Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of stand size on pollination in temperate populations of the mangrove Avicennia marina

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Populations of the mangrove Avicennia marina in the Sydney region exist as stands of varying size, reflecting both natural and anthropogenic fragmentation. We hypothesised that, as observed in many terrestrial forests, small stands (<100 plants) would experience lower pollinator densities and altered pollinator behaviour and visitation and, in consequence, would display reduced pollen deposition as compared with large stands (>10,000 plants). Nevertheless, we recognise that such predictions may be overly simplistic because within this region A. marina attracts a diversity of flower visitors, but its only significant pollinator is the exotic honeybee Apis mellifera. Moreover, it is unclear how readily A. mellifera moves among groups of plants within different mangrove stands of varying sizes separated either by water or urban habitat matrix. Our detailed surveys within pairs of large and small stands in two locations support the predictions that pollinator density and pollen deposition are reduced or altered within small stands. Within small stands honeybee abundance and pollen deposition were on average reduced significantly by 84 and 61 %, respectively. Moreover, within small stands there was a non-significant 12 % increase in the mean time that honeybees spent foraging on individual plants and hence potentially depositing self pollen. Taken together, our data indicate that fragmentation affects the performance of A. mellifera as a pollinator of A. marina and reduce pollinator abundance, leading to pollen limitation in small as compared to large stands, which may negatively affect reproductive output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA (2006) Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 9:968–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre A, Dirzo R (2008) Effects of fragmentation on pollinator abundance and fruit set of an abundant understory palm in a Mexican tropical forest. Biol Conserv 141(2):375–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA (1998) Forest fragmentation and plant reproduction: the pollination link. In: Bruns S, Mantell S, Tragardh C (eds) Recent advances in biotechnology for tree conservation and management. IFS, Stockholm, pp 22–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA, Feinsinger P (1994) Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and feral honey bees in Argentine “Chaco Serrano”. Ecol Appl 4:378–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA, Ashworth L, Leonardo G (2002) Reproductive success in fragmented habitats: do compatibility systems and pollination specialization matter? J Veg Sci 13:885–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierzychudek P (1981) Pollen limitation of plant reproductive success. Am Nat 107:360–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw GA, Marquet PA (2003) How landscapes change: human disturbance and ecosystem fragmentation in the Americas. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burd M (1994) Batemans principal and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot Rev 60:83–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butz Huryn VM (1995) Use of native New Zealand plants by honey bees (Apis mellifera L): a review. N Z J Bot 33(4):497–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH (2001) Habitat fragmentation and native bees: a premature verdict? Conserv Ecol 5:3

  • Cascante A, Quesada M, Lobo JA, Fuchs EJ (2002) Effects of dry tropical forest fragmentation on the reproductive success and genetic structure of the tree, Samanea saman. Conserv Biol 16:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanyenga T, Geldenhuys C, Sileshi G (2011) Effect of population size, tree diameter and crown position on viable seed output per cone of the tropical conifer Widdringtonia whytei in Malawi. J Trop Ecol 27:515–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke PJ, Myerscough PJ (1991) Floral biology and reproductive phenology of Avicennia marina in Southeastern Australia. Aust J Bot 39:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK (2009) Ecology of fragmented landscapes. Johns Hopkins University Press, Boltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke NC (1990) Phenological trends with latitude in the mangrove tree Avicennia marina. J Ecol 78:113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke NC (2006) Australia’s mangroves: the authoritative guide to Australia’s mangrove plants. University of Queensland, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul J (2005) Pollen and seed dispersal among dispersed plants. Biol Rev 80(3):413–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermansen TD (2013) Reproductive biology and genetic structure in fragmented populations of the temperate mangrove Avicennia marina. Dissertation, University of Wollongong, Australia

  • Hermansen TD, Britton DR, Ayre DJ, Minchinton TE (2014) Identifying the real pollinators? Exotic honeybees are the dominant flower visitors and only effective pollinators of Avicennia marina in Australian temperate mangroves. Estuar Coast 37(3):621–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer L (2009) Population structure and distance of gene flow in Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. (Avicenniaceae) on a local/regional scale in the Northern Rivers of New South Wales, Australia. Dissertation, Southern Cross University

  • Jennersten O (1988) Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conserv Biol 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lihoreau M, Raine NE, Reynolds AM, Stelzer RP, Lim KS, Smith AD, Osborne JL, Chittka L (2012) Radar tracking and motion-sensitive cameras on flowers reveal the development of pollinator multi- destination routes over large spatial scales. PLOS Biol 10(9):e1001392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lomov B, Keith DA, Hochuli DF (2010) Pollination and plant reproductive success in restored urban landscapes dominated by a pervasive exotic pollinator. Landsc Urban Plan 96:232–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murcia C (1996) Forest fragmentation and the pollination of Neotropical plants. In: Schelhas J, Greenberg R (eds) Forest patches tropical landscapes. Island Press, Covelo, pp 19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak KG, Davidar P (2010) Pollinator limitation and the effect of breeding systems on plant reproduction in forest fragments. Acta Oecol 36:191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman BJ, Ladd P, Brundrett M, Dixon KW (2013) Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant reproductive success and population viability at the landscape and habitat scale. Biol Conserv 159:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl M, Zhu H, Tautz J, Zhang S (2011) Large scale homing in honeybees. PLOS One 6(5):e19669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paton DC (1993) Honey-bees in the Australian environment. Does Apis mellifera disrupt or benefit the native biota? Bioscience 43:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton DC (1996) Overview of feral and managed honeybees in Australia: distribution, abundance, extent of interactions with native biota, evidence of impacts and future research. Department of Zoology, The University of Adelaide, prepared for the Australian Nature Conservation Agency, pp 1–63

  • Sih A, Baltus MS (1987) Patch size, pollinator behavior, and pollinator limitation in Catnip. Ecology 68:1679–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson MG (2006) Plant systematics. Elsevier Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (1999) Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 121(3):432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83(5):1421–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward M, Johnson SD (2005) Pollen limitation and demographic structure in small fragmented populations of Brunsvigia radulosa (Amaryllidaceae). Oikos 188(2):253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan RJ, Ayre DJ, Beynon FM (2009) The birds and the bees: pollinator behaviour and variation in the mating system of the rare shrub Grevillea macleayana. Ann Bot 103(9):1395–1401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Young A, Pickup M (2010) Low S-allele numbers limit mate availability, reduce seed set and skew fitness in small populations of a self-incompatible plant. J Appl Ecol 47(3):541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ben Beverly for skilled field assistance during the A. marina flowering season of 2009. This study was supported by a UoW postgraduate scholarship to Tyge D. Hermansen, by an ARC Discovery Grant to Todd E. Minchinton and David J. Ayre and by the University of Wollongong’s Institute for Conservation Biology and Environmental Management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. D. Hermansen.

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wardle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hermansen, T.D., Ayre, D.J. & Minchinton, T.E. Effects of stand size on pollination in temperate populations of the mangrove Avicennia marina . Plant Ecol 215, 1153–1162 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0374-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0374-3

Keywords

Navigation