Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robust Methods for Identifying Optimal Reservoir Operation Strategies Using Deterministic and Stochastic Formulations

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water allocation in a competing environment is a major social and economic challenge especially in water stressed semi-arid regions. In developing countries the end users are represented by the water sectors in most parts and conflict over water is resolved at the agency level. In this paper, two reservoir operation optimization models for water allocation to different users are presented. The objective functions of both models are based on the Nash Bargaining Theory which can incorporate the utility functions of the water users and the stakeholders as well as their relative authorities on the water allocation process. The first model is called GA–KNN (Genetic Algorithm–K Nearest Neighborhood) optimization model. In this model, in order to expedite the convergence process of GA, a KNN scheme for estimating initial solutions is used. Also KNN is utilized to develop the operating rules in each month based on the derived optimization results. The second model is called the Bayesian Stochastic GA (BSGA) optimization model. This model considers the joint probability distribution of inflow and its forecast to the reservoir. In this way, the intrinsic and forecast uncertainties of inflow to the reservoir are incorporated. In order to test the proposed models, they are applied to the Satarkhan reservoir system in the north-western part of Iran. The models have unique features in incorporating uncertainties, facilitating the convergence process of GA, and handling finer state variable discretization and utilizing reliability based utility functions for water user sectors. They are compared with the alternative models. Comparisons show the significant value of the proposed models in reservoir operation and supplying the demands of different water users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araghinejad S, Burn DH, Karamouz M (2006) Long-lead probabilistic forecasting of streamflow using ocean-atmospheric and hydrological predictors. Water Resour Res 42:1–11. doi:10.1029/2004WR003853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannayan M, Hoogenboom G (2008) Predicting realization of daily weather data for climate forecasts using the non-parametric nearest-neighbor re-sampling technique. Int J Climatol 28(10):1357–1368. doi:10.1002/joc.1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burn DH, Yulianti S (2001) Waste-load allocation using genetic algorithms. J Water Res Plan Manage 127(2):121–129. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:2(121)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celeste AB, Suzuki K, Kadota A (2008) Integrating long- and short-term reservoir operation models via stochastic and deterministic optimization: case study in Japan. J Water Res Plan Manage 134(5):440–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang F, Hui S, Chen Y (2002) Reservoir operation using grey fuzzy stochastic dynamic programming. Hydrol Processes 16(12):2395–2408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East V, Hall MJ (1994) Water resources system optimization using genetic algorithms. In: 1st int. conf. on hydroinformatics, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp 225–231

  • Eiger G, Shamir U (1991) Optimal operation f reservoirs by stochastic programming. Eng Opt 17:293–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeati G (1990) A comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for runoff forecasting. Hydrol Sci J 35(1):79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganji A, Khalili D, Karamouz M, Ponnambalam K, Javan M (2007) A fuzzy stochastic dynamic nash game analysis of policies for managing water allocation in a reservoir system. Water Resour Manage 22:51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gen MR, Chang L (2000) Genetic algorithm and engineering optimization. Chichester: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1972) A generalized Nash solution for two-person bargaining games with incomplete information. Manage Sci 18:80–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto TJ, Stedinger R, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resources performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Lozano M (2003) Fuzzy adaptive genetic algorithms: design, taxonomy, and future directions. Soft Comput 7(8):545–562. doi:10.1007/s00500-002-0238-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Houck M (1987) Comparison of stochastic and deterministic dynamic programming for reservoir operating rule generation. Water Resour Bull 23(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Mousavi SJ (2003) Uncertainty based operation of large scale reservoir systems: Dez and Karoon experience. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39(4):961–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Vasiliadis HV (1992) Bayesian stochastic optimization of reservoir operation using uncertain forecasts. Water Resour Res 28(5):1221–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Szidarovszky F, Zahraie B (2003) Water resources systems analysis. Lewis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Ahmadi A, Moridi A (2009) Probabilistic reservoir operation using Bayesian stochastic model and support vector machine. Adv Water Res 32:1588–1600. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson M, Yakowitz S (1987) Nearest-neighbor methods for nonparametric rainfall-runoff forecasting. Water Resour Res 23(7):1300–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman J, Stedinger JR, Cooper LA, Hsu E, Yuan SQ (1990) Sampling stochastic dynamic programming applied to reservoir operation. Water Resour Res 26(3):447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember G, Flower AC (1993) Forecasting river flow using nonlinear dynamics, stochastic. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 7:205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerachian R, Karamouz M (2006) Optimal reservoir operation considering the water quality issues: a stochastic conflict resolution approach. Water Resour Res 42:1–17. doi:10.1029/2005WR004575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall U, Sharma A (1996) A nearest neighbor bootstrap for resampling hydrologic time series. Water Resour Res 32(3):679–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei-yi L, Zi-xing C, Guo-yun S (2004) An adaptive genetic algorithm with diversity-guided mutation and its global convergence property. J Cent South Univ Technol 11(3):323–327. doi:10.1007/s11771-004-0066-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz Z (1992) Genetic algorithms data structures evolutionary programs. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld A, Salomons S (2005) Hybrid genetic-instance based learning algorithm for CE-QUAL-W2 calibration. J Hydrol 310:122–142. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelikan M, Goldberg DE, Cantu-Paz E (2000) Linkage problem, distribution estimation, and Bayesian networks. Evol Comput 8(3):311–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards A, Singh N (1997) Two level negotiations in bargaining over water, Game Theoretical Applications to Economics and Operations Research. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifi A, Hipel KW (2001) Interior-point method for reservoir operation with stochastic inflows. J Water Res Plan Manage 127(1):48–57. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733–9496(2001)127:1(48)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas M, Patnaik LM (1994) Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(4):656–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stedinger JR, Sule BF, Loucks DP (1984) Stochastic dynamic programming models for reservoir operation optimization. Water Resour Res 20(11):1499–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teegavarapu RSV, Simonovic SP (2001) Optimal operation of water resource systems: trade-offs between modeling and practical solutions. Integr Water Resour Manage, IAHS Red Book, 272, IAHS, pp 257–263

  • Todini E (2000) Real-time flood forecasting: operational experience and recent advanced. In: Marsalek J et al (eds) Flood issues in contemporary water management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 261–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Trezos T, Yeh WW-G (1987) Use of stochastic dynamic programming for reservoir management. Water Resour Res 23(6):983–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian HR (1995) Coase, competition, and compensation. Japan World Econ 7(1):13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw R, Sharif M (1999) Evaluation of genetic algorithms for optimal reservoir system operation. J Water Res Plan Manage 125(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Karamouz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmadi, A., Karamouz, M. & Moridi, A. Robust Methods for Identifying Optimal Reservoir Operation Strategies Using Deterministic and Stochastic Formulations. Water Resour Manage 24, 2527–2552 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9566-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9566-3

Keywords

Navigation