Skip to main content
Log in

Historical Changes in Water Quality at German Branch in the Choptank River Basin

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many management strategies to improve the health of Chesapeake Bay focus on reducing losses of sediments and nutrients from agricultural land. Plot-scale studies have suggested that Best Management Practices (BMPs) reduce these losses, and natural resource managers have since supported implementation of a variety of BMPs on farms in the Chesapeake Bay watershed over the last two decades. As a test of the efficiency of these BMPs at the watershed scale, all farms within German Branch watershed had BMPs implemented in the early 1990s. Using water quality from two past monitoring programs (i.e., in 1986 and 1991–1995) and current water quality monitoring (i.e., collected 2003–2006), we detected a 28% decrease in baseflow P concentrations a decade after BMP implementation. There were no significant changes in nitrate or total nitrogen concentrations between BMP implementation and the most recent sampling. However, the significant rate of increase (∼0.08 mg N L−1 year−1) from 1986 to the 1990s did not continue to 2003–2006 baseflow conditions, which suggests that BMPs may have suppressed the rate of increase in nitrogen observed earlier in German. These data suggest that other management practices that increase agricultural N losses and natural processes that attenuate N losses at the watershed scale may obscure significant N reductions by current BMPs in the watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMP:

Best Management Practice

CBP:

Chesapeake Bay Program

CREP:

Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program

USDA:

United States Department of Agriculture

References

  • Beman, J. M., Arrigo, K. R., & Matson, P. A. (2005). Agricultural runoff fuels large phytoplankton blooms in vulnerable areas of the ocean. Nature, 434, 211–214. doi:10.1038/nature03370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. S., Palmer, M. A., Allan, J. D., Alexander, G., Barnas, K., Brooks, S., et al. (2005). Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science, 308, 636–637. doi:10.1126/science.1109769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F., Brinsfield, R. B., & Magnien, R. E. (2001). Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 303–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlke, J. K., & Denver, J. M. (1995). Combined use of groundwater dating, chemical, and isotopic analyses to resolve the history and fate of nitrate contamination in two agricultural watersheds, Atlantic coastal plain, Maryland. Water Resources Bulletin, 31, 2319–2339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. W., Goodale, C. L., Jaworski, N. A., & Howarth, R. W. (2002). Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the northeastern USA. Biogeochemistry, 57/58, 137–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. S., & Coale, F. J. (2005). Phosphorus leaching in manure-amended Atlantic Coastal Plain soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 370–381.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. H., Pritchard, D. W., & Whaley, R. C. (1969). Observations of eutrophication and nutrient cycles in some coastal plain estuaries. In: Eutrophication: causes, consequences, correctives. Proceedings of the 1967 International Symposium on Eutrophication, University of Wisconsin (p. 210–221). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

  • Chesapeake Bay Commission (2004). Cost-effective strategies for the bay: Smart investments for nutrient and sediment reduction. Annapolis, MD: Chesapeake Bay Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesapeake Bay Program (2000). Chesapeake bay agreement. Annapolis, MD: U.S. EPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. J., Decker, A. M., Meisinger, J. J., & McIntosh, M. S. (1997). Kill date of vetch, rye, and a vetch-rye mixture. 1. Cover crop and corn nitrogen. Agronomy Journal, 89, 427–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. R., Hagy III, J. D., Boynton, W. R., & Williams, M. R. (2006). An analysis of cultural eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent River estuaries of Chesapeake Bay. Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 435–447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. R., Lee, K.-Y., Berndt, G., Benitez, J. A., & Norton, M. M. (1998). Hydrology and chemistry of the Choptank River Basin. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 105, 387–397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, T. E., Correll, D. L., & Weller, D. E. (1997). Effects of agriculture on discharges of nutrients from coastal plain watersheds of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26, 836–848.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, T. E., & Weller, D. E. (1996). Human contributions to terrestrial nitrogen flux. BioScience, 46, 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, W. M., Boynton, W. R., Adolf, J. E., Boesch, D. F., Boicourt, W. C., Brush, G., et al. (2005). Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions. Marine Ecological Progress Series, 303, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-Y., Fisher, T. R., Jordan, T. E., Correll, D. L., & Weller, D. E. (2000). Modeling the hydrochemistry of the Choptank River Basin using GWLF and Arc/Info: 1. Model calibration and validation. Biogeochemistry, 49, 143–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-Y., Fisher, T. R., & Rochelle-Newall, E. (2001). Modeling the hydrochemistry of the Choptank River Basin using GWLF and Arc/Info: 2. Model application. Biogeochemistry, 56, 311–348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R., Altier, L. S., Newbold, J. D., Schnabel, R. R., Goffman, P. M., Denver, J. M., et al. (1997). Water quality functions of riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake Bay watersheds. Environmental Management, 21, 687–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnien, R., Boward, D., & Bieber, S. (Eds.). (1995). The state of the Chesapeake 1995. Annapolis, MD: U.S. EPA.

  • Meisinger, J. J., & Randall, G. W. (1991). Estimating nitrogen budgets for soil-crop systems. In R. F. Follett, D. R. Keeney, & R. M. Cruse (Eds.), Managing nitrogen for groundwater quality and farm profitability. Madison, WI: SSSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, M. M., & Fisher, T. R. (2000). The effects of forest on stream water quality in two coastal plain watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay. Ecological Engineering, 14, 337–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Officer, C. B., Biggs, R. B., Taft, J. L., Cronin, E., Tyler, M. A., & Boynton, W. R. (1984). Chesapeake Bay anoxia: origin, development, and significance. Science, 223, 22–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R. J., & Moore, K. A. (1983). Chesapeake Bay: an unprecedented decline in submerged aquatic vegetation. Science, 222, 51–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peierls, B. L., Caraco, N. F., Pace, M. L., & Cole, J. J. (1991). Human influence on river nitrogen. Nature, 350, 386–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. J., Denver, J. M., Shedlock, R. J., & Hamilton, P. A. (1993). Effect of forested wetlands on nitrate concentrations in ground water and surface water on the Delmarva Peninsula. Wetlands, 13, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primrose, N. L., Millard, C. J., McCoy, J. L., Sturm, P. E., Dobson, M. G., & Bowen, S. E. (1997). German branch targeted watershed project: Report on 5 years of biotic and water quality monitoring 1990 through 1995. Annapolis, MD: Chesapeake and Coastal Watershed Service, Watershed Restoration Division, Maryland Department of Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliger, H. H., Boggs, J. A., & Biggley, W. H. (1985). Catastrophic anoxia in the Chesapeake Bay in 1984. Science, 228, 70–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, J. T., Simard, R. R., & Joern, B. C. (1998). Phosphorus loss in agricultural drainage: historical perspective and current research. Journal of Environmental Quality, 27, 277–293.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staver, K. W. (2001a). Increasing N retention in coastal plain agricultural watersheds. In R. F. Follett, D. R. Keeney, & R. M. Cruse (Eds.), Managing nitrogen for groundwater quality and farm profitability (pp. 85–124). Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staver, K. W. (2001b). The effect of agricultural best management practices on subsurface nitrogen transport in the German Branch watershed. Final Rep. MD Dept. Nat. Res. Proj. 14-198-34CZM025

  • Staver, K. W., & Brinsfield, R. B. (1994). The effect of erosion control practices on phosphorus transport from coastal plain agricultural watersheds. Chesapeake Research Consortium Publication, 149, 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staver, K. W., & Brinsfield, R. B. (1998). Using cereal grain winter cover crops to reduce groundwater nitrate contamination in the Mid-Atlantic coastal plain. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 53, 230–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staver, K. W., & Brinsfield, R. B. (2001). Agriculture and water quality on the Maryland eastern shore: where to we go from here? Bioscience, 51, 859–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, A. J. (2006). Evaluation of agricultural nutrient reductions in restored riparian buffers. University of Maryland Dissertation.

  • United States Department of Agriculture (1996). German branch water quality hydrologic unit area Queen Anne’s County, Maryland: FY96 annual report. Washington, D.C.: USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (2004). Maryland conservation reserve enhancement program draft: Programmatic environmental assessment. Washington, D.C.: USDA, Farm Services Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valderrama, J. C. (1981). The simultaneous analysis of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in natural waters. Marine Chemistry, 10, 109–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W., Likens, G. E., Matson, P. A., Schindler, D. W., et al. (1997). Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecological Applications, 7, 737–750.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the US Department of Agriculture (Cooperative Agreement 58-1265-5-041) and the Agricultural Research Service. We thank Tom Jordan for access to water quality data collected during the Targeted Watershed Project and Ken Staver for sharing his calculations of groundwater retention time in German Branch watershed. We also thank the agricultural extension agents and managers at local Farm Service Agency and Natural Resources Conservation Service offices for their local knowledge and insights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrienne J. Sutton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutton, A.J., Fisher, T.R. & Gustafson, A.B. Historical Changes in Water Quality at German Branch in the Choptank River Basin. Water Air Soil Pollut 199, 353–369 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9884-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9884-8

Keywords

Navigation