Skip to main content
Log in

Multiobjective Optimization of Pressure Dependent Dynamic Design for Water Distribution Networks

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimal design and rehabilitation scheduling of water distribution networks (WDNs) have been often dealt separately over the past few decades. However initial design (which is named as static design in this paper) has indubitable influence on the operational condition and rehabilitation scheduling of network. This paper introduces an approach for simultaneous optimization of initial design and rehabilitation scheduling of WDNs during their life cycle. In this approach which is named as dynamic design, pipe diameters in the first year and their rehabilitation/replacement in the next years of the expected life of the network are determined considering the nodal demands growth and increase in pipes’ roughness. The proposed model consists of a multiobjective ant colony optimization engine linked to a pressure dependent analysis model and a pipe break prediction model. This paper introduces the following contributions: (1) it implements dynamic design based on the pressure dependent analysis with considering leakage; (2) a support vector machine based sub model is used for pipe break prediction. Then pipe breaks and their repair costs are considered in dynamic design process; (3) a new reliability index is used as one of the objective functions. Two networks are used to investigate the impact of static and dynamic designs on the reliability and total cost of design and rehabilitation of WDNs during their life cycle. The results show that the dynamic design produces more reliable and lower cost networks in comparison to the ones resulted from either static design or rehabilitation scheduling separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afshar A, Sharifi F, Jalali MR (2009) Non-dominated archiving multi-colony ant algorithm for multi-objective optimization: application to multi-purpose reservoir operation. Eng Optim 41(4):313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulou S, Ellinas G (2011) Ant colony optimization for level of service improvements in piping networks. European Water 33:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook CF, White CM (1937) The reduction of carrying capacity of pipes with age. Journal of the Institution of Civil Engineers 7(1):99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creaco E, Franchini M, Walski TM (2014) Accounting for phasing of construction within the design of water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(5):598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha MC, Sousa J (1999) Water distribution network design optimization: simulated annealing approach. J Water Resour Plan Manag 125(4):215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo, M (1992) Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, Polytechnic University of Milan, Milan

  • Dridi L, Mailhot A, Parizeau M, Villeneuve JP (2009) Multiobjective approach for pipe replacement based on bayesian inference of break model parameters. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135(5):344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan N, Mays LW, Lansey KE (1990) Optimal reliability-based design of pumping and distribution systems. J Hydraul Eng 116(2):249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara O, Khang DB (1990) A two-phase decomposition method for optimal design of looped water distribution networks. Water Resour Res 26(4):539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germanopoulos G (1985) A technical note on the inclusion of pressure dependent demand and leakage terms in water supply network models. Civ Eng Syst 2(3):171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghajarnia N, Haddad OB, Kouchakzadeh S (2012) Multiobjective dynamic design of urban water distribution networks. Journal of Iran-Water Resources Research 7(4):21–40 (in Farsi)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont PA (1981) Common pipe flow formulas compared with the theory of roughness. J Am Water Works Assoc 73(5):274–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan S, Jinesh Babu KS (2010) Optimal water distribution network design with honey-bee mating optimization. J Comput Civ Eng 24(1):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puccini GD, Blaser LE, Bonetti CA, Butarelli A (2016) Robustness-based design of water distribution networks. Water Utility Journal 13:13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh S, Tanyimboh TT (2016) Multi-directional maximum-entropy approach to the evolutionary design optimization of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 30(6):1885–1901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyoum AG, Tanyimboh TT, Siew C (2016) Practical application of penalty-free evolutionary multi-objective optimisation of water distribution systems. Water Utility Journal 12:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirzad A, Tabesh M (2016) New indices for reliability assessment of water distribution networks. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA 65(5):384–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirzad A, Tabesh M, Farmani R, Mohammadi M (2013) Pressure-discharge relations with application in head driven simulation of water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 139(6):660–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirzad A, Tabesh M, Farmani R (2014) A comparison between performance of support vector regression and artificial neural network in prediction of pipe burst rate in water distribution networks. KSCE J Civ Eng 18(4):941–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siew C, Tanyimboh TT, Seyoum AG (2014) Assessment of penalty-free multi-objective evolutionary optimization approach for the design and rehabilitation of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 28(2):373–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiliotis M (2014) A particle swarm optimization (PSO) heuristic for water distribution system analysis. Water Utility Journal 8:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutzle T, Hoos HH (2000) Max-min ant system. Futur Gener Comput Syst 16(8):889–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1993) An evolutionary model of bargaining. J Econ Theory 59(1):145–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng F, Qi Z, Bi W, Zhang T, Yu T, Shao Y (2017) Improved understanding on the searching behavior of NSGA-II operators using run-time measure metrics with application to water distribution system design problems. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1564-7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akbar Shirzad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shirzad, A., Tabesh, M. & Atayikia, B. Multiobjective Optimization of Pressure Dependent Dynamic Design for Water Distribution Networks. Water Resour Manage 31, 2561–2578 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1602-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1602-0

Keywords

Navigation