Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the Economic Residual Life of Water Pipes Using the Proportional Hazards Model

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a method for evaluating the residual lives of water pipes using the proportional hazards model (PHM) based on the economically optimal replacement times of pipes. The survival times, which are used in the proportional hazards modeling process, were defined as the economically optimal replacement times of pipes. The break rate of an individual pipe is estimated using the General Pipe Break Model (GPBM). The optimal replacement time of a pipe is obtained using the equivalence relationship between the GPBM and threshold break rate. In order to use the GPBM effectively, the process of estimating the GPBM has been modified in this paper by utilizing additional break data for the time of installation and adjusting the value of the weighting factor (WF) in the GPBM. The residual lives and hazard ratios of the case study pipes, of which the cumulative number of breaks was at least one, were estimated using the estimated survivor function of the constructed PHM. The time-dependency of the pipe material covariate caused the hazard rate of the cast iron pipes to become lower than the hazard rate of the steel pipes after 19 years since installation. The methodology developed in this paper may help utilities identify important factors related to the economics of water pipe maintenance and; therefore more efficiently maintain their water pipes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison PD (1995) Survival analysis using SAS: a practical guide. SAS Institute, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • American Water Works Association (AWWA) (2001) Dawn of the replacement era: reinvesting in drinking water infrastructure. American Water Works Association, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreou SA, Marks DH, Clark RM (1987a) A new methodology for modeling break failure patterns in deteriorating water distribution systems: applications. Adv Water Resour 10:2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreou SA, Marks DH, Clark RM (1987b) A new methodology for modeling break failure patterns in deteriorating water distribution systems: applications. Adv Water Resour 10:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brémond B (1997) Statistical modeling as help in network renewal decision. European commission co-operation on science and technology (COST). Committee C3-Diagnostics of Urban Infrastructure, Paris

  • Christodoulou S, Deligianni A (2010) A neurofuzzy decision framework for the management of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manage 24:139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collet D (2003) Modelling survival data in medical research. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, pp 80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner RC (1999) Pipeline safety, reliability, and rehabilitation. American Society of Civil Engineers, USA, pp 353–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 34(2):187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis R (2007) The case of San Diego’s vanishing water. E-mainstream. http://www.awwa.org/publications/MainStreamArticle.cfm?itemnumber=29525. Accessed 26 Aug 2009

  • Eisenbeis P (1994) Modélisation statistique de la prévision des défailances sur les conduites d’eau potable. PhD thesis, University Louis Pasteur of Strasbourg, collection Etudes Cemagref No 17

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2001) Drinking water infrastructure needs survey: second report to congress. Environmental Protection Agency, USA, p 19

  • Kleiner Y, Adams BJ, Rogers JS (1998) Long-term planning methodology for water distribution system rehabilitation. Water Resour Res 34(8):2039–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein JP, Moeschberger ML (2003) Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. Springer, New York, pp 374–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner Y, Rajani BB (2001) Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: statistical models. Urban Water 3(3):157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knaus W, Weizsacker E (2007) Vergleich Europäischer Wasser- und Abwasserpreise - VEWA. GWFWasser Abwasser 148(7/8):530–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei J (1997) Statistical approach for describing lifetimes of water mains—case Trondheim municipality. Report no 22F007.28, SINTEF Civil and Environmental Engineering, Trondheim

  • Li D, Haims YY (1992a) Optimal maintenance-related decision making for deteriorating water distribution systems 1. Semi-Markovian model for a water main. Water Resour Res 28(4):1053–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Haims YY (1992b) Optimal maintenance-related decision making for deteriorating water distribution systems 2. Multilevel decomposition approach. Water Resour Res 28(4):1063–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loganathan GV, Park S, Sherali HD (2002) Threshold break rate for pipeline replacement in water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manage ASCE 128(4):271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks HD, Andreou S, Jeffrey L, Park C, Zaslavski A (1987) Statistical models for water main failures. US Environmental Protection Agency (Co-operative Agreement CR8 1 0558) M I T Office of Sponsored Projects, No 94211, Boston, MA

  • Milner M (2006) Thames Water fails to plug leaks but profits rise 31%. The guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/jun/21/water.business. Accessed 26 Aug 2009

  • Park S, Loganathan GV (2002) Optimal pipe replacement analysis with a new pipe break prediction model. J Korean Soc Water Wastewater 16(6):710–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Kim JW, Newland A, Kim BJ, Jun HD (2008) Survival analysis of water distribution pipe failure data using the proportional hazards model. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008: Ahupua’a. Proc World Environmental Water Resources Congress 2008, vol 40, no 6, pp 495–502

  • The Irish Times (2008) €118m Dublin water pipe relaying begins. http://www.rte.ie/news/2008/0407/water.html. Accessed 26 Aug 2009

  • Therneau TM, Grambsch PM, Fleming TR (1990) Martingale-based residuals for survival models. Biometrika 77(1):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild D, Francke CJ, Menzli P, Schon U (2007) SAM Study < <water: a market of the future> >. Sustainable Asset Management (SAM), Switzerland

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea

    Suwan Park & Chang Log Choi

  2. K-water Research Institute, Korea Water Resources Corporation, 461-1 Jeonmin-Dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, South Korea

    Jeong Hyun Kim & Cheol Ho Bae

Authors
  1. Suwan Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chang Log Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeong Hyun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cheol Ho Bae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suwan Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, S., Choi, C.L., Kim, J.H. et al. Evaluating the Economic Residual Life of Water Pipes Using the Proportional Hazards Model. Water Resour Manage 24, 3195–3217 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9602-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9602-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation