Skip to main content
Log in

Dispersion of Odorous Gaseous Compounds Emitted from Wastewater Treatment Plants

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Municipal wastewater treatment plants (WTP) emit odorous compounds that produce nuisance to the workers and nearby residents. Several chemical compounds contribute to odour problems, among them, sulphurous organic compounds, hydrogen sulphide, phenols and indoles, ammonia, volatile amines and volatile fatty acids. In the current study, hydrogen sulphide (H2S) concentrations were measured during the summer period of 2007 by a portable handheld device at the WTP of Chania City (Greece). Measurements were taken in several places within the facility. The highest hydrogen sulphide levels were measured close to the primary sedimentation tanks and the tanks where the recycled activated sludge is mixed, the sludge from the primary sedimentation tanks reaching 30 ppm. In conjunction with the measurements, the Gaussian dispersion model AERMOD code was modified in order to estimate the maximum odour concentration for very short time steps using peak-to-mean ratios. The probability of detection of H2S exceeds 50% at 400 m distance from the main emission sources (time interval of 5 s) with a relative high degree of annoyance (3.2 AU) under typical summer period conditions. Furthermore, relations between odour annoyance and odour exposure concentrations have been embedded in the model, in order to express the odour impacts in terms of probability of detection and degree of annoyance of the population near the WTP of Chania.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, J. (1993). Enclosed wastewater treatment plants—health and safety considerations. Foundation for Water Research Report FR/W 0001. Buckinghamshire: Allen House, The Listons.

  • Amoore, J. E. (1985). The perception of hydrogen sulfide odor in relation to setting an ambient standard. Berkeley: Olfacto-Labs (prepared for the California Air Resources Board).

  • Easter, C., Quigley, C., Burrowes, P., Witherspoon, J., & Apgar, D. (2005). Odor and air emissions control using biotechnology for both collection and wastewater treatment systems. Chemical Engineering Journal, 113(2–3), 93–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency. (2004). AERMOD: Description of the model formulation. EPA-454/R-03-004. North Carolina: US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park.

  • Gallego, E., Soriano, C., Roca, F. X., Perales, J. F., Alarcon, M. A., & Guardino, X. (2008). Identification of the origin of odour episodes through social participation, chemical control and numerical modelling. Atmospheric Environment, 42(35), 8150–8160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gostelow, P., & Parsons, S. A. (2000). Sewage treatment works odour measurement. Water Science and Technology, 41(6), 33–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gostelow, P., Parsons, S. A., & Cobb, J. (2001). Development of an odorant emission model for sewage treatment works. Water Science and Technology, 44(9), 181–188.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gostelow, P., Parsons, S. A., & Lovell, M. (2004). Integrated odour modeling for sewage treatment works. Water Science and Technology, 50(4), 169–176.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, P., Nicell, J. A., & Sikdar, A. (2006). Parameters for the assessment of odor impacts on communities. Atmospheric Environment, 40(6), 1016–1029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leonards, G., Kendall, D., & Barnard, N. (1969). Odor threshold determination of 53 odorant chemicals. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 19(2), 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A. (2000). Application of dispersion modeling to odour assessment: a practical tool or a complex trap. Water Science and Technology, 41(6), 81–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata, Y. (1990). Measurement of odor threshold by triangle odor bag method. Bull Japan Environ Sanit Center, 17, 77–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicell, J. (2003). Expressions to relate population responses to odor concentration. Atmospheric Environment, 37(35), 4955–4964.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicell, J. (2009). Assessment and regulation of odour impacts. Atmospheric Environment, 43(1), 196–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicell, J., & Henshaw, P. (2007). Odor impact assessments based on dose-response relationships and spatial analyses of population response. Water Practice, 1(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piringer, M., Petz, E., Groehn, I., & Schauberger, G. (2007). A sensitivity study of separation distances calculated with the Austrian Odour Dispersion Model (AODM). Atmospheric Environment, 41(8), 1725–1735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. E. (1973). Recommended guide for the prediction of the dispersion of airborne effluents. NY: ASME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winegar, E.D. & Schmidt, C.C. (1998). Jerome 631-X portable hydrogen sulfide sensor: laboratory and field evaluation. Report. Chandler: Arizona Instrument Corporation, p. 15.

  • Yu, Z., Guo, H., Xing, Y., & Lague, C. (2009). Setting acceptable odour criteria using steady-state and annual hourly weather data. Biosystems Engineering, 103(3), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Hellenic General Secretariat for Research and Technology through the program PENED-2003 (project No. 663).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Lazaridis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Latos, M., Karageorgos, P., Kalogerakis, N. et al. Dispersion of Odorous Gaseous Compounds Emitted from Wastewater Treatment Plants. Water Air Soil Pollut 215, 667–677 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0508-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0508-8

Keywords

Navigation