Skip to main content
Log in

Discovering Reservoir Operating Rules by a Rough Set Approach

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An integrated Rough Set approach is proposed and implemented to discover the historical operating rules of a Sicilian irrigation purpose reservoir. Operating rules are derived by expressing monthly releases from the reservoir as functions of stored volume, inflow and release during a 35-years period. This is accomplished through the Rough Set approach as implemented in the Rose package and the use of some indices able to recognize and further screen out the effective rules used in water supply reservoir management. This approach represents a new mathematical tool quite different to classical fuzzy rule-based systems in the decision rules induction. Results show that the integrated Rough Set approach allows to individuate with acceptable reliability the real criteria used for the system management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An, A., Shan, N., Chan, C., Cercone, N., and Ziarko, W., 1996, ‘Discovering rules for water demand prediction: an enhanced rough-set approach’, Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence 9(6), 645–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbagallo, S., Cirelli, G. L., and Consoli, S., 2001, ‘An optimization model for reservoir management under water deficit conditions’, Proceedings 6th Scientific Assembly of IAHS, Maastricht.

  • Barbagallo, S., Consoli, S., Greco, S., and Pappalardo, N., 2003, ‘Rough Set approach to the optimization of reservoir operation: A case study in Sicily’, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Irrigation and Drainage, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

  • Bhaskar, N. R., and Whitlatch, E. E., 1980, ‘Derivation of monthly reservoir release policies’, Water Resources Research 16(6), 987–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatty, M., 1991, ‘Hybrid expert system and optimisation model for multipurpose reservoir operation’, PhD Dissertetion, Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colorado.

  • Cancelliere, A. and Rossi, G., 2003, ‘Droughts in Sicily and comparison of identified droughts in Mediterranean regions’, in G. Rossi, A. Cancelliere, L. S. Pereira, T. Oweis, M. Shatanawi, and A. Zairi (eds.), Water Science and Technology Library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 44, 103–122.

  • Chen, W. C., Chang, N. B., and Chen, J. C., 2003, ‘Rough set-based hybrid fuzzy-neural controller design for industrial wastewater treatment’, Water Research 37, 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clasadonte, M. T., Matarazzo, A., Pappalardo, N., Passalacqua, S., and Salemi, C., 2003, ‘Analysis of the milk quality produced in some areas of the Sicilian region with innovative quantitative technology’, Journal of Commodity 42, 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clasadonte, M. T., Matarazzo, A., Pappalardo, N., Collura, F., Cortina, G., Toscano, F. P., and Zerbo, A., 2004, ‘Rough set analysis applied to the study of air pollutants in urban areas’, 13th World Clean Air and Environmental Protection, Congress and Exhibition, 22–27 August, London, UK.

  • Dimitras, A. I., Slowinski, R., Susmaga, R., and Zopounidis, C., 1999, ‘Business failure prediction using rough sets’, European Journal of Operational Research 114, 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and Prade, H., 1980, Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications, Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and Prade, H., 1990, ‘Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets’, Int. Journal of General Systems 17, 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayyad, U. M. and Irani, K. B., 1992, ‘On the handling of continuous-valued attributes in decision tree generation’, Machine Learning 8, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontane, D. G., Gates, T. K., and Moncada, E., 1997, ‘Planning reservoir operation with imprecise objectives’, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 123(3), 154– 162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch, M., 1997, ‘k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 92, 167–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., 1999, ‘The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM’, in T. Gal, T. Stewart and T. Hanne (eds.), Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Chap. 14, 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., 2000, ‘Rough set processing of vague information using fuzzy similarity relations’, in C. Calude and G. Paun (eds.), From Finite to Infinite, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 149–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., 2001, ‘Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis’, European Journal of Operational Research 129(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz, M. and Houck, H., 1987, ‘Comparison of stochastic and deterministic dynamic programming for reservoir operating rule generation’, Water Resources Bullettin 23(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labadie, J., 2004, ‘Optimal operation of multireservoir systems: State of the art review’, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130(2), 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z., 1982, ‘Rough sets’, International Journal of Information & Computer Sciences 11, 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z., 1985, ‘Rough sets and fuzzy sets’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z., 1991, Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z., 1997, ‘Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support’, European Journal of Operational Research 99, 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z., 2002, ‘Rough sets and intelligent data analysis’, Information Sciences 147, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z. and Slowinski, R., 1994, ‘Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis’, European Journal of Operational Research 72, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, L., Oweis, T., and Zairi, A., 2002, ‘Irrigation management under water scarcity’, Agricultural Water Management 57, 175–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Predky, B., Slowinski, R., Stefanowski, R., Susmaga, R., and Wilk, Sz., 1998, ‘ROSE – Software implementation of the Rough set theory’, in L. Polkowsky and A. Skowron (eds.), Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1424, 605–608.

  • Predky, B. and Wilk, Sz., 1999, ‘Rough set based data exploration using ROSE system’, in Z. W. Ras and A. Skowron (eds.), Foundations of Intelligent Systems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1609, 172–180.

  • Raman, H. and Chandramouli, V., 1997, ‘Deriving a general operating policy for reservoir using neural network’, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management Div., ASCE 122(5), 342– 347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, G., Ancarani, A., and Cancelliere, A., 1999, ‘A comparison between neural network approach and multiple regression procedure for deriving reservoir operation policies’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Water Environment, Ecology, Socio-economics and Health Engineering, Seoul, Korea.

  • Shapley, L. S., 1953, ‘A value for n-person games’, in H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, B., Duckstein., L., and Stakhiv, E., 1996, ‘Fuzzy rule-based modelling of reservoir operation’, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 122(4), 262–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slowinski, R., 1993, ‘Rough set learning of preferential attitude in multi-criteria decision making’, in J. Komorowski and Z. W. Ras (eds.), Methodologies for Intelligent Systems. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 689, 642–651.

  • Slowinski, R., Zopounidis, C., Dimitras, A. I., and Susmaga, R., 1999, ‘Rough set predictor of business failure’, in R. A. Ribeiro, H. J. Zimmermann, R. R. Yager, and J. Kacprzyk (eds.), Soft Computing in Financial Engineering, Physica-Verlag, New York, 402–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, A., Salewicz, K., and Aronson, J. E., 1998, ‘An interactive reservoir management system for Lake Kariba’, European Journal of Operational Research 107, 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, W. W. G, 1985, ‘Reservoir management and operation models: A state of the Art Review’, Water Resources Research 21(12), 1797–1818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. K. Jr., 1967, ‘Finding reservoir operating rules’, J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 93, 297–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L., 1965, ‘Fuzzy sets’, Information and control 8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H. J., 1985, Fuzzy Set Theory and its Application, Kluwer Nijoff Publishing, Dordrecht, The Nederlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simona Consoli.

Additional information

Work carried out with equivalent contributions of the Authors. Project AQUATEC “Tecnologie Innovative di Controllo, Trattamento e Manutenzione per la Soluzione dell'Emergenza Acqua” funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, Research and Technological Development (PON 2000–2006).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbagallo, S., Consoli, S., Pappalardo, N. et al. Discovering Reservoir Operating Rules by a Rough Set Approach. Water Resour Manage 20, 19–36 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-2975-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-2975-7

Keywords

Navigation