Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impacts of local and regional factors on vegetation of boreal semi-natural grasslands

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using data from 46 sites in southern Finland and ordination methods, we examined plant-environment relationships in boreal mesic semi-natural grasslands at two spatial scales (grain sizes), using plots of 0.25 ha and 1 × 1 m. We applied the variation partitioning approach to determine the pure fractions of environmental variable groups and their joint effects on plant species compositional variation in the studied grasslands. The variables related to land-use intensity and high nutrient level (especially phosphorus) had a major role in explaining the species composition at both scales, although soil heterogeneity and habitat characteristics also accounted for a notable amount of the species compositional variation at the 0.25 ha grain size. At the 1 × 1 m grain size, the majority of the species compositional variation was related to the “pure” spatial differences between the studied grasslands (i.e. the site identity (dummy 0/1) variable), whereas the impacts of within-site variation of local environmental factors were considerably smaller. High nutrient levels and variables related to low land-use intensity, e.g. litter accumulation, were also significantly correlated with floristic variation at the 1 × 1 m grain size. Rare and declining grassland species are associated with low-nutrient grassland sites and patches. The main recommendation for the management planning of boreal semi-natural grasslands is that the first restoration attempts should be targeted to areas where nutrient levels, particularly that of phosphorus, are relatively low. Soil properties and plant species composition can provide useful guidelines for defining the correct management procedures for different sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts R, Chapin FS (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30:1–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M, Gribble N (1998) Partitioning the variation among spatial, temporal and environmental components in a multivariate data set. Aust J Ecol 23:158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austrheim G (2002) Plant diversity patterns in semi-natural grasslands along an elevational gradients in southern Norway. Plant Ecol 161:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austrheim G, Gunilla E, Olsson A, Grontvedt E (1999) Land-use impact on plant communities in semi-natural sub-alpine grasslands of Budalen, central Norway. Biol Conserv 87:369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker JP (1989) Nature management by grazing and cutting. On the ecological significance of grazing and cutting regimes applied to restore former species-rich grassland communities in the Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bignal EM, McCracken DI (1996) Low-intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countryside. J Appl Ecol 33:413–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braakhekke WG, Hooftman DAP (1999) The resource balance hypothesis of plant species diversity in grassland. J Veg Sci 10:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchley CNR, Allen DS, Fowbert JA, Mole AC, Gundrey AL (2004) Habitat establishment on arable land: assessment of an agri-environment scheme in England, UK. Biol Conserv 119:429–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman S, McGarigal K (2004) Hierarchical analysis of␣forest bird species-environment relationships in␣the␣Oregon coast range. Ecol Appl 14:1090– 1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth JC, Bunce RGH, Malloch AJC (2000) Modelling the potential effects of climate change on calcareous grasslands in Atlantic Europe. J Biogeogr 27:347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstam U, Aronsson M, Forshed N (1988) Ängar. LTs förlag, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O, Cousins SAO, Bruun HH (2002) Land-use history and fragmentation of traditionally managed grasslands in Scandinavia. J Veg Sci 13:743–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson Å, Eriksson H, Berglund H (1995) Species abundance patterns of plants in Swedish semi-natural pastures. Ecography 18:310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freemark KE, Kirk DA (2001) Birds on organic and conventional farms in Ontario: partitioning effects of habitat and practices on species composition and abundance. Biol Conserv 101:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates S, Donald PF (2000) Local extinction of British farmland birds and the prediction of further loss. J␣Appl Ecol 37:806–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough MW, Marrs RH (1990) A comparison of soil fertility between semi-natural and agricultural plant communities: implications for the creation of species-rich grassland on abandoned agricultural land. Biol Conserv 51:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242:344–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Virkkala R, Rainio K (2004) Effects of habitat cover, landscape structure and spatial variables on the abundance of birds in an agricultural-forest mosaic. J Appl Ecol 41:824–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhta AP, Rautio P, Tuomi J, Laine K (2001) Restorative mowing on an abandoned semi-natural meadow: Short-term and predicted long-term effects. J Veg Sci 12:677–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1994) Biological diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämet-Ahti L, Suominen J, Ulvinen T, Uotila P (1998) Retkeilykasvio (Field flora of Finland). Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museum, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihse M (1995) Swedish agricultural landscapes—patterns and changes during the last 50 years, studies by aerial photos. Landsc Ecol 31:21–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2004) Yearbook of Farm Statistics 2004. Tike, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens F, Peeters A, Tallowin JRB, Bakker JP, Bekker RM, Fillat F, Oomes MJM (1998) Relation between soil chemical factors and grassland diversity. Plant Soil 202:69–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jantunen J, Saarinen K, Marttila O (2002) A comparison of vegetation in grazed, formerly grazed and ungrazed valuable semi-natural grasslands in SE Finland. Memoranda Soc Fauna Flora Fennica 78:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston AE, Poulton PR (1977) Yields on the exhaustion land and changes in the NPK content of the soils due to cropping and manuring, 1852–1975. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1976 Part 2:53–85

  • Kooijman AM, Besse M (2002) The higher availability of N and P in lime-poor than in lime-rich coastal dunes in the Netherlands. J Ecol 90:394–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kull K, Zobel M (1991) High species richness in an Estonian wooded meadow. J Veg Sci 2:711–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler B, Ryser P, Güsewell S, Gigon A (2001) Nutrient availability and limitation in traditionally mown and in abandoned limestone grasslands: a bioassay experiment. Plant Soil 230:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti T, Kurtto A, Väisänen RA (1988) Floristic composition and regional species richness of vascular plants in Finland. Ann Bot Fenn 25:281–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004a) Effects of restoration on plant species richness and composition in Scandinavian semi-natural grasslands. Restor Ecol 12:318–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004b) Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology 85:1840–1845

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q (1997) Variation partitioning by partial Redundancy Analysis (RDA). Environmetrics 8:75–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marrs RH (1993) Soil fertility and nature conservation in Europe: theoretical considerations and practical management solutions. Adv Ecol Res 24:241–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea AR, Trueman IC, Fullen MA, Atkinson MD, Besenyei L (2001) Relationships between soil characteristics and species richness in two botanically heterogeneous created meadows in the urban English West Midlands. Biol Conserv 97:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira F, Beja P, Morgado R, Reino L, Gordinho L, Delgado A, Borralho R (2005) Effects of field management and landscape context on grassland wintering birds in Southern Portugal. Agric Ecosyst Environ 109:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Økland R (1990) Methods: Collecting data. Sommerfeltia Suppl 1:72–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Olde Venterink H, Wassen MJ, Verkroost AWM, de Ruiter PC (2003) Species richness-productivity patterns differ between N-, P- and K-limited wetlands. Ecology 84:2191–2199

    Google Scholar 

  • Olff H, Ritchie ME (1998) Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson EGA, Austrheim G, Grenne SN (2000) Landscape change patterns in mountains, land use and environmental diversity, Mid-Norway 1960–1993. Landsc Ecol 15:155–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakeman RJ (2004) Consistency of plant species and trait responses to grazing along a productivity gradient: a multi-site analysis. J Ecol 92:893–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MW (1993) Putting things in even better order: the advantage of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215–2230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker M, Mac Nally R (2002) Habitat loss and the habitat fragmentation threshold: an experimental evaluation of impacts on richness and total abundances using grassland invertebrates. Biol Conserv 105:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pykälä J (2000) Mitigating human effects on European biodiversity through traditional animal husbandry. Conserv Biol 14:705–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pykälä J (2001) Maintaining biodiversity through traditional animal husbandry. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Pykälä J (2003) Effects of restoration with cattle grazing on plant species composition and richness of semi-natural grasslands. Biodivers Conserv 12:2211–2226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pykälä J (2005) Plant species responses to cattle grazing in mesic semi-natural grassland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Webb NR, Putwain PD (1994) Soil fertility and its implications for the restoration of heatland on farmland in Southern Britain. Biol Conserv 70:169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöyry J, Lindgren S, Salminen J, Kuussaari M (2004) Restoration of butterfly and moth communities in semi-natural grasslands by cattle grazing. Ecol Appl 14:1656–1670

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassi P, Alanen A, Kanerva T, Mannerkoski I (2001) The 2000 red list of Finnish species. Ministry of the Environment and Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Roem WJ, Berendse F (2000) Soil acidity and nutrient supply ratio as possible factors determining changes in plant species diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Biol Conserv 92:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosén E, Borgegård S-O (1999) The open cultural landscape. Acta Phytogeogr Suec 84:113–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen J (1993) Weed infestation and factors affecting weed incidence in spring cereals in Finland—a multivariate approach. Agr Sci Finland 2:525–535

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO Reference manual and Canodraw for Windows User’s guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York

  • Tilman D (1988) Dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Vainio M, Kekäläinen H, Alanen A, Pykälä J (2001) Traditional rural biotopes in Finland. Final report of the nationwide inventory. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki

  • Vandvik V, Birks HJB (2002a) Partitioning floristic variance in Norwegian upland grasslands into within-site and between-site components: are the patterns determined by environment or by land-use? Plant Ecol 162:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandvik V, Birks HJB (2002b) Pattern and process in Norwegian upland grasslands: a functional analysis. J␣Veg Sci 13:123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandvik V, Birks HJB (2004) Mountain summer farms in Røldal, western Norway - vegetation classification and patterns in species turnover and richness. Plant Ecol 170:203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan IP, Ormerod SJ (2003) Improving the quality of distribution models for conservation by addressing shortcomings in the field collection of training data. Conserv Biol 17:1601–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuorinen J, Mäkitie O (1955) The method of soil testing in use in Finland. Agrogeol Publ 63:1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijesinghe DK, John EA, Hutchings MJ (2005) Does patterns of soil resource heterogeneity determine plant community structure? An experimental investigation. J Ecol 93:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems JH, Peet RK, Bik L (1993) Changes in chalk-grassland structure and species richness resulting from selective nutrient additions. J Veg Sci 4:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Juha Pöyry, Miska Luoto, Vigdis Vandvik and two anonymous referees for methodological advice and comments. Stefan Fronzek helped in aggregating the climate data. Johanna Kolehmainen and Heidi Lyytikäinen helped in data collection. Ahti Mäkinen advised with soil samples. The research was supported by the Maj and Thor Nessling Foundation (grant number 2005289). Data collection was funded by the Finnish Ministry of Environment through the Finnish Biodiversity Research Programme FIBRE coordinated by the Academy of Finland. Michael Bailey improved the language of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja M. Raatikainen.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Appendix 1 A list of environmental variables with their measurement details measured from the studied grasslands and used in the analyses

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raatikainen, K.M., Heikkinen, R.K. & Pykälä, J. Impacts of local and regional factors on vegetation of boreal semi-natural grasslands. Plant Ecol 189, 155–173 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9172-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9172-x

Keywords

Navigation