Abstract
So that genetic studies can be undertaken on footrot in sheep, it is necessary that a reliable and repeatable method to categorise the phenotype is available. This paper summarises the methods used and results obtained from 1600 hoof lesion scores of 100 mixed-age ewes independently scored twice by two trained operators. Using a 5-pont scale describing the severity of foot lesions, residual correlations were used to assess agreement between scorers and scoring occasions. Data were analysed using both zero-1 and continuous data methods. The average prevalence of any score >0 was 15%, and of scores >1 was 12%. The residual correlation between scorers for SUM_FR was 0.87 and between scoring occasions it was also 0.87, indicating high repeatability or agreement both within and between scorers. No significant differences were detected between scorers or between scoring occasions for any of the traits analysed, or different analytical methods used.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Abbot KA and Lewis CJ (2005). Current approaches to the management of ovine footrot. Veterinary Journal 169:1 28–41.
Bulgin MS, Lincoln SD, Parker CF, South PJ, Dahmen JJ & Lane VM. (1988). Genetic-Associated Resistance to Foot Rot in Selected Targhee Sheep. Journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association 192, 512–515.
Conington J, Hosie B, Nicoll L, Nieuwhof GJ, Bishop SC., Bünger L (2008). Breeding for resistance to footrot – using hoof scoring to quantify footrot in sheep. Abstract. Proc. BSAS, Scarborough 31 Mar to 02-Apr.
Egerton JR and Roberts DS (1971) Vaccination Against Ovine Foot-Rot. Journal of Comparative Pathology 81, 179–370
Escayg A.P., Hickford JGH and Bullock DW (1997). Association between alleles of the ovine major histocompatibility complex and resistance to footrot. Research in Veterinary Science 63, 283–287.
Lawes Agricultural Trust, (2004) Genstat (release 7.2.) Rothamsted Experimental Station, UK.
Morris CA (1998). Responses to selection for disease resistance in sheep and cattle in New Zealand and Australia. 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 27, 295
Nieuwhof GJ. and Bishop SC (2005). Animal Science 81: 23–29
Nieuwhof GJ., Conington J, Bünger L and Bishop SC (2008). Genetic aspects of footrot in sheep. Abstract. Proc. BSAS, Scarborough 31 Mar to 02-Apr.
Patterson RG and Patterson HM (1989). A practical approach to breeding for footrot resistant Merinos. Journal of the New Zealand Mountain Lands Institute P 64–75.
Raadsma, HW (2000). Genetic aspects of resistance to ovine footrot. In ‘Breeding for disease resistance in Farm Animals’ P219–214. Eds. R.F.E. Axford, S.C. Bishop, F.W. Nicholas and J.B. Owen. CABI.
Raadsma HW, Egerton JR, Wood, D, Kristo C. Nicholas FW (1994). Disease resistance in Merino sheep III. Genetic variation in resistance following challenge and subsequent vaccination with an homologous rDNA pilus vaccine. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 111 (5–6): 367–390
Skerman TM., and Moorhouse SR (1987). Broomfield Corriedales: a strain of sheep selectively bred for resistance to footrot. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 35: 101–106
Welsh, EM, Gettinby, G and Nolan AM. (1993). Comparison of a visual analogue scale and a numerical rating scale for assessment of lameness, using sheep as a model. Am. J. Vet. Res, vol. 54:6: 976–983
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to Laura Nicoll and Claire Brockie for doing the foot scoring. This work was funded by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Scottish Government, English Beef and Lamb Executive (Eblex), Hybu Cig Cymru (HCC), Quality Meat Scotland (QMS) and Innovis, under the LINK programme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conington, J., Hosie, B., Nieuwhof, G.J. et al. Breeding for resistance to footrot – the use of hoof lesion scoring to quantify footrot in sheep. Vet Res Commun 32, 583–589 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-008-9062-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-008-9062-x