Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between Metals Leached and Soil Type from Potential Acid Sulphate Soils under Acidic and Neutral Conditions in Western Australia

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metal contaminants are likely to be mobilised from soil when in contact with acidic drainage. Soils containing sulphide are often associated with significant quantities of trace metals. Understanding the source of metal pollution is of significant concern for management because sulphide-containing soils are found in close proximity to estuaries, lowland rivers and lakes. This study focuses on Western Australian soils, which are typically sandy and well weathered. Two leachate trials, a batch and a column method, investigated the possibility of characteristic leachate signatures with respect to future traceability of metal contamination from soil drainage. Leaching signatures were assessed for four soil types (grey sand (GS), iron-rich sand (FeRS), silty sand (SS) and peat) found coastally between Perth and Albany, in Western Australia. Trace metals leached from the four soil types showed significant differences for both the metals leached and the concentrations for the column leaching trial. No nickel (<1.0 µgL−1) but relatively high concentrations of arsenic were leached from the peat site. The FeRS leachates contained chromium, copper, high aluminium and relatively high iron. The GS leached extremely high iron and relatively high manganese concentrations. In comparison, only small concentrations of nickel, iron, aluminium, arsenic and manganese leached from the SS columns. Selenium did not leach above reporting limits (<1.0 µg L−1) from any of the soil types. This work suggests that leachate signatures from different soil types exist and that soil type should be considered when determining the risk of aquatic impact associated with acidic drainage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern, C. R., McElnea, A. E., & Sullivan, L. A. (2004). Acid sulfate soils laboratory methods guidelines. Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia: Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, S., Wong, S., Willis-Jones, B., Angeloni, J., & Watkins, R. (2004). Groundwater acidification caused by urban development in Perth, Western Australia: source, distribution, and implications for management. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 42, 579–585. doi:10.1071/SR03074.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Åström, M. (1998). Mobility of Al, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni and V in sulphide bearing fine grained sediments exposed to atmospheric O2: an experimental study. Environmental Geology, 36, 219–226. doi:10.1007/s002540050338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åström, M. (2001). The effect of acid soil leaching on trace element abundance in a medium sized stream, W. Finland. Applied Geochemistry, 16, 387–396. doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(00)00034-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blunden, B., & Indraratna, B. (2001). Pyrite oxidation model for assessing ground-water management strategies in acid sulphate soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127, 146–157. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:2(146).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Degens, B. P., & Wallace-Bell, P. (2008). Acid sulphate soil survey of shallow regolith on the Scott Coastal Plain. In: Hydrogeological record series. Department of Environment - Land and Water Quality Branch.

  • Deng, H., Åström, M., & Bjorklund, A. (1997). Geochemical and mineralogical properties of sulphide bearing fine grained sediments in Finland. Environmental Geology, 36, 37–44. doi:10.1007/s002540050318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, D. (1986). Acid sulphate soils: a baseline for research and development (vol. 39). International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement/ILRI Netherlands.

  • Dent, D. L., & Pons, L. J. (1995). A world perspective on acid sulphate soils. Geoderma, 67, 263–276. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(95)00013-E.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. J., Meeussen, J. C. L., & Comans, R. N. J. (2004). Leaching of heavy metals from contaminated soils: an experimental and modelling study. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 4390–4395. doi:10.1021/es049885v.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • España, J. S., Pamo, E. L., Santofimia, E., Aduvire, O., Reyes, J., & Barettino, D. (2005). Acid mine drainage in the Iberian pyrite belt (Odiel river watershed, Huelva, SW Spain): geochemistry, mineralogy and environmental implications. Applied Geochemistry, 20, 1320–1356. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.01.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, Y., Murray, P., & Hendershot, W. H. (2000). Trace metal speciation and bioavailability in urban soils. Environmental Pollution, 107, 137–144. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00119-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. L. T., & Mulder, E. (2003). Preliminary assessment of three new European leaching tests. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 24, 165–172. doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00129-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, P.-J., Zhang, H., Shao, L.-M., & Lee, D.-J. (2006). Leaching of carbonated air pollution control residues using compliance leaching tests. Environmental Quality, 35, 442–449. doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laudon, H., Köhler, S., & Bishop, K. (1999). Natural acidity or anthropogenic acidification in the spring flood of northern Sweden? The Science of the Total Environment, 234, 63–73. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00259-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. C., Isbell, R. F., Speight, J. G., Walker, J., & Hopkins, M. S. (1998). Australian soil and land survey. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, N., Jacquier, D., Isbell, R., & Brown, K. (2004). Australian soils and landscapes: an illustrated compendium. Melbourne: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meima, J. A., & Comans, R. N. J. (1997). Geochemical modelling of weathering reactions in municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash. Environmental Science & Technology, 31, 1269–1276. doi:10.1021/es9603158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, R. L., & Camberato, J. J. (1995). Potassium, sulfur, lime and micronutrient fertilizers. In: J. E. Rechcigl (Ed.), Soil amendments and environmental quality (pp. 109-138). CRC.

  • Müller, K., Daus, B., Morgenstern, P., & Wennrich, R. (2007). Mobilization of antimony and arsenic in soil and sediment samples—evaluation of different leaching procedures. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 183, 427–436. doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9391-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National working party on acid sulfate soils. (2000). National strategy for the management of coastal acid sulfate soils. Wollongbar NSW, Australia: NSW Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, B. G., Thurman, E. M., & Malcolm, R. L. (1983). The contribution of humic substances to the acidity of coloured natural waters. Geochimica et Cosmochimica, 47, 2031–2035. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(83)90218-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sammut, J., White, I., & Melville, M. D. (1996). Acidification of an estuarine tributary in Eastern Australia due to drainage of acid sulfate soils. Marine & Freshwater Research, 47, 669–684. doi:10.1071/MF9960669.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, B., & Horwitz, P. (2001). Water quality and macroinvertebrate response to acidification following intensified summer droughts in a Western Australian wetland. Marine & Freshwater Research, 52, 1015–1021. doi:10.1071/MF00021.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia (1997). Australian Standards 4439.3-1997. Wastes, sediments and contaminated soils part 3, Preparation of leachates—bottle leaching procedure

  • Suh, J.-Y., Brown, P. L., & Birch, G. F. (2003). Geochemical factors affecting leachate composition derived from soils in reclaimed lands using laboratory fresh and saline water column experiments. Marine & Freshwater Research, 54, 885–893. doi:10.1071/MF02118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström, R., Åström, M., & Österholm, P. (2002). Comparison of the metal content in acid sulfate soil runoff and industrial effluents in Finland. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 4269–4272. doi:10.1021/es020022g.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western Australian Planning Commission. (2003). Acid Sulphate Soils, Planning Bulletin 64. ISSN 1324-9142.

  • Xu, H., Allard, B., & Grimvall, A. (1991). Effects of acidification and natural organic materials on the mobility of arsenic in the environment. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 57–58, 269–278. doi:10.1007/BF00282890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described here was one component of a larger project examining risk to water resources associated with the disturbance of ASS, funded from the Australian Federal Government by the National Heritage Trust and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. The authors would also like to thank staff from the National Measurement Institute and the Department of Water for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. S. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, F.S., Kilminster, K.L., Degens, B. et al. Relationship between Metals Leached and Soil Type from Potential Acid Sulphate Soils under Acidic and Neutral Conditions in Western Australia. Water Air Soil Pollut 205, 133–147 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0061-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0061-5

Keywords

Navigation