Skip to main content
Log in

Differential responses to defoliation frequency in little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) in tallgrass prairie: implications for herbivory tolerance and avoidance

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant responses to herbivory are complex. In grasses, relative growth rate (RGR), seed, and vegetative reproduction, resource allocation, and architecture vary differentially and often nonlinearly with grazing intensity. High grazing tolerance may be achieved through compensatory photosynthesis and leaf growth, or through demographic mechanisms such as activation of a belowground dormant bud bank. This study assessed the relationship between grazing frequency and responses of Schizachyrium scoparium (little bluestem) in a tallgrass prairie, and examined the roles of tiller growth, reproduction, and bud (meristem) populations in its persistence under grazing. Genets were subjected to varying simulated grazing frequencies for a period of 2 years. Strong differential responses were observed among plant traits. RGR, biomass, and flowering showed strong nonlinear reductions in response to increasing clipping frequency, with no evidence of threshold effects. However, meristem density was unaffected, and plants maintained a large bud bank across all clipping treatments. Tiller natality decreased initially, but increased with >4 clippings, suggesting that declines in tiller RGR are partially offset by increasing tiller natality, and that variation in genet size is driven more by demography than by variation in individual tiller growth. Increased grazing frequency also resulted in differential activation of buds at different positions (emerging within vs. outside the subtending leaf sheath), explaining the shift to a more prostrate growth form observed in many caespitose grasses under persistent grazing. Thus, although this grass species lacks the capacity for compensatory foliage re-growth, the maintenance of a large dormant bud bank and the differential activation of buds in different positions contribute to its grazing tolerance and avoidance, respectively, and its long-term persistence in grazed grasslands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Benson E, Hartnett DC (2006) The role of seed and vegetative reproduction in plant recruitment and demography in tallgrass prairie. Plant Ecol 187:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson E, Hartnett DC, Mann K (2004) Belowground bud banks and meristem limitation in tallgrass prairie plant populations. Am J Bot 91:416–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briske DD (1991) Developmental morphology and physiology of grasses. In: Heitschmidt RK, Stuth JW (eds) Grazing management: an ecological perspective. Timber Press, Portland, pp 85–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JR, Stuth JW (1993) How herbivory affects grazing tolerant and sensitive grasses in a central Texas grassland: integrating plant response across hierarchical levels. Oikos 67:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler JL, Briske DD (1988) Population structure and tiller demography of the bunchgrass Schizachyrium scoparium in response to herbivory. Oikos 51:306–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cingolini AM, Posse G, Collantes MB (2005) Plant functional traits, herbivore selectivity and response to sheep grazing in Patagonian steppe grasslands. J Appl Ecol 42:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalgleish HJ, Hartnett DC (2009) The effects of fire frequency and grazing on tallgrass prairie plant composition and productivity are mediated through bud bank demography. Plant Ecol 201:411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dannell K, Bergstrom R, Duncan P, Pastor J (2006) Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 522

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Mazancourt C, Loreau M, Abbadie L (1998) Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: when do herbivores enhance plant production? Ecology 79:2242–2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del-Val E, Crawley MJ (2005) Are grazing increaser species better tolerators than decreasers? an experimental assessment of defoliation tolerance in eight British grassland species. J Ecol 93:1005–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derner JD, Gillen RL, McCollum FT, Tate KW (1994) Little bluestem tiller defoliation patterns under continuous and rotational grazing. J Range Manag 47:220–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer DD, Elder WC, Single G (1963) Effects of height and frequency of clipping on pure stands of range grasses in north central Oklahoma, Oklahoma Agric Exp Bull 614

  • Fair J, Lauenroth WK, Coffin D (1999) Demography of Bouteloua gracilis in a mixed prairie: analysis of genets and individuals. J Ecol 87:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM (2001) Restoring heterogeneity on rangelands: ecosystem management based on evolutionary grazing patterns. Bioscience 51:625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillen RL, McCollum FT, Brummer JE (1990) Tiller defoliation patterns under short duration grazing in tallgrass prairie. J Range Manag 43:95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman M, Noy-Meir I, Pluda D, Seligman NA, Rothman S, Sternberg M (2001) Biomass partitioning following defoliation of annual and perennial Mediterranean grasses. Conserv Ecol 5:1: http://www.consecol.org/Journal/vol5/iss2/art1

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, p 892

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett DC, Setshogo MP, Dalgleish HJ (2006) Bud banks of perennial savanna grasses in Botswana. Afr J Ecol 44:256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Briggs J, Hartnett DC, Collins SL (eds) (1998) Grassland dynamics: long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford University Press, New York, p 336

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotanen PM, Bergelson J (2000) Effects of simulated grazing on different genotypes of Bouteloua gracilis: how important is morphology? Oecologia 123:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leriche H, Le Roux X, Desnoyers F, Simioni G, Abbadie L (2003) Grass response to clipping in an African savanna: testing the grazing optimization hypothesis. Ecol Appl 13:1346–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschinski J, Whitman TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability and timing. Am Nat 134:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurico R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullahey JJ, Waller SS, Moser LE (1990) Defoliation effects on production and morphological development of little bluestem. J Range Manag 43:497–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullahey JJ, Waller SS, Moser LE (1991) Defoliation effects on yield and bud and tiller numbers of two sand hills grasses. J Range Manag 44:241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N’Guessan M (2007) Effects of grazing on growth and morphology of rhizomatous and caespitose grasses. Thesis, Kansas State University

  • Olson BE, Richards JH (1988) Tussock regrowth after grazing: intercalary meristem and bud activity of tillers of Agropyron desertorum. Oikos 51:374–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters DPC (2002) Recruitment potential of two perennial grasses with different growth forms at a semiarid-arid transition zone. Am J Bot 89:1616–1623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer KE, Hartnett DC (1995) Bison selectivity and grazing responses of little bluestem in tallgrass prairie. J Range Manag 48:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers W, Hartnett DC (2001) Temporal vegetation dynamics and recolonization mechanisms on different-sized soil disturbances in tallgrass prairie. Am J Bot 88:1634–1642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rusch GM, Skarpe C, Halley DJ (2009) Plant traits link hypothesis about resource-use and response to herbivory. Basic Appl Ecol 10:466–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE (2001) Temperate grasslands. In: Chapin FS III, Sala OE, Huber-Sannwald E (eds) Global biodiversity in a changing environment. Scenarios for the 21st century, ecological studies 152. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliskar DM (2003) The response of Ammophila breviligulata and Spartina patens (Poaceae) to grazing by feral horses on a dynamic mid-Atlantic barrier island. Am J Bot 90:1038–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spasojevic MJ, Aicher RJ, Koch GR, Marquardt ES, Mirotchnick N, Troxler TG, Collins SL (2010) Fire and grazing in a mesic tallgrass prairie: impacts on plant species and functional traits. Ecology 91:1651–1659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trlica MJ, Rittenhouse LR (1993) Grazing and plant performance. Ecol Appl 3:21–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi J, Nilsson P, Astrom M (1994) Plant compensatory responses: bud dormancy as an adaptation to herbivory. Ecology 75:1429–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner CL, Seastedt TR, Dyer MI (1993) Maximization of aboveground grassland production: the role of defoliation frequency, intensity, and history. Ecol Appl 3:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veen (Ciska) GF, Blair JM, Smith MD, Collins SL (2008) Influence of grazing and fire frequency on small-scale plant community structure and resource variability in native tallgrass prairie. Oikos 117:859–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesk PA, Westoby M (2004) Funding the bud bank: a review of the cost of buds. Oikos 106:200–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinton MA, Hartnett DC (1992) Effects of bison grazing on Andropogon gerardii and Panicum virgatum in burned and unburned tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 90:374–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DG, Briske DD (1991) Size and ecological significance of the physiological individual in the bunchgrass Schizachyrium scoparium. Oikos 62:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research Program (IBN-9632851), and the US Department of Agriculture Rangeland Research Program (Grant No. 00310306).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Hartnett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

N’Guessan, M., Hartnett, D.C. Differential responses to defoliation frequency in little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) in tallgrass prairie: implications for herbivory tolerance and avoidance. Plant Ecol 212, 1275–1285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9904-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9904-4

Keywords

Navigation