Abstract
Evaluating the productivity growth of water and sewerage companies (WaSCs) is useful to ensure their long-term sustainability and to protect the interests of customers. Previous studies that assessed the WaSCs’s productivity provided an aggregate productivity index without accounting for the specific contribution of the variables involved in the analysis. To overcome this limitation, and as a pioneering approach, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the effects that inputs and outputs have on WaSCs´ overall productivity change. In doing so, a methodological approach based on the weighted directional distance model was applied. An empirical application was carried out for the Chilean water industry from 2005 to 2014. Results evidenced that inputs, desirable outputs and undesirable outputs contributed negatively to productivity regression. The negative change of the efficiency change was caused mainly by the regression of the non-revenue water. From a policy and managerial perspective, this study reveals the importance of quantifying the contribution of inputs and outputs in productivity growth in order to support decision-making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
According to “Cooper’s rule” the number of units to be evaluated must be larger than or equal to max{m ∙ s; 3(m + s) } where m is the number of inputs and s is the number of outputs (desirable and undesirable) involved in the DEA study (Cooper et al. 2007).
References
Ananda J (2014) Evaluating the performance of urban water utilities: robust nonparametric approach. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(9):04014021
Ananda J, Hampf B (2015) Measuring environmentally sensitive productivity growth: an application to the urban water sector. Ecol Econ 116:211–219
Barros CP, Managi S, Matousek R (2012) The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output. Omega 40(1):1–8
Bottasso A, Conti M (2009) Price cap regulation and the ratchet effect: a generalized index approach. J Prod Anal 32(3):191–201
Boussemart J-P, Briec W, Kerstens K, Poutineau J-C (2013) Luenberger and Malmquist productivity indices: theoretical comparisons and empirical illustration. Bull Econ Res 55(4):391–405
Carvalho P, Marques RC (2016) Computing economies of scope using robust partial frontier nonparametric methods. Water (Switzerland) 8(3):82
Chambers RG, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1996) Productivity growth in APEC countries. Pac Econ Rev 1(3):181–190
Chen PC, Yu M, Managi S, Chang C (2011) Non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable outputs. In: Working Paper, 2010. Tohoku University, Japan
Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51(3):229–240
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2007) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Springer, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science
De Witte K, Marques RC (2010) Designing performance incentives, an international benchmark study in the water sector. CEJOR 18(2):189–220
Ferreira DC, Marques RC (2016) Malmquist and Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indexes for clusters performance evaluation. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 15(5):1015–1053
Ferro G, Mercadier AC (2016) Technical efficiency in Chile's water and sanitation providers. Util Policy 43:97–106
Fujii H, Managi S, Matousek R (2014) Indian bank efficiency and productivity changes with undesirable outputs: a disaggregated approach. Journal of Banking and Finance 38(1):41–50
Fujii H, Cao J, Managi S (2015) Decomposition of productivity considering multi-environmental pollutants in Chinese industrial sector. Rev Dev Econ 19(1):75–84
Guerrini A, Romano G, Campedelli B (2013) Economies of scale, scope, and density in the Italian water sector: a two-stage data envelopment analysis approach. Water Resour Manag 27(13):4559–4578
Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R, Del Saz-Salazar S (2012) Tariffs and efficient performance by water suppliers: an empirical approach. Water Policy 14(5):854–864
IWA (2015). Reduction of non-revenue water around the world. Available at: http://www.iwa-network.org/reduction-of-non-revenue-water-around-the-world/ (Accessed on 11st May 2017)
Kumar S, Managi S (2010) Service quality and performance measurement: evidence from the Indian water sector. International Journal of Water Resources Development 26(2):173–191
Marques RC, Simoes P, Pires JS, Almeida J, Neves T (2010) Regulation of water and sewerage services. IWA Publishing, London, An International Comparison
Maziotis A, Saal DS, Thanassoulis E, Molinos-Senante M (2016) Price-cap regulation in the English and Welsh water industry: a proposal for measuring productivity performance. Util Policy 41:22–30
Mbuvi D, De Witte K, Perelman S (2012) Urban water sector performance in Africa: a step-wise bias-corrected efficiency and effectiveness analysis. Util Policy 22:31–40
Mellah T, Ben Amor T (2016) Performance of the Tunisian water utility: an input-distance function approach. Util Policy 38:18–32
Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R (2015) The impact of privatization approaches on the productivity growth of the water industry: a case study of Chile. Environ Sci Policy 50:166–179
Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R, Lafuente M (2015) The role of environmental variables on the efficiency of water and sewerage companies: a case study of Chile. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(13):10242–10253
Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R, Hernandez-Sancho F (2016) Development and application of the Hicks-Moorsteen productivity index for the total factor productivity assessment of wastewater treatment plants. J Clean Prod 112:3116–3123
Portela MCAS, Thanassoulis E, Horncastle A, Maugg T (2011) Productivity change in the water industry in wngland and wales: application of the meta-malmquist index. J Oper Res Soc 62(12):2173–2188
Saal DS, Parker D (2005) Assessing the performance of water operations in the English and Welsh water industry: a panel input distance function approach. Birmingham, Aston Business School
Saal DS, Parker D, Weyman-Jones T (2007) Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985-2000. J Prod Anal 28(1–2):127–139
SISS (2014). Annual report about water and sanitation sector in Chile. (In Spanish). Available at: shttp://www.siss.cl/577/w3-propertyvalue-3443.html (Accessed on 29th January 2017)
SISS (2015). Annual report about water and sanitation sector in Chile. (In Spanish). Available at: http://www.Siss.cl/577/w3-article-16141.html (Accessed on 29th January 2017)
Tang K, Gong C, Wang D (2016) Reduction potential, shadow prices, and pollution costs of agricultural pollutants in China. Sci Total Environ 541:42–50
United Nations (2016). Sustainable development goals. Available on line: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (Accessed on 29th January 2017)
Zhou P, Ang BW, Wang H (2012) Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach. Eur J Oper Res 22(3):625–635
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Highlights
• Analysis of the contribution of inputs and outputs to productivity growth of water companies
• From 2005 to 2014, Chilean water companies suffered a significant retardation of productivity
• The large percentage of non-revenue water was the main contributor to efficiency change regression
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 18 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molinos-Senante, M., Sala-Garrido, R. Decomposition of Productivity Growth of Water and Sewerage Companies: An Empirical Approach for Chile. Water Resour Manage 31, 4309–4321 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1748-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1748-9