Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Estimating hydroperiod suitability for breeding amphibians in southern Rhode Island seasonal forest ponds

  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In New England, seasonal forest ponds provide primary breeding habitat for several amphibian species, including Rana sylvatica (LeConte) and Ambystoma maculatum (Shaw). Because each species requires a minimum duration of inundation to complete its breeding cycle, one of the most important factors determining habitat suitability is a pond’s hydroperiod. The objective of this research was to develop a method for estimating pond hydroperiod from site characteristics such as pond morphology, geology, chemistry, and vegetation structure, and to use the estimates to assess the suitability of individual ponds for breeding amphibians. We monitored the duration of surface inundation in 65 ponds in the Pawcatuck River watershed of southern Rhode Island during 2001 and 2002. Pond hydroperiods, measured from 1 March, ranged from 19 to 44 weeks in 2001 and from 2 to 44 weeks in 2002; mean values were 30 and 21 weeks, respectively. Akaike’s Information Criterion was used to select a multivariate hydroperiod estimation model (R2 = 0.59, p < 0.0001) that permitted identification of ponds with hydroperiods suitable for breeding by R. sylvatica (95.4% correct classification rate [CCR]) and A. maculatum (75.4% CCR). Canopy cover, open basin depth, and specific conductance of surface water were among the most useful site characteristics for estimating hydroperiod, while surficial geology and the texture of soil parent material made smaller contributions. The CCR using open basin depth alone was 95.4 and 73.8%, respectively. These findings indicate that it is possible to estimate the hydroperiod of seasonal ponds – and to assess their suitability for individual species of breeding amphibians – without prolonged periods of hydrologic monitoring. Such techniques could have considerable value to wetland regulatory agencies and for planning amphibian habitat management and acquisition at the landscape scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.R. Anderson K.P. Burnham W.L. Thompson (2000) ArticleTitleNull hypothesis testing: problems, prevalenceand an alternative J. Wildlife Manage. 64 912–923

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.V.A. August A.J. McCann C.L. Labash (1995) Geographic information systems in Rhode Island. Natural Resource Facts Fact Sheet No. 95-1 University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. K.J. Babbitt G.W. Tanner (2000) ArticleTitleUse of temporary wetlands by anurans in a hydrologically modified landscape Wetlands 20 313–322

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.R. Bay (1967) ArticleTitleGround water and vegetation in two peat bogs in northern Minnesota Ecology 48 308–310

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.A. Berven (1990) ArticleTitleFactors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica) Ecology 71 1599–1608

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.H. Boelter (1974) The hydrologic characteristics of undrained organic soils in the Lake States A.R. Aandahl S.W. Buol D.E. Hill H.H. Bailey (Eds) Histosols: Their Characteristics, Classification, and Use Soil Science Society of America Madison, WI, USA 33–46

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.M. Bosch J.D. Hewlett (1982) ArticleTitleA review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration J. Hydrol. 55 3–23 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W.M. Broadfoot H.L. Williston (1973) ArticleTitleFlooding effects on southern forests J. For. 71 584–587

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.T. Brooks (2000) ArticleTitleAnnual and seasonal variation and the effects of hydroperiod on benthic macroinverebrates of seasonal forest (“vernal”) ponds in central Massachusetts, USA Wetlands 20 707–715

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.T. Brooks (2004) ArticleTitleWeather-related effects on woodland vernal pool hydrology and hydroperiod Wetlands 24 104–114

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.T. Brooks M. Hayashi (2002) ArticleTitleDepth-area-volume and hydroperiod relationships of ephemeral (vernal) pools in southern New England Wetlands 22 247–255

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.T. Brooks J. Stone P. Lyons (1998) ArticleTitleAn inventory of seasonal forest ponds on the Quabbin Reservoir watershedMassachusetts Northeastern Nat. 5 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.G. Brown J.R. Stark G.L. Patte (1988) Ground-water and surface-water interactions in Minnesota and Wisconsin wetlands D.D. Hook W.H. McKee H.K. Smith J. Gregory V.G. Burnell M.R. Devoe R.E. Sojka S. Gilbert R. Banks L.H. Stolzy C. Brooks T.D. Matthews T.H. Shears (Eds) The Ecology and Management of Wetlands. Ecology of Wetlands, Vol. 1 Croom Helm London, UK 176–180

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.R. Burne (2001) Massachusetts aerial photo survey of potential vernal pools Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife WestboroughMAUSA

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.J.K. Calhoun M.W. Klemens (2002) Best development practices: conserving pool-breeding amphibians in residential and commercial developments in the northeastern United States Metropolitan Conservation Alliance Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.J.K. Calhoun T.E. Walls S.S. Stockwell M. McCollough (2003) ArticleTitleEvaluating vernal pools as a basis for conservation strategies: a Maine case study Wetlands 23 70–81

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Carter (1997) Wetland hydrology, water quality, and associated functions. Water-Supply Paper 2425 U.S. Geological Survey Reston, VAUSA

    Google Scholar 

  18. L.M. Cowardin V. Carter F.C. Golet E.T. LaRoe (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31 United States Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.M. DeGraaf M. Yamasaki (2001) New England Wildlife: HabitatNatural History, and Distribution University Press of New England HanoverNH, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. P.G. deMaynadier M.L. Hunter (1998) ArticleTitleEffects of silvicultural edges on the distribution and abundance of amphibians in Maine Conserv. Biol. 12 340–352 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96412.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K.C. Dodd SuffixJr. B.S. Cade (1998) ArticleTitleMovement patterns and the conservation of amphibians breeding in small, temporary wetlands Conserv. Biol. 12 331–339 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97183.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R.S. Egan (2001) Within-pond and landscape-level factors influencing the breeding effort of Rana sylvaticaAmbystoma maculatum University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.S. Egan P.W.C. Paton (2004) ArticleTitleWithin-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frogs and spotted salamanders Wetlands 24 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  24. C.M. Epstein (1997) ArticleTitleA field based hydrologic classification for smaller wetlands Wetland J. 9 8–11

    Google Scholar 

  25. ESRI. 1997. PC ARC/INFO, Version 3.5.1. Environmental Systems Research InstituteRedlands, CAUSA.

  26. ESRI. 1999. ArcView, Version 3.2. Environmental Systems Research InstituteRedlands, CAUSA.

  27. B. Fellman (1998) Our hidden wetlands: the proceedings of a symposium on vernal pools in Connecticut Yale University and Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection New Haven, CT, USA

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Flageole R. Leclair SuffixJr. (1992) ArticleTitleEtude demographique dȁ9une population de salamandres (Ambystoma maculatum) a lȁ9aide de la methode squeletto-chronologique Can. J. Zool. 70 740–749

    Google Scholar 

  29. R.F. Flint (1971) Glacial and Quaternary Geology John Wiley and Sons New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  30. D.R. Formanowicz M.S. Bobka (1989) ArticleTitlePredation risk and microhabitat preference: an experimental study of the behavioral responses of prey and predator Am. Midland Nat. 121 379–386

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gamma Design Software. 2002. GS+Version 5.3.1. Gamma Design SoftwarePlainwell, MI, USA.

  32. D. Gay (1996) A comparison of the hydrology and aqueous geochemistry of temporary ponds on the Prescott Peninsula of the Quabbin Reservoir watershed in Central Massachusetts Report to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest ServiceNortheastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PAUSA

    Google Scholar 

  33. J.P. Gibbs (1993) ArticleTitleImportance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals Wetlands 13 23–31

    Google Scholar 

  34. J.G. Gosselink R.E. Turner (1978) The role of hydrology in freshwater wetland ecosystems R.E. Good D.F. Whigham R.L. Simpson (Eds) Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential Academic Press New York, NY, USA 63–78

    Google Scholar 

  35. W.E. Green (1947) ArticleTitleEffect of water impoundment on tree mortality and growth J. For. 45 118–120

    Google Scholar 

  36. T.F. Hall G.E. Smith (1955) ArticleTitleEffects of flooding on woody plants, West Sandy Dewatering ProjectKentucky Reservoir J. For. 53 281–285

    Google Scholar 

  37. D.A. Hammer (1997) Creating Freshwater Wetlands Lewis Publishers New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  38. S.J. Hecnar R.T. Mȁ9Closkey (1997) ArticleTitleThe effects of predatory fish on amphibian species richness and distribution Biol. Conserv. 79 123–131 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00113-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. L.B. Kats J.W. Petranka A. Sih (1988) ArticleTitleAntipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes Ecology 69 1865–1870

    Google Scholar 

  40. L.P. Kenney M.R. Burne (2000) A Field Guide to the Animals of Vernal Pools Natural Heritage and Endangered Species ProgramMassachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife WestboroughMAUSA

    Google Scholar 

  41. L.K. Kirkman S.W. Golladay L. Laclaire R. Sutter (1999) ArticleTitleBiodiversity in Southeastern, seasonally pondedisolated wetlands: management and policy perspectives for research and conservation J. North American Benthol. Soc. 18 553–562

    Google Scholar 

  42. M.W. Klemens (1993) Amphibian and Reptiles of Connecticut and Adjacent Regions State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut HartfordCT, USA

    Google Scholar 

  43. R.M. Lehtinen S.M. Galatowitsch J.R. Tester (1999) ArticleTitleConsequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages Wetlands 19 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  44. D.M. Marsh P.C. Trenham (2001) ArticleTitleMetapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation Conserv. Biol. 15 40–49 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00129.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. W.S. Motts A.L. Oȁ9Brien (1981) Geology and Hydrology of Wetlands in Massachusetts Water Resources Research CenterUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstMAUSA

    Google Scholar 

  46. M.C. Murphy F.C. Golet (1998) Development of revisions to the State of Rhode Island’s freshwater wetland regulations Report to the Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Resources, ProvidenceRI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  47. R. Novitzki (1989) Wetland hydrology S.K. Majumdar R.P. Brooks F.J. Brenner R.W. Tiner (Eds) Wetlands Ecology and Conservation: Emphasis in Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Academy of Science Easton, PAUSA 47–64

    Google Scholar 

  48. P.W.C. Paton W.B. Crouch SuffixIII (2002) ArticleTitleUsing breeding phenology of pond-breeding amphibians to develop conservation strategies Conserv. Biol. 16 192–204 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00260.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. P. Paton S. Egan (2001) Effects of roads on amphibian community structure at breeding ponds in Rhode Island Final Report to the Transportation Environmental Research Program Federal Highway Administration, BaltimoreMD, USA

    Google Scholar 

  50. J.H.K. Pechmann D.E. Scott J.W. Gibbons R.D. Semlitsch (1989) ArticleTitleInfluence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and␣abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 1 3–11 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00177885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. A.J. Peck D.R. Williamson (1987) ArticleTitleEffects of forest clearing on groundwater J. Hydrol. 94 47–65 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1694(87)90032-1 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL2sXmsVaitrg%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. D.D. Rector (1981) Soil Survey of Rhode Island U.S. Department of AgricultureSoil Conservation Service West Warwick, RI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rhode Island Statewide Planning Program. 2002. Historical precipitation dataKingston, RI Weather Station: 1889–2001. http://www.planning.state.ri.us/landuse/dpdf/b1.pdf. Rhode Island Statewide Planning ProgramProvidenceRI, USA.

  54. A.E. Rosenblatt (2000) Hydric soil patterns in riparian corridors of the glaciated Northeast: groundtruthing the Soil Survey Geographic Data Base (SSURGO) University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  55. C.L. Rowe W.A. Dunson (1993) ArticleTitleRelationships among abiotic parameters and breeding effort by three amphibians in temporary wetlands of central Pennsylvania Wetlands 3 237–246

    Google Scholar 

  56. C.L. Rowe W.A. Dunson (1995) ArticleTitleImpacts of pond hydroperiod on growth and survival of larval amphibians in temporary ponds of central PennsylvaniaUSA Oecologia 102 397–403 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00341351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. K. Sandström (1998) ArticleTitleCan forests “provide” water: widespread myth or scientific reality? Ambio 27 132–138

    Google Scholar 

  58. InstitutionalAuthorNameSAS InstituteInc (2000) SAS, Version 8.0.1 Statistical Analysis Systems InstituteInc. Cary, NC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  59. J.F. Schalles (1989) The chemical environment of wetlands S.K. Majumdar R.P. Brooks F.J. Brenner R.W. Tiner (Eds) Wetlands Ecology and Conservation: Emphasis in Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Academy of Science Easton, PAUSA 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  60. D.B. Seale (1982) ArticleTitlePhysical factors influencing oviposition by the wood frog, Rana sylvaticain Pennsylvania Copeia 1982 627–635

    Google Scholar 

  61. R.D. Semlitsch (1987) ArticleTitleInteractions between fish and salamander larvae: costs of predator avoidance or competition? Oecologia 72 481–486 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00378972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. R.D. Semlitsch (2000a) ArticleTitlePrinciples for management of aquatic-breeding amphibians J. Wildlife Manage. 64 615–631

    Google Scholar 

  63. R.D. Semlitsch (2000b) ArticleTitleSize does matter: the value of small isolated wetlands Natl. Wetlands Newslett. 22 5–13

    Google Scholar 

  64. R.D. Semlitsch (2002) ArticleTitleCritical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians Conserv. Biol. 16 619–629 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00512.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. R.D. Semlitsch J.R. Bodie (2002) ArticleTitleBiological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles Conserv. Biol. 17 1219–1228 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02177.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. R.D. Semlitsch D.E. Scott J.H. Pechmann J.W. Gibbons (1996) Structure and dynamics of an amphibian community: evidence from a 16-year study of a natural pond M.L. Cody J. Smallwood (Eds) Long-Term Studies of Vertebrate Communities Academic Press San DiegoCAUSA 217–248

    Google Scholar 

  67. P.W. Shaffer M.E. Kentula S.E. Gwin (1999) ArticleTitleCharacterization of wetland hydrology using hydrogeomorphic classification Wetlands 19 490–504

    Google Scholar 

  68. D.K. Skelly L.K. Freidenburg J.M. Kiesecker (2002) ArticleTitleForest canopy and the performance of larval amphibians Ecology 83 983–992

    Google Scholar 

  69. D.K. Skelly E.E. Werner S.A. Cortwright (1999) ArticleTitleLong-term distributional dynamics of a Michigan amphibian assemblage Ecology 80 2326–2337

    Google Scholar 

  70. J.W. Snodgrass A.L. Bryan J. Burger (2000a) ArticleTitleDevelopment of expectations of larval amphibian assemblage structure in Southeastern depression wetlands Ecol. Appl. 10 1219–1229

    Google Scholar 

  71. J.W. Snodgrass M.J. Komoroski A.L. Bryan J. Burger (2000b) ArticleTitleRelationships among isolated wetland sizehydroperiodand amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulations Conserv. Biol. 14 414–419 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99161.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington, DC, USA.

  73. SPSS, Inc. 1997. SPSS, Version 8.0.0. SPSS, Inc., ChicagoIL, USA.

  74. R.E. Stewart H.A. Kantrud (1971) Classification of Natural Ponds and Lakes in the Glaciated Prairie Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  75. J.S. Stone (1992) Vernal pools in Massachusetts: aerial photographic identification, biological and physiographic characteristics, and State certification criteria University of Massachusetts AmherstMAUSA

    Google Scholar 

  76. R.O. Teskey T.M. Hinckley (1978) Impact of water level changes on woody riparian and wetland communities Eastern Deciduous Forest Region, Vol. 4 U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceOffice of Biological Services Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  77. S.C. Trombulak C.A. Frissell (2000) ArticleTitleReview of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities Conserv. Biol. 14 18–30 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. E.E. Werner K.S. Glennemeier (1999) ArticleTitleInfluence of forest canopy cover on the breeding pond distributions of several amphibian species Copeia 1 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  79. H.M. Wilbur (1984) Complex life cycles and community organization in amphibians P.W. Price C.N. Slobodchikoff W.S. Gaud (Eds) A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems John Wiley New York, NY, USA 195–224

    Google Scholar 

  80. B.S. Windmiller (1996) The pondthe forestand the city: spotted salamander ecology and conservation in a human-dominated landscape Tufts University SomervilleMAUSA

    Google Scholar 

  81. T.C. Winter J.W. Harvey O.L. Franke W.M. Alley (1998) Ground water and surface water: a single resource. Circular 1139 U.S. Geological Survey DenverCO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  82. J.H. Zar (1999) Biostatistical Analysis Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle RiverNJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Room 105, Coastal Institute in Kingston, Kingston, RI , 02881, USA

    Dennis E. Skidds & Francis C. Golet

Authors
  1. Dennis E. Skidds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francis C. Golet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis E. Skidds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skidds, D.E., Golet, F.C. Estimating hydroperiod suitability for breeding amphibians in southern Rhode Island seasonal forest ponds. Wetlands Ecol Manage 13, 349–366 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-004-7527-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-004-7527-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation