Skip to main content
Log in

Time-Varying Discrete Hedging Rules for Drought Contingency Plan Considering Long-Range Dependency in Streamflow

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposed a simple and efficient method for developing time-varying discrete hedging rules. The novelty of the proposed methodology is that long-range streamflow traces are inserted into the sequent peak processes in order to reflect long-lasting drought events, which is rarely considered, during the development of the hedging rules. The developed rules were evaluated with three performance indices (risk, resiliency, and vulnerability) across a wide range of synthetic streamflow scenarios that represent changes in the annual mean streamflow and the long-range streamflow dependency. Boryung Dam, located in South Korea, was used as a case study. As a result, the developed hedging rules reflecting long-range streamflow traces led to enhanced reservoir operation performance results in terms of resiliency and vulnerability indices. The developed hedging rules outperformed the reference hedging rules, especially under dry conditions. When there was a strong long-range dependency in streamflow, the superiority of the developed hedging rules was found to be remarkable. Since the proposed methodology is relatively simple, it will be easy for dam operators to understand and implement discrete hedging rules at different sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayazit M, Ünal NE (1990) Effects of hedging on reservoir performance. Water Resour Res 26(4):713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efstratiadis A, Dialynas YG, Kozanis S, Koutsoyiannis D (2014) A multivariate stochastic model for the generation of synthetic time series at multiple time scales reproducing long-term persistence. Environ Model Softw 62:139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eum HI, Kim Y-O, Palmer RN (2010) Optimal drought management using sampling stochastic dynamic programming with a hedging rule. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(1):113–122

  • Fraedrich K, Larnder C (1993) Scaling regimes of composite rainfall time series. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography 45(4):289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves T, Gramacy R, Watkins N, Franzke C (2017) A brief history of long memory: Hurst, Mandelbrot and the road to ARFIMA, 1951-1980. Entropy 19(9):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19090437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i001p00014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim RR Jr (2002) A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83(8):1149–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking JRM (1984) Modeling persistence in hydrological time series using fractional differencing. Water Resour Res 20(12):1898–1908. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i012p01898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houck MH, Cohon JL, ReVelle CS (1980) Linear decision rule in reservoir design and management: 6. Incorporation of economic efficiency benefits and hydroelectric energy generation. Water Resour Res 16(1):196–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang WC, Chou CC (2005) Drought early warning system in reservoir operation: theory and practice. Water Resour Res 41(11):W11406. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003830

  • Hurst HE (1951) Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 116:770–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Iliopoulou T, Papalexiou SM, Markonis Y, Koutsoyiannis D (2018) Revisiting long-range dependence in annual precipitation. J Hydrol 556:891–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Imen S, Nazif S (2012) Development of a demand driven hydro-climatic model for drought planning. Water Resour Manag 26(2):329–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9920-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemeš V (1977) Value of information in reservoir optimization. Water Resour Res 13(5):837–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis D (2003) Climate change, the Hurst phenomenon, and hydrological statistics. Hydrol Sci J 48(1):3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis D (2011) Hurst-Kolmogorov dynamics and uncertainty. J Am Water Resour Assoc 47(3):481–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00543.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund JR (1996) Developing seasonal and long-term reservoir system operation plans using HEC-PRM (No. HEC-RD-40). Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelakantan TR, Pundarikanthan NV (1999) Hedging rule optimisation for water supply reservoirs system. Water Resour Manag 13(6):409–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neelakantan TR, Pundarikanthan NV (2000) Neural network-based simulation-optimization model for reservoir operation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 126(2):57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell PE, Koutsoyiannis D, Lins HF, Markonis Y, Montanari A, Cohn T (2016) The scientific legacy of Harold Edwin Hurst (1880–1978). Hydrol Sci J 61(9):1571–1590. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1125998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier JD (1998) The power spectral density of atmospheric temperature from time scales of 10− 2 to 106 yr. Earth Planet Sci Lett 158(3–4):157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier JD, Turcotte DL (1997) Long-range persistence in climatological and hydrological time series: analysis, modeling and application to drought hazard assessment. J Hydrol 203(1–4):198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter KW (1978) Sequent peak procedure: minimum reservoir capacity subject to constraint on final storage. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 14(4):991–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1978.tb05595.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval-Solis S, McKinney DC, Loucks DP (2010) Sustainability index for water resources planning and management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(5):381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo SB, Mahinthakumar G, Sankarasubramanian A, Kumar M (2018a) Conjunctive management of surface water and groundwater resources under drought conditions using a fully coupled hydrological model. J Water Resour Plan Manag 144(9):04018060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo SB, Mahinthakumar G, Sankarasubramanian A, Kumar M (2018b) Assessing the restoration time of surface water and groundwater systems under groundwater pumping. Stoch Env Res Risk A 32(9):2741–2759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd A (1998) Drought contingency planning: evaluating the effectiveness of plans. J Water Resour Plan Manag 124(5):246–251. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1998)124:5(246)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT (2003) Water release policy effects on the shortage characteristics for the Shihmen reservoir system during droughts. Water Resour Manag 17(6):463–480. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WARM.0000004958.93250.8a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih JS, ReVelle C (1995) Water supply operations during drought: a discrete hedging rule. Eur J Oper Res 82(1):163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan K, Philipose MC (1998) Effect of hedging on over-year reservoir performance. Water Resour Manag 12(2):95–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson DB, Pavan V, Bojariu R (2000) Is the North Atlantic oscillation a random walk? Int J Climatol 20(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas HA Jr, Burden RP (1963) Operations research in water quality management. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu MY, Hsu NS, Yeh WWG (2003) Optimization of reservoir management and operation with hedging rules. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129(2):86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by a grant (NRF-2017R1A6A3A11031800) obtained through the Young Researchers program funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea. This work also has been supported by a grant (18AWMP-B083066-05) through the Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute funded by the Ministry of Environment. The authors thank the support of the Institute of Engineering Research, Seoul National University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Beom Seo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 750 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seo, S.B., Kim, YO. & Kang, SU. Time-Varying Discrete Hedging Rules for Drought Contingency Plan Considering Long-Range Dependency in Streamflow. Water Resour Manage 33, 2791–2807 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02244-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02244-5

Keywords

Navigation