Skip to main content
Log in

Biofertilizer Replace Urea as a Source of Nitrogen for Sugarcane Production

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, different nitrogen doses (0, 16, 48, 64, 80, and 96 kg ha−1) from two sources, biofertilizer (from anaerobic digestion of cattle wastewater) and urea, were applied to cultivate two sugarcane varieties (RB 867515 and SP 803280). °Brix values higher than 21% were obtained with application of 80 kg ha−1 from biofertilizer. The mean productivity of the cultivar RB 867515 using biofertilizer was 147.5 ton ha−1, while from urea it was 136.87 ton ha−1. The cultivar SP 803280 produced an average yield of 152.25 ton ha−1 when applying biofertilizer and 154.37 ton ha−1 with use of urea. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between the use of biofertilizer and urea were detected for cultivar RB 867515 in terms of crude protein concentration. The application of 80 kg of N ha−1 was considered the ideal dose, corresponding to fertirrigation blades of 54 mm of biofertilizer. The experiment showed that the biofertilizer formulation analyzed can replace urea as a nitrogen source for growing sugarcane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (2012). American Public Health Association; American Waterworks Association - AWWA; Water Environment Federation - WEF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 22.ed. Washington.

  • Bernardo, S.; Soares, A. A.; Mantovani, E. C., (2008). Manual de irrigação. 8. ed. publishing company: UFV. 625 p. Viçosa.

  • Brasil (2015). Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB). Acompanhamento de safra brasileira: cana de açúcar, terceiro levantamento (safra 2015/16), V.2, N.3. Brasília.

  • Brieger, F.O. (1968). Início da safra. Como determinar a maturação. Boletim Informativo Copereste, v.4, p.1–3, Ribeirão Preto.

  • Cai, T., Park, S. Y., & Lin, Y. (2013). Nutrient recovery from wastewater streams by microalgae: status and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 360–369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, N. P., Bordonal, R. O., & La Scala Jr., N. (2016). Greenhouse gas emission estimate in sugarcane irrigation in Brazil: is it possible to reduce it, and still increase crop yield? Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3988–3997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavicchioli, A. Q., Scatamburlo, T. M., Yamazi, F. A., Pieri, F. A., & Nero, L. A. (2015). Occurrence of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus in goat milk from small and medium-sized farms located in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Journal of Dairy Science, 98, 8386–8390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, M. O. D. S., Filho, R. M., Mantelatto, P. E., Cavalett, O., Rossel, E. V., Bonomi, A., & Leal, R. L. V. (2015). Sugarcane processing for ethanol and sugar in Brazil. Environmental Development, 15, 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos, J., & Kassam, A. H. (1979). Yield response to water. 172p. Irrigation and drainage paper, 33. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • EMBRAPA (1997). Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Manual de métodos de análise de solo. 212p. Rio de Janeiro.

  • IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Produção da pecuária Municipal. (2015). available in: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/ppm/2015/. accessed in: 23/10/2017.

  • Mao, C., Feng, Y., Wang, X., & Ren, G. (2015). Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew Sustain Energy, 45, 540–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matos, A.T. (2014). Tratamento e aproveitamento agrícola de resíduos sólidos. 1.ed. publishing company: UFV, 240 p. Viçosa.

  • Mendes Junior, A. P., & Bueno, O. C. (2015). Participação da energia fóssil na produção dos fertilizantes industriais nitrogenados com ênfase na ureia. Energia na Agricultura, 30, 442–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça, H. V., Ribeiro, C. B. M., Borges, A. C., & Bastos, R. R. (2012). Remoção de nitrogênio e fósforo de águas residuárias de laticínios por sistemas alagados construídos operando em bateladas. Journal Ambiente & Água, 7, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça, H. V., Ometo, J. P. H. B., & Otenio, M. H. (2017). Production of energy and biofertilizer from cattle wastewater in farms with intensive cattle breeding. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 228, 1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, R. A., Santos, R. S., Ribeiro, A., Zolnier, S., & Barbosa, M. H. P. (2012). Estimativa da produtividade da cana-de-açúcar para as principais regiões produtoras de Minas Gerais usando-se o método ZAE I. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, 16, 549–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penmam, M. L. (1948). Evaporation: an introductory survey. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 4, 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheneider, F. (1980). Sugar Analysis, ICUMSA Methods. Official and Tentative Methods Recommended by the International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis (ICUMSA). 1.ed. Publishing company: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 264 p. Weinheim. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19800320914

  • Silva, J. B. G., Martinez, M. A., Pires, C. P., Andrade, I. P. S., & Silva, G. T. (2012). Avaliação da condutividade elétrica e pH da solução do solo em uma área fertirrigada com água residuária de bovinocultura de leite. Revista Irriga - Botucatu, special edition, 250–263.

  • Silva, F. S., Cunha, F. N., Oliveira, R. C., Freitas Moura, L. M., Moura, L. C., & Teixeira, M. B. I. (2014). Crescimento da cana-de-açúcar sob aplicação de nitrogênio via gotejamento subsuperficial. Revista Brasileira de Agricultura Irrigada, 8, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silveira, L. C. I. da; Barbosa, M. H. P.; Oliveira, M. W., 2012. Níveis de variedades de cana-de-açúcar predominantes nas principais regiões produtoras de cachaça de Minas Gerais. Informe Agropecuário. 23, 25–32.

  • Wiedenfeld, R. P. (2000). Water stress during different sugarcane growth periods on yield and response to N fertilization. Agricultural Water Management, 43, 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA Dairy Cattle)—process no.: 02.11.05.004.00.00, funding agencies: National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)—process no.: 562645/2010-1, Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)—process no.: CVZ-6/11, Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level or Education Personnel (CAPES)—process no.: 99999.010229/2014-00, the InterAmerican Institute for Climate Change Research (CRN3005) and the Foundation for Research Support of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP2014/50627-2), for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrique Vieira de Mendonça.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Mendonça, H.V., Martins, C.E., da Rocha, W.S.D. et al. Biofertilizer Replace Urea as a Source of Nitrogen for Sugarcane Production. Water Air Soil Pollut 229, 216 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-3874-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-3874-2

Keywords

Navigation