Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Net-Deepening of School Discipline

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents findings from an ethnographic content analysis of 15 chronological district-wide annual codes of student conduct from a large urban US school district. I frame policy creation and modification processes as reflections of societal shifts in perceptions of student behaviors. I looked to the policy documents to explore the possibility that school organizations have, over time, shifted toward school discipline frameworks that get students into deeper trouble today than in years past. The analysis yielded policy changes that, over time, make severe punishment increasingly likely. I refer to the change phenomena as net-deepening of school discipline. I address the pitfalls that net-deepening policy changes pose, with an emphasis on the potential for net-deepening to undermine the effectiveness of proactive and restorative forms of school discipline. The article offers to educators, policy-makers, and researchers conceptual and analytical considerations for developing proactive restorative discipline policies that meets the educational needs of all students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altheide, D. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arum, R. (2003). Judging school discipline. The crisis of moral authority. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astor, R. A., Benbenishty, R., & Estrada, J. (2009). School violence and theoretically atypical schools: The principal’s centrality in orchestrating safe schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 423–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, W., Dohrn, B., & Ayers, R. (Eds.). (2001). Zero tolerance: Resisting the drive for punishment in schools. NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear, G. (2012). Both suspension and alternatives work, depending on one’s aim. Journal of School Violence, 11(2), 174–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1973). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. London: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J., Butler, B., Lewis, C., & Darensbourg, A. (2011). Unmasking the inequitable discipline experiences of urban black girls: Implications for urban educational stakeholders. Urban Review, 43, 90–106. doi:10.1007/s11256-009-0148-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, T., & Cohen, S. (Eds.). (2003). Punishment and social control, enlarged (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowditch, C. (1993). Getting rid of troublemakers: High school disciplinary procedures and the production of dropouts. Social Problems, 40(4), 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (2003). Derailed. The schoolhouse to jailhouse track. A report by the advancement project (sponsored by Rockerfeller Foundation).

  • Caperello, C. (2009). Baby got gat. The debate over arming school officers draws citizen fire. Philadelphia Weekly.

  • Casella, R. (2003). Zero tolerance policy in schools: Rationale, consequences, and alternatives. Teachers College Record, 105(5), 872–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casella, R. (2005). The uses of rules for strategies of containment and self-regulation in a global economy. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(2), 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christle, C., Jolivette, K., & Nelson, C. (2005). Breaking the school to prison pipeline: Identifying school risk and protective factors for youth delinquency. Exceptionality, 13(2), 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment, and classification. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, P. (2003). Shared rule making in practice: The Jefferson Committee at Kingston High School. American Secondary Education, 31(3), 66–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickmann, E., & Cooner, D. (2007). Effective strategies for developing and fostering positive relationships between principals and school-based police officers. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 4(1), 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. A. (2000). Urban pedagogies and the celling of adolescents of color. Social Justice, 27, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenning, P., & Bohanon, H. (2006). School-wide discipline policies: An analysis of the discipline code of conduct. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1021–1040). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenning, P., Pulaski, S., Gomez, M., Morello, M., Maciel, L., Maroney, E., et al. (2012). Call to action: A critical need for designing alternatives to suspension and expulsion. Journal of School Violence, 11(2), 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenning, P., & Rose, J. (2007). Overrepresentation of African American students in exclusionary discipline: The role of school policy. Urban Education, 42, 536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenning, P., Theodos, J., Benner, C., & Bohanon-Edmonson, H. (2004). Integrating proactive discipline practices into codes of conduct. Journal of School Violence, 3(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. M. Sheridan- Smith trans). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

  • Gastic, B., & Gasiewski, J. (2008). School safety under NCLB’s unsafe school choice option. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 5(2). http://urbanedjournal.org.

  • Giroux, H. (2002). Democracy, freedom, and justice after September 11th: Rethinking the role of educators and the politics of schooling. Teachers College Record, 104(6), 1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2003a). Racial injustice and disposable youth in the age of zero tolerance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(4), 553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2003b). Zero tolerance, domestic militarization, and the war against youth. Social Justice, 30(2), 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, G., & Gottfredson, D. (2001). What schools do to prevent problem behavior and promote safe environments. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 12(4), 313–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., Cornell, D., & Fan, X. (2011). The relationship of school structure and support to suspension rates for Black and White high school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 904–934. doi:10.3102/0002831211398531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Mosley, P. (2004). The discipline gap: Teacher’s views on the over-representation of African American students in the discipline system. Equity and Excellence in Education, 37, 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelstein, K., & Brückner, H. (2010). Criminal-justice and school sanctions against nonheterosexual youth: A national longitudinal study. Pediatrics, published online December 2010. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2306).

  • Hirschfield, P. (2008). Preparing for prison?: The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology, 12(1), 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfield, P., & Celinska, K. (2011). Beyond fear: Sociological perspectives on the criminalization of school discipline. Sociology Compass, 5(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hseih, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, J. (2008). ‘Sitting on a Tinderbox’: Racial conflict, teacher discretion, and the centralization of disciplinary authority. American Journal of Education, 144(3), 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajs, L. (2006). Reforming the discipline management process in schools: An alternative approach to zero tolerance. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(4), 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krezmien, M., Leone, P., & Achelles, G. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14(4), 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchik, A. (2009). Things are tough all over: Race, ethnicity, class and school discipline. Punishment and Society, 11(3), 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (1999). Preparing students for democratic citizenship: Codes of conduct in Victoria ‘Schools of the Future’. Education Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. (2003). The surveillance economy of post-Columbine schools. Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies, 25(4), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, P. (2003). Chicago school policy: Regulating black and Latino youth in the global city. Race, Ethnicity & Education, 6(4), 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macallair, D., & Males, M. (2004). A failure of good intentions: An analysis of juvenile justice reform in San Francisco during the 1990s. Review of Policy Research, 21(1), 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, L., & Knoff, H. (2003). Who gets suspended from school and why: A demographic analysis of schools and disciplinary infractions in a large school district. Education & Treatment of Children, 26(1), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, C. (2005). Why are “bad boys” always Black? Causes of disproportionality in school discipline and recommendations for change. The Clearing House, 79(1), 45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. (2005). Tuck that shirt in! Race, class, gender, and discipline in an urban school. Sociological Perspectives, 48(1), 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G., & D’Incau, B. (1997). The web of zero-tolerance: Characteristics of students who are recommended for expulsion from school. Education & Treatment of Children, 20(3), 316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B., & Vaandering, D. (2012). Restorative justice: Pedagogy, praxis, and discipline. Journal of School Violence, 11(2), 138–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raby, R. (2004). Polite, well dressed, and on time: Secondary school conduct codes and the production of docile citizens. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 42(1), 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffaele-Mendez, L., Knoff, H., & Ferron, J. (2002). School demographic variables and out-of school suspension rates: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of a large ethnically diverse school district. Psychology in the Schools, 39(3), 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, A. (2006). Discipline, achievement, race: Is zero tolerance the answer?. Lanhan, MA: Rowman and Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltman, D., & Gabbard, S. (Eds.). (2010). Education as enforcement: The militarization and corporatization of schools (2nd ed.). Routledge: NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, J., & Fenning, P. (2012). Rationale for designing school contexts in support of proactive discipline. Journal of School Violence, 11(2), 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. (2007). Research off limits and underground: Street corner methods for finding invisible students. The Urban Review 3(39), 319–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. (2009). End of the line: Tracing racial inequality from school to prison. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Perspectives, 2(2), 215–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. (2000). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice. Indiana Education Policy Center Policy Research Report # SRS2.

  • Skiba, R., Michael, R., Nardo, A., & Peterson, R. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34(4), 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24(1), 23–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education OSDFS. Guidance Concerning State and Local Responsibilities under the Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994. Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools. http://www2.ed.gov/offices/OSDFS/gfsaguidance.html. Retrieved May 29, 2012.

  • Van Dusen, K. T. (1981). Net-widening and relabeling: Some consequences of deinstitutionalization. American Behavioral Scientist, 24(6), 801–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavrus, F., & Cole, K. (2002). “I Didn’t Do Nothin’”: The discursive construction of school suspension. Urban Review, 34(2), 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, R. (2002). Race-ethnicity, social class, and zero tolerance policy: The cultural and structural wars. Education and Urban Society, 35(1), 50–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, J. (2005). Harsh justice: Criminal justice and the widening divide between America and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zweifler, R., & DeBeers, J. (2002). The children left behind: How zero tolerance impacts our most vulnerable youth. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 8, 191–220.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Decoteau J. Irby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Irby, D.J. Net-Deepening of School Discipline. Urban Rev 45, 197–219 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-012-0217-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-012-0217-2

Keywords

Navigation