Skip to main content
Log in

Antimony Removal from Water by Adsorption to Iron-Based Sorption Materials

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents the results of antimony removal from the Dúbrava water resource using a pilot plant system capable of taking samples from different heights of adsorption materials. The adsorbents GEH, CFH12, CFH18, and Bayoxide E33 and two experimental stainless columns with bleeder valves located at heights of 20, 45, and 70 cm of the adsorption media and 91 cm (GEH), 94 cm (CFH18), 87 cm (CFH12), and 87 cm (Bayoxide E33) filter media high were used. The results of the experiments show that the most suitable material for removing antimony from water is GEH. For an antimony concentration of 78.4–108.0 μg/L in raw water and a filtration rate of 5.6–5.9 m/h, the limit concentration of 5 μg/L at the outlet of the 70-cm high adsorption media was reached at the bed volume 1788. In a case when the media height was 91 cm, the antimony concentration in the treated water would reach the limit value of 5 μg/L after a 672-h operation of the stainless column at the bed volume 4256. Under these conditions, the adsorption capacity was calculated at 184 μg/g. The adsorption capacities and bed volumes of the other adsorbents were lower in comparison to GEH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AWWA (1990). Water quality and treatment. A handbook of community water suppliers.

  • Backman, B., Kettunen, V., Ruskeeniemi, T., Luoma, S., & Karttunen, V. (2007). Arsenic removal from groundwater and surface water—field tests in the Pirkanmaa Region Finland (pp. 1–40). Espoo: Geological Survey of Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, S. E., Olin, T. J., Bricka, R. M., & Adrian, D. D. (1999). A review of potentially low—cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Research, 33(11), 2469–2479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bissen, M., & Frimmel, F. H. (2003). Arsenic—a review; part II: oxidation of arsenic and its removal in water treatment. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 31(2), 97–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive 98/83/EC (1998). Quality of water intended for human consumption.

  • Cumming, L. J., Wang, L., & Chen, A. S. C. (2009). Arsenic and antimony removal from drinking water by adsorptive media, U.S. EPA Demonstration Project at South Truckee Meadows General Improvement District (STMGID), NV Final Performance Evaluation Report, (EPA/600/R-09/016).

  • Driehaus, W., Jekel, M., & Hildebrandt, U. (1998). Granular ferric hydroxide—a new adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from natural water. Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology-Aqua, 47(1), 30–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, K., & Wilson, D. J. (1986). Removal of antimony from aqueous system. Separation Science and Technology, 21(5), 475–493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GEH-Wasserchemie (2014). http://www.geh-wasserchemie.de/files/datenblatt_geh101_en_web.pdf.

  • Ilavský, J., & Barloková, D. (2012). The use of granular iron-based sorption materials for nickel removal from water. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 21(5), 1229–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jekel, M., & Seith, R. (2000). Comparison of conventional and new techniques for the removal of arsenic in a full scale water treatment plant. Water Supply, 18(1), 628–631.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, W., Pelaez, M., Dionysiou, D. D., Entezari, M. H., Tsoutsou, D., & O’Shea, K. (2013). Chromium(VI) removal by maghemite nanoparticles. Chemical Engineering Journal, 222(15), 527–533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemwater ProChemie (2014). http://www.prochemie.cz/chem/tech-list-hydroxid-zelezity-kemira-cfh.pdf.

  • MacPhee, M. J., Charles, G. E., & Cornwell, D. A. (2001). Treatment of arsenic residual from drinking water removal prosesses. (EPA/600/R-11/090).

  • Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U., Jr. (2007). Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—a critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142(1–2), 1–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munka, K., Olejko, Š., Varga, S., & Zaťko Š. (1999). Návrh technológie odstraňovania antimónu z vodných zdrojov SKV Dúbrava a Partizánska Ľupča. Záverečná správa, VÚVH Bratislava, 1999. Design of technology for removal of antimony from water resources Dúbrava and Partizánska Ľupča. Final report, Water Research Institut Bratislava. (in Slovak).

  • Naeem, A., Westerhoff, P., & Mustafa, S. (2007). Vanadium removal by metal (hydr)oxide adsorbents. Water Research, 41(7), 1596–1602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, V. L., Chen, W. H., Young, T., & Darby, J. (2011). Effect of interferences on the breakthrough of arsenic: rapid small scale column tests. Water Research, 45(14), 4069–4080.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitter, P. (2009). Hydrochemie (4th ed.). Praha: Institute of Chemical Technology Press (in Czech).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, F., Jr. (2003). Design manual: Removal of arsenic from drinking water by adsorptive media (EPA/600/R-03/019).

  • Severn Trent Services (2014). http://www.severntrentservices.com/en_us/LiteratureDownloads/Documents/565_0200.pdf.

  • Sperlich, A., Werner, A., Genz, A., Amy, G., Worch, E., & Jekel, M. (2005). Breakthrough behavior of granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) fixed-bed adsorption filters: modeling and experimental approaches. Water Research, 39(6), 1190–1198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thirunavukkarasu, O. S., Viraraghavan, T., & Subramanian, V. (2003). Arsenic removal from drinking water using granular ferric hydroxide. Water SA, 29(2), 161–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2003). Arsenic treatment technology evaluation handbook for small systems, Office of water (4606M), EPA 816-R-03-014.

  • US EPA. (1984). Antimony: an environmental and health effects assessment. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Drinking Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff, P., Highfield, D., Badruzzaman, M., & Yoon, Y. (2005). Rapid small scale column tests for arsenate removal in iron oxide packed bed columns. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131(2), 262–271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2003). Antimony in drinking-water. Background document for preparation of WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed.). Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, H., Arashiro, M., & Giammar, D. (2008). Effect of water chemistry and flow rate on arsenate removal by adsorption to an iron-based sorbent. Water Research, 42(18), 4629–4636.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The experimental measurements were carried out with the financial support of the APVV-0379-07 project from the Slovak Research and Development Agency and VEGA 1/1243/12 research project from the Scientific Grant Agency of the Slovak Ministry of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Ilavský.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ilavský, J., Barloková, D. & Munka, K. Antimony Removal from Water by Adsorption to Iron-Based Sorption Materials. Water Air Soil Pollut 226, 2238 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2238-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2238-9

Keywords

Navigation