Abstract
The overuse of human demand for water threatens the capacity of rivers or watersheds to retain their ecosystem services. Environmental water requirement (EWR) needs to be taken explicitly into account when assessing the impact from freshwater use on freshwater resources. Thus, we propose two perspectives for incorporating EWR into the Demand to availability (DTA) ratio of the water stress index (WSI); including it as a separate demand along with anthropogenic demands (Index 1) or reserving it from the available water (Index 2). It is expected that the more demand increases, the more pressure is put on the lowest priority sector. Index 2, by definition, gives the first priority to EWR whereas this is not so for Index 1. Thus Index 2 provides a more conservative approach in terms of the environmental protection and Index 1 allows a more flexible prioritization approach. Both these indices, however, allow flexibility of changing the EWR based on specific circumstances and context, thus making the evaluation more appropriate for water resource planning at both policy and implementation levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amarasinghe UA, Sharma BR, Aloysius N, Scott C, Smakhtin V, de Fraiture C (2005) Spatial variation in water supply and demand across river basins of India. IWMI research report, 83. IWMI
Arthington A, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ (2006) The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16(4):1311–1318
Börkey P, Cassar A, Meadors L, Saade L, Siebentritt M, Stein R, Tognetti S, Tortajada C (2005) Chapter 7 freshwater ecosystem services. In: Chopra K, Leemans R, Kumar P, Simons H (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: policy responses, volume 3 The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series
Boulay A-M (2012) WATER footprinting: where are we now? WATER in LCA: which assessment techniques are emerging or ready? Including lots of challenging aspects. 50th LCA discussion forum, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Boulay A-M, Bare J, Benini L, Berger M, Klemmayer I, Lathuilliere M, Loubet P, Manzardo A, Margni M, Nunez M, Ridoutt B, Worbe S, Pfister S (2014) Building consensus on a generic water scarcity indicator for LCA-based water footprint: preliminary results from WULCA. 9th international conference LCA of food San Francisco, USA, October, 8-10
Boulay A-M, Bare J, Benini L, Berger M, Lathuilliere M, Manzardo A, Margni M, Motoshita M, Nunez M, Pastor AV, Ridoutt B, Oki T, Worbe S, Pfister S (2017) The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprint: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8
Chebaane M, Salas JD, Boes DC (1993) Modeling of monthly intermittent streamflow processes. DIANE Publishing Company
Penning de Vries FWT, Acquay H, Molden D, Scherr SJ, Valentin C, Cofie O (2003) Integrated land and water management for food and environmental security. Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Research Report 1. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Comprehensive Assessment Secretariat
Fingerman KR, Berndes G, Orr S, Richter BD, Vugteveen P (2011) Impact assessment at the bioenergy-water nexus. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 5(4):375–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.294
Frischknecht R, Steiner R, Arthur B, Norbert E, Gabi H (2006) Swiss Ecological Scarcity Method: The New Version 2006. ESU-Services, Switzerland. http://www.esuservices.ch/fileadmin/download/Frischknecht-2006-EcologicalScarcity-Paper.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2014
Gheewala SH, Silalertusksa T, Nilsalab P, Mungkung R, Perret SR, Chaiyawannakarn N (2013) Implications of the biofuels policy mandate in Thailand on water: the case of bioethanol. Bioresour Technol 150:457–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.052
Gheewala SH, Silalertusksa T, Nilsalab P, Mungkung R, Perret SR, Chaiyawannakarn N (2014) Water footprint and impact of water consumption for food, feed, fuel crops production in Thailand. Water 6(6):1698–1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6061698
Gonzalez FJ, Basson T, Schultz B (2005) Final report of IPOE for review of studies on water Escapages below Kotri barrage. Delft, the Netherlands http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/www.pakistan.gov.pk/ContentPages/19050336.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2016
Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM, Chapagain AK, Mathews RE, Richter BD (2012) Global monthly water scarcity: blue water footprint versus blue water availability. PLoS One 7(2):e32688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032688
Iglesias A, Garrote L, Flores F, Moneo M (2007) Challenges to manage the risk of water scarcity and climate change in the Mediterranean. Water Resour Manag 21(5):227–288
ISO (2014) ISO 14046:2014-Environmental management -Water footprint-Principles, requirements and guidelines
King J, Brown C, Sabet H (2003) A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Res Appl 19(5-6):619–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.709
Nilsalab P, Gheewala SH, Silalertruksa T (2017) Methodology development for including environmental water requirement in the water stress index considering the case of Thailand. J Clean Prod 167:1002–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.130
Pastor AV, Ludwig F, Biemans H, Hoff H, Kabat P (2014) Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18(12):5041–5059. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5041-2014
Pfister S, Bayer P (2013) Monthly water stress: spatially and temporally explicit consumptive water footprint of global crop production. J Clean Prod 73:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.031
Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43(11):4098–4104. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802423e
Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O’Keeffe O, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A (2009) The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshw Biol 55(1):147–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x
Popan A (2011) Impact of sea water intrusion on soil salinity and land used in bang Pakong River basin, Chachoengsao Province. Dissertation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang. Doi:https://doi.org/10.14457/KMITL.res.2011.67
Richter BD, Davis MM, Apse C, Konrad C (2012) A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection. River Res Appl 28(8):1312–1321. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1511
RID (2014) Annual Report 2014. Royal Irrigation Department. http://www.rid.go.th/2009/_data/docs/AnnualRID57.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015
RID (2015) RID response plan for tidal bore to prevent seawater intrusion and maintain raw water quality for tap water. Royal Irrigation Department. http://water.rid.go.th/news/news_58_032.htm. Accessed 13 May 2015
Scherer L, Pfister S (2016) Dealing with uncertainty in water scarcity footprints. Environ Res Lett 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054008
Smakhtin V, Revenga C, Döll P (2004) Taking into account environmental water requirements in global-scale water resources assessments. Comprehensive assessment research report 2. Colombo, Sri Lanka: comprehensive assessment secretariat
Speed R, Li Y, Le Quesne T, Pegram G, Zhiwei Z (2013) Basin water allocation planning. Principles, procedures and approaches for basin allocation planning, UNESCO, Paris
Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19(5-6):397–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.736
Wei Y, Miao H, Ouyang Z (2008) Environmental water requirements and sustainable water resource management in the Haihe River basin of North China. Int J Sust Dev World 15(2):113–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500809469776
Acknowledgements
Financial support by the Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE) and the Thailand Research Fund under the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. program (Grant PHD/0028/2555) is gratefully acknowledged. This research has been carried out under the project “Research Network for LCA and Policy on Food, Fuel and Climate Change” supported by the National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 345 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsalab, P., Gheewala, S.H. & Pfister, S. Method Development for Including Environmental Water Requirement in the Water Stress Index. Water Resour Manage 32, 1585–1598 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1892-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1892-2