Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Water Projects on River Flow Regimes and Water Quality in Huai River Basin

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the impact of water projects (dams or floodgates) on river hydrology and the surrounding environment is important in river basin management. However, it is a difficult scientific issue due to its complexity. Huai River Basin is a unique region in China with high densities in both population and water projects and is experiencing a serious pollution problem. Based on the extended SWAT model with consideration of dams & floodgates, this paper proposes a quantitative framework to assess the impact of dams & floodgates on the river flow regimes and water quality in the middle and upper reaches of Huai River Basin. The results show that: (1) The dams & floodgates reduced the basin’s annual average flow by 2%, in comparison with the scenario of no water projects in the whole basin during 1991–2000, because of the regulation and storage of dams & floodgates. The flow in the non-flood season reduced 5% while the change of flow in the flood season was not acute. The impact of dams & floodgates on the annual flow are different in wet and dry years. In the wet year (1991), the impact of dams & floodgates is not obvious because the gates were opened to control the floods and their main functions are to change the temporal distribution in a year. In the dry year (1999), the flow reduced remarkably in comparison with the flow without dams & floodgates in the basin because the gates were closed in order to meet the water demand. The flow in the flood season increased by 8% whiles the flow in the non-flood season reduced by 12%. (2) There was a certain impact of dams & floodgates on water quality but they were quite different in the different area. It would be changed from the positive effect to the negative effect from the upriver to downstream. The dams & floodgates in the upper reaches played a positive role to improve water quality. But the ones in the middle and lower reaches played a negative role with contribution from 0 to 0.4. However, the contribution of exceeding pollutant discharge was more than 0.6. (3) The joint operation of dams & floodgates to control water quantity and quality will improve the water environment in Huai River Basin, but the key to improve the basin’s water environment is pollution control. This research will guide the anti-pollution and the united water quantity and quality assessment of dams & floodgates in Huai River Basin. Moreover it will provide a foundation to achieve the integrated basin management and sustainability of Huai River Basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanakis K, Mitrakas M, Moustaka-Gouni M, Psilovikos A (2001) Determination of the environmental parameters that influence sulphide formation in the newly formed UThesaurus Reservoir, in Nestos River, Greece. Fresenius Environ Bull 10(6):566–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholow JM, Campbell SG, Flug M (2004) Predicting the thermal effects of dam removal on the Klamath River. Environ Manage 34(6):856–874. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0269-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bärlund I, Kirkkala T, Malve O, Kämäri J (2006) Assessing SWAT model performance in the evaluation of management actions for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in a Finnish catchment. Environ Model Softw 22(5):719–724. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0269-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek AT (2001) Undamming rivers: a review of the ecological impacts of dam removal. Environ Manage 27(6):803–814. doi:10.1007/s002670010189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkamp G, McCartney M, Dugan P, McNeely J, Acreman M (2000) Dams, ecosystem functions and environmental restoration. Thematic Review II.1 prepared as an input to the World Commission on Dams, Cape Town

  • Campbell SG, Hanna RB, Flug M, Scott JF (2001) Modeling Klamath River system operations for quantity and quality. J Water Resour Plan Manage 127(5):284–294. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:5(284)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt K, Arnold JG (2001) Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model. J Hydrol (Amst) 251:103–109. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00429-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental quality standards for surface water of P.R. China (GB3838-2002) (2002)

  • Fontaine TA, Cruickshank TS, Arnold JG (2002) Development of a snowfall–snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool. J Hydrol (Amst) 262:209–223. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00429-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang ZL (2003) Ecological and environmental monitoring plans and protection measures for large-scale hydropower projects. J Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 13(2):101–108 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne BD, Rutherford ES, Wehrly KE (2004) Simulating effects of hydro-dam alteration on thermal regime and wild steelhead recruitment in a stable-flow Lake Michigan tributary. River Res Appl 20(2):185–203. doi:10.1002/rra.746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang NS, Fu LY (1997) Problems of reservoir sedimentation in China. J Lake Sci 9(1):1–8 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1991) Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol Appl 1:66–84. doi:10.2307/1941848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart T, Eckhardt K, Fohrer N, Frede H-G (2002) Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Phys Chem Earth 27:645–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CM, Li DF, Tian Y (2003) An application study of DEM based distributed hydrological model on macro scale watershed. Prog Geogr 22(5):437–445 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CM, Zheng HX, Wang ZG (2006) Distributed simulation of watershed hydrological cycle. Yellow River Conservancy Press, Zheng Zhou (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes LFG, Do Carmo JSA, Cortes RMV (2003) Influence of dam-reservoirs exploitation on the water quality. River Basin Manage II 7:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes LFG, Do Carmo JSA, Cortes RMV, Oliveira D (2004) Hydrodynamics and water quality modelling in a regulated river segment: application on the instream flow definition. Ecol Model 173(2–3):197–218. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowney CL (2000) Stream temperature variation in regulated rivers: Evidence for a spatial pattern in daily minimum and maximum magnitudes. Water Resour Res 36(10):2947–2955. doi:10.1029/2000WR900142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao ZP, Wang YC, Peng WQ (2005) Advances in effects of dams on river ecosystem. Adv Water Sci 16(1):134–140 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed AA, Ahmed AM, Elotify AM (1989) Field and laboratory studies on Nile phytoplankton in Egypt. 4. Phytoplankton of Aswan High Dam Lake (Lake Nasser). Int Rev Der Gesamten Hydrobiol 74:549–578. doi:10.1002/iroh.19890740507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz JG, Montalban F, Gras J, Rubi PG et al (2006) Environmental integrated rules in dams with water quality problems—The Santomera Dam, an example on how to integrate water quality and water quantity needs. In: Berga L et al (eds) Dams and reservoirs, societies and environment in the 21st century, proceedings and monographs in engineering, water and earth sciences, vol 1–2, pp 237–242

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2002). Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2000

  • Sadek MF, Shahin MM, Stigter CJ (1997) Evaporation from the reservoir of the High Aswan Dam, Egypt: a new comparison of relevant methods with limited data. Theor Appl Climatol 56:57–66. doi:10.1007/BF00863783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selim MM, Imoto M, Hurukawa N (2002) Statistical investigation of reservoir-induced seismicity in Aswan area, Egypt. Earth Planets Space 54:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley DJ, Wingerath JG (1996) Nile sediment dispersal altered by the Aswan High Dam: the kaolinite trace. Mar Geol 133:1–9. doi:10.1016/0025-3227(96)00019-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suo LS (2005) Dams and ecology. Rural Hydropower Electrification China 8:3–5 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol (Amst) 324:10–23. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZG, Liu CM, Huang YB (2003) The theory of SWAT model and its application in Heihe Basin. Prog Geogr 22(1):79–86 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei GL, Yang ZF, Cui BS et al (2008) Impact of dam construction on water quality and water self-purification capacity of the Lancang River, China. Water Resour Manag 23(9):1763–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Dams (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan HR (2004) The water environmental capacity analysis of Three Gorges Reservoir. China. Water Resour 20:19–22 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YY, Xia J, Wang GS et al (2007) Research on the influence of dams’ union operation on water quality in Huai River Basin. Eng J Wuhan Univ 40(4):31–35 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

    Yongyong Zhang, Jun Xia & Tao Liang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China

    Yongyong Zhang & Jun Xia

  3. CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences, Leeuwin Centre, 65 Brockway Road, Floreat Park, WA, 6014, Australia

    Quanxi Shao

Authors
  1. Yongyong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tao Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Quanxi Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Xia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Xia, J., Liang, T. et al. Impact of Water Projects on River Flow Regimes and Water Quality in Huai River Basin. Water Resour Manage 24, 889–908 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9477-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9477-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation