Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Planning for a Large Dam Project: The Case of Traveston Crossing Dam

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The approval for a large dam project proposal these days predominantly involves satisfying broadly the criteria of economic development, social equity, and environmental sustainability. It is justified that the criterion of economic development seeks full project cost recovery as well as significant contribution to economic growth of a region. Cost–benefit analysis is normally used as the yardstick for economic development but it has limitations and a better method is warranted. Social equity considerations should embody the need to address the concerns of all sections in communities to be impacted by a project and involve them in the decision-making process. The lapse of this aspect in project planning of the past has led, at least as being partly responsible, to disastrous consequences. Environmental sustainability should seek to ensure that the vital components of the environment are preserved such that the future generation can use the natural resources to their benefit at least as much as the current generation. Environmental sustainability is arguably the most contentious criteria among these. The vagueness in the concept of environmental sustainability and the tendency of the society to err on the safe side have caused many large dam project proposals not reach their fruition. An attempt is made in this paper to define environmental sustainability in a more meaningful way from an analytic viewpoint. The case of Traveston Crossing Dam project in southeast Queensland, Australia is presented as an illustrative example and to evaluate the performance and relevance of the three broad criteria in a real-world application. The case study is also an example of the fact that environmental awareness can lead to enormous level of socio-political forces which can create many hurdles to cross by a democratic government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York. ISBN 0-300-01364-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ (2006) The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16(4):1311–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Morse S (1999) Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable? Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernroider E, Stix V (2007) A method using weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis for ranking and validity issues in decision making. Comput Oper Res 34:2637–2647. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2005.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas AK, Tortajada C (eds) (2007) Impacts of megaconferences on the water sector. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bithas K (2008) The European policy on water use at the urban level in the context of the Water Framework Directive: effectiveness, appropriateness and efficiency. Eur Plan Stud 16(9):1293–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonetto AA, Castello HP, Wais IR (1987) Stream regulation in Argentina, including the Superior Parana and Paraguay Rivers. Regulated Rivers: Res Manage 1:129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman WD, Gartner JR, Holland K, Wiedermann M (2006) Nitrogen critical loads for alpine vegetation and terrestrial ecosystem response: are we there yet? Ecol Appl 16(3):1183–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X (2008) Water stress, water transfer and social equity in northern China—implications for policy reforms. J Environ Manag 87:14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappells H, Medd W (2008) What is fair? Tensions between sustainable and equitable domestic water consumption in England and Wales. Local Environ 13(8):725–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO (2006) Commonwealth scientific and industrial research organization. Sustainable ecosystem study of traveston crossing dam project, http://www.qldwi.com.au/TravestonCrossingDam/ApprovalProcess/EnvironmentalImpactStatement.aspx. Accessed 9 September 2009

  • Davies SP, Jackson SK (2006) The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16(4):1251–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DDP (2007) Dams and development: relevant practices for improved decision making. UNEP, Nairobi. ISBN: 978-92-807-2816-3

  • Deason JP, Schad TM, Sherk GW (2001) Water policy in the United States: a perspective. Water Policy 3:175–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley RK, Platania SP (2007) Flow regulation and fragmentation imperil pelagic-spawning riverine fishes. Ecol Appl 17(7):2074–2086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt KAM (2006) Relating effect and response traits in submerged aquatic macrophytes. Ecol Appl 16(5):1808–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadlelmawla A (2008) Towards sustainable water policy in Kuwait: Reforms of the current practices and the required investments, institutional and legislative measures. Water Resour Manag 23:1969–1987. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9363-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flug M, Seitz HLH, Scott JF (2000) Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon Dam. J Water Resour Plan Manage, ASCE 126(5):270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin RC (2008) Benchmarking in water project analysis. Water Resour Res 44:W11418. doi:10.1029/2008WR006868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland G, Webster PJ (2007) Heightened tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic: natural variability or climate trend? Philos Trans Royal Soc A 365:2695–2716. doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hueting R (2009) Why environmental sustainability can most probably not be attained with growing production. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (2005) The three phases of land-use change: implications for biodiversity. Ecol Appl 15(6):1864–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) The fourth assessment report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, UNEP, Nairobi

  • Jackson T (2007) Mainstreaming sustainability in local economic development practice. Local Econ 22(1):12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joubert AR, Leiman A, de Klerk HM, Katua S, Aggenbach JC (1997) Fynbos (fine bush) vegetation and the supply of water: a comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis. Ecol Econ 22:123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon R, Farber O, Danin A (2003) A systematic analysis of factors affecting the performance of climatic envelope models. Ecol Appl 13(3):853–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangas O, Palme J (2009) Making social policy work for economic development: the Nordic experience. Int J Soc Welf 18:S62–S72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass G, (primary author) (2001) Open Channels: public dialogue in science and technology. Report No. 153, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, House of Commons, London, UK

  • Khagram S (2004) Dams and development: transnational struggles for water and power. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 270 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd CV (1992) The evolution of sustainability. J Agric Environ Ethics 5(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind RC (1997) Intertemporal equity, discounting, and economic efficiency in water policy evaluation. Clim Change 37:41–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud MR, Garcia LA (2000) Comparison of different multicriteria evaluation methods for the Red Bluff diversion dam. Environ Model Softw 15:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar C, Gupta G (2007) The debate over municipal water pricing: evidence from Kolkata, India. Water Resour Dev 23(4):571–582. doi:10.1080/07900620701488570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel M, Levin P, Patil A (2006) Using life history and persistence criteria to prioritize habitats for management and conservation. Ecol Appl 16(2):797–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata-Lima H (2009) Human–environment–society interactions: dam projects as a case example. Environ Qual Manag 18:71–76. doi:10.1002/tqem.20216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldan B, Billharz S, Matravers R (eds) (1997) Sustainability indicators: report on project on indicators of sustainable development. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Parveen S, Faisal IM (2002) People versus power: the geopolitics of Kaptai dam in Bangladesh. Water Resour Dev 18(1):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearman PB, Penskar MR, Schools EH, Enander HD (2006) Identifying potential indicators of conservation value using natural heritage occurrence data. Ecol Appl 16(1):186–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts J (2008) Public engagement to build trust: false hopes? J Risk Res 11(6):821–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Burgman MA, Medellin RA, Master LL, Keith DA (2002) Limits to the use of threatened species list. Trends Ecol Evol 17:503–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • QWI (2009) Traveston crossing dam. Queensland Water Infrastructure Pty Ltd. http://www.qldwi.com.au. Accessed 9 September 2009

  • Rahman MM, Varis O (2008) The Mexico World Water Forum’s ministerial declaration 2006: a dramatic policy shift? Water Resour Dev 24(1):177–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg DM, Berkes F, Bodaly RA, Hecky RE, Kelly CA, Rudd JWM (1997) Large-scale impacts of hydroelectric development. Environ Rev 5:27–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rout TM, Hauser CE, Possingham HP (2009) Optimal adaptive management for the translocation of a threatened species. Ecol Appl 19(2):515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salman A, Al-Karablieh E, Haddadin M (2008) Limits of pricing policy in curtailing household water consumption under scarcity conditions. Water Policy 10:295–304. doi:10.2166/wp.2008.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah Z, Kumar MD (2008) In the midst of the large dam controversy: objectives, criteria for assessing large water storages in the developing world. Water Resour Manag 22:1799–1824. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9254-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard JL, Larsen DP, Hawkins CP, Johnson RK, Norris RH (2006) Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecol Appl 16(4):1267–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilt B, Braun Y, He D (2009) Social impacts of large dam projects: a comparison of international case studies and implications for best practice. J Environ Manag 90:S249–S257. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge WB (2007) The role of stochasticity and prior effects in floodplain restoration. Ecol Appl 17(5):1312–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Economic Commission for Europe (1998) Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. http://www.unece.org/env/pp/welcome.html

  • UNEP (2006) Ninth Special Session of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme, 7–9 February, Dubai. UNEP/GCSS.IX/4

  • US National Research Council (1999) New directions in water resources planning for the US Army Corps of Engineers. Natl Acad, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aalst MK (2006) The impacts of climate change on the risk of natural disasters. Disasters 30(1):5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCD (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. Word Commission on Dams, Earthscan, London

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford

  • Wintle BA, Bardos DC (2006) Modeling species–habitat relationship with spatially autocorrelated observed data. Ecol Appl 16(5):1945–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing Sciences, CQ University, Rockhampton, Queensland, 4702, Australia

    Saleh Ahmed Wasimi

Authors
  1. Saleh Ahmed Wasimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saleh Ahmed Wasimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wasimi, S.A. Planning for a Large Dam Project: The Case of Traveston Crossing Dam. Water Resour Manage 24, 2991–3015 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9591-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9591-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation