Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ammonia and Greenhouse Gases Emission from On-Farm Stored Pig Slurry

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pig farms have achieved importance in the last few decades from the perspective of environment protection as a consequence of the intensive rearing systems in livestock production. Ammonia (NH3) and greenhouse gases (GHG), such as methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrous oxide (N2O), are emitted from slurry storage at farm prior to land application, but little is known about these losses under on-farm conditions in Spain. This study assessed the influence of management and environmental parameters on NH3 and GHG emissions from slurry storage in spring and autumn. Gas emissions were measured in a commercial pig-fattening farm from two lagoons (1000 and 768 m3 capacity, respectively) during 30 days by the floating dynamic chamber system in spring and autumn 2011 (average temperature 19 and 9 °C, respectively). Low NH3 and CH4 emissions were registered in spring (range 10–406 and 3–17 mg m−2 min−1, respectively) probably as a result of low pH values of stored slurry (6.5 to 7.0) and rainfall. High variability on NH3, CH4, and CO2 emissions was observed as a result of differences in temperature and rainfall. No NH3 emission and low CH4 and CO2 emissions were observed in autumn (average 1.2 ± 0.9 and 27 ± 22 mg m−2 min−1, respectively). Slurry loading operations increased NH3 losses from storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFNOR, Association Française de Normalisation (1976). Standard U44-160. Saint-Denis, France.

  • Anderson, N., Strader, R., & Davidson, C. (2003). Airborne reduced nitrogen: ammonia emissions from agriculture and other sources. Environment International, 29, 277–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aneja, V. P., Bunton, B., Walker, J. T., & Malik, B. P. (2001). Measurement and analysis of atmospheric ammonia emissions from anaerobic lagoons. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 1949–1958.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anthonisen, A. C., Loehr, R. C., Prakasam, T. B. S., & Srinath, E. G. (1976). Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous-acid. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 48, 835–852.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Attal, A., Ehlinger, F., Audic, J. M., & Faup, G. M. (1988). pH inhibition mechanisms of acetogenic, acetoclastic and hydrogenophilic populations. In E. R. Hall & P. N. Hobson (Eds.), Anaerobic digestion 1988: proceedings of the fifth international symposium on anaerobic digestion (pp. 71–78). Bologna: Pergammon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunden, J., & Aneja, V. P. (2008). Characterizing ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from a swine waste treatment lagoon in North Carolina. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 3277–3290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, R., Huber, P., & Meyrath, J. (1981). Ammonia toxicity in liquid piggery manure digestion. Biotechnology Letters, 3, 159–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, D., Sommer, S. G., Thorman, R., Fangueiro, D., Cardenas, L., Amon, B., & Misselbrook, T. (2011). Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166–67, 514–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, X. R., & Blanes-Vidal, V. (2013). Emissions of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide from swine wastewater during and after acidification treatment: effect of pH, mixing and aeration. Journal of Environmental Management, 115, 147–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dinuccio, E., Berg, W., & Balsari, P. (2008). Gaseous emissions from the storage of untreated slurries and the fractions obtained after mechanical separation. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 2448–2459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flesch, T. K., Verge, X. P. C., Desjardins, R. L., & Worth, D. (2013). Methane emissions from a swine manure tank in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 93, 159–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J. et al. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock. Technical report, FAO, Rome, Italy.

  • Harper, L. A., Sharpe, R. R., & Parkin, T. B. (2000). Gaseous nitrogen emissions from anaerobic swine lagoons: ammonia, nitrous oxide, and dinitrogen gas. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29(4), 1356–1365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, J., & Phillips, V. R. (1994). Control of gaseous emissions from livestock buildings and manure stores. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 57, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2006). IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, vol.4. Agriculture, forestry and other land use. In H.S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, L. Miwa, T. Ngara, K. Tanabe (Eds.), Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme IGES, Hayama, Japan.

  • James, K. M., Blunden, J., Rumsey, I. C., & Aneja, V. P. (2012). Characterizing ammonia emissions from a commercial mechanically ventilated swine finishing facility and an anaerobic waste lagoon in North Carolina. Atmopheric Pollution Research, 3, 279–288.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaharabata, S. K., Schuepp, P. H., & Desjardins, R. L. (1998). Methane emissions from aboveground open manure slurry tanks. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 12, 545–554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, T. T., Heber, A. J., Ni, J. Q., Sutton, A. L., & Shao, P. (2003). Odor and gas release from anaerobic treatment lagoons for swine manure. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 406–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moller, H. B., Sommer, S. G., & Ahring, B. K. (2004). Biological degradation and greenhouse gas emissions during pre-storage of liquid animal manure. Journal of Environmental Quality, 33, 27–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, H. B., & Angelidaki, I. (2008). Strategies for optimizing recovery of the biogas process following ammonia inhibition. Bioresource Technology, 99, 7995–8001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. H., Thompson, A. G., Marinier, M., Clark, K., & Wagner-Riddle, C. (2006). Greenhouse gas emissions from stored liquid swine manure in a cold climate. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 618–627.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peu, P., Beline, F., & Martinez, J. (1999). A floating chamber for estimating nitrous oxide emissions from farm scale treatment units for livestock wastes. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 73, 101–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillippe, F. X., & Nicks, B. (2015). Review on greenhouse gas emissions from pig houses: production of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide by animals and manure. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 199, 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodhe, L. K. K., Abubaker, J., Ascue, J., Pell, M., & Nordberg, A. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions from pig slurry during storage and after field application in northern European conditions. Biosystems Engineering, 113, 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, R. R., Harper, L. A., & Byers, F. M. (2002). Methane emissions from swine lagoons in southeastern US. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 90, 17–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spanish Ministry of Agriculture (1974). Official methodologies for soil and water analysis. Madrid, Spain.

  • Szögi, A. A., Vanotti, M. B., & Stansbery, A. E. (2006). Reduction of ammonia emissions from treated anaerobic swine lagoons. Transactions of the ASABE, 49, 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2013) Demographic components of future population growth. Technical Paper No. 2013/3. 19pp.

  • Vallejo, A., García-Torres, L., Diez, J. A., Arce, A., & López-Fernández, S. (2005). Comparison of N losses (NO3 -, N2O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry o fan irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate. Plant and Soil, 272, 313–325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • VanderZaag, A. C., Flesch, T. K., Desjardins, R. L., Baldé, H., & Wright, T. (2014). Measuring methane emissions from two dairy farms: seasonal and manure-management effects. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 194, 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded by BATFARM Interreg-Atlantic Area Project (2009-1/071) entitled “Evaluation of best available techniques to decrease air and water pollution in animal farms”. Maialen Viguria holds a grant from the Ph.D. student’s research program of the Department of Education, Universities and Research of the Basque Government. The authors are especially grateful to the farmer that provided agricultural infrastructure and to the University of the Basque Country for the computer facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pilar Merino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viguria, M., López, D.M., Arriaga, H. et al. Ammonia and Greenhouse Gases Emission from On-Farm Stored Pig Slurry. Water Air Soil Pollut 226, 285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2548-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2548-6

Keywords

Navigation