Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of dispersal limitation and topographic heterogeneity on beta diversity and phylobetadiversity in a subtropical forest

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We assessed the effects of topographic heterogeneity and stem density on species composition between grains of different sizes (20 × 20, 50 × 50, and 100 × 100 m), based on partial Mantel tests. Similarity in species composition was measured by the abundance-based Jaccard index (C_J) and by an index that incorporates phylogenetic information into C_J (pC_J). Plants were divided into five groups, arbor, subarbor, and shrub according to life form and two other groups: species that produce dry fruits (PDF) and that produce fleshy fruits (PFF). C_J and pC_J between any two grains at each grain size were calculated separately for these groups and for all species combined. In order to examine what influences C_J and pC_J, we analyzed their correlations with topographic heterogeneity variables and two dispersal limitation-related variables (stem and topographic resistance). Our data indicate that at all three grain sizes, C_J and pC_J decrease with increasing distance for all plant groups. Dispersal limitation and topographic heterogeneity were both important at 20 × 20 and 50 × 50 m grain sizes for C_J and pC_J of all plant groups; and at 100 × 100 m grain size, topographic heterogeneity dominates over dispersal limitation for some plant groups. C_J and pC_J of PDFs are less negatively correlated with stem resistance than those of PFFs. We conclude that both beta diversity and phylobetadiversity are dependent on plant groups and grain sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bray RJ, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen T (2005) A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol Lett 8:148–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 345:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Condit R, Hubbell SP, Lafrankie JV, Sukumar R, Manokaran N, Foster RB, Ashton PS (1996) Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees: a comparison of three 50-ha plots. J Ecol 84:549–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG Jr, Chave J, Terborgh J, Foster RB, Percy NV, Aguilar S, Valencia R, Villa G, Muller-Landau HC, Losos E, Hubbell SP (2002) Beta diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295:666–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin F, Schulz P (1998) Multiple correlations and Bonferroni’s correction. Biol Psychiat 44:775–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidar P, Rajagopal B, Mohandass D, Puyravaud JP, Condit R, Wright SJ, Leigh EG Jr (2007) The effect of climatic gradients, topographic variation and species traits on the beta diversity of rain forest trees. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:510–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier S, Manion G, Elith J, Richardson K (2007) Using generalized dissimilarity modeling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment. Divers Distrib 13:252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. JSS 22:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham CH, Fine PVA (2008) Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. Ecol Lett 11:1263–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy OJ, Senterre B (2007) Characterizing the phylogenetic structure of communities by an additive partitioning of phylogenetic diversity. J Ecol 95:493–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He FL, Duncan RP (2000) Density-dependent effect on tree survival in an old-growth Douglas fir forest. J Ecol 88:676–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He F, LaFrankie JV, Song B (2002) Scale dependence of tree abundance and richness in a tropical rain forest, Malaysia. Landscape Ecol 17:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe HF (1986) Seed dispersal by fruit-eating birds and mammals. In: Murray DR (ed) Seed dispersal. Academic Press, Sydney, pp 123–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • John R, Dalling JW, Harms KE, Yavitt JB, Stallard RF, Mirabello M, Hubbell SP, Valencia R, Navarrete H, Vallejo M, Foster RB (2007) Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical tree species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:864–869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-neto PR (2005) Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol Monogr 75:435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Mi X, Ren H, Ma K, Yu M, Sun IF, He F (2009) Partitioning beta. Diversity in a subtropical broad-leaved forest of China. Ecology 90:663–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Wei SG, Huang ZL, Ye WH, Cao HL (2009) Spatial distributions of tree species in a subtropical forest of China. OIKOS 118:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morlon H, Chuyong G, Condit R, Hubbell S, Kenfack D, Thomas D, Valencia R, Green JL (2008) A general framework for the distance-decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecol Lett 11:904–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Landau HC, Wright SJ, Calderón O, Condit R, Hubbell SP (2008) Interspecific variation in primary seed dispersal in a tropical forest. J Ecol 96:653–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The decay of similarity with distance in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26:857–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normand S, Vormisto J, Svenning J-C, Grández C, Balslev H (2006) Geographical and environmental controls of palm beta diversity in paleo-riverine terrace forests in Amazonian Peru. Plant Ecol 186:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts MD, Davies SJ, Bossert WH, Tan S, Supardi MNN (2004) Habitat heterogeneity and niche structure of trees in two tropical rain forests. Oecologia 139:446–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H (2009) Beta diversity in relation to dispersal ability for vascular plants in North America. Global Ecol Biogeogr 18:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Klinka K, Kayahara GJ (1998) Longitudinal patterns of plant diversity in the North American boreal forest. Plant Ecol 138:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahbek C (2005) The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecol Lett 8:224–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed RA, Peet RK, Palmer MW, White PS (1993) Scale dependence of vegetation-environment correlations: a case study of a North Carolina piedmont woodland. J Veg Sci 4:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooley RL (2006) Spatial heterogeneity and characteristic scales of species–habitat relationship. Bioscience 56:533–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schurr FM, Steinitz O, Nathan R (2008) Plant fecundity and seed dispersal in spatially heterogeneous environments: models, mechanisms and estimation. J Ecol 96:628–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986) Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst Zool 35:627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen J, McDonald R, Hillebrand H (2007) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Song YC (2001) Vegetation ecology. East China Normal University Press, Shanghai (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org

  • Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K (2006) Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding targets of different methods of analysis. Ecology 87:2697–2708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Kalliola R, Linna A, Danjoy W, Rodriguez Z (1995) Dissecting Amazonian biodiversity. Science 269:63–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Yli-Halla M (2003) Dispersal environment, and floristic variation of western amazonian forest. Science 299:241–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valencia R, Foster RB, Villa G, Condit R, Svenning J-C, Hernández C, Romoleroux K, Losos E, Magård E, Balslev H (2004) Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador. J Ecol 92:214–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Hao Z, Ye J, Zhang J, Li B, Yao X (2008) Spatial variation of species diversity across scales in an old-growth temperate forest of China. Ecol Res 23:709–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Ye W, Cao H, Huang Z, Lian J, Li L, Wei S, Sun IF (2009) Species-topography association in a species-rich subtropical forest of China. Basic Appl Ecol 10:648–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1956) Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol Monogr 26:1–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H (1981) Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia 50:296–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Z (2002) Structure, growth and ontology of plant organs. In: Fu C, Ding B (eds) Botany. Zhejiang university press, Hangzhou (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank many individuals who contributed to the field survey of the plot. This study was funded by the Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX-YW-430-03), the National Key Technology R&D Program (2008BAC39B02), and “11th Five-Year” plan on National Scientific and Technological Support Projects (2008BADB0B05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanhui Ye.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 1.

Table 1 Classifications of the species analyzed in this study

Appendix 2

See Table 2.

Table 2 Results of partial Mantel tests on correlation coefficients between similarity indices (C_J and pC_J) and stem resistance (Rstem), topographic resistance (Rtopo), aspect (Da), convexity (Dc), elevation (De), and slope (Ds) for different plant groups at different grain sizes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bin, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, Z. et al. The effects of dispersal limitation and topographic heterogeneity on beta diversity and phylobetadiversity in a subtropical forest. Plant Ecol 209, 237–256 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9708-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9708-y

Keywords

Navigation