Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do Physiological Integration and Soil Heterogeneity Influence the Clonal Growth and Foraging of Schoenoplectus pungens?

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physiological integration and foraging behavior have both been proposed as advantages for clonal growth in heterogeneous environments. We tested three predictions concerning their short- and long-term effects on the growth of the clonal perennial sedge Schoenoplectus pungens (Pers.) Volk. ex Schinz and R. Keller: (1) growth would be greatest for clones with connected rhizomes and on heterogeneous soil, (2) clones would preferentially place biomass in the nutrient-rich patches of a spatially heterogeneous environment, and (3) physiological integration would decrease a clone’s ability to forage. We tested our predictions by growing S. pungens clones for 2 years in an experimental garden with two severing treatments (connected and severed rhizomes) crossed with two soil treatments (homogeneous and heterogeneous nutrient distribution). Severing treatments were only carried out in the first year. As predicted, severing significantly decreased total biomass and per capita growth rate in year one and individual ramet biomass both in year one and the year after severing stopped. This reduction in growth was most likely caused by severing damage, because the total biomass and growth rate in severed treatments did not vary with soil heterogeneity. Contrary to our prediction, total biomass and number of ramets were highest on homogeneous soil at the end of year two, regardless of severing treatment, possibly because ramets in heterogeneous treatments were initially planted in a nutrient-poor patch. Finally, as predicted, S. pungens concentrated ramets in the nutrient-rich patches of the heterogeneous soil treatment. This foraging behavior seemed enhanced by physiological integration in the first year, but any possible enhancement disappeared the year after severing stopped. It seems that over time, individual ramets become independent, and parent ramets respond independently to the conditions of their local microsite when producing offspring, a life-history pattern that may be the rule for clonal species with the spreading “guerrilla” growth form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P. Alpert (1991) ArticleTitleNitrogen sharing among ramets increases clonal growth in Fragaria chiloensis Ecology 72 69–80

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Alpert (1999) ArticleTitleEffects of clonal integration on plant plasticity in Fragaria chiloensis Plant Ecol. 141 99–106 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1009823015170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Alpert H.A. Mooney (1986) ArticleTitleResource sharing among ramets in the clonal herbFragaria chiloensis Oecologia 70 227–233 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00379244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Amon C.A. Thompson Q.J. Carpenter J. Miner (2002) ArticleTitleTemperate zone fens of the glaciated Midwestern USA Wetlands 22 301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Charpentier F. Mesleard J.D. Thompson (1998) ArticleTitleThe effects of rhizome severing on the clonal growth and clonal architecture of Scirpus maritimus Oikos 83 107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • H. de Kroon M.J. Hutchings (1995) ArticleTitleMorphological plasticity in clonal plants: the foraging concept reconsidered J. Ecol. 83 143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • H. de Kroon F. Schieving (1990) Resource partitioning in relation to clonal growth strategy J. van Groenendael H. de Kroon (Eds) Clonal Growth in Plants: Regulation and Function SPB Academic Publishers The Hague 113–130

    Google Scholar 

  • H. de Kroon J. van Groenendael (Eds) (1997) The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants Bachhuys Publishers Leiden, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • T. D’Hertefeldt U. Falkengren-Grerup (2002) ArticleTitleExtensive physiological integration in Carex arenaria Carex disticha in relation to potassium and water availability New Phyotol. 156 469–477

    Google Scholar 

  • T. D’Hertefeldt I. Jónsdóttir (1999) ArticleTitleExtensive physiological integration in intact clonal systems of Carex arenaria J. Ecol. 87 258–264

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Dong B. Alaten (1999) ArticleTitleClonal plasticity in response to rhizome severing and heterogeneous resource supply in the rhizomatous grass Psammochloa villosa in an Inner Mongolian duneChina Plant Ecol. 141 53–58 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1009875000149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Evans (1988) ArticleTitleNitrogen translocation in a clonal dune perennial, Hydrocotyle bonariensis Oecologia 77 64–68 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00380926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Evans M.L. Cain (1995) ArticleTitleA spatially explicit test of foraging behavior in a clonal plant Ecology 76 1147–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Evans S. Whitney (1992) ArticleTitleClonal integration across a salt gradient by a nonhalophyteHydrocotyle bonariensis (Apiaceae) Am. J. Bot. 79 1344–1347

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Hershock (2002) Plant community structure in calcareous fens: effects of competition, soil environmentand clonal architecture University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Hutchings H. de Kroon (1994) Foraging in plants: The role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition M. Begon A.H. Fitter (Eds) Advances in Ecological Research v. 25 Academic Press New York 159–238

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Hutchings M. Mogie (1990) The spatial structure of clonal plants: control and consequences J. van Groenendael H. de Kroon (Eds) Clonal Growth in Plants: Regulation and Function SPB Academic Publishers The Hague 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Hutchings E.A.C. Price (1993) ArticleTitleDoes physiological integration enable clonal herbs to integrate the effects of environmental heterogeneity? Plant Species Biol. 8 95–105 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1442-1984.1993.tb00061.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Jerling (1988) ArticleTitleClone dynamics, population dynamics and vegetation pattern of Glaux maritima on a Baltic sea shore meadow Vegetatio 74 171–185

    Google Scholar 

  • I.S. Jónsdóttir T.V. Callaghan (1989) ArticleTitleLocalized defoliation stress and the movement of C14-photoassimilates between tillers of C. bigelowii Oikos 54 211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • I.S. Jónsdóttir M.A. Watson (1997) Extensive physiological integration: an adaptive trait in resource-poor environments H. de Kroon J. van Groenendael (Eds) The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants Backhuys Publishers Leiden 109–136

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Lovett Doust (1981) ArticleTitlePopulation dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunuculus repens): I. the dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats J. Ecol. 69 743–755

    Google Scholar 

  • D.W. Magee (1981) Freshwater Wetlands: A Guide to Common Indicator Plants of the Northeast University of Massachusetts Press Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Noble C. Marshall (1983) ArticleTitleThe population biology of plants with clonal growth: the nutrient strategy and modular physiology of Carex arenaria J. Ecol. 71 865–877 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXkvVKrtQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • E.A.C. Price C. Marshall M.J. Hutchings (1992) ArticleTitleStudies of growth in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. I. Patterns of physiological integration J. Ecol. 80 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Schmid F.A. Bazzaz (1987) ArticleTitleClonal integration and population structure in perennials: effects of severing rhizome connections Ecology 68 2016–2022

    Google Scholar 

  • A.J. Slade M.J. Hutchings (1987) ArticleTitleClonal integration and plasticity in foraging behaviour in Glechoma hederacea J. Ecol. 75 1023–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Stuefer H.J. During H. de Kroon (1994) ArticleTitleHigh benefits of clonal integration in two stoloniferous species, in response to heterogeneous light environments J. Ecol. 82 511–518

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Stuefer H. De Kroon H.J. During (1996) ArticleTitleExploitation of environmental heterogeneity by spatial division of labour in a clonal plant Functional Ecol. 10 328–334

    Google Scholar 

  • W.J. Sutherland R.A. Stillman (1988) ArticleTitleThe foraging tactics of plants Oikos 52 239–244

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameSYSTAT (2000) SYSTAT Version 10 SPSS Inc Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • E.G. Voss (1972) Michigan Flora; A Guide to the Identification and Occurrence of the Native and Naturalized Seed Plants of the State Cranbrook Institute of Science Bloomfield Hills, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Wilhalm (1995) ArticleTitleA comparative study of clonal fragmentation in tussock-forming grasses Abstracta Botanica 19 51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • D.K. Wijesinghe (1994) ArticleTitleTemporal and structural components of ramet independence in the clonal perennial herbPotentilla simplex J. Ecol. 82 13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • D.K. Wijesinghe S.N. Handel (1994) ArticleTitleAdvantages of clonal growth in heterogeneous habitats: an experiment with Potentilla simplex J. Ecol. 82 495–502

    Google Scholar 

  • D.K. Wijesinghe M.J. Hutchings (1997) ArticleTitleThe effects of spatial scale of environmental heterogeneity on the growth of a clonal plant: an experimental study with Glechoma hederacea J. Ecol. 85 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • D.K. Wijesinghe M.J. Hutchings (1999) ArticleTitleThe effects of environmental heterogeneity on the performance of Glechoma hederacea: the interactions between patch contrast and patch scale J. Ecol. 87 860–872 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00395.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allison Poor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poor, A., Hershock, C., Rosella, K. et al. Do Physiological Integration and Soil Heterogeneity Influence the Clonal Growth and Foraging of Schoenoplectus pungens?. Plant Ecol 181, 45–56 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-2429-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-2429-y

Keywords

Navigation