Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Causal Reasoning for the Analysis of Rivers Runoff Temporal Behavior

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accurate knowledge about the influence of time in the behavior of rivers systems is crucial for a proper river basin water management. Traditional techniques such as correlograms or ARMA models have been widespread used over the last decades providing the analyzer with an average behaviour of temporal influence of hydrological series. In the last decade, the development of techniques, under the discipline of artificial intelligent, have increased the range of available analytical tools. On the other hand, hydrological processes have a very strong random nature and they are driven by its high uncertainty and variability. Consequently, it is necessary to build tools, able to incorporate these peculiarities in their analytical functioning. Causal Reasoning through Bayesian Networks (BNs) allows processing and analysing hydrological series, incorporating and assessing all their variability. Causality driven by Bayes´ theorem is used here to dynamically identify, characterize and quantify the influence of time (dependence) for each time step in annual run-off series in five Spanish River basins. Therefore, BNs arise as a powerful tool for getting a deeper understanding on the knowledge of temporal behaviour of hydrological series because this analysis is dynamic and implemented specifically for temporal iterations (decision variables). Implications and applications of this research are largely aimed to improve and optimize the design and dimensioning of hydraulic infrastructures, as well as reducing the risk of negative impacts produced by extreme events such as several droughts or floods, among others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akintug B, Rasmussen PF (2005) A Markov switching model for annual hydrologic time series. Water Resour Res 41:W09424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000a) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts. J Hydrol Eng 5:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000b) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. Ii: hydrologic applications. J Hydrol Eng 5:124–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain J (2001) Planning improvements in natural resources management. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona G, Varela-Ortega C, Bromley J (2013) Supporting decision making under uncertainty: development of a participatory integrated model for water management in the middle Guadiana river basin. Environ Model Softw 50:144–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelletti A, Soncini-Sessa R (2007) Bayesian networks and participatory modelling in water resource management. Environ Model Softw 22:1075–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang FJ, Chang YT (2006) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of water level in reservoir. Adv Water Resour 29:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consorcio de Compensación de Seguros (2017) La cobertura de los riesgos extraordinarios en España. Depósito Legal: M-38845-2015

  • Croitoru A, Minea I (2015) The impact of climate changes on rivers discharge in eastern Romania. Theor Appl Climatol 120:563–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daliakopoulos IN, Coulibaly P, Tsanis IK (2005) Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 309:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz Caballero FF (2011) Selección de modelos mediante criterios de información en análisis factorial: aspectos teóricos y computacionales. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Granada, Granada

  • Genc O, Dag A (2016) A machine learning-based approach to predict the velocity profiles in small streams. Water Resour Manag 30:43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst HE (1951) Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. T Am Soc Civ Eng 116:770–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias A, Garrote L, Flores F, Moneo M (2007) Challenges to manage the risk of water scarcity and climate change in the Mediterranean. Water Resour Manag 21:775–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilich N, Despotovic J (2008) A simple method for effective multi-site generation of stochastic hydrologic time series. Stoch Env Res Risk A 22:265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain A, Kumar AM (2007) Hybrid neural network models for hydrologic time series forecasting. Appl Soft Comput 7:585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayakrishnan R, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Arnold JG (2005) Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management. Hydrol Process 19:749–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen FV (2001) Bayesian network and decision graphs. Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karthikeyan L, Kumar DN (2013) Predictability of nonstationary time series using wavelet and EMD based ARMA models. J Hydrol 502:103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall DR, Dracup JA (1991) A comparison of index-sequential and Ar(1) generated hydrologic sequences. J Hydrol 122:335–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutroumanidis T, Sylaios G, Zafeiriou E, Tsihrintzis VA (2009) Genetic modeling for the optimal forecasting of hydrologic time-series: application in Nestos River. J Hydrol 368:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar DN, Raju KS, Sathish T (2004) River flow forecasting using recurrent neural networks. Water Resour Manag 18:143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall U, Sharma A (1996) A nearest neighbor bootstrap for resampling hydrologic time series. Water Resour Res 32:679–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAGRAMA (2015) http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/agua/temas/seguridad-de-presas-y-embalses/desarrollo/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015

  • Molina JL, Bromley J, Garcia-Arostegui JL, Sullivan C, Benavente J (2010) Integrated water resources management of overexploited hydrogeological systems using object-oriented Bayesian networks. Environ Model Softw 25:383–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina JL, Pulido-Velazquez D, Luis Garcia-Arostegui J, Pulido-Velazquez M (2013) Dynamic Bayesian networks as a decision support tool for assessing climate change impacts on highly stressed groundwater systems. J Hydrol 479:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal MS, Chowdhury JU (2013) Generation of 10-day flow of the Brahmaputra River using a time series model. Hydrol Res 44:1071–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi SJ, Ponnambalam K, Karray F (2007) Inferring operating rules for reservoir operations using fuzzy regression and ANFIS. Fuzzy Sets Syst 158:1064–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mun J (2010) Modeling risk (second edition): applying monte carlo simulation, real options analysis, forecasting, and optimization. Wiley Risk Simulator 10.00, 2014. http://www.realoptionsvaluation.com/

  • Myung IJ (2000) The importance of complexity in model selection. J Math Psychol 44:190–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nodelman U, Horvitz E, (2003) Continuous time bayesian networks for inferring users’ presence and activities with extensions for modeling and evaluation. Microsoft Research

  • Nourani V, Kisi O, Komasi M (2011) Two hybrid artificial intelligence approaches for modeling rainfall-runoff process. J Hydrol 402:41–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel SS, Ramachandran P (2015) A comparison of machine learning techniques for modeling river flow time series: the case of upper Cauvery river basin. Water Resour Manag 29:589–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Pena JM, Lozano JA, Larranaga P (2004) Unsupervised learning of Bayesian networks via estimation of distribution algorithms: an application to gene expression data clustering. Int J Uncertainty Fuzziness 12:63–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulido-Velazquez D, Luis Garcia-Arostegui J, Molina J, Pulido-Velazquez M (2015) Assessment of future groundwater recharge in semi-arid regions under climate change scenarios (Serral-Salinas aquifer, SE Spain). Could increased rainfall variability increase the recharge rate? Hydrol Process 29:828–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan B, Salas JD, Lall U (2010) Stochastic methods for modeling precipitation and streamflow. In: Berndtsson R, Sivakumar B (eds) Advances in data-based approaches for hydrologic modeling and forecasting. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 17–52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Said A (2006) The implementation of a Bayesian network for watershed management decisions. Water Resour Manag 20:591–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas JD (1993) Analysis and modeling of hydrologic time series. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. The McGraw Hill, New York, pp 1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas J, Delleur J, Yevjevich V (1980) Applied modeling of hydrologic time series. Water Resources Publications, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang Y, Wang Z, Liu C (2015) Wavelet neural modeling for hydrologic time series forecasting with uncertainty evaluation. Water Resour Manag 29:1789–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Tarboton DG, Lall U (1997) Streamflow simulation: a nonparametric approach. Water Resour Res 33:291–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastav RK, Srinivasan K, Sudheer KP (2011) Simulation-optimization framework for multi-season hybrid stochastic models. J Hydrol 404:209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojkovic M, Prohaska S, Plavsic J (2015) Stochastic structure of annual discharges of large European rivers. J Hydrol Hydromech 63:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valipour M, Banihabib ME, Behbahani SMR (2013) Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir. J Hydrol 476:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varis O, Fraboulet-Jussila S (2002) Water resources development in the lower Senegal River basin: conflicting interests, environmental concerns and policy options. Int J Water Resour Dev 18:245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Traore S, Kerh T, Leu J (2011) Modelling reference evapotranspiration using feed forward backpropagation algorithm in arid regions of Africa. Irrig Drain 60:404–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Chen X (2015) Auto regressive and ensemble empirical mode decomposition hybrid model for annual runoff forecasting. Water Resour Manag 29:2913–2926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zounemat-Kermani M, Teshnehlab M (2008) Using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for hydrological time series prediction. Appl Soft Comput 8:928–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. High Polytechnic School of Engineering, Ávila. Area of Hydraulic Engineering, Salamanca University, Av. de los Hornos Caleros, 50, 05003, Ávila, Spain

    José-Luis Molina & Santiago Zazo

Authors
  1. José-Luis Molina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Santiago Zazo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José-Luis Molina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Molina, JL., Zazo, S. Causal Reasoning for the Analysis of Rivers Runoff Temporal Behavior. Water Resour Manage 31, 4669–4681 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1772-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1772-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation