Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economic Sharing of Basin Water Resources between Competing Stakeholders

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an application of linear programming (LP) methods for optimal allocation of water among competing stakeholders that would achieve the highest economic return from water use in the agricultural section of the Sefidrud Basin, northern Iran. In a network presentation of the basin, the nodes stand for the supply and demand points and arcs represent reaches. The constraints of the LP model are the network structure of the basin (flows, stream geography and channel capacity), the available surface and ground water in each node, the environmental demand in different reaches, upper and lower bands of supply in each node and water balances. Optimal policies are derived for current and future demand. The optimal policies indicate that, at present, the basin water resources satisfy the demands of all stakeholders. Although, the results show that there is no conflict for supplying stakeholders’ current demands, they indicate that the current proportion of surface water used is not optimal compared with the proportion of ground water used. The results also indicate that some future demands of provinces with lower marginal value of water are unsatisfied and that this could cause conflict between stakeholders. Since in some nodes the optimal solutions suggest using surface water even where they have available ground water, they are categorized as having a higher possibility to construct dams in the basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcamo J, Henrichs T, Rösch T (2000) World water in 2025: Global modeling and scenario analysis for the World Commission on Water for the 21st century. Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel

  • Amini Fasakhodi A, Nouri S, Amini M (2010) Water resources sustainability and optimal cropping pattern in farming systems; a multi-objective fractional goal programming approach. Water Resour Manag 24(15):4639–4657. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9683-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babel MS, Das Gupta A, Nayak DK (2005) A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands. Water Resour Manag 19(6):693–712. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-3282-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billib MHA, Boochs PW, Matheja A, Rusteberg B (1995) Interactive management of a conjunctive use system considering quality aspects. Modelling and management of sustainable basin-scale water resource systems. Proc Int Symp Colo 231:273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen RL, Young RA (1985) Financial and economic irrigation net benefit functions for Egypt's Northern Delta. Water Resour Res 21(9):1329–1335. doi:10.1029/WR021i009p01329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braddock RD, Schreider SY (2006) Application of the Morris algorithm for sensitivity analysis of the REALM model for the Goulburn irrigation system. Environ Model Assess 11(4):297–313. doi:10.1007/s10666-005-9029-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, McKinney D, Lasdon L (2002) Integrated Hydrologic-Agronomic-Economic Model for River Basin Management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129(1):4–17. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2003)129:1(4)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi P, Fayyaz S (2010) A compromise programming model to integrated urban water management. Water Resour Manag 24(6):1211–1227. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9492-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith M, Codner G, Weinmann E, Schreider S (2009) Modelling hydroclimatic uncertainty and short-run irrigator decision making: the goulburn system. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 53(4):565–584. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00465.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins A, Archer A, Hajkowicz S (2008) A stochastic non-linear programming model for a multi-period water resource allocation with multiple objectives. Water Resour Manag 22(10):1445–1460. doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9236-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini Safa H, Morid S, Moghaddasi M (2012) Incorporating economy and long-term inflow forecasting uncertainty into decision-making for agricultural water allocation during droughts. Water Resour Manag 26(8):2267–2281. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0015-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi A, Ardakanian R (2010) Development of a dynamic long-term water allocation model for agriculture and industry water demands. Water Resour Manag 24(9):1717–1746. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9521-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch H, Kaltofen M, Grünewald U, Messner F, Karkuschke M, Zwirner O, Schramm M (2005) Scenarios of water resources management in the Lower Lusatian mining district, Germany. Ecol Eng 24(1–2):49–57. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kritskiy SN, Menkel MF (1952) Vodochozjajstwennye raschety (Water management computations) (in Russian). Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat

  • Kucukmehmetoglu M, Guldmann JM (2004) International water resources allocation and conflicts: the case of the Euphrates and Tigris. Environment and Planning A 36(5):783–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louie PWF, Yeh WWG, Nien-Sheng H (1984) Multiobjective water resources management planning. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 110(1):39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahab Ghods Company (2011) National water master plan study: The Sefidrud Basin. Iranian Ministry of Energy, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Quba’a R, El-Fadel M, Darwish MR (2002) Water pricing for multi-sectoral allocation: a case study. Int J Water Resour Dev 18(4):523–544. doi:10.1080/0790062022000017383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reca J, Roldán J, Alcaide M, López R, Camacho E (2001) Optimisation model for water allocation in deficit irrigation systems: I. Description of the model. Agric Water Manag 48(2):103–116. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00126-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani R, Torabi Palatkaleh S, Karimi A (2011) Water deficit sharing: A new approach to conflict resolution among stakeholders in the watershed. In: Perth, WA, 2011. 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation - Sustaining Our Future: Understanding and Living with Uncertainty, MODSIM2011. pp 3917–3923

  • Ryu JH, Palmer RN, Jeong S, Lee JH, Kim Y-O (2009) Sustainable water resources management in a conflict resolution framework. JAWRA 45(2):485–499. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00304.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Salman AZ, Al-Karablieh EK, Fisher FM (2001) An inter-seasonal agricultural water allocation system (SAWAS). Agric Syst 68(3):233–252. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00010-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoccimarro M, Walker A, Dietrich C, Schreider S, Jakeman T, Ross H (1999) A framework for integrated catchment assessment in northern Thailand. Environ Model Softw 14(6):567–577. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00020-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straton A, Jackson S, Marinoni O, Proctor W, Woodward E (2011) Exploring and evaluating scenarios for a river catchment in Northern Australia using scenario development, multi-criteria analysis and a deliberative process as a tool for water planning. Water Resour Manag 25(1):141–164. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9691-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torabi Palatkaleh S, Estiri K, Hafez B (2010a) The role of environmental requirements in process of water allocation for watersheds in Iran: sustainable development approach. Paper presented at the 2nd international conference Water, ecosystems and sustainable development in arid and semi-arid zones, Tehran

  • Torabi Palatkaleh S, Roozbahani R, Hobevatan M, Estiri K (2010b) Water allocation regulation. Iranian Ministry of Energy Tehran

  • Yamout G, El-Fadel M (2005) An optimization approach for multi-sectoral water supply management in the Greater Beirut Area. Water Resour Manag 19(6):791–812. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-3280-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Yang Z (2013) Development of a long-term, ecologically oriented dam release plan for the Lake Baiyangdian Sub-basin, Northern China. Water Resour Manag 27(2):485–506. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0198-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghaami M (2006) Integrated water resources management in Polrud irrigation system. Water Resour Manag 20(2):215–225. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-8048-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoltay VI, Vogel RM, Kirshen PH, Westphal KS (2010) Integrated watershed management modeling: generic optimization model applied to the Ipswich River Basin. J Water Resour Plan Manag 136(5):566–575. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000083

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper. They are also grateful to water managers from Ministry of Energy who provided data for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences, RMIT University, GPO BOX 2476, Melbourne, Vic, 3001, Australia

    R. Roozbahani, S. Schreider & B. Abbasi

Authors
  1. R. Roozbahani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Schreider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Abbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Roozbahani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roozbahani, R., Schreider, S. & Abbasi, B. Economic Sharing of Basin Water Resources between Competing Stakeholders. Water Resour Manage 27, 2965–2988 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0326-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0326-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation