Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new modification of tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy following radical cystectomy

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cutaneous ureterostomy is a well-established surgical technique of incontinent urinary diversion treatment. However, stoma stenosis limits widespread utilization of this technique. We present our modification of constructing single-site tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy aiming to reduce stomal complications and improve catheter-free rate of those patients.

Materials and methods

In 2016–2017, 30 patients with 60 renal units underwent modified and 30 patients with 60 renal units standard technique. The main differences of our method from previously described techniques were the preservation of parietal peritoneum and fixation of ureteral orifices one to another. Catheter-free rate was calculated in all patients with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. In total, 52 patients, 26 from the modified cutaneous ureterostomy group, and 26 from the standard cutaneous ureterostomy group were available for the final analysis.

Results

The patients’ mean age was 63.1 years. The median follow-up period was 25.8 months (ranging from 1–37 months). The catheter-free rate was achieved 76.9% (20 patients) in the modified group compared to 42.3% (11 patients) in the standard group (P value = 0.013). No statistically significant differences were observed between two groups for late complications and readmission rates.

Conclusions

Our technique of single-site-modified cutaneous ureterostomy is a safe and simple surgical technique with similar postoperative complications rate and better catheter-free rate compared to standard cutaneous ureterostomy. We believe that this technique could be a method of choice not only for candidates for cutaneous ureterostomy but also for selected patients for ileal conduit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Witjes JA, Comperat E, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Gakis G, Lebret T, Ribal MJ, Van der Heijden AG, Sherif A, European Association of U (2014) EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines. Eur Urol 65(4):778–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farnham SB, Cookson MS (2004) Surgical complications of urinary diversion. World J Urol 22(3):157–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-004-0429-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hautmann RE (2003) Urinary diversion: ileal conduit to neobladder. J Urol 169(3):834–842. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000029010.97686.eb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Novotny V, Zastrow S, Koch R, Wirth MP (2012) Radical cystectomy in patients over 70 years of age: impact of comorbidity on perioperative morbidity and mortality. World J Urol 30(6):769–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0782-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M, Kessler TM, Thoeny H, Fleischmann A, Thalmann GN (2006) Twenty years experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute—lessons to be learned. J Urol 176(1):161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00573-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodriguez AR, Lockhart A, King J, Wiegand L, Carrion R, Ordorica R, Lockhart J (2011) Cutaneous ureterostomy technique for adults and effects of ureteral stenting: an alternative to the ileal conduit. J Urol 186(5):1939–1943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Longo N, Imbimbo C, Fusco F, Ficarra V, Mangiapia F, Di Lorenzo G, Creta M, Imperatore V, Mirone V (2016) Complications and quality of life in elderly patients with several comorbidities undergoing cutaneous ureterostomy with single stoma or ileal conduit after radical cystectomy. BJU Int 118(4):521–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deliveliotis C, Papatsoris A, Chrisofos M, Dellis A, Liakouras C, Skolarikos A (2005) Urinary diversion in high-risk elderly patients: modified cutaneous ureterostomy or ileal conduit? Urology 66(2):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W, Bochner B, Dalbagni G, Daneshmand S, Fradet Y, Hautmann RE, Lee CT, Lerner SP, Pycha A, Sievert KD, Stenzl A, Thalmann G, Shariat SF (2014) Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int 113(1):11–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim CJ, Wakabayashi Y, Sakano Y, Johnin K, Yoshiki T, Okada Y (2005) Simple technique for improving tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy. Urology 65(6):1221–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Terai A, Yoshimura K, Ueda N, Utsunomiya N, Kohei N, Arai Y (2006) Clinical outcome of tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy by the Toyoda method. Int J Urol 13(7):891–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01435.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wada Y, Kikuchi K, Imamura T, Suenaga T, Matsumoto K, Kodama K (2008) Modified technique for improving tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy by Ariyoshi method. Int J Urol 15(2):144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01948.x (discussion 150)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ariyoshi A, Fusijawa Y, Ohshima K, Hiratsuka Y, Sakamoto K (1975) Catheterless cutaneous ureterostomy. J Urol 114(4):533–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kearney GP, Docimo SG, Doyle CJ, Mahoney EM (1992) Cutaneous ureterostomy in adults. Urology 40(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. MacGregor PS, Montie JE, Straffon RA (1987) Cutaneous ureterostomy as palliative diversion in adults with malignancy. Urology 30(1):31–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Toyoda Y (1977) A new technique for catheterless cutaneous ureterostomy. J Urol 117(3):276–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jilling A, Frang D (1986) Cutaneous ureterostomy with an introverted pediculate skin flap. Int Urol Nephrol 18(2):153–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chitale SV, Chitale VR (2006) Bilateral ureterocutaneostomy with modified stoma: long-term follow-up. World J Urol 24(2):220–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0080-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Namiki T, Yanagi S (1995) A new technique for bilateral single stoma loop cutaneous ureterostomy. J Urol 154(2 Pt 1):361–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lodde M, Pycha A, Palermo S, Comploj E, Hohenfellner R (2005) Uretero-ureterocutaneostomy (wrapped by omentum). BJU Int 95(3):371–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05302.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang S, Gao F, Xue C, Zhang N, Gao F, Li S, Wen J (2017) The application of wrapping ureter by a pedicled gastrocolic omentum flap combined with an artificial external scaffold to prevent stoma stenosis in rabbit after ureterocutaneostomy. Int Urol Nephrol 49(2):255–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1475-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang JH, Lu JY, Yao XD, Peng B, Wang GC, Zheng JH (2015) Comparison of two kinds of cutaneous ureterostomy using in radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(8):14371–14375

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arman Tsaturyan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsaturyan, A., Sahakyan, S., Muradyan, A. et al. A new modification of tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy following radical cystectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 51, 959–967 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02145-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02145-x

Keywords

Navigation