(2):267–279
Cooper JC, Hanemann M., Signorello G (2002) One and one half bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Rev Econ Stat 84(4):742–750
Cummings RG, Harrison GW (1995) The measurement and decomposition of non-use values: A critical review. Environ Resour Econ 5:225–247
Fisher AC, Raucher R (1984) Intrinsic benefits of improved water quality: Conceptual and empirical perspectives In: Smith KV (ed) Advances in applied economics. JAI Press, Greenwich Conn
Freeman AM (1993) The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Resources for the future, Washington DC
Greenley DA, Walsh RG, Young RA (1981) Option value: empirical evidence from a case study of recreation and water quality. Q J Economics 96:657–674
Kahneman D, Knetsch JL (1992) Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. J Environ Econ Manage 22:57–70
Kaoru Y (1993) Differentiating use and non-use values for coastal pond water quality improvements. Environ Resour Econ 3:487–494
Kay DL, Brown TL Allee DJ (1987) The economic benefits of the restoration of Atlantic Salmon to New England Rivers. Department of Natural Resources, New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, NY
Krutilla JV (1965) Conservation reconsidered. Am Econ Rev 57:776–786
Langford IH, Bateman IJ Jones AP, Langford HD, Georgiou S (1996) Improved estimation of willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation. CSERGE GEC Papers 96-09, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment. University of East Anglia, UK
Lazo JK, McClelland GH, Schulze W (1997) Economic theory and psychology of non-use values. Land Econ 73(3):358–371
Mardle S. Pascoe S, Herrero I (2004) Management objective importance in fisheries: An evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Environ Manage 33(1):1–11
McConnell KE (1997) Does altruism undermine existence value? J Environ Econ Manage 32:22–73
Oglethorpe DR, Miliadou D (2000) Economic valuation of the non-use attributes of a wetland: A case-study for Lake Kerkani. J Environ Econ Manage 43(6):755–767
Perman R, Ma Y, McGilvray J, Common M (2003) Natural resources and environmental economics, 3rd edn. Pearson Educational Ltd., Essex
Pyo Hee-Dong (2002) An economic valuation of coastal wetlands in Korea. PhD thesis, University of Portsmouth, UK
Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281
Samples KC, Dixon JA, Gowen MM (1986) Information disclosure and endangered species valuation. Land Econ 62:306–312
Silberman J, Gerlowski DA, Williams NA (1992) Estimating existence value for users and non-users of New Jersey beaches. Land Econ 68:225–236
Smith VK, Desvousges WH (1986) Measuring water quality benefits. Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing
Stevens TH, Benin S, Larson JS (1995) Public attitudes and economic values for wetland preservation in New England. Wetlands 15:181–194
Streever WJ, Callaghan-Perry M, Searles A, Stevens T, Svoboda P (1998) Public attitudes and values for wetland conservation in New South Wales. Australia. J Environ Manage 54:1–14
Sutherland RJ, Walsh RG (1985) Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality. Land Econ 61:281–291
Survey Department of Sri Lanka (1989) National Atlas of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka
Walsh RG, Loomis JB, Gillman RA (1984) Valuing option, existence and bequest demands for wilderness. Land Econ 60:14–29
Walsh RG, Sanders LD, Loomis JB (1985) Wild and scenic river economic: recreation use and preservation values. Report to the American Wilderness Alliance, Department of Agriculture and Natural Resource Economics, Colorado State University
Wattage P, Smith A, Pitts C, McDonald A, Kay D (2000) Integrating environmental impact, contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis: empirical evidence for an alternative perspective. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 18:5–14
Wattage P, Mardle S (2005) Stakeholder preferences towards conservation versus development for a wetland in Sri Lanka. J Environ Manage 77:122–132
Acknowledgements
This research (Project EMBioC) was funded by the Darwin Initiative of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), UK. We are grateful to Cooper JC, Hanemann M and our local partners at the Department of Town and Country Planning at the University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wattage, P., Mardle, S. Total economic value of wetland conservation in Sri Lanka identifying use and non-use values. Wetlands Ecol Manage 16, 359–369 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-007-9073-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-007-9073-3