Abstract
A novel approach that borrows methods commonly used in environmental geophysics was developed for obtaining the estimates of the aquifer parameters. Specifically, estimates of hydraulic conductivity were obtained from field measurements of the electrical resistivity while accounting for the karsticity of the geological formations in the area of study. Geophysically determined hydraulic conductivity estimates were introduced to a 3-D groundwater numerical simulator (Princeton Transport Code – PTC) to compute the hydraulic heads distribution of the area of interest. The calibration of the numerical model was obtained matching the hydraulic-heads predicted by the simulator with the hydraulic-heads measured at specific well locations. Simulated hydraulic-heads were used with the Chyben-Herzberg equation to approximate the position of the sharp freshwater/saltwater interface of the base of the water supply aquifer. The existence of the faults impacts the groundwater flow and the distribution of the freshwater/saltwater interface.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguilera R (1998) Geologic aspects of naturally fractured reservoirs. Lead Edge 17:1667–1670
Al-Hanai W, Russell SD, Vassapragada B (1999) Carbonate rocks, ADCO & Schlumberger. In: International symposium of the society of core analysts
Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans Am Inst Min Metall & Pet Eng 146:54–61
Babu DK, Pinder GF (1984) A finite element – finite difference alternating direction algorithm for 3-dimensional groundwater transport. Adv Water Resour 7(3):116–119
Babu DK, Pinder GF, Niemi A, Ahlfeld DP, Stothoff SA (1997) Chemical transport by three-dimensional groundwater flows. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 84-WR-3
Balia R, Gavaudo E, Ardau F, Ghiglieri G (2003) Case history: geophysical approach to the environmental study of a coastal plain. Geophysics 68(5):1446–1459
Bear J (1979) Hydraulics of groundwater. McGraw-Hill Series in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering
Bernabe Y, Mok U, Evans B (2003) Permeability-porosity relationships in rocks subjected to various evolution processes. Pure Appl Geophys 160:937–960
Byrnes AP, Bhattacharya S (2004) Issues with permeability, relative permeability, and capillary pressure architecture and upscaling to accurately model performance of thin, heterogeneous, shallow-shelf carbonate reservoirs in Kansas, Search and Discovery. Electronic Journal for Exploration and Production Geoscientists
Choquette PW, Pray LC (1970) Geologic nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates. AAPG Bull 54(2):207–250
Dewan JT (1983) Essentials of modern open-hole log interpretation. Pennwell Books, Tulsa, Ukla, p 374
Ghyben WB (1888) Nota in verband met de voorgenomen putboring nabij Amsterdam. Tijdschrift van het Kononklijk Instituut van Ingenieurs The Hague 9:8–22
Heigold PC, Gilkeson R, Cartwright K, Reed PC (1979) Aquifer transmissivity from surficial electrical measurements. Ground Water 17:338–345
Herzberg A (1901) Die Wasserversorgung einiger Nordseebader (The water supply of parts of the North Sea coast in Germany). J Gasbeleucht Wasserversorg 44:815–819
Hubbert MK (1940) The theory of groundwater motion. J Geol 48(8):785–944
Katsube T, Humet P (1987) Permeability determination in crystalline rocs by standard geophysical logs. Geophysics 32(3):342–352
Kelly W, Reiter PF (1984) Influence of anisotropy on relations between electrical and hydraulic properties of aquifers. J Hydrol 74:311–321
Klidopoulou M (2003) Groundwater flow towards water drills (a field case of Almiros area, Heraklion, Crete), PhD in Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete, p 383
Kohout FA (1960) Cyclic flow of saltwater in the Biscaybe aquifer in southeastern Florida. J Geophys Res 65(7):2133–2141
Kwader T (1985) Estimating aquifer permeability from formation resistivity factors. Ground Water 23:762–766
Loke ÌH, Barker RD (1994) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudoseclions. In: Extended abstracts of papers 5616 FACE meeting Vienna, Austria 6–10 June 1994, p 1802
Louis I, Karantonis G, Voulgaris N, Louis F (1982) Technical report on a geophysical survey at greater Mornos plain and Eupalion plateau. Ministry of Agriculture, Athens, Greece
Mazac O, Kelly W, Landa I (1987) Surface geoelectrics for groundwater pollution and protection studies. J Hydrol 93:277–294
Niwas S, Singhal D (1984) Aquifer transmissivity of porous media from resistivity data. J Hydrol 82:143–153
Nunes LM (1998) Estimativa do campo de permeabilidades potenciais e dos tensores de macrodispersividade em aquiferos heterogeneos a partir de Informacao Geofisica ‘Estimation of permeability fields and microdispersivity tensors in heterogenous aquifer based on geophysical data. MSc in Georesources, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal
Olivares JL (2000) Argus ONE-PTC interface, v. 2.2 User’s guide PTC User’s Manual
Papadopoulou MP, Karatzas GP, Koukadaki MA, Trichakis Y (2005) Modeling the saltwater intrusion phenomenon in coastal aquifers – a case study in the industrial zone of Heraklio in Crete. Global NEST J 7(2):197–203
Pape H, Clauser C, Iffland J (2000) Variation permeability with porosity in sandstone diagenesis interpreted with a fractal space pore model. Pure Appl Geophys 157:603–619
Pinder GF (2002) Groundwater modelling using geographical information systems. Wiley, New York, p 233
Pinder GF, Gray WG (1977) Finite element simulation in surface and subsurface hydrology. Academic, New York, p 295
Salem HS (2001) Determination of porosity, formation resistivity factor, archie cementation factor, and pore geometry factor for a glacial aquifer. Energy Sources 23(6):589–596
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koukadaki, M.A., Karatzas, G.P., Papadopoulou, M.P. et al. Identification of the Saline Zone in a Coastal Aquifer Using Electrical Tomography Data and Simulation. Water Resour Manage 21, 1881–1898 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9135-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9135-y