Skip to main content
Log in

Participatory Water-Food-Energy Nexus Approach for Evaluation and Design of Groundwater Governance

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Improving the groundwater governance structure can help reduce groundwater decline and improve the state of an aquifer. This study develops an approach to modify groundwater governance based on a participatory, water-food-energy (WFE) nexus. Given the need for the participation of actors in the decision-making for the WFE nexus, we identified and selected some powerful nexus actors. Using the actor’s viewpoints, factors that led to excessive withdrawal of groundwater resources in each sector were identified as governance challenges. Using the DPSIR (Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response) approach, the actors assessed the cause-and-effect relationships of the groundwater governance challenges and proposed modification in the groundwater governance. Thirteen groundwater governance scenarios were defined. Then, the impact of scenarios on WFE sectors was evaluated by the participation of nexus actors and the nexus assessment ranking of the scenarios. The results show that, out of the 13 groundwater governance scenarios, only seven scenarios had positive effects in all three sectors (WFE). The scenario of developing and enforcing region-specific cropping patterns and value-chain management has the highest rank. This paper highlights the need for the participation of actors in decision-making and the use of WFE nexus in modifying the groundwater governance system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Albrecht TR, Crootof A, Scott CA (2018) The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environ Res Lett 13(4):043002

  • Bagordo F, Migoni D, Grassi T, Serio F, Idolo A, Guido M, De Donno A (2016) Using the DPSIR framework to identify factors influencing the quality of groundwater in Grecìa Salentina (Puglia, Italy). Rend Lincei 27(1):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bojovic D, Giupponi C, Karali E (2017) Social Network Analysis of the PLACARD Project Stakeholders.

  • Borji M, Nia AM, Malekian A, Salajegheh A, Khalighi S (2018) Comprehensive evaluation of groundwater resources based on DPSIR conceptual framework. Arab J Geosci 11(8):158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Sahoo B, Panda SN (2020) Evaluation of nexus-sustainability and conventional approaches for optimal water-energy-land-crop planning in an irrigated canal command. Water Resour Manag 34:2329–2351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Loë RC, Patterson JJ (2018) Boundary judgments in water governance: Diagnosing internal and external factors that matter in a complex world. Water Resour Manag 32(2):565–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Serrano MM, Borrego-Marin MM (2020) Drivers of innovation in groundwater governance. The links between the social and the ecological systems. Land Use Policy 91:104368

  • Flammini A, Puri M, Pluschke L, Dubois O (2014) Walking the nexus talk: assessing the water-energy-food nexus in the context of the sustainable energy for all initiative: FAO

  • Fliervoet J, Geerling G, Mostert E, Smits A (2016) Analyzing collaborative governance through social network analysis: a case study of river management along the Waal River in The Netherlands. Environ Manage 57(2):355–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbe J, Pahl-Wostl C, Lange M, Velonis C (2015) Governance of transitions towards sustainable development–the water–energy–food nexus in Cyprus. Water Int 40(5–6):877–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika N, Nitivattananon V (2016) Strategic assessment of groundwater resource exploitation using DPSIR framework in Guwahati city, India. Habitat Int 51:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff H (2011) Understanding the nexus: Background paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm

  • Hoolohan C, Larkin A, McLachlan C, Falconer R, Soutar I, Suckling J, Lumbroso D (2018) Engaging stakeholders in research to address water–energy–food (WEF) nexus challenges. Sustain Sci 13(5):1415–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inas EG, Grigg N, Waskom R (2017) Water-food-energy: nexus and non-nexus approaches for optimal cropping pattern. Water Resour Manag 31(15):4971–4980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iran Water Resource Management Company (2016) Basic studies on water resources of Yazd –Ardakan plain. (NO.5–20) Yazd Regional Water Authority. Yazd

  • Jia X, O’Connor D, Hou D, Jin Y, Li G, Zheng C, Luo J (2019) Groundwater depletion and contamination: Spatial distribution of groundwater resources sustainability in China. Sci Total Environ 672:551–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson OW, Karlberg L (2017) Co-exploring the water-energy-food nexus: facilitating dialogue through participatory scenario building. Front Environ Sci 5:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnib A (2018) Bridging science and policy in water-energy-food nexus: using the Q-Nexus model for informing policy making. Water Resour Manag 32(15):4895–4909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazuva E, Zhang J, Tong Z, Si A, Na L (2018) The DPSIR model for environmental risk assessment of municipal solid waste in Dar es Salaam city, Tanzania. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(8):1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler LW, Wiek A, White DD, Sampson DA (2015) Linking stakeholder survey, scenario analysis, and simulation modeling to explore the long-term impacts of regional water governance regimes. Environ Sci Policy 48:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharanagh SG, Banihabib ME, Javadi S (2020) An MCDM-based social network analysis of water governance to determine actors' power in water-food-energy nexus. J Hydrol 581:124382

  • Kuzdas C, Wiek A, Warner B, Vignola R, Morataya R (2015) Integrated and participatory analysis of water governance regimes: The case of the Costa Rican dry tropics. World Dev 66:254–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marttunen M, Mustajoki J, Sojamo S, Ahopelto L, Keskinen M (2019) A Framework for Assessing Water Security and the Water–Energy–Food Nexus—The Case of Finland. Sustainability 11(10):2900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrane S, Acuto M, Artioli F, Chen P-Y, Comber R, Cottee J, Farr-Wharton G, Helfgott A, Larcom S, McCann JA, O’Reilly P, Salmoral G, Scott M, Todman LC, van Gevelt T, Yan X (2018) Scaling the nexus: Towards integrated frameworks for analysing water, energy and food. KnowledgeBase, University of Strathclyde, Geogr. J

    Google Scholar 

  • Megdal SB, Petersen-Perlman JD (2018) Decentralized Groundwater Governance and Water Nexus Implications in the United States. Jurimetrics 59:99–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehryar S, Sliuzas R, Sharifi A, van Maarseveen M (2016) The socio-ecological analytical framework of water scarcity in Rafsanjan Township. Int J Saf Secur Eng 6(4):764–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills M, Álvarez-Romero JG, Vance-Borland K, Cohen P, Pressey RL, Guerrero AM, Ernstson H (2014) Linking regional planning and local action: Towards using social network analysis in systematic conservation planning. Biol Conserv 169:6–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2017) An evolutionary perspective on water governance: from understanding to transformation. Water Resour Manag 31(10):2917–2932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paletto A, Balest J, Demeo I, Giacovelli G, Grilli G (2016) Power of forest stakeholders in the participatory decision making process: A case study in northern Italy. Acta Silvatica Et Lignaria Hungarica 12(1):9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villholth KG, Lopez-Gunn E, Conti K, Garrido A, Van Der Gun J (2017) Advances in groundwater governance: CRC Press

  • Weiss K, Hamann M, Kinney M, Marsh H (2012) Knowledge exchange and policy influence in a marine resource governance network. Glob Environ Change 22(1):178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Samaneh Ghafoori-Kharanagh, Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib, and Saman Javadi. Results and Analysis were checked by Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib, Saman Javadi, and Timothy O. Randhir. Ghafoori-Kharanagh wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Finally, all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib or Saman Javadi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

The authors undertake that this article has not been published in any other journal and that no plagiarism has occurred.

Consent to Participate

The authors agree to participate in the journal.

Consent for Publication

The authors agree to publish in the journal.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghafoori-Kharanagh, S., Banihabib, M.E., Javadi, S. et al. Participatory Water-Food-Energy Nexus Approach for Evaluation and Design of Groundwater Governance. Water Resour Manage 35, 3481–3495 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02894-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02894-4

Keywords

Navigation