Abstract
Epiphytic biomass, canopy humus and associated canopy water storage capacity are known to vary greatly between old-growth tropical montane cloud forests but for regenerating forests such data are virtually absent. The present study was conducted in an old-growth cloud forest and in a 30-year-old secondary forest (SF) on wind-exposed slopes in the Cordillera de Tilarán (Monteverde area) in northern Costa Rica. Epiphytic vegetation in both forests was dominated by bryophytes. Epiphyte mat weight (epiphyte biomass and canopy humus) at the stand level was 1,035 kg ha−1 in the SF and 16,215 kg ha−1 in the old-growth forest (OGF). The water contents of epiphytic bryophytes in the OGF were determined gravimetrically in situ and showed maximum values of 418% ± 74 (SD)% of dry weight and minimum values of 36% ± 10 (SD)%. Maximum stand water storage of non-vascular epiphytes and canopy humus at Monteverde was estimated at 0.36 mm for the SF and 4.95 mm for the OGF. Epiphytic bryophytes exhibited more dynamic wetting and drying cycles compared to canopy humus. Maximum water loss through evaporation was 251% of dry weight (bryophytes) and 117% of dry weight (canopy humus) within 3 days of sunny weather without precipitation. Despite the high potential water storage capacity of epiphytic bryophytes and canopy humus the actually available storage is likely to be much smaller depending on antecedent rainfall and evaporative conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ataroff M, Rada F (2000) Deforestation impact on water dynamics in a Venezuelan Andean cloud forest. Ambio 29:440–444
Benzing DH (1998) Vulnerabilities of tropical forests to climate change: the significance of resident epiphytes. Climatic Change 39:519–540
Bohlman SA, Matelson TJ, Nadkarni NM (1995) Moisture and temperature patterns of canopy humus and forest floor soil of a montane cloud forest, Costa Rica. Biotropica 27:13–19
Bruijnzeel LA (2005) Tropical montane cloud forests: a unique hydrological case. In: Bonell M, Bruijnzeel LA (eds) Forests, water and people in the humid tropics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 462–483
Bruijnzeel LA, Burkard R, Carvajal A, Frumau KFA, Köhler L, Mulligan M, Schellekens J, Schmid S, Tobón-Marin C (2006) Hydrological impacts of converting tropical montane cloud forest to pasture, with initial reference to northern Costa Rica. Final Technical Report DFID-FRP Project R7991. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, and Forestry Research Programme of the U.K. Department for International Development, London, 52 pp
Bubb P, Das S, Mapping tropical montane cloud forests. In: Bruijnzeel LA, Scatena FN, Hamilton LS, Juvik J (eds) Mountains in the mist: Science for conserving and managing tropical montane cloud forests, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu (in press)
Calder IR, Wright IR, Murdiyarso D (1986) A study of evaporation from tropical rainforest—West Java. J Hydrol 89:13–31
Clark KL, Nadkarni NM, Schaefer D, Gholz HL (1998) Atmospheric deposition and net retention of ions by the canopy in a tropical montane forest, Monteverde, Costa Rica. J Trop Ecol 14:27–45
Coxson DS, Nadkarni NM (1995) Ecological roles of epiphytes in nutrient cycles of forest ecosystems. In: Lowman MD, Nadkarni NM (eds) Forest Canopies, Academic Press, San Diego, pp 495–543
Edwards PJ, Grubb PJ (1977) Studies of mineral cycling in a montane rain forest in New Guinea: I. The distribution of organic matter in the vegetation and soil. J Ecol 65:943–969
Frahm JP (1990) The ecology of epiphytic bryophytes on Mt. Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia). Nova Hedwigia 51:121–132
Frahm JP, Gradstein SR (1991) An altitudinal zonation of tropical rain forests using bryophytes. J Biogeogr 18:669–676
Freiberg M, Freiberg E (2000) Epiphyte diversity and biomass in the canopy of lowland and montane forests in Ecuador. J Trop Ecol 16:673–688
Giambelluca TW (2002) Hydrology of altered tropical forest. Hydrol Processes 16:1665–1669
Helmer EH (2000) The landscape ecology of tropical secondary forest in montane Costa Rica. Ecosystems 3:98–114
Hofstede RGM, Wolf JHD, Benzing DH (1993) Epiphytic biomass and nutrient status of a Colombian upper montane rain forest. Selbyana 14:37–45
Hölscher D, Köhler L, Van Dijk AIJM, Bruijnzeel LA (2004) The importance of epiphytes to total rainfall interception by a tropical montane rain forest in Costa Rica. J Hydrol 292:308–322
Hölscher D, Mackensen J, Roberts JM (2005) Forest recovery in the humid tropics: changes in vegetation structure, nutrient pools and the hydrological cycle. In: Bonell M, Bruijnzeel LA (eds) Forests, water and people in the humid tropics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 598–621
Ingram SW, Nadkarni NM (1993) Composition and distribution of epiphytic organic matter in a neotropical cloud forest, Costa Rica. Biotropica 25:370–383
Jacobsen NHG (1978) An investigation into the ecology and productivity of epiphytic mosses. S Afr J Bot 44:297–312
Jetten VG (1996) Interception of tropical rain forest: Performance of a canopy water balance model. Hydrol Processes 10:671–685
Johansson D (1974) Ecology of vascular epiphytes in West African rain forest. Acta Phytogeographica Suedica 59:1–136
Kappelle M, Kennis PA, Vries RAJ (1995) Changes in diversity along a successional gradient in a Costa Rican upper montane Quercus forest. Biodivers Conserv 4:10–34
Köhler L (2002) Die Bedeutung der Epiphyten im ökosystemaren Wasser—und Nährstoffumsatz verschiedener Altersstadien eines Bergregenwaldes in Costa Rica. Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Reihe A, Band 181, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 134 pp
Lawton R, Dryer V (1980) The vegetation of the Monteverde cloud forest reserve. Brenesia 18:101–116
Lloyd CR, Marques A de O (1988) Spatial variability of throughfall and stemflow measurements in Amazonian rainforest. Agr Forest Meteorol 42:63–73
Nadkarni NM (1984) Epiphyte biomass and nutrient capital of a neotropical elfin forest. Biotropica 16:249–256
Nadkarni NM, Schaefer D, Matelson TJ, Solano R (2004) Biomass and nutrient pools of canopy and terrestrial components in a primary and a secondary montane cloud forest, Costa Rica. Forest Ecol Manage 198:223–236
Perry DR (1978) A method of access into the crowns of emergent and canopy trees. Biotropica 10:155–157
Pócs T (1980) The epiphytic biomass and its effect on the water balance of two rain forest types in the Uluguru Mountains (Tanzania, East Africa). Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 26:143–167
Tanner EVJ (1980) Studies on the biomass and productivity in a series of montane rain forest in Jamaica. J Ecol 68:573–588
Tanner EVJ (1985) Jamaican montane forests: nutrient capital and cost of growth. J Ecol 73:553–568
Veneklaas E, Van Ek R (1990) Rainfall interception in two tropical montane rain forests, Colombia. Hydrol Processes 4:311–326
Veneklaas EJ, Zagt RJ, Van Leerdam A, Van Ek R, Broekhoven AJ, Van Genderen M (1990) Hydrological properties of the epiphyte mass of a montane tropical rain forest, Colombia. Vegetatio 89:183–192
Weaver PL (1972) Cloud moisture interception in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. Caribb J Sci 12:129–144
Wolf JHD (1995) Non-vascular epiphyte diversity patterns in the canopy of an Upper Montane Rain Forest, Central Cordillera, Colombia. Selbyana 16(2):185–195
Wolf JHD (2005) The response of epiphytes to anthropogenic disturbance of pine-oak forests in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Forest, Ecol Manage 212:376–393
Acknowledgements
The present study was funded by the U.K. Department for International Development, Forestry Research Programme, as part of the Hydrological impacts of converting tropical montane cloud forest to pasture project (DFID-FRP Project no. R7991). The views expressed in this article are not necessarily those of DFID.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Köhler, L., Tobón, C., Frumau, K.F.A. et al. Biomass and water storage dynamics of epiphytes in old-growth and secondary montane cloud forest stands in Costa Rica. Plant Ecol 193, 171–184 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9256-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9256-7