Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing Impacts of Conservation Measures on Watershed Hydrology Using MIKE SHE Model in the Face of Climate Change

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change triggers changes in temperature, precipitation, evapotranspiration, etc. and has a significant impact on water resources in many regions. Considering the increasing scarcity of water as a result of climate change, conservation of water and groundwater recharge have become crucial factors for water resources planning and management. In this paper, an attempt is made to study the detailed hydrological behaviour of a treated watershed using physically based distributed hydrological modelling system MIKE SHE to assess the impact of conservation measures on watershed hydrology considering future climate change. Three hypothetical management scenarios are simulated for the period 2010–2040. RegCM4 regional climate model is used in the study for RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios. Detailed hydrological water balance is extracted for individual years from 1979 to 2009 to compare relevant components. The evaluation for base period shows 10.06% reduction in surface runoff and 11.33% enhancement in groundwater recharge. Further simulation with RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios show notable reduction in surface runoff and increase in groundwater recharge. The structures in the micro-watershed influence the surface runoff and increase infiltration into the soil, resulting in higher groundwater recharge. MIKE SHE simulations for various structures management scenarios establish the role of conservation measures in reducing surface runoff and enhancing groundwater recharge under substantial effect of climate change. The results will assist in decision-making on watershed development plans in quantitative terms, including planning for water conservation measures in the face of climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi NA, Xu X, Lucas-Borja ME, Dang W, Liu B (2019) The use of check dams in watershed management projects: examples from around the world. Sci Total Environ 676:683–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O’Connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986a) An introduction to the European hydrologic system-Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, SHE, 1: history and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system. J Hydrol 87:45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O’Connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986b) An introduction to the European hydrologic system-Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, SHE, 2: structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system. J Hydrol 87:61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Berríos NL, Soto-Bayó S, Holupchinski E, Fain SJ, Gould WA (2018) Correlating drought conservation practices and drought vulnerability in a tropical agricultural system. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 33(3):279–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, A. (2008). Temporal and spatial trends of reference evapotranspiration in agro-ecological regions of India. Ph.D. thesis, Agricultural & Food Engineering Department, IIT, Kharagpur

  • Benabdallah, S., Mairech, H., & Hummel, F. M. (2018). Assessing the impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge for the Chiba Basin in Tunisia. In Groundwater and Global Change in the Western Mediterranean Area (pp. 27–33). Springer, Cham

  • Benini L, Antonellini M, Laghi M, Mollema PN (2016) Assessment of water resources availability and groundwater salinization in future climate and land use change scenarios: a case study from a coastal drainage basin in Italy. Water Resour Manag 30(2):731–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Candela L, Tamoh K, Olivares G, Gómez M (2016) Climate and land use changes on Streamflow and subsurface recharge in the Fluvià Basin, Spain. Water 8(6):228

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Li C, Trettin C, Sun G, Amatya D, Li H (2010) Bi-criteria evaluation of the MIKE SHE model for a forested watershed on the South Carolina coastal plain. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(6):1033–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashora Y, Dillon P, Maheshwari B, Soni P, Dashora R, Davande S, Purohit C, Mittal HK (2018) A simple method using farmers’ measurements applied to estimate check dam recharge in Rajasthan, India. Sustainable Water Resources Management 4(2):301–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado JA, Li R (2016) The Nanchang communication about the potential for implementation of conservation practices for climate change mitigation and adaptation to achieve food security in the 21st century. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 4(2016):148–150

    Google Scholar 

  • DHI (2007a) MIKE SHE user manual. Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark, p 396

    Google Scholar 

  • DHI (2007b) MIKE 11: A modeling system for rivers and channels – reference manual. Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark, p 516

    Google Scholar 

  • Faurès JM, Steduto P, Hoogeveen J, Winpenny JT, Burke JJ (2012) Coping with water scarcity: an action framework for agriculture and food security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 100

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiseha BM, Setegn SG, Melesse AM, Volpi E, Fiori A (2014) Impact of climate change on the hydrology of upper Tiber river basin using bias corrected regional climate model. Water Resour Manag 28:1327–1343

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung F, Watts G, Lopez A, Orr HG, New M, Extence C (2013) Using large climate ensembles to plan for the hydrological impact of climate change in the freshwater environment. Water Resour Manag 27(4):1063–1084

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg KK, Karlberg L, Barron J, Wani SP, Rockstrom J (2011) Assessing impacts of agricultural water interventions in the Kothapally watershed, southern India. Hydrol Process 26(3):387–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Coppola E, Solmon F, Mariotti L, Sylla MB, Bil X, Elguindi N, Diro GT, Nair V, Giuliani G, Turuncoglu UU, Cozzini S, Güttler I, O’Brien TA, Tawfik AB, Shalaby A, Zakey AS, Steiner AL, Stordal F, Sloan LC, Brankovic C (2012) RegCM4: model description and preliminary tests over multiple CORDEX domains. Clim Res 52:7–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling SN, Arnell NW (2016) A global assessment of the impact of climate change on water scarcity. Clim Chang 134(3):371–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowrisankar G, Jagadeshan G, Elango L (2017) Managed aquifer recharge by a check dam to improve the quality of fluoride-rich groundwater: a case study from southern India. Environ Monit Assess 189(4):200

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, M. K., Singh, V. and Eslamian, S. (2016). Impact of climate change on drinking water. In Eslamian, S. (Ed.) Urban water reuse handbook, CRC press

  • Graham DN, Butts MB (2005) Flexible, integrated watershed modelling with MIKE SHE. In: Singh VP, Frevert DK (eds) Watershed models, CRC press. ISBN, vol 0849336090, pp 245–272

  • Guyassa E, Frankl A, Zenebe A, Poesen J, Nyssen J (2017) Effects of check dams on runoff characteristics along gully reaches, the case of northern Ethiopia. J Hydrol 545:299–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddeland I, Heinke J, Biemans H, Eisner S, Flörke M, Hanasaki N, Konzmann M, Ludwig F, Masaki Y, Schewe J, Stacke T, Tessler ZD, Wada Y, Wisser D (2014) Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(9):3251–3256

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijioka, Y., Lin, E., Pereira, J. J., Corlett, R. T., Cui, X., Insarov, G. E., Lasco, R. D., Lindgren, E. and Surjan, A. (2014). Asia. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Barros, V.R., C.B. Field, D.J. Dokken, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1327–1370

  • House AR, Thompson JR, Sorensen JPR, Roberts C, Acreman MC (2016) Modelling groundwater/surface water interaction in a managed riparian chalk valley wetland. Hydrol Process 30:447–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Hinokidani O, Yasuda H, Ojha CS, Kajikawa Y, Li S (2012) Effects of the check dam system on water redistribution in the Chinese loess plateau. J Hydrol Eng 18(8):929–940

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, p 151

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangalawe RY (2017) Climate change impacts on water resource management and community livelihoods in the southern highlands of Tanzania. Clim Dev 9(3):191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG (1975) Rank Correlation Methods, 4th edition, Charles Griffin, London

  • Klemes V (1986) Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrol Sci J 31(1):13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Kpadonou RAB, Owiyo T, Barbier B, Denton F, Rutabingwa F, Kiema A (2017) Advancing climate-smart-agriculture in developing drylands: joint analysis of the adoption of multiple on-farm soil and water conservation technologies in west African Sahel. Land Use Policy 61:196–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen KJ, Jensen SE (1975) A model for estimating actual evapotranspiration from potential transpiration. Nord Hydrol 6:170–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Krois, J. and Schulte, A. (2013). Modeling the hydrological response of soil and water conservation measures in the ronquillo watershed in the northern Andes of Peru. Proceedings: 6th ICWRER Conference, At Koblenz, Germany, Volume: Water and Environmental Dynamics, 147-184

  • Kundu, S., Khare, D. and Mondal, A. (2016). Interrelationship of rainfall, temperature and reference evapotranspiration trends and their net response to the climate change in Central India. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 1-22

  • Lodha P, Gosain A (2008) Impact of watershed management on livelihoods: quantification and assessment. Land Use and Water Resources Research 8:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Loo YY, Billa L, Singh A (2015) Effect of climate change on seasonal monsoon in Asia and its impact on the variability of monsoon rainfall in Southeast Asia. Geosci Front 6(6):817–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig F, van Slobbe E, Cofino W (2014) Climate change adaptation and integrated water resource management in the water sector. J Hydrol 518:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econom: J Econ Soc 245-259

    Google Scholar 

  • Melaku ND, Renschler CS, Holzmann H, Strohmeier S, Bayu W, Zucca C, Klik A (2018a) Prediction of soil and water conservation structure impacts on runoff and erosion processes using SWAT model in the northern Ethiopian highlands. J Soils Sediments 18(4):1743–1755

    Google Scholar 

  • Melaku ND, Renschler CS, Flagler J, Bayu W, Klik A (2018b) Integrated impact assessment of soil and water conservation structures on runoff and sediment yield through measurements and modeling in the northern Ethiopian highlands. Catena 169:140–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Mernild SH, Hasholt B, Liston GE (2008) Climatic control on river discharge simulations, Zackenberg River drainage basin, Northeast Greenland. Hydrol Process 22:1932–1948

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A, Froebrich J, Gassman PW (2007) Evaluation of the swat model for assessing sediment control structures in a small watershed in India. Trans ASABE 50(2):469–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra AK, Pachouri A, Kaur A (2015) Watershed management structures and decision making frameworks. Water Resour Manag 29(13):4849–4861

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostaghimi S, Park SW, Cooke RA, Wang SY (1997) Assessment of management alternatives on a small agricultural watershed. Water Res 31(8):1867–1878

    Google Scholar 

  • Mujumdar PP (2013) Climate change: a growing challenge for water management in developing countries. Water Resour Manag 27(4):953–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagdeve, M. (2004). Hydrological water balance modelling of a treated watershed. Ph.D. thesis, Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, IIT, Kharagpur, India

  • Narjary B, Kumar S, Kamra SK, Bundela DS, Sharma DK (2014) Impact of rainfall variability on groundwater resources and opportunities of artificial recharge structure to reduce its exploitation in fresh groundwater zones of Haryana. Curr Sci 107(8):1305–1312

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part 1. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman LM, Niraula R (2016) Model analysis of check dam impacts on long-term sediment and water budgets in Southeast Arizona, USA. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 16(3):125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Panigrahy, N. (2002). Hydrological modelling of a small watershed. Ph.D. thesis, Agricultural & Food Engineering Department, IIT, Kharagpur

  • Parimalarenganayaki S, Elango L (2014) Assessment of effect of recharge from a check dam as a method of managed aquifer recharge by hydrogeological investigations. Environ Earth Sci 73:5349–5361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3790-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polyakov VO, Nichols MH, McClaran MP, Nearing MA (2014) Effect of check dams on runoff, sediment yield, and retention on small semiarid watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 69(5):414–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravazzani G, Barbero S, Salandin A, Senatore A, Mancini M (2015) An integrated hydrological model for assessing climate change impacts on water resources of the upper Po River basin. Water Resour Manag 29(4):1193–1215

    Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard, J. C. and Storm, B. (1995). MIKE SHE in: V. P. Singh (Ed.) Computers Models in Watershed Hydrology, water resources publications, Colorado, USA, pp 809-846

  • Renganayaki SP, Elango L (2013) A review on managed aquifer recharge by check dams: a case study near Chennai, India. International Journal of Research Engineering Technology 2(4):416–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Rujner H, Leonhardt G, Marsalek J, Viklander M (2018) High-resolution modelling of the grass swale response to runoff inflows with Mike SHE. J Hydrol 562:411–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Safaei M, Mahan A (2018) Impact of mechanical and biological watershed treatments on surface runoff. Open Journal of Geology 8(09):896–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Satheeshkumar S, Venkateswaran S (2018) Predilection of sustainable recharge structures using morphometric parameters and decision making model in the Vaniyar sub basin, South India. Appl Water Sci 8(7):213

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63(324):1379-1389

  • Sharda VN, Kurothe RS, Sena DR, Pande VC, Tiwari SP (2006) Estimation of groundwater recharge from water storage structures in a semi-arid climate of India. J Hydrol 329(1–2):224–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma PJ, Loliyana VD, Resmi SR, Timbadiya PV, Patel PL (2018) Spatiotemporal trends in extreme rainfall and temperature indices over upper Tapi Basin, India. Theor Appl Climatol 134(3–4):1329–1354

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Zhou Y, Fan X, Shao W (2013) A study on the annual runoff change and its relationship with water and soil conservation practices and climate change in the middle Yellow River basin. Catena 100:31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi P, Zhang Y, Ren Z, Yu Y, Li P, Gong J (2019) Land-use changes and check dams reducing runoff and sediment yield on the loess plateau of China. Sci Total Environ 664:984–994

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha NK, Du X, Wang J (2017) Assessing climate change impacts on fresh water resources of the Athabasca River basin, Canada. Sci Total Environ 601:425–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Sietz D, Van Dijk H (2015) Land-based adaptation to global change: what drives soil and water conservation in western Africa? Glob Environ Chang 33:131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Sishodia RP, Shukla S, Wani SP, Graham WD, Jones JW (2018) Future irrigation expansion outweigh groundwater recharge gains from climate change in semi-arid India. Sci Total Environ 635:725–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan D, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Adgo E, Tsubo M, Meshesha DT, Masunaga T, Aklog D, Fenta AA, Ebabu K (2018) Impact of soil and water conservation interventions on watershed runoff response in a tropical humid highland of Ethiopia. Environ Manag 61(5):860–874

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultana Z, Coulibaly P (2011) Distributed modelling of future changes in hydrological processes of Spencer Creek watershed. Hydrol Process 25:1254–1270

    Google Scholar 

  • The ASCE Task Committee on Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models (1993) Definition of criteria for evaluation of watershed models. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE 119(3):429–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuppad P, Santhi C, Wang X, Williams JR, Srinivasan R, Gowda PH (2010) Simulation of conservation practices using the APEX model. Appl Eng Agric 26(5):779–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste T, Tavakoli M, Ntegeka V, Willems P, De Smedt F, Batelaan O (2013) Climate change impact on river flows and catchment hydrology: a comparison of two spatially distributed models. Hydrol Process 27(25):3649–3662

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Hoffman DW, Wolfe JE, Williams JR, Fox WE (2009) Modeling the effectiveness of conservation practices at shoal creek watershed, Texas, using APEX. Trans ASABE 52(4):1181–1192

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolka K, Mulder J, Biazin B (2018) Effects of soil and water conservation techniques on crop yield, runoff and soil loss in sub-Saharan Africa: A review. Agric Water Manag 207:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Xevi E, Christiaens K, Espino A, Sewnandan W, Mallants D, Sørensen H, Feyen J (1997) Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of the MIKE SHE model using the Neuenkirchen catchment as case study. Water Resour Manag 11(3):219–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Fu B, He C (2013) Assessing the hydrological effect of the check dams in the loess plateau, China, by model simulations. Hydrological Earth Systems Science 17(6):2185–2193

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan S, Li Z, Li P, Xu G, Gao H, Xiao L, Wang F, Wang T (2019) Influence of check dams on flood and Erosion dynamic processes of a small watershed in the loss plateau. Water 11(4):834

    Google Scholar 

  • Zema DA, Bombino G, Denisi P, Lucas-Borja ME, Zimbone SM (2018) Evaluating the effects of check dams on channel geometry, bed sediment size and riparian vegetation in Mediterranean mountain torrents. Sci Total Environ 642:327–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Podlasly C, Ren Y, Feger KH, Wang Y, Schwärzel K (2014) Separating the effects of changes in land management and climatic conditions on long-term streamflow trends analyzed for a small catchment in the loess plateau region, NW China. Hydrol Process 28(3):1284–1293

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gajanan Ramteke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramteke, G., Singh, R. & Chatterjee, C. Assessing Impacts of Conservation Measures on Watershed Hydrology Using MIKE SHE Model in the Face of Climate Change. Water Resour Manage 34, 4233–4252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02669-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02669-3

Keywords

Navigation