Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of maximal and more maximal intermittent androgen blockade during 5-year treatment of advanced prostate cancer T3NxMx-1

  • Urology – Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) benefit from intermittent maximal androgen blockade (IMAB) therapy when time-off period (TOP) is extended. A comparative study included patients who received uninterrupted finasteride (mMAB) treatment and those who did not MAB.

Methods

A randomized group of 63 patients with PCa (T3NxM1; Gl. 6-7) was prospectively examined for 5 years: group A (GrA)—31 patients receiving MAB and group B (GrB)—32—mMAB. Testosterone inactivating pharmaceuticals period (TIP) lasted until PSA was 0.2 ng/ml (group A) and 0.1 ng/ml (group B), followed by MAB (TOP) discontinuation. CR, PR, BP, and TP evaluation criteria were adopted. Tests were carried out every 3 months.

Results

After 5 years, five patients in GrA did not reach PSA concentration nadir value and were eliminated from final evaluation. TIP1 for both groups was comparable; TIP2-4 were shorter in GrB. TOP1-3 for GrB were longer than in GrA, and TOP4 was comparable in both groups. Treatment effects were, respectively, CR, 1(3.2%) and 17(53%); PR, 9(29%) and 3(9%); BP 11(35.5%) and 5(15.6%); TP, 10(32.2%) and 7(22%). Before the therapy, QoL of 63 patients was between 4 and 5 points; after 5 years for patients with CR and PR, between 1 and 2 points, but for BP, between 3 and 4 points.

Conclusions

Better therapy effects were observed in patients treated with mMAB, receiving additional finasteride. Response to the treatment improved by nearly double, and progression was two times lower. TOP after TIP was extending in time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADT:

Androgen deprivation therapy

5AR:

5-Alfa-reductase

5ARI:

5-Alfa-reductase inhibitor

BPH:

Benign prostatic hyperplasia

CAB:

Combined androgen blockade

CRPCa:

Castration-resistant prostate cancer

DHT:

Dihydrotestosterone

GrA:

Group of patients A

GrB:

Group of patients B

HT:

Hormone therapy

IAB:

Intermittent androgen blockade

IHT:

Intermittent hormone therapy

IPSS:

International Prostate Score System

LHRH:

Luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone

MAB:

Maximal androgen blockade

mMAB:

More maximal androgen blockade

PCa:

Prostate cancer

PCPT:

Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial

TIP:

Testosterone inactivating pharmaceuticals

TOP:

Time-off period

PSA:

Prostate-specific antigen

QoL:

Quality of life

References

  1. Boyle P, Ferlay J (2005) Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol 16:481–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer facts and figures 2007. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heidenrich A, Aus G, Boilo M et al (2008) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 53:68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huggins C (1943) Endocrine control of prostatic cancer. Science 97:541–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shally AV, Arimura A, Baba Y et al (1971) Isolation and properties of the FSH and LH-releasing hormone. Biochim Biophys Res Comm 43:393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peets EA, Henson MF, Neri R (1974) On the mechanism of the anti-androgenic action of flutamide (alpha-trifluoro-2-methyl-4′-nitro-m-propionotolecidide) in the rat. Endocrinology 94:532–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Labrie F, Dupont A, Belanger A et al (1982) New hormonal therapy in prostatic carcinoma combined treatment with an LHRH agonist and an antiandrogen. Clin Invest Med 5:267–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lukka H, Waldron T, Klotz L et al (2006) Maximal androgen blockade for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer—a systematic review. Curr Oncol 13:81–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tindall DJ, Rittmaster RS (2008) The rationale for inhibiting 5 alpha-reductase isoenzymes in the prevention and treatment of prostate cancer. J Urol 179:1235–1242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schellhammer PF, Sharifi R, Block NL et al (1997) Clinical benefits to bicalutamide compared with flutamide in combined androgen blockade for patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma: final results of multi-centre, double-blind, randomized trial. Br J Urol 80(Suppl 2):278–279

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klotz L, Schellhammer P, Carroll KA (2004) A re-assessment of the role of combined androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int 93:1177–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tunn U (2007) The current status of intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) therapy for prostate cancer: putting IAD under the spotlight. BJU Int 99(Suppl 1):19–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klotz L, Akakura K, Gillatt D et al (2007) Advanced prostate cancer: hormones and beyond. Eur Urol Suppl 6(3):354–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dutkiewicz S (2004) Pilot attempt of advanced prostate cancer treatment T3NXMX-1 by intermittent more complete androgen blockade. Int Urol Nephrol 36:359–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyamoto H, Messing EM, Chang C (2004) Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: current status and future prospects. Prostate 61(4):332–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Spry NA, Kristjanson L, Hooton B et al (2006) Adverse effects to quality of life arising from treatment can recover with intermittent androgen suppression in men with prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 42:1083–1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bae DC, Stein BS (2004) The diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in men on androgen deprivation therapy for advanced carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 172(6 Pt 1):2137–2144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. European Association of Urology (2009) Guidelines on prostate cancer. http://www.uroweb.org/nc/professionalresources/guidelines/online/

  19. Bubley GJ (2001) Is the flare phenomenon clinically significant? Urology 58(2 Suppl 1):5–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu YS, Sun GH (2005) 5α-reductase isoenzyme in the prostate. J Med Sci 25:1–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Redman MW, Tangen CM, Goodman PJ (2008) Finasteride does not increase the risk of high-grade prostate cancer: a—bias—adjusted modeling approach. Cancer Prev Res 1:174–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Scholz MC, Strum SB, Jennrich RI et al (2006) Intermittent use of testosterone inactivating pharmaceuticals using finasteride prolongs the time off period. J Urol 175(5):1673–1678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shaw G, Oliver RTD (2009) Intermittent hormone therapy and its place in the contemporary endocrine treatment of prostate cancer. Surg Oncol 18:275–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sato N, Akakura K, Jsaka S et al (2004) Intermittent androgen suppression for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer: preliminary report of a prospective multicenter study. Urology 64:341–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Slawomir A. Dutkiewicz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dutkiewicz, S.A. Comparison of maximal and more maximal intermittent androgen blockade during 5-year treatment of advanced prostate cancer T3NxMx-1. Int Urol Nephrol 44, 487–492 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-011-0051-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-011-0051-6

Keywords

Navigation