Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of Modelling Systems for the Development and Revision of Water Resources Management Plans

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, two modelling systems used for the simulation of water resources management are compared. These modelling systems can be used in the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive or to perform any other kind of integrated assessment with regard to water resources management. In such investigations the use of models is inevitable, as integrated water resources management demands the survey of large areas as well as the inclusion of the different functions of the water cycle and water utilisation processes. Water quantity data provides important input for hydro-chemical, hydro-ecological or hydro-economic models. If no significant water resources management activities are realised in the basin under study, these data can be provided by simple rainfall-runoff models. If significant water resources management activities are realised or planned, the effects of these water resources management activities must be taken into consideration. Then, however, the use of water resources management models becomes necessary. Two such modelling systems, WRAP and WBalMo, are compared. Both have been designed for the development and revision of water resources management plans. Due to different approaches regarding the modelling routines the models lead to different results in the calculation of water quantities. By tracking the simulation algorithms, an understanding of the detected differences becomes possible. By adapting the spatial configuration of the modelled system, equivalent results can be obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksoy H, Kavvas ML (2005) A review of hillslope and watershed scale erosion and sediment transport models. Catena 64:247–271. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2005.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreu J, Capilla J, Sanchis E (1996) AQUATOOL, a generalized decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management. J Hydrol (Amst) 177:269–291. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02963-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugnach M, Tagg A, Keil F, de Lange WJ (2007) Uncertainty matters: computer models at the science–policy interface. Water Resour Manag 21:1075–1091. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9099-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham AB, Amend JR (1986) Interactive simulation of water resource systems. J Water Resour Plan Manage 112(3):326–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish Hydraulic Institute (2008) http://www.dhigroup.com/Software/WaterResources/MIKEBASIN.aspx. Accessed 10 Sept 2008

  • Dørge J, Windolf J (2003) Implementation of the water framework directive—can we use models as a tool in integrated river basin management? Int J River Basin Manage 1(2):165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • EU-WFD (2000) The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy (European Water Framework Directive). Official J of the Europ Communities L 327/1 of 22 December 2000

  • Fedra K, Jamieson D (1996) The ‘WaterWare’ decision-support system for river-basin planning. 2. Planning capability. J Hydrol (Amst) 177:177–198. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02958-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote IW (1998) Integrated watershed management: principles and practice. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz I, Pulido-Velasquez M, Lund J, Andreu J (2007) Hydro-economic modeling in river basin management: implications and applications for the European Water Framework Directive. Water Resour Manage 21:1103–1125. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9101-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch RM (1981) Stochastic hydrologic model for drought management. J Water Resour Plan Manage Div 107(2):303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Hydraulics D (2008) http://www.wldelft.nl/soft/ribasim/int/index.html. Accessed 10 Sept 2008

  • Jakeman AJ, Letcher RA (2003) Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management. Environ Model Softw 18(6):491–501. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00024-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaden S, Schramm M (2000) Control model Spree/Schwarze Elster—a tool to optimise rehabilitation of water resources in the Lusatian mining district. Landsc Urban Plan 51:101–108. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00100-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaden S, Schramm M, Redetzky M (2004) ArcGRM: interactive simulation system for water resources planning and management in river basins. In: Xi RZ, Gu WZ, Seiler KP (eds) Research basins and hydrological planning. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch H, Kaltofen M, Grünewald U, Messner F, Karkuschke M, Zwirner O, Schramm M (2005) Scenarios of water resources management in the lower Lusatian mining district, Germany. Ecol Eng 24(1–2):49–57. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch H, Kaltofen M, Schramm M, Grünewald U (2006) Adaptation strategies to global change for water resources management in the Spree river Catchment, Germany. Int J River Basin Manage 4(4):273–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Letcher R, Croke B, Jakeman A (2007) Integrated assessment modelling for water resources allocation and management: a generalised conceptual framework. Environ Model Softw 22(5):733–742. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP (2006) Generic simulation models for facilitating stakeholder involvement in water resources planning and management: a comparison, evaluation, and identification of future needs. In: Voinov A, Jakeman AJ, Rizzoli AE (eds) Proceedings of the iEMSs third biennial meeting: “Summit on Environmental Modelling and Software”, Burlington

  • Loucks DP, van Beek E (2005) Water resources systems planning and management—an introduction to methods, models and applications. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra R, Singh RD (1998) The influence of model structure on the efficiency of rainfall-runoff models: a comparative study for some catchments of Central India. Water Resour Manage 12:325–341. doi:10.1023/A:1008052009729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt W, Letcher R, Jakeman A (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Softw 18:761–799. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00078-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rekolainen S, Kämäri J, Hiltunen M, Salortana T (2003) A conceptual framework for identifying the need and role of models in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Int J River Basin Manage 1(4):347–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers P, Fiering MB (1986) Use of system analysis in water management. Water Resour Res 22(9):146S–158S. doi:10.1029/WR022i09Sp0146S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber J, Purkey D (2007) Water evaluation and planning system—USER GUIDE for WEAP 21. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Hidalgo H, Martín-Domínguez IR, Alarcón-Herrera MT, Granados-Olivas A (2008) Mathematical modelling for the integrated management of water resources in hydrological basins. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9296-y

  • Smith MB, Seo DJ, Koren VI, Reed SM, Zhang Z, Duan Q, Moreda F, Cong S (2004) The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design. J Hydrol 298:4–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasson JG, Tusseau-Vuillemin MH, Andreassin V, Perrin C, Faure JB, Bousquet M et al (2003) What kind of water models are needed for the implementation of the European water framework directive? Examples from France. Int J River Basin Manage 1(2):125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurbs RA (2005a) Comparative evaluation of generalized river/reservoir system models, Technical Report TR-282. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station. http://ceprofs.tamu.edu/rwurbs/wrap.htm

  • Wurbs RA (2005b) Modeling river/reservoir system management, water allocation and supply reliability. J Hydrol (Amst) 300:100–113. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurbs RA (2005c) Fundamentals of water availability modeling with WRAP. Technical Report TR-283. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station

  • Wurbs RA (2005d) Water Rights Analysis Package (WRAP) modeling system reference manual, 2nd edn. Technical Report TR-255. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station

  • Wurbs RA (2005e) Water Rights Analysis Package (WRAP) modeling system users manual, 2nd edn. Technical Report TR-256. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station

  • Wurbs RA, Muttiah RS, Felden F (2005) Incorporation of climate change in water availability modeling. J Hydrol Eng 10(5):375–385. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:5(375)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh WWG (1985) Reservoir management and operation models: a state-of-the art-review. Water Resour Res 21(12):1797–1818. doi:10.1029/WR021i012p01797

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany

    Hagen Koch & Uwe Grünewald

Authors
  1. Hagen Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Uwe Grünewald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hagen Koch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koch, H., Grünewald, U. A Comparison of Modelling Systems for the Development and Revision of Water Resources Management Plans. Water Resour Manage 23, 1403–1422 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9333-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9333-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation