1 Introduction

Phytoremediation can be applied both in the presence of inorganic contaminants, such as heavy metals, through extraction or stabilization processes, and in the presence of organic contaminants, through degradation or extraction processes (Gardea-Torresdey et al. 2004; Anderson et al. 2005; Karimi et al. 2009; Ranieri et al. 2013; Petrella et al. 2016; Ranieri et al. 2020). Phytoextraction, which can be defined as the use of plants to remove non-degradable contaminants from the soil, is considered a green technology that can be applied to some heavy metals (McGrath et al. 2006; Reeves and Baker 2009; Tangahu et al. 2011; Petrella et al. 2012; Gikas and Ranieri 2014; Al-Bataina et al. 2016; Petrella et al. 2016a, b; Petrella et al. 2018). This remediation is applied in situ, and therefore, it does not require any excavation, transport, and disposal of soil; its main aim is to maintain, restore, or even improve the physical-chemical properties of the soil. Furthermore, it is advantageous both from an ecological point of view, due to its environmental value, and from the economic one, since the costs are much lower than those required for conventional techniques (Ranieri and Swietlik 2010; Van Lienden 2010; Ciudin et al. 2014; Ragazzi et al. 2014). The premise of this method is to find out a hyperaccumulator, like Moso bamboo, which has a great ability to accumulate the metals at high biomass production so that it can use his plant’s ability of uptake metals which are essential for its growth (Cho-Ruk et al. 2006; Robinson et al. 2006; Arshad et al. 2008; Bian et al. 2017).

Chromium is one of the most common heavy metals in soils and easily adsorbed by plants where is present on a combination of both Cr(III) and Cr(VI) (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias 2001). To date, few plants have been identified that can be defined as hyperaccumulators of chromium. Bamboo species usually thrive in toxic environments with minimal maintenance and produce a large amount of biomass (Kigomo 2007). Cr speciation in the plant roots and shoots was found as trivalent chromium Cr(III) which formed as a result of Cr(VI) reduction. Under those conditions, there is also a possibility of oxidation of trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) to the more toxic hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) (Vaiopoulou and Gikas 2012; Vaiopoulou and Gikas 2020). But, as predominant mechanism, the Cr(VI) in cells is readily reduced to Cr(III) which is easily retained in the root cortex cells under low concentration of Cr(VI) which can explain the higher concentrations of Cr(III) in plant tissues (Shanker Aruna et al. 2005; Vidayanti et al. 2017).

In the present study, the use of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens, Fig. 1) for phytoremediation is investigated in order to:

  • Evaluate its growth capacity in a habitat other than that in which it normally develops

  • Evaluate the tolerance of the bamboo in chromium contaminated soils

  • Evaluate its phytoextraction capacity of chromium

  • Assess the migration capacity of the chromium within the plant

Fig. 1
figure 1

Scheme of bamboo elements (adapted from Mississippi Watershed 2014 and Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, 2019)

To pursue the aforementioned objectives, an experimental study was carried out, conducted in the laboratory and developed in several stages. The first phase, lasting 84 days, had as its objective to compare the development of Moso bamboo in a habitat other than that particularly favorable to its growth (Song et al. 2013), characterized by a tropical or subtropical climate, with the development in a typical Mediterranean climate.

The length was monitored, checking week by week the growth rate of the main morphological parts such as stem and leaves. The second phase, lasting also 84 days, was aimed to evaluate the tolerance of Moso bamboo by measuring the growth in a soil contaminated by a chromium solution. The elongations suffered by the main morphological structures were noted weekly, thus allowing the calculation of the growth rate under stress.

During the last 84 days third phase, it was evaluated the chromium transferred from contaminated soil to the plants. Accumulation zones of the chromium in the plant were identified and it was reported a mass balance.

2 Material and Methods

The experimental part of this work was carried out entirely in a controlled environment.

The Moso bamboo plants (Fig. 2) are allocated in four pots, for the experiments of adaptability tests, contamination tests, evaluation of chromium removal from soils and roots, rhizomes, stems, and leaves analyses.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Soil and pots used during the experimentation

Each pot has a diameter D = 25 cm and height h = 20 cm. Horizontal surface for each pot is equal to 490 cm2, for a single volume of 10 L. The soil was a mixture of blond, brown peat, natural vegetable conditioner, and rich in humified organic substance with density (D) of the soil equal to 0.25 kg/l. C(org) in the soil is approx. 20% dry weight (DW) and N is approx. 1% DW; pH was 6.9. The total soil mass per pot was 4 kg.

Tap water was used throughout the first two steps of the experimentation, having the following chemical characteristics: bicarbonate 270 mg/L; potassium 27.7 mg/L; calcium 30.9 mg/L; magnesium 9.5 mg/L; fluorides 1 mg/L; nitrate 8 mg/L as N, and phosphate 1.2 mg/L as P.

The quantity of water for each plant was calculated based on the rainfall regime and the diameter of the vessel of the sample considered. It was initially thought to follow two rainfall regimes: 1800 mm/year, a value close to that which is found in the natural habitat of Moso bamboo, and 600 mm/year, a rainfall regime close to that which is had on average in Apulia. Consequently, two flows (Q) for growth and contamination test were used: 600 mm/year and 1800 mm/year that correspond to Q1 = 1.648 mm/day = 0.0805 l/day and Q2 = 4.944 mm/day = 0.2416 l/day.

A scanning electronic microscope (SEM), Sigma 300 VP, at high resolution was used for having support on which sections of Moso bamboo plant were higher the chromium concentration by detecting small lumps adhered to soil particles or tissues forming a heterogenous agglomerate (Figs. 3, 4). In the second step, tap water was added with chromium by a solution of K2Cr2O7 apt to form a solution of 100 mg Cr/L.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Soil particles at SEM with presence of chromium

Fig. 4
figure 4

Rhizomes at SEM with presence of chromium

2.1 Bamboo Growth Performance Measurement

Heights of four pots containing the bamboo species were measured with a ruler to evaluate growth performance each week. For each measurement, a computer-aided drawing was updated reporting the distance covered by a single element, cluster or group of stems of bamboo growing from a common underground rhizome system. Any evidence of malformation in plant growth was also annotated.

2.2 Samples Preparation

Soil samples were air-dried at 75 °C to a constant weight. The samples were mixed homogeneously and, then, sieved through a 2-mm sieve to remove coarse particles prior to chemical digestion. Each bamboo plant was separated into respective organs composed of roots, rhizomes, stems and leaves. They were then washed in water and rinsed thoroughly with deionized water in order to remove soil particles and debris. The plant materials were subsequently splitted into small pieces and the samples were dried at 75 °C to a constant weight. They were then milled in a cyclone to a particle size of 0.2 mm. The samples were allocated in desiccators prior to chemical digestion.

2.3 Chemical Digestion of Plant Materials and Soil Samples

A sample of 0.5 g of plant materials was digested using 7 mL of concentrated nitric acid (HNO3): 1 mL hydrochloric acid (HCI) (7:1) in a fluorocarbon polymer (PFA/TFM) closed system oven. The vessel liner was equipped with an extraction fume system. The oven unit was equipped with a quartz power system (1800 W). After cooling the vessel, the clear liquid was diluted to 50 mL in acid-washed vials.

Dried ground soil samples of 1.5 g were transferred to the 100-mL digesting tubes. This was followed by addition of aqua regia, a mixture of 20 mL concentrated HNO3 and HCl, 70% in a ratio of 1:4. The tubes were covered by a funnel and digestion at 160 °C was carried out in a fume chamber using a digestion block. This was heated until about 4 mL was left in the tube. The procedure was repeated by adding a further 20 mL of aqua regia and allowed to evaporate to a volume of about 5 mL. Then, the solution was filtered through membrane filters (10 μm). The filtrate was then made up to a volume of 25 mL with de-ionized and distilled water prior to analysis of total Cr. All the digested samples including the laboratory blanks were then taken for the spectroscopic analysis to determine the levels of total Cr. Light and atmospheric moisture were regulated and constants; air temperature was constant and equal to 20 °C during the experiments.

2.4 Analysis of Total Chromium Levels

The plant materials, soil, and blank samples were analyzed for levels of total Cr using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Total Cr levels were therefore determined in the soils before transplanting bamboo species, and those of the corresponding rhizosphere soils, roots, rhizomes, stems and leaves after 6 months of growth period. The levels were expressed in milligram per kilogram of dry weight (mg/kg DW) for each sample.

2.5 Quality Assurance and Control

Samples were analyzed using adequate quality assurances and controls (QA/QC) to determine the reliability and accuracy of the results. Precautions were taken to avoid external contamination of the samples. All reagents used throughout the analytical procedure were of high purity analytical grade. Glassware was soaked in 0.5% (v/v) of HNO3 and rinsed several times with distilled and de-ionized water prior to use.

2.6 Statistical Analysis

The samples were analyzed in triplicate, and the data obtained was then reported as mean ± standard deviation. One-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at P < 0.05 was used to compare variables between and within the groups using F test for statistical significance.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Growth Rate Test on Moso Bamboo

Given the climatic differences of Moso bamboo, compared to those that represent its optimum for growth, it was necessary to proceed with adaptation tests prior to start the growth test.

The growth test lasted 84 days and was carried out in a laboratory-controlled environment in which the following parameters were constantly monitored:

  • Soil pH

  • Exposure to light

  • Homogeneity of the quantity of water to be supplied in all pots

  • Temperature

By measuring weekly the variations in length, it was possible to calculate the growth rate (gr), understood as the rate of growth that the morphological parts considered, branches, and total length, had. Results are shown in Fig. 5 for pots 1–2 and in Fig. 6 for pots 3–4. In both cases, bamboo plants showed a good adaptability. The growth rate gr was very similar for pots 1–2 (600 mm/year) and equal to 4.56 mm/week; also for pots 3 and 4 (1800 mm/year), gr was equal to almost the double and precisely equal to 8.45 mm/week as average. The interpolation curve was linear in both cases: h = 4.56(weeks) − 2.49 for pots 1 and 2 with R2 = 0.9911 and h = 8.45(weeks) − 7.39 for pots 3 and 4 with R2 = 0.9925. The total elongation appears to be lower than the one observed in natural conditions (Xu et al. 2011).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Moso bamboo growth with 600 mm/year tap water. Pots 1–2

Fig. 6
figure 6

Moso bamboo growth with 1800 mm/year tap water. Pots 3–4

Figure 7 presents the height of bamboo plants after the growth rate test.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Moso bamboo after first step of growth

3.2 Contamination and Tolerance Test

The treatment with the contaminant lasted about 3 months according to the concentration of the contaminant solution. Moso bamboo will not survive in metal-contaminated soils with more than 300 mg kg−1 DW (Chen et al. 2015a). Were et al. (2017) report that the bamboo species had a survival rate of 100% for all the species grown for soil concentration around 100 mg Cr/kg DW. Otherwise, low metal exposure (< 100 mg kg−1 DW) does not inhibited plant growth in pots experiment (Michaud et al. 2008; Collin et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2015a, b; Liu et al. 2015). So it is supposed that Moso bamboo should tolerate an higher metal stress, and there is a potentiality to use Moso bamboo as phytoremediation material for Cr-contaminated soil up to 200–300 mg Cr/kg DW.

To contaminate the soil of four pots, K2Cr2O7 was used in quantity apt to form an aqueous solution of 100 mg Cr/L (APHA, AWWA 1998).

At the end of these tests, information obtained were the weekly growth rate for each plant during the test and the morphology of the plants after the contamination with the SEM that was used also to obtain information the quantity of chromium adsorbed by the morphological structures of the plant.

At the concentration of irrigation water 100 mg Cr/L, the gr was considerably reduced, but in both pots 1 and 2, the bamboo plants still maintain his vegetative functions (Fig. 8). Only after 5 weeks in pot 2 a necrosis of the upper part of the stem and of the upper leaves has been showed, where the growth was almost zero, the better interpolation curve was y = 0.0038 (weeks)2 − 0.0655(weeks) + 55.13 with a low equal to R2 = 0.3862.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Moso bamboo tolerance. Growth with 600 mm/year contaminated water. Pots 1–2

In first pot, the growth interpolation curve was h = 56.45 × e0.0062 (weeks). The slope of this curve (pot 1) was higher than in pot 2 due to the higher total tissue mass in the first pot.

Like in pots 1–2, Moso bamboo in pots 3–4, where the soil was contaminated with an aqueous solution of 100 mg Cr/L, does not show obvious symptoms of contamination stress (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Moso bamboo tolerance. Growth with 1.800 mm/year contaminated water. Pots 3–4

The tolerance for bamboo in pots 3 and 4 was higher and an higher gr has been also shown. The interpolation curve for pot 3 was h = 97.13 × e0.0012 (weeks) with R2 = 0.978. The interpolation curve for pot 4 was h = 96.485 × e0.0014 (weeks) with R2 = 0.935.

Application of chromium caused some significant change in tissue morphological parameters after the fifth–sixth week, particularly in pot 3 where some tissue necrosis has been revealed due to the higher chromium absorbed. These effects were more pronounced on roots and rhizomes than stem and leaves in terms of volume reduction, and reduction of the number of new shoots.

3.3 Chromium Phytoextraction from the Soil

Chromium phytoextraction depends on the specific hyperaccumulator-contaminant interaction (Tu et al. 2004, López-Luna et al. 2009). Understanding mass balance analyses and the metabolic fate of pollutants in plants are the keys to proving the applicability of phytoremediation (Mwegoha 2008; Oliveira 2012; Ranieri et al. 2020). Previous contamination tests were also aimed to quantify how much chromium the Moso bamboo plant is able to retain. Plants use different mechanisms to control the toxic effects of chromium, accumulating it in the tissues through the uptake of the roots and subsequent translocation (Ranieri et al. 2020).

Figures 10 report the phytoextraction capacity of bamboo and the soil chromium content after 3 months for 600 mm/year pots and Figs. 12 for 1800 mm/year pots. The residual levels of Cr in the soils after the experimentation ranged from 58 to 60 mg/kg DW for pots 1 and 2 (Figs. 10, 11), and from 156 to 162 mg/kg DW for pots 3 and 4 (Figs. 12, 13). Results on soils analyses showed that the chromium levels reduced significantly after the growing plants on contaminated soils with percentages of removal around 50% similar than in other experiences (Bosire 2014).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Moso bamboo phytoextraction. Growth with 600 mm/year contaminated water. Pot 1

Fig. 11
figure 11

Moso bamboo phytoextraction. Growth with 600 mm/year contaminated water. Pot 2

Fig. 12
figure 12

Moso bamboo phytoextraction. Growth with 1.800 mm/year contaminated water. Pot 3

Fig. 13
figure 13

Moso bamboo phytoextraction. Growth with 1.800 mm/year contaminated water. Pot 4

Chromium removal percentage from soil was ranging from 43.3 to 44.7% (pots 1 and 2) starting from a contamination of approx. 105 mg/kg DW and ranging from 44.3 to 47.5% (pots 3 and 4) starting from a contamination of approx. 295 mg/kg DW. The interpolating curve for pot 1 is [Cr] = 110 × e−0.056 (weeks) with R2 = 0.982 and for pot 2: [Cr] = 112 × e−0.051 (weeks) with R2 = 0.981. Pots 3–4 are, respectively, [Cr] = 0.10 × (week)2 − 13.7 (week) + 306 with R2 = 0.99 and [Cr] = 0.08 × (week)2 − 12.2 (week) + 307 with R2 = 0.99 indicating an higher tendency to continue the phytoextraction vs time if compared to the 600 mm/year pots. Another noteworthy factor is the influence that the characteristics of the soil can have on the adsorption of chromium: if the soil has humic acids inside, the metal tends to form bonds with them as a matter of priority, reducing phytoextraction, as confirmed by numerous other studies (Salido et al. 2003; Carvalho-Pereira et al. 2015), reducing its bioavailability up to 57% (Cary 1982; Kalčíková et al. 2016).

3.4 Chromium Distribution in Tissues

Samples of the leaves and roots of the plants of the pots 1, 2, 3, and 4 were taken, after the contamination test in order to perform SEM microanalyses on them to analyze the chromium distribution. For all pots, the aerial parts of the plant showed little chromium concentrations. This could indicate that 84 days of Cr poisoning is not enough to exceed the tolerance limit of the roots and rhizomes, thus allowing the translocation of the metal in the aerial part (Shanker Aruna et al. 2005; Shehata et al. 2019). Having found chromium principally in the roots and rhizomes, it is confirmed that Moso bamboo concentrates chromium in the rhizome-root system by limiting transport in the aerial parts, parts included in the animal and human food chain (Vernay et al. 2007; Gopal et al. 2009; Awalla 2013; Shahid et al. 2017). In Fig. 14, the distribution of the chromium in bamboo tissues is reported for pots 1–4: for pots 1–2, 142 mg Cr is in the rhizomes, 36 mg Cr in the roots, 14 mg Cr in stems, and 12 mg Cr in the leaves that correspond to 69% for rhizomes, 18% for roots, 7% for stems, and 6% for leaves. Similar percentages of chromium distributions are revealed for pots 3–4, irrigated with 1800 mm/year, with a higher translocation rate and where the chromium in leaves was approx. 7% (Fig. 14). Relating to the ratio of chromium mass retained per plant tissues mass, the quantity of chromium per gram of root/rhizome is equal, as average, to 3.9 mg/g DW, while the quantity of chromium per gram of stem/leaves is equal, as average, to 2.5 mg/g DW.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Chromium (mg/L and %) absorbed by elements of bamboo in pots 1–4

4 Conclusions

Phytoextraction technique by Moso bamboo has showed a good adaptability in Mediterranean conditions and high performances in removal chromium from soil. Conclusive remarks that should be drawn from the experience are:

  • Moso bamboo has evidenced a good growth in lab conditions either for 600 mm/year condition with an average value equal to 4.56 cm/week either for 1800 mm/year conditions with an average value equal to 8.45 cm/week.

  • The tolerance was tested for all pots containing bamboo plants; results have showed a good response of the plant up to 100 mg Cr/l solution utilized for irrigation of the pots. During the 12-week irrigation period, the growth rate of the bamboo in pots irrigated with the 600 mm/year was almost zero in one pot and less than 1 mm/week in the other; the same rate, 1 mm/week, was shown in both bamboo pots irrigated with 1800 mm/year of contaminated water.

  • Chromium removal percentages from soil were in 12 weeks quite high with values ranging from 43.3 to 44.7% starting from a contamination of approx. 105 mg/kg DW for 600 mm/year and ranging from 44.3 to 47.5% starting from a contamination of approx. 295 mg/kg DW for 1800 mm/year.

  • Inside the plant tissues, chromium was principally found in the rhizome, approx. 68%, in all pots. Translocation rate was slightly higher for pots irrigated with 1800 mm/year where the chromium in leaves was approx. 7%.