Abstract
Recent years have seen accelerated processes of decentralization and devolution of social services from central government toward local authorities and from them to non-profit organizations (NPOs). This article describes a case study of the process of transition of power from a local authority to a NPO and the outcomes of this transition on public policy making. The findings presented in the article are based on a qualitative analysis of documents over a period of 7 years (1999–2006) in a large local authority in Israel and its relations with a NPO which provide services for the elderly.
Résumé
On observe ces dernières années une accélération du processus de décentralisation et de déconcentration des services sociaux du gouvernement central aux collectivités locales, et de ces dernières aux OBNL. Cet article décrit une étude de cas du processus de transition du pouvoir d’une autorité locale vers une organisation à but non lucratif et les effets de cette transition sur l’élaboration des politiques publiques. Les résultats présentés dans cet article reposent sur une analyse qualitative de documents sur une période de sept ans (1999-2006) dans une importante collectivité locale d’Israël, ainsi que ses relations avec un OBNL proposant des services aux personnes âgées.
Zusammenfassung
In den vergangenen Jahren konnte ein beschleunigter Prozess der Dezentralisierung und Regionalisierung sozialer Leistungen von der zentralen Regierung zu den Lokalbehörden und von diesen zu den Nonprofit-Organisationen beobachtet werden. Dieser Beitrag beschreibt eine Fallstudie zum Prozess des Kompetenzübergangs von einer Lokalbehörde zu einer Nonprofit-Organisation und die Folgen dieses Übergangs auf die Festlegung öffentlicher Grundsätze. Die in dem Beitrag präsentierten Ergebnisse basieren auf einer qualitativen Analyse von Dokumenten über einen Zeitraum von sieben Jahren (1999-2006) in einer großen Lokalbehörde in Israel und ihrer Beziehung zu einer Nonprofit-Organisation, die Dienstleistungen für ältere Menschen anbietet.
Resumen
en los últimos años se ha producido una serie de procesos acelerados de descentralización y devolución de servicios sociales, desde el gobierno central a las autoridades locales y de éstas a las OSAL. En este artículo se analiza un estudio de caso del proceso de transición de poder de una autoridad local a una organización sin ánimo de lucro y los resultados de esta transición sobre la elaboración de políticas públicas. Los resultados presentados en el trabajo se basan en un análisis cualitativo de los documentos durante un periodo de siete años (1999-2006) en una autoridad local mayor en Israel y sus relaciones con una OSAL que da servicio a los ancianos.
摘要
最近几年,从中央到地方当局以及从地方当局到非营利组织的权力下放和社会服务分权进程加快。本文介绍了从地方当局到非营利组织实施权力转移进程的个案研究,以及这种权力转移对公共决策的作用及成果。本文提出的结论是基于以色列一个大的地方当局过去7年(1999-2006)的文件的定性分析,以及它与一个专为老人提供服务的非营利组织的关系。
ملخص
قد شهدت السنوات الأخيرة عمليات تسريع اللامركزية وإنتقال ملكية الخدمات الإجتماعية من الحكومة المركزية إلى السلطات المحلية ومنهم إلى المنظمات الغير هادفة للربح (NPO’s). وصفت هذه المقالة دراسة حالة لعملية إنتقال السلطة من سلطة محلية إلى منظمة غير ربحية ونتائج هذا التحول في صنع السياسات العامة. وتستند النتائج الواردة في هذا البحث على التحليل النوعي للوثائق على مدى سبع سنوات (1999-2006) في سلطة محلية كبيرة في إسرائيل وعلاقاتها مع المنظمات الغير هادفة للربح (NPO’s) التي تقدم خدمات للمسنين.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A final power base is that of informational power, which refers to A’s ability to influence B's actions by persuasion or logical argument. In the current study, no events were found that comply with this power base.
In the year 2000.
Supporting neighborhood—a “caring community” that help the elderly to stay in the community by providing them several services as emergency call center, social activity and a neighborhood facilitator.
The state social insurance administration.
References
Alexander, J. (1999). The impact of devolution on nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(1), 57–70.
Archambault, E., & Boumendil, J. (2002). Dilemmas of public private partnership in France. In U. Ascoli & C. Ranci (Eds.), Dilemmas of the welfare mix: The new structure of welfare in an era of privatization. New York: Planum Publisher.
Austin, M. J. (2003). The changing relationship between nonprofit organizations and public social service agencies in the era of welfare reform. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 97–114.
Bel, C., & Fageda, X. (2007). Why do local governments privatize public services? A survey of empirical studies. Local Government Studies, 33(4), 517–534.
Berenskoetter, F. (2007). Unity in diversity? Power in world politics. London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of International Relations. Paper prepared for presentation at the SGIR Sixth Pan-European Conference, Turin, 12–15 September.
Bifulco, L., & Centemeri, L. (2008). Governance and participation in local welfare: The case of the Italian piani de Zone. Social Policy and Administration, 42(3), 211–227.
Bode, L. (2006). Disorganized welfare mixes: Voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(4), 346–359.
Boris, E. T., & Steuerle, C. E. (2006). Scope and dimensions of the nonprofit sector. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The non-profit sector. A research handbook (pp. 66–89). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Burnley, C., Matthews, C., & McKenzie, S. (2005). Devolution of services to children and families: The experience of NPOs in Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada. Voluntas, 16(1), 69–87.
Cairns, B., Harris, M., & Hutchison, R. (2007). Sharing God’s love or meeting government goals? Local churches and public policy implementation. Policy & Politics, 35(3), 413–432.
Carmeli, A., Yitzhak, Y., & Vinerski-Peretz, H. (2008). Fiscal distress in local authorities in Israel: The convened committee as a method and a solution. Local Government Studies, 34(3), 323–347.
Caro, F. G., & Morris, R. (2002). Introduction. In F. G. Caro & R. Morris (Eds.), Devolution and aging policy. New York: Haworth Press.
Clemens, E. (2006). The constitution of citizens: Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (pp. 207–221). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Côté, D. (1999). Power strategy formation in a human service organization undergoing turbulent change. Canada: Doctoral Program in Applied Social Sciences, University of Montréal.
Craig, G., Taylor, M., Szanto, C., & Wilkinson, M. (1999). Developing local compacts—relationships between local public sector bodies and community sectors. York, England: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Dahlberg, L. (2006). The complementarity norm: Service provision by the welfare state and voluntary organizations in Sweden. Health and Social Care in the Community, 14(4), 302–310.
Devine, F. (2002). Qualitative methods. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (2nd ed., pp. 197–216). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
De-Vita, C. (1998). Nonprofits and devolution: What do we know? In E. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
Dijke, M. V., & Poppe, M. (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537–556.
DiMaggio, P. K., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. W. Powell & P. K. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Donnelly, C. M. (2007). Delegation of governmental power to private parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Doron, I. (2006). Rights of the elderly. Israel: Taub Centre for Social Policy Studies (Hebrew).
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.
Entwistle, T. (2005). Why are local authorities reluctant to externalize (and do they have a good reason)? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(2), 191–206.
French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). Bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Gal, J. (2006). On the national and local in the social policy. Social Security, 71, 5–8. (Hebrew).
Gal, J., & Weiss, I. (2006). Anti-poverty strategies in Jerusalem. Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Israeli Studies (Hebrew).
Gazley, B., & Brudney, J. L. (2007). The purpose (and perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 389–415.
Greer, S. L. (2010). How dose decentralization affect the welfare state? Territorial politics and the welfare state in UK and US. Journal of Social Policy, 39(2), 181–201.
Grimshaw, D., Vincent, S., & Willmott, H. (2002). Going privately: Partnership and outsourcing in UK public services. Public Administration, 80(3), 475–502.
Hananel, R. (2007). Corruption and decentralization in local-central government relationship: Potential effects of the new municipality’s law proposal (2005). Tel Aviv: The Harold Hartog School of Government and Policy (Hebrew), Tel Aviv University.
Haque, S. M. (2002). The changing balance of power between the government and NGOs in Bangladesh. International Political Science Review, 23(4), 411–435.
Hebdon, R., & Jalette, P. (2008). The restructuring of municipal services: A Canada–United States comparison. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 144–158.
Hinkin, T., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 561–567.
Hodder, I. (2000). The interpretation of documents and meterial culture. In N. K. Denzin & I. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 703–715).
Huxham, C. (2003). Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review, 5(3), 401–423.
Immergluck, D. (2005). Building power, losing power: The rise and fall of a prominent community economic development coalition. Economic Development Quarterly, 19(3), 211–224.
Katz, H., & Yogev, H. (2009). The Israel third sector and the economic crisis. Newsletter, 31, February, Israeli Center for Third sector Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Available at www.bgu.ac.il/ictr. Accessed 20 January 2010.
Kendall, J. (2000). The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990s: Why and wherefores. Policy & Politics, 28(4), 541–562.
Kim, P., Pinkley, R., & Fragale, A. (2005). Power dynamics in negotiation. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 799–822.
Langly, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
Maor, A., & Bar Nir, D. (2008). Implications of the sweeping use of the economic arrangements law on social gaps in 2002–2005. Social Security, 77, 95–125. (Hebrew).
May, T. (1997). Social research: Issues, methods and process (2nd ed., pp. 157–174). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Menon, N. (2006). Investigating the “What” and “How”: A critical review of decentralization research. Paper for the 35 ARNOVA conference, Chicago, IL, USA, November 16–18.
Milbourne, L. (2009). Remodelling the third sector: Advancing collaboration or competition in community-based initiatives. Journal of Social Policy, 38(2), 277–298.
Miller, F. A., & Alvarado, K. (2005). Incorporating documents into qualitative nursing research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(4), 348–353.
Milward, H. B., & Provan, G. K. (2003). Managing the hollow state-collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review, 5(10), 1–18.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organization. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice Hall.
Najam, A. (2000). The four C’s of third sector—government relations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(4), 376–396.
Newman, J., Glendinning, C., & Hughes, M. (2008). Beyond modernization? Social care and the transformation of welfare governance. Journal of Social Policy, 37(4), 531–559.
Proulx, J., Bourque, D., & Savard, S. (2007). The government—third sector interface in Quebec. Voluntas, 18, 293–307.
Ramanath, R. (2008). Limits to institutional isomorphism: Examining internal processes in NGO-Government interactions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, March, 1–26.
Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent development. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227–251.
Razin, E. (2003). Local government reform in Israel: Between centralization and decentralization between traditionalism and modernity. Jerusalem: Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies (Hebrew).
Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16(1/2), 29–49.
Schmid, H. (2003). Rethinking the policy of contracting out social services to non-governmental organizations: Lessons and dilemmas. Public Management Review, 5(3), 307–323.
Sellers, J. M., & Lidstrom, A. (2007). Decentralization, local government, and the welfare state. Governance, 20(4), 609–632.
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis (pp. 33–37). New York: Guilford.
Struyk, R. (2002). Nonprofit organizations as contracted local social service providers in Eastern Europe and the commonwealth of independent state. Public Administration and Development, 22(5), 429–437.
Twombly, E. C. (2003). What factors affect the entry and exit of nonprofit human service organizations in Metropolitan areas? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(2), 211–235.
West, A., & Currie, P. (2008). The role of the private sector in publicly funded schooling in England: Finance, delivery and decision making. Policy & Politics, 36(2), 191–207.
Wincott, D. (2006). Devolution and the welfare state: Lessons from early childhood education and care policy in Wales. Environment and planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 279–295.
Yannai, U. (2006). The Welfare Act 1958: Is it a basis and a guarantee for the welfare of the population? Working paper. Jerusalem: The Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University (Hebrew).
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Young, D. R. (1998). Complementary, supplementary, or adversarial? A theoretical and historical examination of nonprofit-government relations in the United States. In E. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict (pp. 31–67). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1—List of Interviews
In the Local Authority
The director of the welfare department (December 2005; March, 2006 (2))
The assistant to the director of the welfare department (December 2005)
The director of developing community services in the elderly department (September 2006)
The director of the unit for the elderly (January, 2006; March, 2006; April, 2006)
The coordinator of the elderly department (April, 2006)
The director of the unit for volunteering department (December 2005)
The director of the welfare contracts department (December 2005)
The director of the welfare accountant department (January, 2006 (2); April, 2006 (2); July, 2006)
The director of the department for people with disabilities (April, 2006)
The coordinator of the department for people with disabilities (September 2006)
The coordinator of the department for children and family (September 2006)
The Ministry of Welfare and Social Services
The director of department for children and family (August, 2006)
The director of the elderly department (August, 2006)
The director of the social services department (August, 2006)
Appendix 2: Summary of Documentary Evidence
Source of document | |
|---|---|
LA | Local authority |
NPO | Non-profit organization |
MS | Ministry of social welfare |
SC | Social security institute |
Event/year | Total | Minute of meetings | Publication | Work plan | Budget | Letter | Contract | Document | Meeting protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/1999 | 3 | NPO1 | LA1 | NPO1 | |||||
2/1999 | 2 | LA1 NPO1 | |||||||
3/1999 | 4 | LA1 NPO-1 LA | NPO-1 LA | LA-NPO1 | |||||
4/1999 | 1 | LA-1 NPO | |||||||
5/1999 | 3 | NPO-1 LA | NPO-LA1 LA1 | ||||||
6/1999 | 2 | MS-LA1 | LA1 | ||||||
Total | 15 | – | – | – | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 1 |
Event/year | Total | Minute of meetings | Publication | Work plan | Budget | Letter | Contract | Document | Meeting protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/2000 | 4 | LA1 | NPO1 | NPO2 | |||||
2/2000 | 2 | NPO-LA1 | NPO1 | ||||||
3/2000 | 4 | LA4 | |||||||
4/2000 | 1 | LA-1 NPO | |||||||
Total | 11 | 1 | – | 1 | 2 | 1 | – | 4 | 2 |
Event/year | Total | Minute of meetings | Publication | Work plan | Budget | Letter | Contract | Document | Meeting protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/2001 | 3 | NPO2 | LA1 | ||||||
2/2001 | 3 | NPO1 | LA1 | LA1 | |||||
3/2001 | 3 | NPO1 | LA1 | NPO1 | |||||
4/2001 | 3 | LA3 | |||||||
5/2001 | 2 | LA1 LA-NPO1 | |||||||
6/2001 | 3 | LA2 LA-NPO1 | |||||||
7/2001 | 4 | LA-NPO 2 | LA1 | LA1 | |||||
8/2001 | 5 | LA1 | LA2 NPO-MS1 | LA1 | |||||
9/2001 | 3 | NPO-LA1 | NPO1 | LA-NPO1 | |||||
10/2001 | 3 | LA-NPO1 NPO-LA1 | NPO1 | ||||||
Total | 32 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 3 | 1 |
Event/year | Total | Minute of meetings | Publication | Work plan | Budget | Letter | Contract | Document | Meeting protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/2002 | 1 | NPO-LA1 | |||||||
2/2002 | 8 | NPO-LA1 | SC1 | LA-NPO2 NPO-LA1 LA1 MS-LA1 | NPO1 | ||||
Total | 9 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
Event/year | Total | Minute of meetings | Publication | Work plan | Budget | Letter | Contract | Document | Meeting protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/2003 | 5 | NPO1 | LA1 | LA-NPO2 | LA1 | ||||
2/2003 | 3 | NPO1 | LA1 | NPO1 | |||||
3/2003 | 5 | NPO1 | LA1 | NPO3 | |||||
4/2003 | 3 | LA1 | LA-NPO1 | LA1 | |||||
5/2003 | 3 | LA1 | LA-NPO1 | LA1 | |||||
6/2003 | 3 | LA1 NPO1 | NPO1 | ||||||
7/2003 | 1 | LA-NPO1 | |||||||
8/2003 | 1 | LA-NPO1 | |||||||
9/2003 | 1 | LA-NPO1 | |||||||
10/2003 | 1 | LA-NPO1 | |||||||
11/2003 | 1 | LA-NPO1 | |||||||
12/2003 | 6 | LA-NPO1 | NPO-1 LA LA3 | LA-NPO1 | |||||
Total | 33 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 4 | 7 |
Event/year | Total | Minute of meetings | Publication | Work plan | Budget | Letter | Contract | Document | Meeting protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/2004 | 2 | LA-NPO1 | LA1 | ||||||
2/2004 | 1 | LA-NPO1 | |||||||
3/2004 | 3 | LA-NPO1 | LA2 | ||||||
4/2004 | 3 | LA2 | LA1 | ||||||
5/2004 | 1 | LA-1 NPO | |||||||
6/2004 | 4 | NPO1 | 2LA | LA-NPO1 | |||||
7/2004 | 2 | LA-NPO2 | |||||||
8/2004 | 5 | NPO-1 LA LA1 | LA-NPO1 | LA2 | |||||
9/2004 | 1 | LA-NPO1 | |||||||
10/2004 | 5 | NPO1 | NPO-1 LA LA-1 NPO LA1 | NPO 1 | |||||
Total | 27 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 3 |
Event/year | Total | Minute of meetings | Publication | Work plan | Budget | Letter | Contract | Document | Meeting protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/2005 | 3 | LA-NPO1 | NPO1 | LA1 | |||||
2/2005 | 6 | LA-1 NPO | NPO2 LA3 | ||||||
3/2005 | 4 | LA-NPO1 | NPO1 | MSLA1 LA1 | |||||
4/2005 | 2 | LA-NPO1 | LA1 | ||||||
Total | 15 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bar-Nir, D., Gal, J. Who Has the Power? The Role of NPOs in Local Authorities. Voluntas 22, 1–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9144-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9144-6