Skip to main content
Log in

Selecting Portfolios of Water Supply and Demand Management Strategies Under Uncertainty—Contrasting Economic Optimisation and ‘Robust Decision Making’ Approaches

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Planning appropriate portfolios of new water supplies and demand management measures requires considering a wide array of options and their interactions over a largely unknown future. Various modelling-assisted approaches are available to help this planning process. This paper applies two such frameworks to the UK’s Thames water resource system and compares their methods and outputs: how they consider uncertainty, how they represent supply and demand management options, and what plans each recommends. The first method is the current England and Wales industry standard: annual least-cost capacity expansion optimisation over a 25 to 30 year time horizon considering capital, operating (fixed and variable), social and environmental costs. The second approach uses stochastic simulation and regret analysis to select a preferred alternative, then statistical cluster analysis to identify causes of system failure enabling further plan improvement. When applied iteratively with system planners this second approach is referred to as Robust Decision Making (RDM). The economic optimisation approach considers all plausible combinations of supply and conservation schemes and recommends the least-cost schedule of their implementation. Our RDM application considers a smaller number of options but makes a more detailed assessment of the effect of uncertainty (supply, demand and energy price uncertainty were considered) on multiple criteria of system performance. The simulation-based approach also enables more realistic interaction amongst supply and demand management schemes. Both approaches recommended different plans which we explain by discussing the benefits and limitations of each. Joint application is recommended to produce least-cost plans that are robust considering multiple criteria of performance across a wide range of futures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arena C, Mazzola MR, Scordo G (2010) A simulation/optimization model for selecting infrastructure alternatives in complex water resource systems. Water Sci Technol 61(12):3050–3060. doi:10.2166/wst.2010.220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim Y (2006) Information gap decision theory: Decisions under severe uncertainty, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga BPF, Conejo JGL, Becker L, Yeh WWG (1985) Capacity Expansion of Sao-Paulo water-supply. J Water Res Plan Manag Asce 111(2):238–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brill ED, Flach JM, Hopkins LD, Ranjithan S (1990) MGA - A decision support system for complex, incompletely defined problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 20(4):745–757. doi:10.1109/21.105076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant BP, Lempert RJ (2010) Thinking inside the box: a participatory, computer-assisted approach to scenario discovery. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(1):34–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cookson A, Weston A (2008) Thames Water Modelling project: Model 1a final report. Environment Agency

  • Dandy GC, McBean EA, Hutchinson BG (1984) A model for contrained optimum water pricing and capacity expansion. Water Resour Res 20(5):511–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessai S, Hulme M (2007) Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: a case study on water resources management in the East of England. Glob Environ Chang Hum Policy Dimens 17(1):59–72. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EA (2008) Water Resource Planning Guidelines. Environment Agency. Almondsbury, UK

  • Essex and Suffolk Water (2010) Final water resources management plan 2010–2035. Durham, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2011) Electricity prices for industrial consumers. Eurostat. Available via Eurostat. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=ten00114. Accessed February 6, 2011

  • Fredrich AJ (1975) Hydrologic engineering methods for water resources development (trans: Hydrologic Engineering Center). Reservoir yield, vol 8. Davis, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH, Fisher NI (1999) Bump hunting in high-dimensional data. Stat Comput 9(2):123–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin R (2006) Water resource economics: The analysis of scarcity, policies, and projects. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves DG, Lempert RJ (2007) A new analytic method for finding policy-relevant scenarios. Glob Environ Chang Hum Policy Dimens 17(1):73–85. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JW, Lempert RJ, Keller K, Hackbarth A, Chirstophe M, McInerney DJ (2011a) Robust climate policies under uncertainty: A comparison of Robust Decision-Making and Info-Gap methods. Risk Analysis

  • Hall JW, Watts G, Keil M, de Vial L, Street R, Conlan K, O'Connell PE, Beven KJ, Kilsby CG (2011b) Towards risk-based water resources planning in England and Wales under a changing climate. Water and Environment Journal:no-no. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00271.x

  • Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington P (2007) Waste Not, Want Not? Water Tariffs for Sustainability. WWF, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiritskiy SN, Menkel MF (1952) Water Management Computations (in Russian). GIMIZ, Leningrad, USSR

  • Klemeš V (1969) Reliability estimates for a storage reservoir with seasonal input. J Hydrol 7(2):198–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Collins MT (2007) Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches. Risk Anal 27(4):1009–1026. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00940.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Groves DG (2010) Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(6):960–974. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Groves DG, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2006) A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manag Sci 52(4):514–528. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez A, Fung F, New M, Watts G, Weston A, Wilby RL (2009) From climate model ensembles to climate change impacts and adaptation: a case study of water resource management in the southwest of England. Water Resour Res 45. doi:10.1029/2008wr007499

  • Loucks DP, van Beek E (2006) Water Resources Systems Planning and Management—An Introduction to Methods, Models and Applications. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP, Stedinger JR, Haith DA (1981) Water resources systems planning and analysis. Prentice-Hal, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo B, Maqsood I, Huang GH (2007) Planning water resources systems with interval stochastic dynamic programming. Water Resour Manag 21(6):997–1014. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9069-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luss H (1982) Operations-research and capacity expansion problems—a survey. Oper Res 30(5):907–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maass A, Hufschmidt M, Dorfman R, Thomas H, Marglin S, Fair G (1962) Design of Water-Resources Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud MR (2006) High dimension dynamic programming model for water resources expansion projects. Eng Optimiz 38(3):371–389. doi:10.1080/03052150600593218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne AS (1967) Investments for Capacity Expansion: Size, Location, and time-Phasing. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin QW (1987) Hierarchical algorithm for water-supply expansion. J Water Res Plan Manag Asce 113(5):677–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matrosov ES, Harou JJ, Loucks DP (2011) A computationally efficient open-source water resource system simulation model: IRAS-2010—Application to London and the Thames Basin. Environ Model Softw. doi:10.1016

  • Mays LW (2005) Water Resources Systems Management Tools. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Jenkins GJ, Boorman PM, Booth BBB, Brown CC, Clark RT, Collins M, Harris GR, Kendon EJ, Betts RA, Brown SJ, Howard TP, Humphrey KA, McCarthy MP, McDonald RE, Stephens A, Wallace C, Warren R, Wilby R, Wood RA (2009) UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate change projections. Met Office, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaoghaire, Himmelblau (1974) Optimal Expansion of a water resources systems

  • Padula S, Harou JJ, Papageorgiou LG, Viros V (2010) Formulation and application of a minimum cost capacity expansion model for water supply and demand systems. In: BHS Third International Symposium, Newcastle, UK, 2010. British Hydrological Society

  • Rogers PP, Fiering MB (1986) Use of systems-analysis in water management. Water Resour Res 22(9):S146–S158. doi:10.1029/WR022i09Sp0146S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan S, McCalley J, Woodruff D (2011) Long term resource planning for electric power systems under uncertainty, Technical Report. Iowa State University

  • Sahinidis NV (2004) Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities. Comput Chem Eng 28(6–7):971–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage LJ (1954) The Foundation of Statistics. Dover Publications

  • Simon H (1959) Theories of decision-making in economic and behavioral science. Am Econ Rev 49(3):253–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton & East Surrey Water (2009) Draft water resources management plan

  • Thames Water (2009) Revised Water Resource Management Plan

  • Three Valleys (2008) Revised Draft Water Resource Management Plan. UK

  • UKWIR (2002) The Economic of Balancing Supply & Demand (EBSD)—Main Report. London

  • UKWIR (2009) Assessment of the Significance to Water Resource Management Plans of the UK Climate change projections 2009

  • Veolia Water Central Limited (2010) Water Resources Management Plan. Hatfield, UK

  • Veolia Water Central Limited (2011) Charges Scheme 2011/2012

  • von Lany PH, Choudhury F, Hepworth N, Akande K (this issue) Applying optimisation and uncertainty analysis to help develop an integrated water resources plan for South East England. Water Resources Management

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Steven Wade and Brigitte von Christierson from HR Wallingford who provided the climate change perturbation ratios. Evgenii Matrosov and Julien Harou were supported by the ARCC-Water project funded by EPSRC (EP/G061181/1) and Silvia Padula was funded by the UCL Faculty of Engineering. The authors thank 3 reviewers whose comments strongly improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien J. Harou.

Additional information

Evgenii S. Matrosov and Silvia Padula contributed equally to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matrosov, E.S., Padula, S. & Harou, J.J. Selecting Portfolios of Water Supply and Demand Management Strategies Under Uncertainty—Contrasting Economic Optimisation and ‘Robust Decision Making’ Approaches. Water Resour Manage 27, 1123–1148 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0118-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0118-x

Keywords

Navigation