Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of ultrasound-guided compression immediately after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy on postbiopsy bleeding: a randomized controlled pilot study

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether ultrasound-guided compression performed immediately after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy decreases bleeding complications.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated a total of 148 consecutive patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between March 2015 and July 2016. Systematic 12-core prostate biopsy was performed in all patients. Of these, 100 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the compression group (n = 50) underwent TRUS-guided compression on bleeding biopsy tracts immediately after prostate biopsy, while the non-compression group (n = 50) underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy alone. The incidence rate and duration of hematuria, hematospermia, and rectal bleeding were compared between the two groups.

Results

The incidence rates of hematuria and hematospermia were not significantly different between the two groups (60 vs. 64%, p = 0.68; 22 vs. 30%, p = 0.362, respectively, for compression vs. non-compression group). The rectal bleeding incidence was significantly lower in the compression group as compared to the non-compression group (20 vs. 44%, p = 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in the median duration of hematuria, hematospermia, or rectal bleeding between the two groups (2, 8, and 2 days vs. 2, 10, and 1 days, p > 0.05, respectively, for compression vs. non-compression group). TRUS-guided compression [p = 0.004, odds ratio (OR) 0.25] and patient age (p = 0.013, OR 0.93) were significantly protective against the occurrence of rectal bleeding after prostate biopsy in multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

Although it has no impact on other complications, ultrasound-guided compression on bleeding biopsy tracts performed immediately after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is an effective and practical method to treat or decrease rectal bleeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71–74 (discussion 74–75)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, Myers L, Bachmann LM, Kleijnen J (2006) Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol 175:1605–1612. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00957-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen PF, Zhu YC, Wei WR, Li YZ, Yang J, Li YT, Li DM, Wang J, Zeng H (2012) The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 14:310–315. doi:10.1038/aja.2011.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozveren B, Turkeri L (2013) Massive rectal bleeding after prostate biopsy controlled by endoclipping in a patient using acetylsalicylic acid. Can Urol Assoc J 7:E442–E444. doi:10.5489/cuaj.1390

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V, Lotan Y (2013) Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 64:876–892. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bjurlin MA, Wysock JS, Taneja SS (2014) Optimization of prostate biopsy: review of technique and complications. Urol Clin North Am 41:299–313. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2014.01.011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kilciler M, Erdemir F, Demir E, Guven O, Avci A (2008) The effect of rectal Foley catheterization on rectal bleeding rates after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1344–1346. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Park BK, Kim SH (2007) Transrectal ultrasound performed immediately after prostate biopsy: imaging features and ultrasound-guided compression to bleeding biopsy tract. Acta Radiol 48:232–237. doi:10.1080/02841850601080457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giannarini G, Mogorovich A, Valent F, Morelli G, De Maria M, Manassero F, Barbone F, Selli C (2007) Continuing or discontinuing low-dose aspirin before transrectal prostate biopsy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Urology 70:501–505. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peyromaure M, Ravery V, Messas A, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L (2002) Pain and morbidity of an extensive prostate 10-biopsy protocol: a prospective study in 289 patients. J Urol 167:218–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Halliwell OT, Yadegafar G, Lane C, Dewbury KC (2008) Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: aspirin increases the incidence of minor bleeding complications. Clin Radiol 63:557–561. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2007.09.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SH, Chen SM, Ho CR, Chang PL, Chen CL, Tsui KH (2009) Risk factors associated with transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy in patients with prostate cancer. Chang Gung Med J 32:623–627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee G, Attar K, Laniado M, Karim O (2006) Safety and detailed patterns of morbidity of transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of prostate in a urologist-led unit. Int Urol Nephrol 38:281–285. doi:10.1007/s11255-006-6671-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Jesus CM, Correa LA, Padovani CR (2006) Complications and risk factors in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. Sao Paulo Med J 124:198–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kariotis I, Philippou P, Volanis D, Serafetinides E, Delakas D (2010) Safety of ultrasound-guided transrectal extended prostate biopsy in patients receiving low-dose aspirin. Int Braz J Urol 36:308–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carmignani L, Picozzi S, Bozzini G, Negri E, Ricci C, Gaeta M, Pavesi M (2011) Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies in patients taking aspirin for cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Transfus Apher Sci 45:275–280. doi:10.1016/j.transci.2011.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ecke TH, Gunia S, Bartel P, Hallmann S, Koch S, Ruttloff J (2008) Complications and risk factors of transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsies of the prostate evaluated by questionnaire. Urol Oncol 26:474–478. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Addla SK, Adeyoju AA, Wemyss-Holden GD, Neilson D (2003) Local anaesthetic for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Urol 43:441–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raber M, Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Deho F, Briganti A, Salonia A, Gallina A, Di Girolamo V, Montorsi F, Rigatti P (2008) Topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream combined with peripheral nerve block improves pain control in prostatic biopsy: results from a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol 53:967–973. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wachsberg RH (2004) Transrectal color Doppler sonographically guided compression to treat active extravasation after transrectal prostate biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1706–1707. doi:10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zaytoun OM, Anil T, Moussa AS, Jianbo L, Fareed K, Jones JS (2011) Morbidity of prostate biopsy after simplified versus complex preparation protocols: assessment of risk factors. Urology 77:910–914. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Binns JC, Isaacson P (1978) Age-related changes in the colonic blood supply: their relevance to ischaemic colitis. Gut 19:384–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lovat LB (1996) Age related changes in gut physiology and nutritional status. Gut 38:306–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Hee Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, B.H., Kim, J.I., Bae, S.R. et al. The effect of ultrasound-guided compression immediately after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy on postbiopsy bleeding: a randomized controlled pilot study. Int Urol Nephrol 49, 1319–1325 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1607-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1607-x

Keywords

Navigation