Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping the Field of Donation-Based Crowdfunding for Charitable Causes: Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compiles the main findings in the field of academic research on pure donation-based crowdfunding (DCF) soliciting monetary contributions for charitable causes. To this purpose, a systematic literature review is conducted, resulting in 92 scientific publications analyzed for the first time in this field of research. The prevailing thematic dimensions and research gaps are identified and discussed. The incipient literature on DCF, with a majority of publications from 2015 onward in the form of empirical articles using quantitative methodologies, focuses on antecedents related to individual donors, organizational promoters as main actors, and online channels and design-related features of campaigns as enablers. However, the effects of DCF on relevant stakeholders (particularly beneficiaries and society in general) remain largely obscure. Based on this analysis, an integrated conceptual framework on DCF is proposed to guide future research. This framework, susceptible of empirical evaluation, allows characterizing the DCF as a distinct and emerging type of philanthropic funding model based on specific and novel antecedents, actors, enablers and effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Authors’ own elaboration

Fig. 2

Source: Authors’ own elaboration

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althoff, T., & Leskovec, J. (2015). Donor retention in online crowdfunding communities: A case study of DonorsChoose.org. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 34–44).

  • Aprilia, L., & Wibowo, S. S. (2017). The impact of social capital on crowdfunding performance. South East Asian Journal of Management, 11(1), 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu, T., & Sarker, S. (2015). A conceptual framework for understanding crowdfunding. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R. (2010). Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money. Social Science Research, 39(3), 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2013). Individual crowdfunding practices. Venture Capital, 15(4), 313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belleflamme, P., Omrani, N., & Peitz, M. (2015). The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Information Economics and Policy, 33, 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellio, E., Buccoliero, L., & Fiorentini, G. (2015). Marketing and fundraising through mobile phones: New strategies for nonprofit organizations and charities. In Marca D., & van Sinderen M. (Eds.), ICE-B 2013—10th international conference on E-business, part of the ICETE 2013: 10th international joint conference on E-business and telecommunications.

  • Beltran, J. F., Siddique, A., Abouzied, A., & Chen, J. (2015). Codo: Fundraising with conditional donations. In UIST 2015—Proceedings of the 28th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 213–222).

  • Bennett, R. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of website atmosphere in online charity fundraising situations. Journal of Website Promotion, 1(1), 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2009). Impulsive donation decisions during online browsing of charity websites. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8(2–3), 116–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergamini, T. P., Navarro, C. L. C., & Hilliard, I. (2017). Is crowdfunding an appropriate financial model for social entrepreneurship? Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 23(1), 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, L. S., & Kenworthy, N. J. (2017). Producing a worthy illness: Personal crowdfunding amidst financial crisis. Social Science and Medicine, 187, 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardino, S., & Santos, J. F. (2016). Financing social ventures by crowdfunding: The influence of entrepreneurs’ personality traits. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 17(3), 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Body, A., & Breeze, B. (2016). What are ``unpopular causes’ and how can they achieve fundraising success? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 21(1), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budak, C., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Measuring the efficiency of charitable giving with content analysis and crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2016 (pp. 32–41).

  • Burtch, G., & Chan, J. (2014). Reducing medical bankruptcy through crowdfunding: Evidence from give forward. In 35th International Conference on Information Systems “Building a Better World tThrough Information Systems”, ICIS 2014.

  • Byrnes, J. E. K., Ranganathan, J., Walker, B. L. E., & Faulkes, Z. (2014). To crowdfund research, scientists must build an audience for their work. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e110329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., & Jia, L. (2017). The effects of the facial expression of beneficiaries in charity appeals and psychological involvement on donation intentions: Evidence from an online experiment. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 27(4), 457–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casale, D., & Baumann, A. (2015). Who gives to international causes? A sociodemographic analysis of U.S. donors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(1), 98–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, M., Petrie, R., & Wardell, C. (2014). Fundraising through online social networks: A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & Givens, T. (2013). Mobile donation in America. Mobile Media and Communication, 1(2), 196–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B., & Kim, M. (2016). Donation via mobile applications: A study of the factors affecting mobile donation application use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(12), 967–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choy, K., & Schlagwein, D. (2015). It affordances and donor motivations in charitable crowdfunding: The “earthship kapita” case. In 23rd European conference on information systems, 2015 (May).

  • Choy, K., & Schlagwein, D. (2016). Crowdsourcing for a better world on the relation between IT affordances and donor motivations in charitable crowdfunding. Information Technology & People, 29(1, SI), 221–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C., & Moriuchi, E. (2016). The effectiveness of donation advertising: An experimental study for felt ethnicity and messages on in-groups and out-groups. In K. Kim (Ed.) Celebrating America’s Pastimes: Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and Marketing? Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (pp. 745–746). Cham:Springer.

  • Cockrell, S. R., Meyer, D. W., & Smith, A. D. (2016). Electronic intervention and platforms and their impacts on crowdfunding behavior. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 23(3), 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard, M. T., & Gravert, C. (2017). Now or never! The effect of deadlines on charitable giving: Evidence from two natural field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Buysere, K., Gajda, O., Kleverlaan, R., & Marom, D. A. (2012). Framework for European crowdfunding. http://www.crowdfundingframework.eu.

  • De Oliveira, A. C. M., Croson, R. T. A., & Eckel, C. (2011). The giving type: Identifying donors. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5–6, SI), 428–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragojlovic, N., & Lynd, L. D. (2014). Crowdfunding drug development: The state of play in oncology and rare diseases. Drug Discovery Today, 19(11), 1775–1780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, L., & Li, X. (2016). The influence of micro-charity online comments on the decision making of the donors. In Z. Yang (Ed.), Proceedings of 2016 China Marketing International Conference: Marketing theory and practice.

  • Eller, A. (2008). Solidarity.com: Is there a link between offline behavior and online donations? Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11(5), 611–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnel, M. (2015). Kickstarting trans{*}: The crowdfunding of gender/sexual reassignment surgeries. New Media & Society, 17(2), 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R., Gutberg, J., Schattke, K., Paulin, M., & Jost, N. (2015). Self-determination theory, social media and charitable causes: An in-depth analysis of autonomous motivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 298–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanigan, S. T. (2017). Crowdfunding and diaspora philanthropy: An integration of the literature and major concepts. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(2), 492–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondevila Gascon, J. F., Rodriguez, J. R., Monforte, J. M., Lopez, E. S., & Masip, P. M. (2015). Crowdfunding as a formula for the financing of projects: An empirical analysis. Revista Cientifica Hermes, 14, 24–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, H., & Schaefer, D. (2017). Guidelines for successful crowdfunding. Procedia CIRP, 60, 398–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge, L., Guo, Z., & Luo, X. (2016). Intermediaries vs peer-to-peer: A study of lenders’ incentive on a donation-based crowdfunding platform. In AMCIS 2016: Surfing the IT innovation wave. Association for Information Systems.

  • Ghosh, A., & Mahdian, M. (2008). Charity auctions on social networks. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (pp. 1019–1028).

  • Gleasure, R., & Feller, J. (2016a). Does heart or head rule donor behaviors in charitable crowdfunding markets? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20(4), 499–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleasure, R., & Feller, J. (2016b). Emerging technologies and the democratization of financial services: A metatriangulation of crowdfunding research. Information and Organization, 26(4), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goecks, J., Voida, A., Voida, S., & Mynatt, E. D. (2008). Charitable technologies: Opportunities for collaborative computing in nonprofit fundraising. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 689–698).

  • Gras, D., Nason, R. S., Lerman, M., & Stellini, M. (2017). Going offline: Broadening crowdfunding research beyond the online context. Venture Capital, 19(3), 217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunes, S. (2012). Wisdom of firms versus wisdom of crowds. International Journal of Business, Humanities & Technology, 2(3), 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., & Oparaocha, G. O. (2017). Crowdfunding: Motives, definitions, typology and ethical challenges. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J., Zhang, C., & Allen, R. (2017). Understanding the dynamics of the individual donor’s trust damage in the philanthropic sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28, 648–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, G., Hudson, S. E., & Kraut, R. E. (2011). Donate for credibility: How contribution incentives can improve credibility. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3435–3438).

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. H., Buffart, M., & Croidieu, G. (2016a). TMI: Signaling credible claims in crowdfunding campaign narratives. Group and Organization Management, 41(6), 717–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. G., Kong, H. K., Karahalios, K., Fu, W.-T., & Hong, H. (2016b). The power of collective endorsements: Credibility factors in medical crowdfunding campaigns. In 34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4538–4549).

  • Kim, H., & De Moor, L. (2017). The case of crowdfunding in financial inclusion: A survey. Strategic Change, 26(2), 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. G., Vaccaro, K., Karahalios, K., & Hong, H. (2017). Not by money alone: Social support opportunities in medical crowdfunding campaigns. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1997–2009.

  • Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University: UK 33(TR/SE-0401), 28.

  • Korolov, R., Peabody, J., Lavoie, A., Das, S., Magdon-Ismail, M., & Wallace, W. (2015). Actions are louder than words in social media. In S. F. Pei, & J. Tang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (pp. 292–297).

  • Korolov, R., Peabody, J., Lavoie, A., Das, S., Magdon-Ismail, M., & Wallace, W. (2016). Predicting charitable donations using social media. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6(1), 31, 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri, N. (2015). Success of crowd-based online technology in fundraising: An institutional perspective. Journal of International Management, 21(2), 100–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, C., & Desmet, P. (2017). Motivations for participation and e-WOM among supporters of crowdfunding campaigns. In A. Kavoura, D. Sakas, & P. Tomaras (Eds.), Strategic Innovative Marketing. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics (pp. 315–321). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Dewester, D., & Park, S. (2008). Web 2.0 and opportunities for small businesses. Service Business, 2(4), 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-H., & Hsieh, G. (2013). Does slacktivism hurt activism? The effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 811–820).

  • Lee, U., Song, A., Lee, H.-I., & Ko, M. (2015). Every little helps: Understanding donor behavior in a crowdfunding platform for non-profits. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings, 18 (pp. 1103–1108).

  • Lee, Y.-C., Yen, C.-H., & Fu, W.-T. (2016). Improving donation distribution for crowdfunding: An agent-based model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9708, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.-M., & Wu, J.-D. (2016). A social recommendation mechanism for social fundraising. In Pacific Asia conference on information systems, PACIS 2016.

  • Mano, R. S. (2014). Social media, social causes, giving behavior and money contributions. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massolution (2012). The Crowdfunding Industry Report: Market Trends, Composition and Crowdfunding Platforms. Crowdsourcing LLC.

  • Meer, J. (2014). Effects of the price of charitable giving: Evidence from an online crowdfunding platform. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103, 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, J. (2017). Does fundraising create new giving? Journal of Public Economics, 145, 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejova, Y., Weber, I., Garimella, V. R. K., & Dougal, M. C. (2014). Giving is caring: Understanding donation behavior through email. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1297–1307).

  • Meyskens, M., & Bird, L. (2015). Crowdfunding and value creation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2), 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moqri, M., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2016). Please share! Online word of mouth and charitable crowdfunding. In AMCIS 2016: Surfing the IT innovation wave—22nd Americas conference on information systems.

  • Neumayr, M., & Handy, F. (2017). Charitable giving: What influences donors’ choice among different causes? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30, 783–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogami, T. (2014). What makes disaster donors different from non-donors? Disaster Prevention and Management, 23(4), 484–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowdfunding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.

  • Ozdemir, Z. D., Altinkemer, K., De, P., & Ozcelik, Y. (2010). Donor-to-nonprofit online marketplace: An economic analysis of the effects on fund-raising. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 213–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, C., & Wash, R. (2017). The rich get richer? Limited learning in charitable giving on donorschoose.org. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 172–181).

  • Panic, K., Hudders, L., & Cauberghe, V. (2016). Fundraising in an interactive online environment. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(2), 333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulin, M., Ferguson, R. J., Jost, N., & Fallu, J.-M. (2014a). Motivating millennials to engage in charitable causes through social media. Journal of Service Management, 25(3), 334–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulin, M., Ferguson, R. J., Schattke, K., & Jost, N. (2014b). Millennials, social media, prosocial emotions, and charitable causes: The paradox of gender differences. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 26(4), 335–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlstein, E. O. (2013). Anatomy of the Crowd4Discovery crowdfunding campaign. Springer Plus, 2(1), 560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, L., Keating, S., Bruwer, L., Murgolo-Poore, M., & De Bussy, N. (2002). Charitable donations as social exchange or agapic action on the internet: The case of hungersite.com. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 9(4), 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polzin, F., Toxopeus, H., & Stam, E. (2017). The wisdom of the crowd in funding: Information heterogeneity and social networks of crowdfunders. Small Business Economics, 50(2), 251–273.  

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddick, C. G., & Ponomariov, B. (2013). The effect of individuals’ organization affiliation on their internet donations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(6), 1197–1223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinstein, D., & Riener, G. (2012). Reputation and influence in charitable giving: An experiment. Theory and Decision, 72(2), 221–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey-Garcia, M., Liket, K. C., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I., & Maas, K. (2017). Back to basics. Revisiting the relevance of beneficiaries for evaluation and accountability in nonprofits. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 27(4), 493–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, S., & Kim, Y.-G. (2016). A typology of crowdfunding sponsors: Birds of a feather flock together? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 16, 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, S., Kim, K., & Kim, Y.-G. (2016). Reward versus philanthropy motivation in crowdfunding behavior. In Pacific Asia conference on information systems.

  • Sanzo-Perez, M. J., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I., & Rey-Garcia, M. (2015). How to encourage social innovations: A resource-based approach. The Service Industries Journal, 35(7–8), 430–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G. D., & Wang, L. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. W., Faro, D., & Burson, K. A. (2012). More for the many: The influence of entitativity on charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 961–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., Windmeijer, F., & Wright, E. (2015). Peer effects in charitable giving: Evidence from the (Running) field. Economic Journal, 125(585), 1053–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J., Mathers, A., & Crooks, V. A. (2016). Fund my treatment! A call for ethics-focused social science research into the use of crowdfunding for medical care. Social Science and Medicine, 169, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., Ma, W., & Wash, R. (2015). Don’t wait! How timing affects coordination of crowdfunding donations. In CSCW 2015—Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 547–556).

  • Steinemann, S. T., Mekler, E. D., & Opwis, K. (2015). Increasing donating behavior through a game for change: The role of interactivity and appreciation. In CHI PLAY 2015—Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer–human Interaction in play (pp. 319–330).

  • Sura, S., Ahn, J., & Lee, O. (2017). Factors influencing intention to donate via social network site (SNS): From Asian’s perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, X., Lu, Y., & Tan, Y. (2016). An examination of social comparison triggered by higher donation visibility over social media platforms. In 2016 international conference on information systems, ICIS 2016.

  • Tanaka, K. G., & Voida, A. (2016). Legitimacy work: Invisible work in philanthropic crowdfunding. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings (pp. 4550–4561).

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiblmaier, H., & Pollach, I. (2006). A framework for measuring people’s intention to donate online. In PACIS 2006—10th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: ICT and Innovation Economy (pp. 808–819).

  • Tremblay-Boire, J., & Prakash, A. (2017). Will you trust me? How individual American donors respond to informational signals regarding local and global humanitarian charities. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(2), 646–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, M. H. D., & Wiepking, P. (2013). National campaigns for charitable causes: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(2), 219–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., Lim, E. T. K., & Van Toorn, C. (2016). Gimme money! Designing digital entrepreneurial crowdfunding platforms for persuasion and its social implications. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2016—Proceedings (p. 377).

  • Wash, R. (2013). The value of completing crowdfunding projects. In ICWSM (13).

  • Wiepking, P. (2008). For the love of mankind. A sociological study on charitable giving (Ph.D. Dissertation). Faculty of Social Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Wojciechowski, A. (2009). Models of charity donations and project funding in social networks. In Meersman R., Herrero P., & Dillon T. (Eds.), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2009 Workshops. Vol. 5872 (pp. 454–463).

  • Yang, Y., Wang, H. J., & Wang, G. (2016). Understanding crowdfunding processes: A dynamic evaluation and simulation approach. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Z.-J., & Lin, S. (2017). The antecedents and consequences of charitable donation heterogeneity on social media. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 23(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain

    Noelia Salido-Andres & Marta Rey-Garcia

  2. University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

    Luis Ignacio Alvarez-Gonzalez & Rodolfo Vazquez-Casielles

Authors
  1. Noelia Salido-Andres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marta Rey-Garcia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luis Ignacio Alvarez-Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rodolfo Vazquez-Casielles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noelia Salido-Andres.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salido-Andres, N., Rey-Garcia, M., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L.I. et al. Mapping the Field of Donation-Based Crowdfunding for Charitable Causes: Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework. Voluntas 32, 288–302 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00213-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00213-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation