Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Optimal River Training Work Using GA Based Linked Simulation-Optimization Approach

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Use of structural measures for controlling a river to minimize its devastating effect and to utilize it for the benefit of mankind is a common practice all over the world. Because of high investment, such measures require prior investigation through model study. As lab based physical model study is very expensive and time consuming, mathematical modeling is generally used for investigating different alternatives of river training works. In this study, a new approach is proposed for deciding appropriate river training measure in a particular reach of a river or channel. In this methodology, an optimization model is linked with the hydrodynamic model for obtaining cost effective combination of groynes which will maintain a user defined flow speed in a pre-decided portion of a river reach. The optimization model is developed using binary coded Genetic Algorithm (GA) and the flow simulation model uses the Beam and Warming scheme for solving the two dimensional (2D) hydrodynamic equations of unsteady flow. The performance of the model is tested by applying the methodology in a rectangular channel for attaining different target speed values at a pre-defined portion of the channel and logical results have been obtained for all the tested scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-El-Sha’r W, Rihani J (2007) Application of the high performance computing techniques of parflow simulator to model groundwater flow at Azraq basin. Water Resour Manag 21(2):401–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed JA, Sarma AK (2005) Genetic algorithm for optimal operating policy of a multipurpose reservoir. Water Resour Manag 19(2):145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed HS, Hasan MM, Tanaka N (2010) Analysis of flow around impermeable groynes on one side of symmetrical compound channel: an experimental study. Water Sci Eng 3(1):56–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Alauddin M, Tsujimoto T (2012) Optimum configuration of groynes for stabilization of alluvial rivers with fine sediments. Int J Sediment Res 27(2):158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beam RM, Warming RF (1976) An implicit finite difference algorithm for hyperbolic systems in conservation law form. J Comput Phys 22:87–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjya RK (2006) Optimal design of open channel section incorporating critical flow condition. ASCE J Irrig Drain Eng 132(5):513–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan F, Hey RD, Wormleaton PR (2010) Bank-attached vanes for bank erosion control and restoration of river meanders. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 136(9):583–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang JX, Bai T, Huang Q, Yang DW (2013) Optimization of water resources utilization by PSO-GA. Water Resour Manag 27(10):3525–3540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry MH (2008) Open channel flow, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cho JH, Sung KS, Ha SR (2004) A river water quality management model for optimizing regional wastewater treatment using a genetic algorithm. J Environ Manag 73:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A (2000) Optimal channel cross section with composite roughness. ASCE J Irrig Drain Eng 126(1):68–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A (2007) Optimal design of channel having horizontal bottom and parabolic sides. ASCE J Irrig Drain Eng 133(2):192–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan JG, Nanda SK (2006) Two-dimensional depth-averaged model simulation of suspended sediment concentration distribution in a groyne field. J Hydrol 327:426–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan JG, He L, Fu X, Wang Q (2009) Mean flow and turbulence around experimental spur dike. Adv Water Resour 32:1717–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazli M, Ghodsian M, Neyshabouri SAAS (2008) Scour and flow around a spur dike in a 900 bend. Int J Sediment Res 23(1):56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennema RJ, Chaudhry MH (1990) Explicit methods for 2D transient free-surface flows. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 116(8):1013–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi A, Bakhshipour AE (2012) Optimization of sewer networks using an adaptive genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manag 26(12):3441–3456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi A, Samani HMV, Samani ZMV (2011) GA-ILP method for optimization of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 25(7):1791–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam A, Raghuwanshi N, Singh R, Sen DJ (2005) Comparison of gradually varied flow computation algorithms for open-channel network. ASCE J Irrig Drain Eng 131(5):457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain A, Bhattacharjya RK, Sanaga S (2004) Optimal design of composite channels using Genetic Algorithm. ASCE J Irrig Drain Eng 130(4):286–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalal MM, Rodin SI, Marino MA (2004) Use of Genetic Algorithm in optimization of irrigation pumping stations. ASCE J Irrig Drain Eng 130(5):357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia Y, Wang SSY (1999) Numerical model for channel flow and morphological change studies. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 125(9):924–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung BS, Karney BW (2006) Hydraulic optimization of transient protection devices using GA and PSO approaches. ASCE J Water Resour Plan Manag 132(1):44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassem AA, Chaudhry MH (1998) Comparison of coupled and semi coupled numerical models for alluvial channels. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 124(8):794–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassem AA, Chaudhry MH (2005) Effect of bed armoring on bed topography of channel bends. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 131(12):1136–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katopodes ND (1984) Two-dimensional surges and shocks in open channels. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 110(6):794–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klonidis AJ, Soulis JV (2001) An implicit scheme for steady two-dimensional free-surface flow calculation. J Hydraul Res 39(3):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnle RA, Alonso CV, Shields FD (1999) Geometry of scour holes associated with 900 spur dikes. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 125(9):972–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liong SY, Chan WT, Ram JS (1995) Peak-flow forecasting with genetic algorithm and SWMM. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 121(8):613–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mccoy A, Constantinescu G, Weber LJ (2008) Numerical investigation of flow hydrodynamics in a channel with a series of groynes. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 134(2):157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molls T, Chaudhry MH (1995) Depth-averaged open-channel flow model. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 121(6):453–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molls T, Zhao G (2000) Depth-averaged simulation of supercritical flow in channel with wavy sidewall. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 126(6):437–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molls T, Chaudhry MH, Khan KW (1995) Numerical simulation of two-dimensional flow near a spur-dike. Adv Water Resour 18(4):221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Sarma AK (2010) 2D flow simulation in alluvial river using MIKE software: a modeling approach. Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Niyogi P (2009) Introduction to computational fluid dynamics. Pearson Education Publications, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman MA, Ibrahim AAA (2008) Empirical assessment of local scour at the head of groynes. Nile Water Sci Eng 1:53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotopoulos AG, Soulis JV (2000) Implicit bidiagonal scheme for depth-averaged free-surface flow equations. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 126(6):425–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SY, Choi JH, Wang S, Park SS (2006) Design of a water quality monitoring network in a large river system using the genetic algorithm. J Ecol Model 99:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Haque MA (2004) Local scour at sloped wall spur dike like structures in alluvial rivers. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 130(1):70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaratnam N, Nwachukwu A (1983) Flow near groin like structure. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 109(3):463–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh R, Datta B, Bhallamudi SM, Narayana A (2000) Optimal estimation of roughness in open-channel flows. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 126(4):299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenberg D, Harms M (2004) Discontinuous Galerkin Finite-Element method for transcritical two-dimensional shallow water flows. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 130(5):412–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen DJ, Garg N (1998) Efficient solution technique for dendritic channel networks using FEM. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 124(8):831–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen DJ, Garg N (2002) Efficient algorithm for gradually varied flows in channel networks. ASCE J Irrig Drain Eng 128(6):351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RM (2011) Design of barrages with genetic algorithm based embedded simulation optimization approach. Water Resour Manag 25(2):409–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RM, Datta B (2006) Identification of groundwater pollution sources using GA-based linked simulation optimization model. ASCE J Hydrol 11(2):101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang HU, Xin XK, Dai WH, Xiao Y (2010) Parameter identification for modeling river network using a genetic algorithm. J Hydrodyn 22(2):246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingsanchali T, Maheswaran S (1990) 2D depth-averaged flow computation near groyne. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 116(1):71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai FTC, Katiyar V, Toy D, Goff RA (2009) Conjunctive management of large-scale pressurized water distribution and groundwater systems in semi-arid area with parallel genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manag 23(8):1497–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaghefi M, Ghodsian M, Neyshabouri SAAS (2012) Experimental study on scour around a T-shaped spur dike in a channel bend. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 138(5):471–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JS, Ni HG, He YS (2000) Finite-difference TVD scheme for computation of dam-break problems. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 126(4):253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdi J, Sarkardeh H, Azamathulla HM, Ghani AA (2010) 3D simulation of flow around a single spur dike with free surface flow. Int J River Basin Manag 8(1):55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong GL (2010) Two-dimensional depth-averaged flow modeling with an unstructured hybrid mesh. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 136(1):12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon TH, Seok KK (2004) Finite Volume model for two-dimensional shallow water flows on unstructured grids. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 130(7):678–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Nakagawa H, Kawaike K, Baba Y (2009) Experiment and simulation of turbulent flow in local scour around a spur dyke. Int J Sediment Res 24(1):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajib Kumar Bhattacharjya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalita, H.M., Sarma, A.K. & Bhattacharjya, R.K. Evaluation of Optimal River Training Work Using GA Based Linked Simulation-Optimization Approach. Water Resour Manage 28, 2077–2092 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0593-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0593-3

Keywords

Navigation