Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hypsometric Integral Estimation Methods and its Relevance on Erosion Status of North-Western Lesser Himalayan Watersheds

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of erosion status of a watershed is an essential prerequisite of integrated watershed management. This not only assists in chalking out suitable soil and water conservation measures to arrest erosion and conserve water but also helps in devising best management practices to enhance biomass production in watersheds. The geologic stages of development and erosion proneness of the watersheds are quantified by hypsometric integral. The estimation of hypsometric integral is carried out from the graphical plot of the measured contour elevation and encompassed area and by using empirical formulae. In this study, efforts were made to estimate the hypsometric integral values of the Sainj and Tirthan watersheds and their sub watersheds in the Lesser Himalayas using four different techniques, and to compare the procedural techniques of its estimation and relevance on erosion status. It was revealed that the hypsometric integral calculated by elevation–relief ratio method was accurate, less cumbersome and easy to calculate within GIS environment. Also comparison of these hypsometric integral values revealed that the Sainj watershed (0.51) was more prone to erosion than the Tirthan watershed (0.41). Further, the validation of these results with the recorded sediment yield data of 24 years (1981–2004) corroborated that the average annual sediment yield during this period for Sainj watershed (0.53 Mt) was more than that of the Tirthan watershed (0.3 Mt). Thus, the hypsometric integral value can be used as an estimator of erosion status of watersheds leading to watershed prioritization for taking up soil and water conservation measures in watershed systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Awasthi KD, Sitaula BK, Singh BR, Bajacharaya RM (2002) Land-use changes in two Nepalese watersheds: GIS and geomorphometric analysis. Land Degrad Dev 13:495–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBMB (Bhakra Beas Management Board) (1997) Sedimentation survey report. BBMB, Bhakra Dam Circle, Nangal, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop MP, Shroder JF, Bonk R, Olsenholler J (2002) Geomorphic change in high mountains: a western Himalayan perspective. Glob Planet Change 32:311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabral PP (2003) Hypsometric analysis of Dikrong River basin of Arunachal Pradesh. J Soil Water Conserv India 2:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling TI, Richardson DP, O’Sullivan A, Summerell GK, Walker J (1998) Application of the hypsometric integral and other terrain based metrices as indicators of the catchment health: a preliminary analysis. Technical report 20/98. CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg SK (1983) Geology—the science of the earth. Khanna, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel AK, Singh JK (2000) Hypsometric analysis for foothills of Shivaliks. Indian J Soil Conserv 28:84–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison CG, Miskell KJ, Brass GW, Saltzman ES, Sloan JL II (1983) Continental hypsography. Tectonics 2:357–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtrez JE, Sol C, Lucazeau F (1999a) Effect of drainage area on hypsometry from an analysis of small-scale drainage basins in the Siwalik hills (Central Nepal). Earth Surf Processes Landf 24:799–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtrez JE, Lucazean F, Lave J, Avouac JP (1999b) Investigation of the relationship between basin morphology, tectonic uplift and denudation from the study of an active fold belt in Siwalik hills (Central Nepal). J Geophys Res 104:779–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Kumar S, Varghese J (2001) Estimation of soil erosion for a Himalayan watershed using GIS technique. Water Resour Manag 15:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Singh P, Saraf AK, Seth SM (2003) Estimation of sediment yield for a rain, snow and glacier fed river in the western Himalayan region. Water Resour Manag 17:377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langbein WB (1947) Topographic characteristics of drainage basins. U.S.G.S. Water Supply Paper 968C:127–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra N (1988) Hypsometric integral—a basis for determining the erosion status and priority number of ungauged watershed. J Soil Water Conserv 32:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmori H (1993) Changes in the hypsometric curve through mountain building resulting from concurrent tectonics and denudation. Geomorphology 8:263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2004) Hypsometric analysis of watershed using geographic information system. J Soil Water Conserv India 3:123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike RJ, Wilson SE (1971) Elevation–relief ratio, hypsometric integral and geomorphic area–altitude analysis. Geol Soc Amer Bull 82:1079–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan K, Senapati PC (2002) Hypsometric analysis of some selected watersheds of Hirakund catchment. J Soil Water Conserv 30:183–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao VV, Chakraborti AK, Vaz N, Sarma U (1994) Watershed prioritization on sediment yields modeling and IRS-1A LISS data. Asian Pacific Remote Sensing Journal 6:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter DF, Kochel RC, Miller JR (2002) Process geomorphology. McGraw Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt P, Pinet PC (1994) Comparative hypsometric analysis of Earth and Venus. Geophys Res Lett 21:465–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi A, Bhattacharya AK (2000) Use of geomorphological parameters for sediment yield prediction from watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 44:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi A, Bhattacharya AK, Singh A, Singh AK (2001) Use of geographic information system (GIS) in assessing the erosion status of watersheds. Indian J Soil Conserv 29:190–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi A, Madramootoo CA, Singh DK (2004) Development of ArcGIS assisted user interfaces for estimation of watershed morphologic parameters. J Soil Water Conserv 3:139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1956) The evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Amer Bull 67:597–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1952) Hypsometric (area–altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc Amer Bull 63:1117–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd G, Paul P, Smith G, Atkins A (1997) Estimating the economic costs of hydrologic data collection. Water Resour Manag 11:283–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissel JK, Pratson LF, Malinverno A (1994) The length-scaling properties of topography. J Geophys Res 99:13997–14012

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Sarangi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, O., Sarangi, A. & Sharma, M.C. Hypsometric Integral Estimation Methods and its Relevance on Erosion Status of North-Western Lesser Himalayan Watersheds. Water Resour Manage 22, 1545–1560 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9242-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9242-z

Keywords

Navigation