Abstract
Environmental concerns and legislation of the water industry have recently drawn the attention of many researchers to the management, calibration and power cost reduction of water pipeline systems. Effective water system management rests upon the knowledge of the current state of a water pipeline system. For example, leakages, unknown status of in-line valves, and partial blockages are often a source of management costs. These anomalies must be detected and corrected as early as possible. In this paper a diagnosis tool is presented able to detect leaks, partially closed in-line valves and partial blockages by means of transient head measurements. The algorithm introduced is a Stochastic successive Linear Estimator [SLE] (Yeh et al. Water Resour Res 32: 2757–2766, 1996a) which provides statistically best unbiased estimate of these anomalies and quantifies the uncertainty associated with these estimates via assimilation of available information. Therefore, the information from common diagnosis techniques e.g., inspection methods, and head measurements available at different locations of the system, obtained by different transient tests are fused to provide the most accurate and reliable diagnosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alkasseh JMA, MohdNordin A, Ismail A, HamidiAbdul A, Abu Bakar Mohamad H (2013) Applying minimum night flow to estimate water loss using statistical modeling: a case study in Kinta Valley, Malaysia. Water Resour Manag 27(5):1439–1455
Brunone B (1999) Transient test-based technique for leak detection in outfall pipes. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 125(5):302–306
Brunone B, Ferrante M (2001) Detecting leaks in pressurised pipes by means of transients. J Hydraul Res 39(5):539–547
Brunone B, Ferrante M, Meniconi S (2008a) Portable pressure wave-maker for leak detection and pipe system characterization. J Am Water Works Assoc 100(4):108–116
Brunone B, Ferrante M, Meniconi S (2008b) “Discussion of ‘’Detection of Partial Blockage in Single Pipelines“ by Mohapatra PK, Chaudhry MH, Kassem AA, Moloo J.” Journal of Hydrauilic Engineering, ASCE 134 (6) (January): 872–874
Cabrera E, Pardo MA, Cobacho R, Cabrera E Jr (2010) Energy audit of water networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 136(6):669–677
Cabrera E, Pardo MA, Cabrera E Jr, Arregui FJ (2013) Tap water costs and service sustainability, a close relationship. Water Resour Manag 27(1):239–253
Christodoulou S, Deligianni A (2009) A neurofuzzy decision framework for the management of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 24(1):139–156
Colombo AF, Karney BW (2002) Energy and costs of leaky pipes: toward comprehensive picture. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 128(6):441–450
Dettinger MD, Wilson JL (1981) First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow part 1. Mathematical development. Water Resour Res 17:149–161
Fang J, Tacher L (2003) An efficient and accurate algorithm for generating spatially-correlated random fields. Commun Numer Methods Eng 19(10):801–808
Ferrante M (2012) Experimental investigation of the effects of pipe material on the leak head-discharge relationship. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 138(8):736–743
Ferrante M, Brunone B (2003) Pipe system diagnosis and leak detection by unsteady-state tests. 2. Wavelet analysis. Adv Water Res 26(1):107–116
Ferrante M, Brunone B, Meniconi S (2007) Wavelets for the analysis of transient pressure signals for leak detection. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 133(11):1274–1282
Ferrante M, Brunone B, Meniconi S (2009) Leak detection in branched pipe systems coupling wavelet analysis and a Lagrangian model. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA 58(2):95–106
Ferrante M, Massari C, Brunone B, Meniconi S (2011) “Experimental evidence of hysteresis in the head-discharge relationship for a leak in a polyethylene pipe. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 137(7):775–780
Fletcher J (1988) Computational techniques for fluid dynamics Vol. 1, 409 pp, Springer-Verlag, New York. 1988
Gooch RM, Clarke TA, Ellis TJ (1996) “A semi-autonomous sewer surveillance and inspection vehicle.” In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 1996. Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE, 64–69
Hoeksema RJ, Kitanidis PK (1984) An application of the geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in two-dimensional groundwater modeling. Water Resour Res 20(7):1003–1020
Hunt A (1996) Fluid properties determine flow line blockage potential. Oil Gas J 94(29):62–66
Kapelan ZS, Savic DA, Walters GA (2003) A hybrid inverse transient model for leakage detection and roughness calibration in pipe networks. J Hydraul Res 41(5):481–492
Kitanidis PK, Vomvoris EG (1983) A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one-dimensional simulations. Water Resour Res 19(3):677–690
Lee PJ, Vitkovsky JP, Lambert MF, Simpson AR, Liggett JA (2008) Discrete blockage detection in pipelines using the frequency response diagram: numerical study. J Hydraul Eng 134(5):658–663
Liggett JA, Chen LC (1994) Inverse transient analysis in pipe networks. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 120(8):934–955
Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11(2):431–441
Massari C, Ferrante M, Brunone B, Meniconi S (2012) Is the leak head–discharge relationship in polyethylene pipes a bijective function? J Hydraul Res IAHR 50(4):409–417
Massari C, Yeh TCJ, Ferrante M, Brunone B, Meniconi S (2013a) “Detection and sizing of extended partial blockages in pipelines by means of a stochastic successive linear estimator” Journal of Hydroinformatics. (In press)
Massari C, Yeh TCJ, Ferrante M, Brunone B, Meniconi S (2013b) “A successive stochastic linear estimator to diagnose pipe systems: first results” Journal of Water Science and Technology: Water Supply. (In press)
Meniconi S, Brunone B, Ferrante M, Massari C (2010) “Potential of transient tests to diagnose real supply pipe systems: What can be done with a single extemporary test.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 137 (2) (June 24): 238–241
Meniconi S, Brunone B, Ferrante M (2011a) In-line pipe device checking by short-period analysis of transient tests. J Hydraul Eng 137(7):713–722
Meniconi S, Brunone B, Ferrante M, Massari C (2011b) Small amplitude sharp pressure waves to diagnose pipe systems. Water Res Manag 25(1):79–96
Meniconi S, Brunone B, Ferrante M (2012) Water-hammer pressure waves interaction at cross-section changes in series in viscoelastic pipes. J Fluids Struct 33(8):44–58
Misiunas D, Vítkovský J, Olsson G, Simpson A, Lambert M (2005) Pipeline break detection using pressure transient monitoring. J Water Res Plan Manag 131(4):316–325
Mohapatra PK, Chaudhry MH, Kassem AA, Moloo J (2006) Detection of partial blockage in single pipelines. J Hydraul Eng 132(2):200
Romano M, Kapelan Z, Savic AD (2011) “Geostatistical Techniques for Approximate Location of Bursts in Water Distribution Systems.” In 11th International Conference on Computing and Control for the Water Industry: Challenges and Opportunities, CCWI
Sharma A, Sandhu BS, Singh B (2010) Incoherent scattering of gamma photons for non-destructive tomographic inspection of pipeline. Appl Radiat Isot Incl Data Instrumen Methods Use Agric Ind Med 68(12):2181–2188
Sykes JF, Wilson JL, Andrews RW (1985) Sensitivity analysis for steady state groundwater flow using adjoint operators. Water Resour Res 21(3):359–371
Vargas-Guzmán JA, Yeh T-CJ (2002) The successive linear estimator: a revisit. Adv Water Res 25(7):773–781
Vítkovský J, Simpson A, Lambert M (2000) Leak detection and calibration using transients and genetic algorithms. J Water Res Plan Manag ASCE 126(4):262–265
Wang XJ, Martin L, Simpson A (2005) Detection and location of a partial blockage in a pipeline using damping of fluid transients. J Water Res Plan Manag ASCE 131(3):244–249
Wylie E, Streeter V (1993) Fluid Transients in Systems. Prenctice Hall
Xiang J, Yeh T-CJ, Lee C-H, Hsu K-C, Wen J-C (2009) A simultaneous successive linear estimator and a guide for hydraulic tomography analysis. Water Resour Res 45, W02432
Ye G, Fenner R (2010) “Kalman Filtering of Hydraulic Measurements for Burst Detection in Water Distribution Systems.” Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice 2 (1) (31): 14–22
Yeh T-CJ, Jin M (1996b) An iterative stochastic inverse method: conditional effective transmissivity and hydraulic head fields. Water Resour Res 32(1):85–92
Yeh T-CJ, Liu S (2000) Hydraulic tomography: development of a new aquifer test method. Water Resour Res 36(8):2095–2105
Yeh T-CJ, Zhang J (1996a) A geostatistical inverse method for variably saturated flow in the vadose zone. Water Resour Res 32(9):2757–2766
Yeh T-CJ, Gutjahr AL, Jin M (1995) An iterative cokriging-like technique for ground-water flow modeling. Ground Water 33(1):33–41
Zhang J, Yeh TC, J. T-C (1997) “An iterative geostatistical inverse method for steady flow in the vadose zone.” Water Resources Research 33(1): 63–71
Zhu J, Yeh J. T-C (2005) “Characterization of Aquifer Heterogeneity Using Transient Hydraulic Tomography.” Water Resources Research 41(7) (January 26): W07028
Acknowledgments
This research has been supported by Fondazione Cassa Risparmio Perugia under the Project “Hydraulic characterization of innovative pipe materials” (Project 2013.0050.021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Massari, C., Yeh, TC.J., Brunone, B. et al. Diagnosis of Pipe Systems by means of a Stochastic Successive Linear Estimator. Water Resour Manage 27, 4637–4654 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0433-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0433-x