Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adaptation to Climate Change in the Management of a Canadian Water-Resources System Exploited for Hydropower

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management adaptation potential of the Peribonka River water resource system (Quebec, Canada) is investigated in the context of the evolution of climate change. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impacts on hydropower, power plant efficiency, unproductive spills and reservoir reliability due to changes in the hydrological regimes. The climate change projections used here are from the Canadian regional climate model (CRCM) nested by the Canadian-coupled global climate model (CGCM3) forced with the SRES A2 greenhouse gas emission scenario. The hydrological regimes were simulated with the distributed hydrological model Hydrotel. They were incorporated into a dynamic and stochastic optimization model in order to adapt the operating rules of the water resource system annually, according to the evolution of the climate. The impacts were analyzed over the years 1961–2099, split into four periods for comparison purposes: control period (1961–1990), horizon 2020 (2010–2039), horizon 2050 (2040–2069) and horizon 2080 (2070–2099). The main results indicate that annual mean hydropower would decrease by 1.8% for the period 2010–2039 and then increase by 9.3% and 18.3% during the periods 2040–2069 and 2070–2099, respectively. The trend to increase is statistically significant starting from 2061 (Mann–Kendall with p = 5%). The change in the mean annual production is statistically significant for the 2040–2069 and 2070–2099 periods (t-test with p = 5%). Also, the change in the variance is significant for the periods 2010–2039, 2040–2069 and 2070–2099 (F-test). Annual mean unproductive spills would increase from 1961–2099, but the trend is not statistically significant. However, the changes in the variance of the annual mean spills are significant in the periods 2010–2039, 2040–2069 and 2070–2099. Overall, the reliability of a reservoir would decrease and the vulnerability increase as the climate changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caya D, Laprise R (1999) Semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian regional climate model: the Canadian RCM. Mon Weather Rev 127(3):341–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NS, Wood AW, Voisin N, Lettenmaier DP, Palmer RN (2004) The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado river basin. Clim Change 62:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin J-P, Turcotte R, Massicotte S, Moussa R, Fitzback J, Villeneuve J-P (2001) Distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data. 1: description of the model. J Hydrol Eng 6(2):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HJ, Kilsby CG (2007) Using regional climate model data to simulate historical and future river flows in northwest England. Clim Change 80:337–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Int J Climatol 27:1547–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamed KH (2008) Trend detection in hydrologic data: the Mann–Kendall trend test under the scaling hypothesis. J Hydrol 349:350–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe K, Wake CP, Huntington TG, Luo L, Shchwartz MD, Sheffield J, Wood E, Anderson B, Bradbury J, DeGaetano A, Troy TJ, Wolfe D (2007) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast. Clim Dyn 28(4):381–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel of climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani JP, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK, 1000 p

  • Kalra A, Piechota TC, Davies R, Tootle GA (2007) Changes in U.S. streamflow and western U.S. snowpack. J Hydrol Eng 13(3):156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods. Griffin, London

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Mata LJ, Arnell NW, Döll P, Kabat P, Jiménez B, Miler KA, Oki T, Sen Z, Shiklomanov IA (2007) Freshwater resources and their management. In: Canziani OF, Parry ML, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vunerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 173–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Labadie JW (2004) Optimal operation of multireservoir systems: state-of-the-art review. J Water Resour Plan Manage 130(2):93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markoff MS, Cullen AC (2008) Impact of climate change on Pacific Northwest hydropower. Clim Change 87:451–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer EP (2007) Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California, under two emissions scenarios. Clim Change 82:309–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane NA, Boer GG, Blanchet J-P, Lazare M (1992) The Canadian climate centre second-generation general circulation model and its equilibrum climate. J Climate 5:1013–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minville M, Brissette F, Leconte R (2008) Uncertainty of the impact of climate change on the hydrology of a Nordic Watershed. J Hydrol 358(1–2):70–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, La Rovere EL, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Raihi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H-H, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 599

  • Nash JE, Sutcliff JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. 1. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen JE, Carter TR, Diaz-Ambrona CH, Fronzek S, Heidmann T, Hickler T, Holt T, Minguez MI, Ruiz-Ramos M, Rubaek GH, Sau F, Smith B, Sykes MT (2007) Uncertainties in projected impacts of climate change on European agriculture and terrestrial ecosystems based on scenarios from regional climate models. Clim Change 81:123–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne JT, Wood AW, Hamlet AF, Palmer RN, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Mitigating the effects of climate change on the water resources of the Columbia river basin. Clim Change 62:233–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer DA, Caya D, Frigon A, Cote H, Giguere M, Paquin D, Biner S, Harvey R, De elia R (2006) Climate and climate change over North America as simulated by the Canadian RCM. J Climate 19(13):3112–3132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regonda SK, Rajagopalan B, Clark M, Pitlick J (2005) Seasonal cycle shifts in hydroclimatology over the western United States. J Climate 18(2):372–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salathé EP Jr, Mote PW, Wiley MW (2007) Review of scenario selection and downscaling methods for the assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology in the United States pacific northwest. Int J Climatol 27:1611–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidli J, Frei C, Vidale PL (2006) Downscaling from GCM precipitation: a benchmark for dynamical and statistical downscaling methods. Int J Climatol 26:679–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Brooks RJ, Barrow EM, Richardson CW (1998) Comparison of the WGEN and LARS-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse climates. Clim Res 10:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Li L (2004) Sensitivity of the Red river basin flood protection system to climate variability and change. Water Resour Manag 18:89–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte R, Fortin L-G, Fortin V, Villeneuve J-P (2007) Operational analysis of the spatial distribution and the temporal evolution of the snowpack water equivalent in southern Quebec, Canada. Nord Hydrol 38(3):211–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turgeon A (2005) Solving a stochastic reservoir management problem with multilag autocorrelated inflows. Water Resour Res 41:W12414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanRheenen NT, Wood AW, Palmer RN, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Potential implications of PCM climate change scenarios for Sacremento-San Joaquin river basin hydrology and water resources. Clim Change 62:257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield PH, Cannon AJ (2000) Recent variation in climate and hydrology in Canada. Can Water Resour J 25(1):19–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood AW, Leung LR, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim Change 62:189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Minville.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minville, M., Brissette, F., Krau, S. et al. Adaptation to Climate Change in the Management of a Canadian Water-Resources System Exploited for Hydropower. Water Resour Manage 23, 2965–2986 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9418-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9418-1

Keywords

Navigation