Skip to main content
Log in

From Opposition to Engagement: Lessons from High Achieving African American Students

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Influential research on African American students has examined their school failure in terms of students’ opposition to school achievement. Only a few studies have explored school engagement and success among these students, and even fewer have examined the experiences of high achieving black students. This study illustrates the school context and school processes that high achieving African American students identify as contributing to their academic success. The findings reveal three main school effects impacting the students’ performance: 1) teacher practices, engaging pedagogy versus disengaging pedagogy; 2) participation in extracurricular activities and; 3) the state scholarship as performance incentive. According to the students, teacher practices were the most instrumental school effect benefiting their outcomes. Recognizing the processes that promote high achievement among African American students can help to improve our understanding of student performance, while promoting success among these students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth-Darnell, J. A. (2002). Why does it take a village?: The mediation ofneighborhood effects on educational achievement. Social Forces, 81(1), 117–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W., & Downey, D. B. (1998). Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial/ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review, 63, 536–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akom, A. A. (2003). Reexamining resistance as oppositional behavior: The nation ofislam and the creation of a black achievement ideology. Sociology ofEducation, 76(4), 305–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K., Entwisle, D. R., & Thompson, M. (1987). School performance, status relations, and the structure of sentiment: Bringing the teacher back in. American Sociological Review, 52, 665–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1995). Education and Power (2nd ed). New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstine, B. 1990. Rational and caring teachers: Reconstructing teacher preparation. Teachers College Record, 92(2), 230–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asante, M. (1988). Afrocentricity. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C., & Boykin, W. (2001). The role of task variability and home contextual factors in the academic performance and task motivation ofAfrican-American elementary school children. Journal of Negro Education, 70(1/2), 84–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantine, J. (2001). Sociology of Education (5th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. (1997). Educating Citizens in a Multicultural Society. New York: TeachersCollege Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (4th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. L. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise inthe sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, M. (1987). Black Athena. Volume 1: The fabrication of Ancient Greece. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, M. (1991). Black Athena. Volume 2: The Archaeological and documentaryevidence. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Birenbaum, M., Tatsuoka, C., & Xin, T. (2005). Large-scale diagnostic assessment:Comparison, of eighth graders’ mathematics performance in the United States,Singapore, and Israel. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 12(2), 167–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Broh, B. (2002). Linking extracurricular programming to academic achievement:Who benefits and why?”. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 69–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. (1999). Balancing ‘acts’: Issues of identity and cultural resistance in the social and educational behaviors of minority youth. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, NY

  • Carter, P. (2003). Black’s cultural capital, status positioning and schoolingconflicts for low-income African American youth. Social Problem, 50(1), 136–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Cater, P. (2005). Keeping it real: School success beyond acting white. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington: U.S.Government Printing Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. (2003). Disparities within: Unequal spending and achievement in an urban school district. Sociology of Education, 7(1), 18–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2000). Urban school reform from a student-of-color perspective. Urban Education, 34(5), 597–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corwin, M. (2000). And still we rise: The trials and triumphs of twelve gifted innercity high school students. New York: William Morrow

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among fivetraditions. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpit, L. (1996). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. NewYork: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarrais, K., & LeCompte, M. (1995). The way schools work: A sociological analysis of education. White Plains, New York: Longman

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMeis, D., & Turner, R. R. (1978). Effects of students’ race, physical attractiveness,and dialect on teachers’ evaluations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy ofeducation. New York: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, D., & Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W. (2002). The search for oppositional culture among black students. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 156–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreeben, R. (1968). On what is learned in school. Reading, Massachusetts: AddisonWesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle, D. R, & Alexander, K. L. (1992). Summer setback: Race, poverty, schoolcomposition and mathematics achievement. American Sociological Review, 57, 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. L. (1994). Winter setback: The racial composition of schools and learning to read. American Sociological Review, 59(3), 446–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, G., Lleras, C., & Maczuga, S. (2002). Does oppositional culture exist in minority and poverty peer groups? American Sociological Review, 67(1), 150–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Figone, A. (1994). Teacher-coach role conflict: Its impact on students and studentathletes. Physical Educator, 51(1), 29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., & Harris, J. (1996). Perceptions and attitudes of black students toward school achievement, and other educational variables. ChildDevelopment, 67, 1141–1152

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., & Wright, L. (1998). Achievement levels, outcomes, and orientations ofblack students in single-and two parents families. Urban Education, 33(3), 360–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamoran, A. (2001). American schooling and educational inequality: A forecast for the21st century. Sociology of Education, Extra Issue, 135–153

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, P. A. (2004). Schools’ racial mix, students’optimism, and the black-whiteand latino-white achievement gaps. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 121–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D., & Marciniak, E. (1995). Increasing teacher expectations for student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 88(3), 155–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D.(1996). The effect of school resourceson student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, A. G. III. (1997). The structure of valid staff development. Journal of StaffDevelopment, 18(2), 28–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, A. G. III. (2003). No mystery: Closing the achievement gap between Africansand excellence. In T. Perry, C. Steel, & A. Hilliard (Eds.), Young, gifted andblack: Promoting high achievement among African-American students (pp. 131165). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The Bell curve: Intelligence and classstructure in American life. New York: The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, T. (2002). Hearing footsteps in the dark: African American students’description of effective teachers. Journal of Education for Students Placed AtRisk, 7(4), 425–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, T. (2001). Telling their side of the story: African-American students’perceptions of culturally relevant teaching. Urban Review, 33(2), 131–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J. J. (1991). Black students and school failure: Personnel, practices, andprescriptions. New York: Praeger

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. S., Acland, H., Bane, M., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., & Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effects of family and schooling inAmerica. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (Eds.) (1998). The black-white test gap. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabel, J., & Halsey, A. H. (1977). Power and ideology in education. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, P., Hubbard, R., Lapp, B., Schroeder, P., & Wilson, J. (2003). Why education matters. Sociology of Education, 76, 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, J., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. Jr. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Crown

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozol, J. (2006). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid inschooling in America. New York: Random House

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African Americanchildren. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2000). Home Advantage (2nd ed). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, T. (2006). Boys are no match for girls in completing high school. New York Times, April 19. Retrieved April 28, 2006 from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/19/education/19graduation.html?ex=114636900&en=35bc54a53df5ecb9&ei=5070)

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, G. (2003). The myths of oppositional culture. Journal of Black Studies, 33(4), 450–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations. Westport,Connecticut: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, J. (1995). Ain’t no makin’ it: Aspirations and achievement in a low-incomeneighborhood. Boulder: Westview press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S. (2002). How economic segregation affects children’s educationalattainment. Social Forces, 81(1), 153–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integratingdiversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickelson, R. A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63, 44–61

    Google Scholar 

  • McWhorter, J. (2000). Losing the race: Self-sabotage in black America. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V.S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T.A. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s ThirdInternational Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Boston: Center for theStudy of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. A., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A.,O’Connor, K.M., Chrostowski, S. J., & Smith, T. A. (2000). TIMSS 1999International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Repeat of the ThirdInternational Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S., & Berliner, D.C. (2005). The inevitable corruption of indicators and educators through high-stakes testing. Tempe, Arizona: Education PolicyStudies Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, C. (1997). Dispositions toward collective struggle and educationalresilience in the inner city: A case analysis of six African-American high schoolstudents. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 593–629

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, K. M., Chrostowski, S. J., & Smith, T. A. (2000). TIMSS 1999 InternationalMathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Repeat of the Third InternationalMathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: BostonCollege.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, L. (2005). Examining the variability of mathematics performance and itscorrelation using data from TIMSS’95 and TIMSS’99. Educational Research andEvaluation, 11(2), 155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offiong, D. (2001). Globalisation, post-neodependency and poverty in Africa. Enugu, Nigeria: Fourth Dimension Publishing Co., LTD

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J. (1978). Minority education and caste: The American system in cross cultural perspective. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J. (1987). Variability in minority school performance: A problem in search ofan explanation. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18, 312–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J. (1988). Black education: A cultural-ecological perspective. In H. P. McAdoo (Ed.), Black Families (2nd ed.) (pp. 169–184). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academicdisengagement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J. (2004). Collective identity and the ‘burden of acting white’ in blackhistory, community, and education. Urban Review, 36(1), 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J., & Fordham, S. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the burden of acting white. Urban Review, 18(3), 176–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn Towns, D., Cole-Henderson, B., & Serpell, Z. (2001). The journey to urban school success: Going the extra mile. Journal of Negro Education, 70(1/2), 4–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (1990). Multiculturalism: E pluribus plures. American Scholar, 59(3), 337–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, R. C. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfillingprophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 411–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, R. C. (2000). HER classic: Student social class and teacher expectations: The selffulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 70(3), 257265

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, G. (1987). The social world of high school athletic coaches: Multiple roledemands and their consequences. Sociology of Sport Journal, 4, 213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, G. (1990). Power and ideology in American sport. Champaign, IL: HumanKinetics Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Selingo, J. (1999a). Texas colleges seek new ways to attract minority students.Chronicle of Higher Education, November 19, A35–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Selingo, J. (1999b). Copying Georgia’s HOPE: States that are weighing tuitionscholarship proposals. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 16, A37.

  • Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Translated by George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, C. (2005). How American middle schools differ from schools of five Asiancountries: Based on cross-national data from TIMSS 1999. Educational Researchand Education, 11(2), 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J., Hallett, T., & Diamond, J. (2003). Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (1972). Education and the rise of the corporate state. Boston: Beacon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Co

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques andprocedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Tice, T. (1994). Critical plus open. Education Digest, 59(6), 42–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Traoré, R., & Lukens, R. (2006). “This isn’t the America I though I’d find:” Africanstudents in the urban U.S. high school. Lanham, Maryland: University Press ofAmerica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, K. (2002). Weighing in: Elementary-age students and the debate onattitudes toward school among black students. Social Forces, 80(4), 1157–1189

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, K., Darity, W., & Castellino, D. (2005). It’s not ‘a black thing’: Understanding the burden of acting white and other dilemmas of high achievement. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 582–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, F. (1999). A Caring Teacher: Explorations into Primary School Teachers’Professional Identity and Ethic of Care. Gender and Education, 14(3), 251–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, F. B., & Sweetland, S. R. (2003). School finance reform: An unresolved issue across the nation. Education, 124(1), 143–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggan, G. (2003). Student achievement and student based-inquiry research. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 17, Atlanta

  • Wiggan, G. (2007 Forthcoming). Race, school achievement and educational inequality:towards a student-based inquiry perspective. Review of Educational Research.

  • Wright, M. (2001). Pell grants, politics and the penitentiary: Corrections between the development of U.S. higher education and prisoner post-secondaryprograms. Journal of Correctional Education, 52(1), 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, C. G. (1933). The mis-education of the Negro. Trenton, NJ: AssociatedPublishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1991). The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1997). Social mindscapes: An invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg Wiggan.

Additional information

The author wishes to thank Ron DePeter and Tekla Johnson for their comments on a previous draft of this article

Appendix

Appendix

Interview Schedule

The questions focused on students' high school experiences. They addressed quality of instruction, meaning of student achievement, school climate, as well as solutions to the achievement problem.

High School Experiences

Which high school(s) did you attend?

What was it like going to school there?

  • (If student attended more than one high school, the questions will focus on the one he or she graduated from)

Probes:

  • What were the things you liked or disliked about your high school? Why?

  • Were there any major concerns in your high school that might have impeded students’ learning? Explain?

  • How would you describe the relationship between the students and teachers in your high school? Ho well did they get along with each other?

  • Were there many conflicts in your high school? (Teacher-student, student-student, teacher-administration etc.)

  • Describe some of your high school experiences that you believe were significant. Why do you believe these experiences were significant?

  • What are some of the important aspects of your high school education you believe may or may not have benefited your readiness for college?

  • Did you find that you were prepared for your transition to college?

Quality of Instruction

Now that you have completed high school and are in college, how well do you believe your high school prepared you for higher education?

How do you feel about the quality of instruction you received in your high school?

Probes:

  • Who was one of your best teachers? Why?

  • What are the characteristics that made this teacher effective?

  • As far as teaching, what was going on in this person’s classroom?

  • Were most of your other teachers like this person?

  • How did this person teach?

  • What teaching styles did this teacher use that in turn benefited your learning? (Lectures, discussions, working in groups, class projects, using visuals, etc.)

  • What classes were you satisfied or dissatisfied with? Why?

  • Do you think your teachers incorporated technology enough in the classroom?

  • How could the quality of instruction in your high school have been improved?

Achievement

What did student achievement mean to you in high school?

Probes:

  • Do you think that your teachers were able to accurately determine how well you were learning? How so?

  • Do you believe that grades and standardized test scores were good measures of your performance? Why?

  • Were there students in your classes that you believe knew a lot more than their tests scores indicated? If yes, why was this the case?

  • What grades were you happy or unhappy with? Why?

  • How did you approach school? Were you very serious in your studies?

  • Did you study very hard for your exams? Why?

  • Did you wish your teachers had created some other measures of your performance other than test scores? (Yes, No) How could your teachers’ have assessed your performance differently?

Solutions to the Achievement Problem

What do you believe are the barriers to school achievement in high schools across the nation?

Probes:

  • How can these barriers be removed?

  • What can schools do to help students? How?

  • What do you think about placing all students on a college preparatory track?

  • Or how about having high school students attend a class on a college campus for a day to gain exposure?

  • Also, some have suggested that having disguised student researchers in the classroom would allow for true assessment of teaching styles and learning habits.

  • How can students help themselves?

  • How can teachers and administrators improve school achievement across the nation?

  • What advice might you offer to teachers, principals and administrators?

  • How should they implement these changes?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiggan, G. From Opposition to Engagement: Lessons from High Achieving African American Students. Urban Rev 40, 317–349 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0067-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0067-5

Keywords

Navigation