Abstract
Grassroots organizations have a central place in service provision within many urban communities, particularly as they work with young people. Enhancing the potential of youth serving organizations is vital as many of these small groups lack infrastructure and resources. One organization has gone beyond grant making to organizations to include providing technical assistance, then moving to a model of capacity building to improve their ability to fulfill their mission. This paper describes the efforts of New Detroit to improve the infrastructure of youth serving grassroots organizations through a multi-faceted model and the outcomes evidenced from the first cohort. In addition we explore the contradictions inherent in working with small groups. How do you improve effectiveness without destroying the “homegrown” character these groups possess? The model presented here shows the value of empowering small grassroots groups to build capacity.
Résumé
Les organisations populaires tiennent une place centrale dans la prestation de services dans de nombreuses collectivités urbaines, particulièrement car elles travaillent avec de jeunes personnes. L’amélioration du potentiel des organisations s’adressant aux jeunes est vitale car ces petits groupes manquent d’infrastructures et de ressources. Une organisation a été au-delà du subventionnement leur étant accordé en fournissant une assistance technique, puis en construisant un modèle de capacité d’élaboration en vue d’améliorer leur capacité àremplir leur mission. Cette étude décrit les efforts de New Detroit pour améliorer l’infrastructure des organisations populaires s’adressant aux jeunes par le biais d’un modèle àplusieurs facettes et de résultats attestés par la première cohorte. De plus, nous explorons les contradictions inhérentes au travail par petits groupes. Comment pouvons-nous améliorer l’efficacité sans détruire le caractère propre de ces groupes ? Le modèle présenté dans cette étude montre la valeur de l’initiative de petits groupes populaires en ce qui concerne la capacité d’élaboration.
Zusammenfassung
Basisorganisationen nehmen einen zentralen Stellenwert bei der Bereitstellung von Dienstleistungen innerhalb vieler städtischer Gemeinden ein, insbesondere dann, wenn Jugendarbeit involviert ist. Die Förderung des Potentials von Jugendorganisationen ist äußerst wichtig, da es vielen dieser kleinen Gruppen an Infrastruktur und Ressourcen mangelt. Eine Organisation ging über die Vergabe von Förderungsmitteln an andere Organisationen hinaus, um technische Hilfestellungen zu geben und stellte ein Modell zum Ausbau von Kapazitäten zur Verfügung, um so die Fähigkeiten der Organisationen zur Erfüllung ihrer Mission zu verbessern. Dieser Beitrag beschreibt die Bemühungen von New Detroit zur Verbesserung der Infrastruktur in Jugend-Basisorganisationen mit Hilfe eines facettenreichen Modells und geht auf die Ergebnisse der ersten Kohorte ein. Des Weiteren werden die bei der Arbeit mit kleinen Gruppen einhergehenden Widersprüchlichkeiten untersucht. Wie kann man die Effektivität verbessern, ohne den „hausgemachten“ Charakter dieser Gruppen zu verlieren? Das hier dargestellte Modell zeigt, wie wertvoll es ist, wenn kleine Basisgruppen die Möglichkeit erhalten, ihre Kapazitäten auszubauen.
Resumen
Las organizaciones comunitarias ocupan un lugar esencial prestando servicios en muchas comunidades urbanas, sobre todo cuando trabajan con los jóvenes. Promover el desarrollo de las organizaciones juveniles es crucial ya que, en la mayoría de los casos, se trata de grupos reducidos que carecen de infraestructura y recursos. Una de estas organizaciones ha pasado de dedicarse solamente a gestionar becas para las organizaciones a incluir asistencia técnica, adoptando un modelo de creación de capacidades para poder cumplir mejor con su misión. Este trabajo describe los esfuerzos de New Detroit para mejorar la infraestructura de las organizaciones comunitarias de apoyo a los jóvenes a través de un modelo múltiple y del resultado obtenido por el primer grupo. Asimismo, analizamos las contradicciones inevitables que aparecen al trabajar con pequeños grupos. ¿Es posible mejorar la efectividad de estos pequeños grupos sin destruir la naturaleza local que poseen? El modelo que aquí se presenta muestra la importancia de atribuir poderes a estos pequeños grupos para permitirles potenciar sus capacidades.
摘要
基层组织在许多城市社区内都有一个集中服务提供地点,尤其是他们与年轻人一起工作时。增强青年服务组织的潜力是至关重要的,因为多数此类小型团体缺乏基础设施和资源。有一个组织超越了对各种组织的资助并进而提供技术援助,然后成为通过提高自身能力来完成任务的楷模。本文描述“新底特律”致力于通过多方合作模式改善青年服务基层组织的基础设施以及第一批组织所显示的结果。此外我们也探讨了与小型团体合作时存在的矛盾和问题。你该如何提升效果但又不破坏那些团体天生具有的特性?这里提供的案例表明了促使小型基层团体增强能力的价值。
ملخص
أعضاء المنظمات لهم مكان مركزي في بند الخدمه ضمن الكثيرمن المجتمعات الحضريه ، خاصه و هم يعملون مع الشباب . تحسين إمكانيه خدمه منظمات الشباب حيوي لأن كثير من هذه المجموعات الصغيره يفتقد البنيه الأساسيه و الموادر . أحد المنظمات تخطت تقديم المنح لمنظمات لتشمل تقديم المساعدات الفنيه ، ثم الإنتقال إلى نموذج بناء القدره لتحسين القدره على إتمام المهمه .هذه المقاله تصف جهود ديترويت الجديده لتحسين البنيه الأساسيه لخدمه أعضاء منظمات الشباب من خلال نموذج متعدد الأوجه والنتائج الداله من المجموعه الأولى. بالإضافه نحن قمنا بدراسه للتناقضات المتأصله في العمل مع مجموعات صغيره . كيف يمكنك تحسين الفاعليه من غير تحطيم الشخصيه المحليه التي تملكها هذه المجموعات ؟ النموذج الذي قدمناه هنا يظهر قيمه تشجيع أعضاء مجموعات صغيره لبناء قدرات .
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backer, T. (2001). Strengthening nonprofits: Foundation initiatives for nonprofit organizations. In C. J. DeVita & C. Fleming (Eds.), Building capacity in nonprofit organizations (pp. 31–84). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Bailey, D., & Grochau, K. (1993). Aligning leadership needs to the organizational stage of development: Applying management theory to nonprofit organizations. Administration in Social Work, 17, 23–45.
Bess, G. (1998). A first stage organization life cycle study of six emerging nonprofit organizations in Los Angeles. Administration in Social Work, 22, 35–51.
Blumenthal, B. (2003). Investing in capacity building: A guide to high-impact approaches. The Foundation Center.
Castelloe, P., Watson, T., & White, C. (2002). Participatory change: An integrative approach to community practice. Journal of Community Practice, 10, 7–31.
Chaskin, R. J., Brown, P., Venkatesh, S., & Vidal, A. (2001). Building community capacity. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Connolly, P., & Lukas, C. (2002). Strengthening nonprofit performance: A funder’s guide to capacity building. St. Paul, MN: Amherst Wilder Foundation.
Delgado, M. (2000). Community social work practice in an urban context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Detroit Executive Service Corps. (2001). Nonprofit organizational self-assessment questionnaire. Detroit, MI.: Author.
DeVita, C., Fleming, C., & Twombly, E. (2001). Building nonprofit capacity: A framework for addressing the problem. In C. J. DeVita & C. Fleming (Eds.), Building capacity in nonprofit organizations (pp. 5–30). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Doherty, S., & Mayer, S. (2003). Results of an inquiry into capacity building programs for nonprofit programs. Effective Communities Project. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
Eisinger, P. (2002). Organizational capacity and organizational effectiveness among street-level food assistance programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 115–130.
Forbes, D. (1998). Measuring the unmeasurable: Empirical studies of nonprofit organization effectiveness from 1977–1997. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 183–202.
Hasenfeld, Y., & Schmid, H. (1989). The life cycle of human service organizations: An administrative perspective. Administration in Social Work, 13, 243–269.
Hodgkinson, V., & Weitzman, M. (1996). Nonprofit almanac, 1996–1997. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Holley, L. (2003). Emerging ethnic agencies: Building capacity to build community. Journal of Community Practice, 11, 39–57.
Kushner, R., & Poole, P. (1996). Exploring structure-effectiveness relationships in nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7, 119–135.
Lake, K. E., Reis, T. K., & Spann, J. (2000). From grant-making to change making: How the W.K. Kellogg Foundation’s impact services model evolved to enhance the management and social effects of large initiatives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 41–68.
Lawrence, K., Sutton, S., Kubisch, A., Susi, G., & Fulbright-Anderson, K. (2004). Structural racism and community building. Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
Light, P. (2002). Pathways to nonprofit excellence. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Nadler, D. (1981). Managing organizational change: An integrative perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 191–211.
Rappaport, J., & Hess, R. (1984). Studies in empowerment. New York: Haworth Press.
Roman, C., & Moore, G. (2004). Measuring local institutions and organizations: The role of community institutional capacity in social capital. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Siciliano, J. J. (1997). The relationship between formal planning and performance in NPOs. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7, 389–403.
Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots associations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Toepler, S. (2003). Grassroots associations versus larger nonprofits: New evidence from a community case study in arts and culture. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 236–251.
Torres, C., Zey, M., & McIntosh, W. (1991). Effectiveness in voluntary organizations: An empirical assessment. Sociological Focus, 24, 157–174.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2002). The compassion capital fund and the faith-and community-based initiative. HHS Press Release. Available Online: http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2002pres/20020605.html
Venture Philanthropy Partners (2001). Effective capacity building in nonprofit organizations. Reston, VA: Author.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by a contract to New Detroit, Inc. from the Skillman Foundation. Our contract with New Detroit, Inc. permitted academic freedom to publish the results reported herein. The authors would like to thank their colleagues at New Detroit and the SCOPE coordinating team as well as the participating organizations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sobeck, J., Agius, E. & Mayers, V.N. Supporting and Sustaining Grassroots Youth Organizations: The Case of New Detroit. Voluntas 18, 17–33 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-007-9029-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-007-9029-5