Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

“Good Dredging Practices”: The Place of Traditional Eco-livelihood Knowledge

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residents of most rural communities in developing countries depend on surface water resources for their livelihoods. The development and management of this vital resource should as much as possible take into consideration local socio-economic priorities if sustainable development is to be achieved at local levels in these countries. Inland river dredging is a water resource management strategy usually aimed at improving water courses for navigation, land reclamation and or mitigate flood in the dredged catchment. Dredging operations like most development projects have impacts that are often localised, and benefits that could be local, regional or national. “Good dredging practices”, GDP, in industrialised countries have been aimed at balancing national/regional economic benefits, technical feasibility and environmental protection. These practices rely heavily on the quality, and quantity of available relevant base-line data. In most developing countries there is a dearth of baseline data, and often national/regional economic gains do not necessarily translate into local livelihood benefits. Hence, the basis of GDP should be extended to incorporate local livelihoods priorities, without ignoring the relevance of scientific data when it is available, the issue of technical feasibility, environmental sustainability and economic viability. This approach is relevant to the demand for equitable development in the developing world; could be used in conjunction with traditional eco-livelihoods knowledge in developing or determining appropriate approaches for sustainable surface water resources management, as well as reducing environmental conflicts between stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abam TKS (2001) Regional hydrological research perspectives in the Niger Delta. Hydrol Sci 46(1):13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adolph B, Butterworth J, Conroy C, Morris M (2001) Common pool resources in Semi-arid India problems and potentials. Natural Resources Institute (NRI), Chatham, UK, Synthesis Report CRIDA/CWS/AKRSP (I) WRM Ltd./MSU/NRI Common Pool Resources Research Project Report No. 4 (NRI Report No. 2650)

  • Agarwal A (1997) Environmental pollution due to urbanisation in developing countries. New Sci 154(4):51–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge DC (2000) The impacts of dredging and weed cutting on a population of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Biol Conserv 95:247–257. doi:10.1016/S0006–3207(00)00045–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar SK, Sastri MV, Rama Rao K, Venkateshwarlu D, Srinivas K (2001) Common pool resources in Semi-arid India: Andhra pradesh regional report. Natural Resources Institute (NRI), Chatham (NRI Report No. 2648. 64)

  • Ault JS, Lindeman KC, Clarke DG (1998) FISHFATE: Population dynamics models to assess risks of hydraulic entrainment by dredges. DOER Technical Notes Collection (TN DOER-E-4), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. www.wes.army.mil/el/dots/doer. Accessed 12 February 2003

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10(5):1251–1262. doi:10.1890/1051–0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielawski E (1992) Inuit indigenous knowledge and science in the Arctic. North Perspect 20(1):8

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard AL, Feder HM (2003) Adjustment of benthic fauna following sediment disposal at a site with multiple stressors in Port Valdez, Alaska. Mar Pollut Bull 46:1590–1599. doi:10.1016/S0025–326X(03)00325–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray RN (1998) A review of the past and a look to the future. Terra Aqua 70:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray RN, Bates AD, Land JM (1998) Dredging a handbook for engineers. Wiley, New York, p 434

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigden AJ (1996) Used dredged spoil as a topsoil substitute for derelict land reclamation. Dock Harb Auth 77(869):85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes A (1988) Channelized rivers: perspective for environmental management. Wiley, Chichester, p 342

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes A (1989) Alternative channelization procedures. In Gore JA, Petts GE (eds) Alternatives in regulated river management. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo A (2000) Ecological information system: analyzing the communication and utilization of scientific information in Mexico. Environ Manage 25(4):383–392. doi:10.1007/s002679910030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEDA (1999) Dredging: the facts. Central Dredging Association (CEDA), Al Deft, p 6

  • Chokkalingam U, Kurniawan I, Ruchiat Y (2005) Fire, livelihoods, and environmental change in the middle Majakam Peatlands, East Kalimantan. Ecol Soc 10(1):26, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art26/

    Google Scholar 

  • CIRIA (1997) Inland dredging—Guidance on good practice. Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA), Westminster, p 181

  • Clarke DG, Wilber DH (2000) Assessment of potential impacts of dredging operations due to sediment resuspension. DOER Technical Notes Collection (ERDCTN-DOER-E9), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Centre, Vicksburge, MS. www.wes.army.mil/el/dots/doer. 12 February 2003

  • Coates D, Bovin T, Darwall WRT, Friend R, Hirsch P, Poulsen AF et al (2003) Review information, knowledge and policy. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Management of Large Rivers for Fisheries, Phnom Penh, Kingdom of Cambodia, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations and the Mekong River Commission

  • Crisman TL, Chapman LJ, Kaufman LS (2003) Conservation ecology, and management of African fresh waters. University Press of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson DD, Reine KJ, Clarke DG (1998) Economic impacts of environmental windows associated with dredging operations. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. DOER Technical Notes Collection (TN DOER-E3). www.wes.army.mil/el/dots/doer. Accessed 12 February 2005

  • Ellery WN, McCarthy TS (1994) Principles for the sustainable utilisation of the Okavango Delta ecosystem, Botswana. Biol Conserv 70:159–168. doi:10.1016/0006–3207(94)90284–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency (2005) Fluvial trent strategy. Environmental Agency Midlands Region, Nottingham, p 148

  • Environment Canada (1997a) Environmental risk assessments of priority substances under the Canadian environmental protection act: guidance manual. Chemical Evaluation Division, Commercial Chemicals Evaluation Branch, Environment Canada (EC), Ottawa

  • Environment Canada (1997b) Evaluating the environmental impact of Dredging Burnaby Lake. Environment Canada (EC), North Vancouver, p 107

  • Fernadez-Gimenez ME (2000) The role of Mongolian Nomadic Pastoralists’ ecological knowledge in rangeland management. Ecol Appl 10(5):1318–1326. doi:10.1890/1051–0761(2000)010[1318:TROMNP]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FoE (2000) Dubious development: How the World Bank’s private arm is failing the poor and the environment. Friends of the Earth (FoE), Washington, DC, p 24

  • Forrest S (2000). Indigenous knowledge and its representation within Western Australian’s new curriculum framework. In: The Australian Indigenous Education Conference, Fremantle, 3–7 April 2000

  • Gadgil M, Berkes F (1991) Traditional resources management systems. Resour Manage Optim 8(3–4):127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M, Berkes F, Folke C (1993) Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22(2–3):151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist G, Mallory M, Merkel F (2005) Can local ecological knowledge contribute to wildlife management? Case studies of migratory birds. Ecol Soc 10(1):20, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art20/

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore JA, Petts GE (1989) Alternatives in regulated river management. CRC, Boca Raton, p 344

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Cornejo R, Koedam N, Luna AR, Troell M, Dahdouh-Guebas F (2005) Remote sensing and ethnobotanical assessment of the mangrove forest changes in the Navachiste–San Ignacio–Macapule lagoon complex, Sinaloa, Mexico. Ecology and Society 10(1):16, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art16/

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitric M (2005) Lobster and conch fisheries of Belize: a history of sequential exploitation. Ecol Soc 10(1):21, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art21/

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington HP (2000) Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecol Appl 10(5):1270–1274. doi:10.1890/1051–0761(2000)010[1270:UTEKIS]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jodha NS (1990) Rural common property resources: contribution and crisis. Econ Polit Wkly 30(30):A65–A78

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson M (2003) Research on traditional environmental knowledge: its development and its role. The International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, http://web.idrc.ca/en/ev-43097–201–1-DO_TOPIC.html. Accessed 22 April 2005

  • Kwak SJ, Yoo SH, Shin CO (2002) A multivariate index for assessing environmental impacts of regional development projects: A case study of Korea. Environ Manage 29(2):301–309. doi:10.1007/s00267–001–0022–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landers DH, Bangay G, Sisula H, Colborn T, Liljelund L-E (1995) Airbone contaminants in the Artic: what we need to know. Sci Total Environ 160/161:841–848. doi:10.1016/0048–9697(95)04417-Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke RA, Reavell PE, Dye PJ (1984) The effects of dredging on the macrophyte vegetation of the Boro River, Okavango Delta, Botswana. Biol Conserv 30:211–236. doi:10.1016/0006–3207(84)90085–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiwal P, Jha MK, Singh PK, Mahnot SC, Gupta A (2004) Planning and design of cost-effective water harvesting structures for efficient utilization of scarce water resources in semi-arid regions of Rajasthan, India. Water Resour Manag 18:219–235. doi:10.1023/B:WARM.0000043152.86425.7b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marine UK (2002a) Environmental impacts of maintenance dredging and disposal. UK Marine Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) Project, http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/activities/ports/ph5_2.htm. Accessed 23 October 2002

  • Marine UK (2002b) Dredging and Disposal: Contaminated sediments. UK Marine Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) Project. http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/activities/ports/ph5_2_5.htm. Accessed 23 October 2002

  • Marine UK (2002c) Means of avoiding, minimising and assessing the potential impacts of maintenance dredging and promoting benefits. UK Marine Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) Project. http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/activities/ports/ph5_3.htm. Accessed 23 October 2002

  • McCauley RW (1977) Laboratory methods for determining temperature preference. J Fish Res Board Can 34:749–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos Y, Kolokytha E, Kampragou E, Vagiona D (2008) A combined methodology for transboundary river basin management in Europe. Application in the Nestos-Mesta catchment area. Water Resour Manag 22:1101–1112. doi:10.1007/s11269–007–9214–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan GP (1997) Cultures of habitat: on nature, culture, and story. Counterpoint, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NRA (1994) Water-nature’s precious resource. An environmental sustainable water resources development strategy for England and Wales. National Rivers Authority (NRA), Bristol

  • Ohimain EI (2004) Environmental impacts of dredging in the Niger Delta. Terra Aquat 97:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C (2001) Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems (N Y, Print) 4:85–104. doi:10.1007/s100210000061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr P, Colvin J, King D (2008) Involving stakeholders in integrated river basin planning in England and Wales. Water Resour Manag 21:331–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman M, Mishra PK, Mishra AK, Dixit S, Ramachandran K, Singh HP et al (2001) Common Pool Resources in Semi-arid India: a review of dynamics, management and livelihood contributions. Natural Resources Institute (NRI), Kent

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlikakis GE, Tsihrintzis VA (2000) Ecosystem management: A review of a new concept and methodology. Water Resour Manage 14:257–283. doi:10.1023/A:1008139011867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PTF (1999) Environmental impact assessment of the proposed dredging of the Lower Niger Waterway. Petroleum (Special) Trust Fund (PTF), Wuse, Abuja, Nigeria. Draft Report, 557

  • Quinn CH, Huby M, Kiwasila H, Lovett JC (2003) Local perceptions of risk to livelihood in semi-arid Tanzania. J Environ Manage 68:111–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Reine K, Clark D (1998) Entrainment by hydraulic dredges—A review of potential impacts. Technical Note Dredging Operations and Environmental Research (DOER). U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS

  • Reine KJ, Dickerson DD, Clarke DG (1998) Environmental windows associated with dredging operations. DOER Technical Notes Collection (TN DOER-E2). U.S. Army Engineering Research and Development Centre, Vicksburg, MS. http://www.wes.army.mil/el/dots/doer

  • Riddell J (2000) Dredging: opportunities and challenges for 2000 and beyond. Terra et Aqua 78:3–10(March)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg DM, Bodaly RA, Usher PJ (1995) Environmental and social impacts of large-scale hydro-electric development: who is listening? Glob Environ Change 5:127–148. doi:10.1016/0959–3780(95)00018-J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RSPB (1995) The New Rivers and Wildlife Handbook. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), National Rivers Authority (NRA) and Royal Society for Nature Conservation (RSCN)

  • Stolpe NE (2001) Trawling and dredging effects; an industry perspective. NAS/NRC Committee on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing: Phase 1. Effects of Bottom Trawling on Seafloor Habitats. New England Aquarium, Boston

  • Sullivan CA, Meigh J (2007) Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: Addressing water problems at different scales. Water Resour Manag 21:111–128. doi:10.1007/s11269–006–9044–0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swales S (1989) The use of in stream habitat improvement methodology in mitigating the adverse effects of river regulation on fisheries. In Gore JA, Petts GE (eds) Alternatives in regulated river management. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabuti JRS, Dhillion SS, Lye KA (2003) Ethnoveterinary medicines for cattle (Bos indicus) in Bulamogi county, Uganda: plant species and mode of use. J Ethnopharmacol 88:278–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamuno PBL (2001) Flood mitigation: a case study from Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC), Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, 161. MSc Thesis

  • Tamuno PBL (2006) Eco-livelihood assessment of inland river dredging of the Kolo and Otuoke creeks, Nigeria. Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, 328. PhD thesis. http://hdl.handle.net/2134/2334

  • Tamuno PBL, Ince ME, Howard G (2003) Understanding vulnerability in the Niger floodplain. Towards the Millennium Development Goals ∼ Actions for Water and Environmental Sanitation., Abuja, Nigeria, Proceedings of the 29th Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC), Loughborough University, UK, pp 358–361

  • Tengö M, Belfrage K (2004) Local management practices for dealing with change and uncertainty: a cross-scale comparison of cases in Sweden and Tanzania. Ecology and Society 9(3):4, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art4

    Google Scholar 

  • Terano T, Asai K, Sugeno M (1997) The ecological component of environmental impact assessments: A critical review of British environmental assessments. J Environ Plan Manag 40:157–171. doi:10.1080/09640569712164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner NJ, Ignace MB, Ignace R (2000) Traditional ecological knowledge and wisdom of Aboriginal peoples in British Columbia. Ecol Appl 10(5):127–1287. doi:10.1890/1051–0761(2000)010[1275:TEKAWO]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1998) Report of the fourth meeting of the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), Nairobi

  • United Nations (2002) Report of the world summit on sustainable development. The United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellinga P (2002) Dredging in a changing environment. Terra Aqua 87:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren DM, Rajasekaran B (1993) Putting local knowledge to good use. Int Agric Dev 13(4):8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • WODA (2004) Hamburg declaration. World Organisation of Dredging Associations (WODA), Las Vegas, 29 September 2004

  • World Bank (1997) IDA in Action 1994–1996, the pursuit of sustained poverty reduction. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1999) India: livestock sector review: enhancing growth and development. The World Bank and Allied Publishers, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC), Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK

    P. B. L. Tamuno & M. D. Smith

  2. Climate and Environment Group, DFID Abercrombie House, East Kilbride, Glasgow, G75 8EA, UK

    G. Howard

Authors
  1. P. B. L. Tamuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. D. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. B. L. Tamuno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tamuno, P.B.L., Smith, M.D. & Howard, G. “Good Dredging Practices”: The Place of Traditional Eco-livelihood Knowledge. Water Resour Manage 23, 1367–1385 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9331-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9331-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation