Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Evaluation of Genetic Programming and Neural Network as Potential Surrogate Models for Coastal Aquifer Management

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determining the optimal rates of groundwater extraction for the sustainable use of coastal aquifers is a complex water resources management problem. It necessitates the application of a 3D simulation model for coupled flow and transport simulation together with an optimization algorithm in a linked simulation-optimization framework. The use of numerical models for aquifer simulation within optimization models is constrained by the huge computational burden involved. Approximation surrogates are widely used to replace the numerical simulation model, the widely used surrogate model being Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). This study evaluates genetic programming (GP) as a potential surrogate modeling tool and compares the advantages and disadvantages with the neural network based surrogate modeling approach. Two linked simulation optimization models based on ANN and GP surrogate models are developed to determine the optimal groundwater extraction rates for an illustrative coastal aquifer. The surrogate models are linked to a genetic algorithm for optimization. The optimal solutions obtained using the two approaches are compared and the advantages of GP over the ANN surrogates evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlfeld DP, Heidari M (1994) Applications of optimal hydraulic control to groundwater. J Water Resour Plan Manage-Asce 120(3):350–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aly AH, Peralta RC (1999) Optimal design of aquifer cleanup systems under uncertainty using a neural network and a genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 35(8):2523–2532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ataie-Ashtiani B, Ketabchi H (2011) Elitist continuous ant colony optimization algorithm for optimal management of coastal aquifers. Water Resour Manag. 25(1):165–190. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9693-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayvaz MT, Karahan H (2008) A simulation/optimization model for the identification of unknown groundwater well locations and pumping rates. J Hydrol 357(1–2):76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babovic V, Keijzer M (2002) Rainfall runoff modelling based on genetic programming. Nord Hydrol 33(5):331–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjya RK, Datta B (2009) ANN-GA-based model for multiple objective management of coastal aquifers. J Water Resour Plan Manage-Asce 135(5):314–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng AHD, Halhal D, Naji A, Ouazar D (2000) Pumping optimization in saltwater-intruded coastal aquifers. Water Resour Res 36(8):2155–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagan G, Zeitoun DG (1998) Seawater–freshwater interface in a stratified aquifer of random permeability distribution. J Contam Hydrol 29(3):185–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Datta B (1999a) Development of management models for sustainable use of coastal aquifers. J Irrig Drain Eng-Asce 125(3):112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Datta B (1999b) Development of multiobjective management models for coastal aquifers. J Water Resour Plan Manage-Asce 125(2):76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley

  • Dhar A, Datta B (2009) Multi-objective management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers using linked simulation optimization—methodology development and performance evaluation. J Hydrol Eng-Asce 14(12):1263–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorado J, Rabunal JR, Puertas J, Santos A, Rivero D (2002) In: Cagnoni S, Gottieb J, Hart E, Middendorf M, Raidl GR (eds), Prediction and modelling of the flow of a typical urban basin through genetic programming, pp 190–201

  • Emch PG, Yeh WWG (1998) Management model for conjunctive use of coastal surface water and ground water. J Water Resour Plan Manage-Asce 124(3):129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira da Silva JF, Haie N (2007) Optimal locations of groundwater extractions in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Manag 21:1299–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francone FD (1998) DiscipulusTM Software Owner’s Manual, version 3.0 DRAFT. Machine Learning Technologies Inc, Littleton, CO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson GD (1991) Intelligence neural network connection weights. Artif Intell Expert 6:47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaur S, Deo MC (2008) Real-time wave forecasting using genetic programming. Ocean Eng 35(11–12):1166–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gevrey M, Dimopoulos L, Lek S (2003) Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecol Model 249–264

  • Gorelick SM (1983) A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods. Water Resour Res 19(2):305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallaji K, Yazicigil H (1996) Optimal management of a coastal aquifer in southern Turkey. J Water Resour Plan Manage-Asce 122(4):233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iribar V, Carrera J, Custodio E, Medina A (1997) Inverse modelling of seawater intrusion in the Llobregat delta deep aquifer. J Hydrol 198(1–4):226–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsifarakis KL, Petala Z (2006) Combining genetic algorithms and boundary elements to optimize coastal aquifers’ management. J Hydrol 327(1–2):200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourakos G, Mantoglou A (2009) Pumping optimization of coastal aquifers based on evolutionary algorithms and surrogate modular neural network models. Adv Water Resour 32(4):507–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourakos G, Mantoglou A (2011) Simulation and multi-objective management of coastal aquifers in semi arid regions. Water Resour Manag 25:1063–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koza JR (1994) Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection. Stat Comput 4(2):87–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H-CJ, Richards DR, Talbot CA, Yeh G-T, Cheng J-R, Cheng H-P, Jones NL (1997) A three-dimensional finite element computer model for simulating density-dependent flow and transport in variable saturated media: version 3.0. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss

  • Makkeasorn A, Chang NB, Zhou X (2008) Short-term streamflow forecasting with global climate change implications—a comparative study between genetic programming and neural network models. J Hydrol 352(3–4):336–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantoglou A (2003) Pumping management of coastal aquifers using analytical models of saltwater intrusion. Water Resour Res 39(12):1335. doi:10.1029/2002WR001891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantoglou A, Papantoniou M (2008) Optimal design of pumping networks in coastal aquifers using sharp interface models. J Hydrol 361(1–2):52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantoglou A, Papantoniou M, Giannoulopoulos P (2004) Management of coastal aquifers based on nonlinear optimization and evolutionary algorithms. J Hydrol 297(1–4):209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman K, Elshorbagy A (2008) Toward improving the reliability of hydrologic prediction: model structure uncertainty and its quantification using ensemble-based genetic programming framework. Water Resour Res 44:W12406. doi:10.1029/2007WR006451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park CH, Aral MM (2004) Multi-objective optimization of pumping rates and well placement in coastal aquifers. J Hydrol 290(1–2):80–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjithan S, Eheart JW, Garrett JH (1993) Neural network based screening for groundwater reclamation under uncertainty. Water Resour Res 29(3):563–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao SVN, Bhallamudi SM, Thandaveswara BS, Mishra GC (2004) Conjunctive use of surface and groundwater for coastal and deltaic systems. J Water Resour Plan Manage-Asce 130(3):255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers LL, Dowla FU, Johnson VM (1995) Optimal field-scale groundwater remediation using neural networks and the genetic algorithm. Environ Sci Technol 29(5):1145–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheta AF, Mahmoud A (2001) Forecasting using genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, pp 343–347

  • Wang M, Zheng C (1998) Ground water management optimization using genetic algorithms and simulated annealing: formulation and comparison. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(3):519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WC, Chau KW, Cheng CT, Qiu L (2009) A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. J Hydrol 374(3–4):294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan SQ, Minsker B (2006) Optimal groundwater remediation design using an adaptive neural network genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 42(5):W05407. doi:10.1029/2005WR004303

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Sreekanth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sreekanth, J., Datta, B. Comparative Evaluation of Genetic Programming and Neural Network as Potential Surrogate Models for Coastal Aquifer Management. Water Resour Manage 25, 3201–3218 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9852-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9852-8

Keywords

Navigation